Monday, July 28, 2008

What KHOODEELAAR! means, an abridged update 1915 GMT 28 July 2008

This page was last edited at 1915 GMT London Monday 28 July 2008



London Monday 28 July 2008

KHOODEELAAR! is a Seelotee language word devised as the call-sign to raise awareness and action in defence of the inner city East End of London including Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Stepney London E1 against the impending Big Business take-over of the area...

To stop the agenda that is set to FURTHER uproot, disrupt, dislocate the local community by economic, environmental and social policies. KHOODEELAAR! movement against Crossrail was set up on Saturday 31 January 2004 and has been the source of over TEN MILLION published words of originally researched texts on the most comprehensive range of topics, issues and subjects characterising the inner city community in the context of the UK society, the UK institutions, the UK, parliament and Big Business


[To be continued]

Gordon Brown's backing for CRASSrail is typical of his imprudence that is sinking him now...

This page was last edited at 1815 GMT London Monday 28 July 2008

1815 GMT London Monday 28 July 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! the economic, environmental, social, legal, constitutional, ethical, evidential, moral OPPOSITION to “ the Crossrail hole plot, agenda, Bill, Act and baggage ...." CAMPAIGN SAYS that Gordon Brown is being sunk under the weight of the evidence of the crassness of policy that he has been following.... That Crassness is nowhere more clearly typified, exhibited and exposed than in his banal and very imprudent commitment to fund the CRASSrail hole plot......And the evidence of that same imprudence keeps appearing, as it does today in the LINKED item [access is by following the same comment as contained in the linking column to the left of this one] published on the web in the past 90 minutes by one of the most stupid promoters of CRASSrail... But they, in their stupidity, have no escape from being caught in the spotlight of truth......which is that KHOODEELAAR! identified the CRASSrail scam as being about Canary Wharf, Heathrow and the City of London.... In the FIRST line of the texts we here link to they admit this... thus EXPOSING, [unintentionally, of course] ne of their own lies... the lie being that CRASSrail would bring benefits to ‘the whole country’.... The words of plastic banality as uttered by Ruth Kelly in the same piece...... CLICK on the commentary about this as published on the left of this column to view that item of evidence of crass spin, banal spin, callous spin, careless spin, uncaring spin for the CRASSrail hole plot.... and associated Big Business agenda peddling propaganda and lies... [To be continued]

Khoodeealaar! Organiser challenges CROSSRAIL hole plot-peddler MP John Austin to show evidence to prove CRASSrail hole spin....

This page was last edited at 1425 GMT 28 July 2008

1425 GMT London Monday 28 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! Organiser has challenged the south London MP John Austin who is a Crossrail hole plot-plugger....The challenge has been posted on the web site of Newshopper UK at 1418 Hrs GMT London Monday 28 July 2008..[Quote] You state that the Erith and Thamesmead MP John Austin, secretary of the all-party Parliamentary group for Crossrail, said: "It's a great confidence boost. "It will transform this area in terms of travel times for people going to their jobs and will bring jobs here as well."
The quoted utterance warrants a most urgent series of questions to be addressed: What jobs might the MP be referring to there?
The jobs that are vanishing? Or the jobs that cannot be secured due to the decades of failures by the schools and other institutions in and across south London? Or the jobs that are not ever going to materialise because of the lack of effective demand? What evidence and in what form did the MPs actually look at and find and can cite that showed that ordinary people have said that there has to be a ‘Crossrail’ as opposed to overdue improvement to EXISTING transport lines, routes, services and networks in and around London including those that exist in the parts of London serving the people of south London boroughs and regions? Did the so-called All party Crossrail Group look at the evidence of what really 'jobs' mean in the context? Where is that evidence accessible as having been seen and examined by that Group of Crossrail-backing MPs?
What correlative evidence can they cite with objectively verifiable credibility and from what comparable project and from which country?
Which ones of the speeches for Crossrail Bill and as delivered on what dates [ the 19 July 2005 was when they had the Second Reading in the House of Commons is an example] contained any evidence that can be verified right away to test the veracity of the spin and the propaganda statements plugging the Big Business Crossrail agenda? Organiser, KHOODEELAAR! the constitutional law campaign against “ the Crossrail hole, Big Business, City of London agenda...” CAMPAIGN 1415 GMT London Monday 28 July 2008 [To be continued]

If the former Labour Party is being 'punished' the 'real reason' must include the Party's callous backing of Big Business

This page was last edited at 1335 GMT London Monday 28 July 2008


1325 Hrs GMT Monday 28 July 2008::

KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole agenda of ADDING to the poverty in the East End of London.....” says to the LYING Guardian that the ‘REAL REASON WHY the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired Party’ is being ‘punished’ [if that is the word] is to be found in the pages of the LYING Guardian which even this past seven days has published a lie ‘praising’ the poverty-creating behaviour of the Tower Hamlets Council....The Guardian has contributed and is continuing to contribute daily - to giving the Blaring agenda-couriers and performers the ‘appearance of acceptability’ when in fact t they have been demolishing the very fabric of what makes society What keeps society With any modicum of social safety and sustainability...... By backing the lies of Big Business and by peddling the lying City of London CROSSRAIL hole plot agenda, the Guardian has confirmed that it [The Guardian] does not care for the truth much less for justice and rights for the people who are institutionally pushed into poverty,d deprivation, destitution and denial of rights...and denial of. dignity and social and human defence.........[To be continued]

What even the Crossrail hole agenda-peddling BBC admit is wrong with the LYING UK Dept for Transport....

This AADHIKAROnline Page last edited at 1305 GMT London Monday 28 July 2008


The Crossrail hole plot-promoting UK Department for Transport has been exposed as being full of liars...


Just as KHOODEELAAR! has identified the DfT to be staffed by liars and operated for Big Business interests and fronted by dishonest time-serving ministers, now the BBC confesses, ever so cautiously of course, but it confesses to having found evidence that the DfT is lying against people...

More, here, during today Monday 28 July 2008

Crossrail hole agenda-plugging 'transportbrifeing.co.uk' is accused of lying and falsely enhancing Crossrail image...

This AADHIKARonline page carrying news of the latest KHOODEELAAR! action against 'the London Crossrail hole scam ' was last edited at 1011 GMT London Monday 28 July 2008


1100 GMT London Monday 28 July 2008:


KHOODEELAAR! says to the publishers of 'transportbriefing.co.uk' that they must STOP publishing lies to make CRASSrail better than it is....


They must be careful about the dates and the items that they include.... There is a difference of NINE years between the actual operation and the picture they are painting suggesting that things will happen NINE years before they IN ACTUAL FACT AND BY THEIR OWN ADMISSION will....More will be published here on the language of lying [or the lying language used] by CRASSrail hole plot-pluggers, pedllers and such like, ..


[To be continued]

How is 'Tower Hamlets MP' Jim F Patrick embroiled and involved in wrongful conduct by the CROSSRAIL hole plot-backer DfT?

How is 'Tower Hamlets MP' Jim F Patrick embroiled and involved in wrongful conduct by the CROSSRAIL hole plot-backer DfT?

By©Muhammad Haque
1040 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 28 july 2008

Jim F Patrick actively backs Crossrail hole plot.
How?
Answer: Not just by being engaged as a petty careerist in the current DfT. Jim F Patrick made a point of arriving in the Brick Lane area in June 2007 and plotted there to get his fl included in a ‘news’ item that was later on shown on the Channel S Tv channel.

To most people reading the Khoodeelaar! campaign materials and accessing our campaign against 'the Crossrail hole agenda' blogs and web sites, Channel S would not be immediately known.

It is a channel, one of thousands that have been given trading licences under the globalising marketing policies Channel S is based in London and broadcast to audiences that are in the main of Seelotee speaking Bangladeshi origin descent and connections.

A linguistic dissection of the ‘name’ ‘Channel S’. The intriguing ‘S’ is in fact a retreat from the word Sylhet. Seelot. When the ‘TV 'broadcasting' licence’ began to operate, it was as Sylhet Channel. The word Sylhet had a commercially compelling attraction..... Why they dropped that word and settled for the unsettling ‘S’ will be explored when Khoodeelaar! files the actual legal action documents in court.

The KHOODEELAAR! legal action programme against Crossrail hole agenda includes Channel S and a number of other ‘ethnicity-linked’ UK media outlets.....

More on ‘Channel S’ later.


Back to Jim F patrick. For now.

He was keen to get on Channel S in June 2007 on the occasion of the KHOODEELAAR! demonstration against Alan Johnson. Johnson was in Brick Lane [just on the edge, Osborn Street in fact] to convey to the suitably ethnicity-linked ‘party members’ of the Blaired outfit that he, Alan Johnson, was perfectly ethnicty-friendly and would make a good ethncity-enhancing, career-promoting, leader of the Blaired party!

In June 2007, Jim F Patrick wanted to be seen on Channel S because right at that very moment KHOODEELAAR! was holding one of the most audible demonstrations in Brick Lane itself. The topic was Harriet harman’s ‘rival’ for the Deputy Dummyship in the former Labour Party.

Jim F Patrick is one of the defendants in the KHOODEELAAR! legal action.

‘Strangely’ enough., the reason is F Patrick’s display of ill-advised enthusiasm to appear on that Channel S ‘news’ bulletin in June 2007 and backing the Crossrail hole scam.... NOT because of his being a ‘minister’ in the DfT!!!!.


[To be continued]

No to "Crossrail hole plot" COURT ACTIONS: How many UK Govt ministers are linked to holes-targeted East End?

This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0955 Hrs GMT London Monday 28 July 2008


By©Muhammad Haque
Constitutional law action programme updates
at 0950 Hrs GMT
London Monday 28 July 2008

Well, too many!

RUTH KELLY: Crossrail hole plot agenda-courier cabinet minister herself. For a start...

Ruth Kelly, who is the official face of the CRASSrail hole-plotter UK central Govt Department 'for' [?????] Transport [=DfT] is allegedly a resident in Tower Hamlets. In fact, the alleged reports suggest that she may be a resident in a Tower Hamlets borough council ward that is not too far from Stepney...Or Brick Lane... Or Whitechapel...! May be she even has an address close to Wapping!

Then there is Jim F Patrick! He is a ‘sitting’ MP for one of the two UK House of Commons parliamentary seats allegedly representing Tower Hamlets.

Jim F Patrick too is a ‘minister’ in the same DfT!

Then there is Tom McNulty, currently assaulting civil liberties and the magna carta under cover of terrorism-countering legislation and promoting the 42 day detention without charge excesses. McNulty was at the DfT in 2004-2005 when the ‘Crossrail Bill’ was being drafted for formal introduction into the UK House of Commons [22 February 2005] . McNulty is not known to have actually lived in Tower Hamlets AS SUCH. But he has had access to the most intimate [in the sense of PROXIMATE and exclusive] of sources to get to find out about Tower Hamlets. Whatever the realities may be of his marriage to Christine Gilbert, the fact that McNulty was married to Christine Gilbert during the time that she was employed in Tower Hamlets Council gave McNulty a very important and practical source of information about the East London Borough...

KHOODEELAAR! made the discovery of the fact that McNulty was married to Gilbert in the course of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law research and investigation in 2004

Immediately, we put a series of legal and constitutional law questions to Christine Gilbert and asked her as delicately, diplomatically and ethically as we could whether she was breaking her duties to the community and to the electorate in any way over her part as the Council’s chief executive in relation to the Council’s inviting of the Crossrail hole plot attacks on the community and the East End of London.....


We specifically asked her about the status, the implications of her advice...

By advice, we meant advice to the ‘legally constituted d entity of the Council’ . The context was her relationship with McNulty. McNulty was not just a minister in the DfT. He was very closely involved in the DfT’s dealings with the entire lobby of the CROSSRAIl scam and in devising the ‘'arguments'’ on behalf of the DfT and FOR the CRASSrail hole scam itself.

To this day, we have not received any answer from Christine Gilbert to our questions

Just as we have not received any answer to any of the hundreds of other questions that we have put to the ‘Council’, in effect received and ‘concealed’ by the clique that has been in control of Tower Hamlets Council in all this time.

We are stating this for the first time here on Monday 28 July 2008 because the time has now come for the impmenaton of all the legal acton notices we have been issuing.

Christine Gilbert is definitely included as a defendant in the constitutional law actions... We shall have lots more on her role in INVITING the Crossrail hole plot attack on the East End of London....

[To be continued]

No to "Crossrail hole plot" COURT ACTIONS: How many UK Govt ministers are linked to holes-targeted East End?

No to Crossrail hole plot COURT ACTIONS: How many UK Govt ministers are linked to holes-targeted East End?

This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 1000 Hrs GMT London Monday 28 July 2008


By©Muhammad Haque
Constitutional law action programme updates
at 0950 Hrs GMT
London Monday 28 July 2008

Well, too many!

RUTH KELLY: Crossrail hole plot agenda-courier cabinet minister herself. For a start...

Ruth Kelly, who is the official face of the CRASSrail hole-plotter UK central Govt Department 'for' [?????] Transport [=DfT] is allegedly a resident in Tower Hamlets. In fact, the alleged reports suggest that she may be a resident in a Tower Hamlets borough council ward that is not too far from Stepney...Or Brick Lane... Or Whitechapel...! May be she even has an address close to Wapping!

Then there is Jim F Patrick! He is a ‘sitting’ MP for one of the two UK House of Commons parliamentary seats allegedly representing Tower Hamlets.

Jim F Patrick too is a ‘minister’ in the same DfT!

Then there is Tom McNulty, currently assaulting civil liberties and the magna carta under cover of terrorism-countering legislation and promoting the 42 day detention without charge excesses. McNulty was at the DfT in 2004-2005 when the ‘Crossrail Bill’ was being drafted for formal introduction into the UK House of Commons [22 February 2005] . McNulty is not known to have actually lived in Tower Hamlets AS SUCH. But he has had access to the most intimate [in the sense of PROXIMATE and exclusive] of sources to get to find out about Tower Hamlets. Whatever the realities may be of his marriage to Christine Gilbert, the fact that McNulty was married to Christine Gilbert during the time that she was employed in Tower Hamlets Council gave McNulty a very important and practical source of information about the East London Borough...

KHOODEELAAR! made the discovery of the fact that McNulty was married to Gilbert in the course of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law research and investigation in 2004

Immediately, we put a series of legal and constitutional law questions to Christine Gilbert and asked her as delicately, diplomatically and ethically as we could whether she was breaking her duties to the community and to the electorate in any way over her part as the Council’s chief executive in relation to the Council’s inviting of the Crossrail hole plot attacks on the community and the East End of London.....


We specifically asked her about the status, the implications of her advice...

By advice, we meant advice to the ‘legally constituted d entity of the Council’ . The context was her relationship with McNulty. McNulty was not just a minister in the DfT. He was very closely involved in the DfT’s dealings with the entire lobby of the CROSSRAIl scam and in devising the ‘'arguments'’ on behalf of the DfT and FOR the CRASSrail hole scam itself.

To this day, we have not received any answer from Christine Gilbert to our questions

Just as we have not received any answer to any of the hundreds of other questions that we have put to the ‘Council’, in effect received and ‘concealed’ by the clique that has been in control of Tower Hamlets Council in all this time.

We are stating this for the first time here on Monday 28 July 2008 because the time has now come for the implementation of all the legal acton notices we have been issuing.

Christine Gilbert is definitely included as a defendant in the constitutional law actions... We shall have lots more on her role in INVITING the Crossrail hole plot attack on the East End of London....

[To be continued]