This page was last edited at 2020 GMT London Sunday 3 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! Says No to Crossrail hole plot agenda backer John McDonnell... He has not shown ANY evidence of anything since he began a long career as being an MP all those centuries ago...McDonnell has become the PROFESSIONAL stalking horse MP in the PBP [Parliamentary Blaired Party]....[To be continued]
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Sunday, August 3, 2008
John McDonnell is NOT any answer to anything! He has BACKED CRASS Crossrail hole plot all the way!
This page was last edited at 2005 GMT London Sunday 3 August 2008
The KHOODEELAAR! test for Gordon Brown also applies to ALL THE Community: STAND UP FOR JUSTICE, rights and the truth..End collusion with Big Business
THIS PAGE WAS LAST EDITED AT 1720 GMT on Sunday 3 August 2008
By©Muhammad Haque
1700 GMT 1800 UK Time London Sunday 3 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! the campaign against the London Crossrail hole agenda... the campaign in defence of the community in and of the inner city East End of London, Khoodeelaar! the campaign situated in the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area’ that Khoodeelaar! has been defending since the campaign was founded in January 2004; Khoodeelaar! the constitutional, the ethical, the legal, the constitutional law campaign against the crassness of ‘lawmaking’ in the UK as exhibited in the crassly conceived Crossrail hole plot contained in the crassly drafted Crossrail Bill that has just been robotically passaged through BOTH Houses of the UK parliament [and the CRASSrail Bill that is now allegedly all ‘done’ because it has been given the mechanical royal assent dated 22 July 2008] .... TOLD YOU SO!
THAT the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired regime in the UK was engaged in carrying out the agenda that suited the demands of Big Business... that by definition, Big Business was bad for society that by definition, any Govt that carried out the agenda of elements that remained unaccountable to the people the end result of any Govt acton was bound to be bad for the people... that the transport needs in and of ordinary London were NOT anywhere near the top of the agenda [or priorities] of those who contrived the CRASSrail hole scam... that every OTHER piece of legislation in the UK Parliamentary facade that has been seen to be promoted by the same regime suffers from the same fundamental deficit, the same fundamental flaws as attack and apply to the CROSSRAIL BILL and the Crossrail hole plot agenda.... That the so-called ‘meltdown’ [see below the item we have for evidence taken from the web site of the London Daily Mail in the past 20 minutes] of the Gordon Brown regime is NOT going to be followed by some kind of just and democratic regime... that the experience [and the evidence of the events so far] of lies and lying that we have encountered as perpetrated by the GOVT acting as touts for Big Business at every stage and at every level proves that ANY regime that is set to or likely to come in after the ‘meltdown’ is over .. is NOT going to be any better... that the only guarantee of anything ‘better’ is with the people... If the people in the community prefer to go to sleep, as it were, when the need of the hour is for vigilance against wrongdoing and attacks then of course the community will be sunk.... in a hole.....beginning with the Crossrail, hole...... [To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1700 GMT 1800 UK Time London Sunday 3 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! the campaign against the London Crossrail hole agenda... the campaign in defence of the community in and of the inner city East End of London, Khoodeelaar! the campaign situated in the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area’ that Khoodeelaar! has been defending since the campaign was founded in January 2004; Khoodeelaar! the constitutional, the ethical, the legal, the constitutional law campaign against the crassness of ‘lawmaking’ in the UK as exhibited in the crassly conceived Crossrail hole plot contained in the crassly drafted Crossrail Bill that has just been robotically passaged through BOTH Houses of the UK parliament [and the CRASSrail Bill that is now allegedly all ‘done’ because it has been given the mechanical royal assent dated 22 July 2008] .... TOLD YOU SO!
THAT the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired regime in the UK was engaged in carrying out the agenda that suited the demands of Big Business... that by definition, Big Business was bad for society that by definition, any Govt that carried out the agenda of elements that remained unaccountable to the people the end result of any Govt acton was bound to be bad for the people... that the transport needs in and of ordinary London were NOT anywhere near the top of the agenda [or priorities] of those who contrived the CRASSrail hole scam... that every OTHER piece of legislation in the UK Parliamentary facade that has been seen to be promoted by the same regime suffers from the same fundamental deficit, the same fundamental flaws as attack and apply to the CROSSRAIL BILL and the Crossrail hole plot agenda.... That the so-called ‘meltdown’ [see below the item we have for evidence taken from the web site of the London Daily Mail in the past 20 minutes] of the Gordon Brown regime is NOT going to be followed by some kind of just and democratic regime... that the experience [and the evidence of the events so far] of lies and lying that we have encountered as perpetrated by the GOVT acting as touts for Big Business at every stage and at every level proves that ANY regime that is set to or likely to come in after the ‘meltdown’ is over .. is NOT going to be any better... that the only guarantee of anything ‘better’ is with the people... If the people in the community prefer to go to sleep, as it were, when the need of the hour is for vigilance against wrongdoing and attacks then of course the community will be sunk.... in a hole.....beginning with the Crossrail, hole...... [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenge is that the Crossrail Bill was introduced and pushed through the two Houses of Parliament UNCONSTITUTIONALLY
This page was last edited at 1425 GMT London Sunday 3 August 2008
The briefest reasonable statement of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenge is that the Crossrail Bill was introduced and pushed through the two Houses of Parliament in contravention of the UK’s treaty obligations. In particular the contents of the Crossrail Bill was NOT compatible with the ‘Convention’.
The ‘Convention’ here means the ‘European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’.
The OTHER grounds include the fact that no evidence was produced to substantiate the plug that Crossrail was the economic benefit-bringer that the peddlers have claimed it to be.
SECONDLY, NO evidence was produced to substantiate the £100 Million grant made to the CLRL under Section 6 of the ‘Railways Act 2005’. That ‘Railways Act 2005’ itself is externe,y dodgy and in ordinary language, it was a criminal device which had been itself passed in a stealthy way through Parliament to do precisely the kind of thing that Alistair Darling did in making the £100 Million grant to CLRL in 2005.
[To be continued]
This page was last edited at 1305 GMT LOndon Sunday 3 August 2008
Gordon Brown should DISS Big Business, cut off the secret, insidious links that Blair had contrived with the sleazebags...
[To be continued]
The briefest reasonable statement of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenge is that the Crossrail Bill was introduced and pushed through the two Houses of Parliament in contravention of the UK’s treaty obligations. In particular the contents of the Crossrail Bill was NOT compatible with the ‘Convention’.
The ‘Convention’ here means the ‘European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’.
The OTHER grounds include the fact that no evidence was produced to substantiate the plug that Crossrail was the economic benefit-bringer that the peddlers have claimed it to be.
SECONDLY, NO evidence was produced to substantiate the £100 Million grant made to the CLRL under Section 6 of the ‘Railways Act 2005’. That ‘Railways Act 2005’ itself is externe,y dodgy and in ordinary language, it was a criminal device which had been itself passed in a stealthy way through Parliament to do precisely the kind of thing that Alistair Darling did in making the £100 Million grant to CLRL in 2005.
[To be continued]
This page was last edited at 1305 GMT LOndon Sunday 3 August 2008
Gordon Brown should DISS Big Business, cut off the secret, insidious links that Blair had contrived with the sleazebags...
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! legal action against CROSSRAIL hole plot - claims against holder of the post of 'mayor' in the name of London
THIS PAGE WAS LAST EDITED AT 1255 GMT LONDON Sunday 3 August 2008
KHOODEELAAR! legal action against CROSSRAIL hole plot - claims against the bureaucracy associated the post of 'mayor' in the name of London
KHOODEELAAR! Action archive conterxtiual update: Wednesday 26 April 2008
“London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
By©Muhammad Haque
26 April 2008
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! Was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone’s role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the aadhikaronline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
KHOODEELAAR! legal action against CROSSRAIL hole plot - claims against the bureaucracy associated the post of 'mayor' in the name of London
KHOODEELAAR! Action archive conterxtiual update: Wednesday 26 April 2008
“London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
By©Muhammad Haque
26 April 2008
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! Was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone’s role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the aadhikaronline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
Evidence of Ken Livingstone's role as a tout for Big Business liars' ploy CROSSRAIL hole agenda....
KHOODEELAAR! Action archive conterxtiual update: Wednesday 26 April 2008
“London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
By©Muhammad Haque
26 April 2008
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! Was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone’s role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the aadhikaronline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
“London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
By©Muhammad Haque
26 April 2008
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of aadhikaronline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude's backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! Was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone’s role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the aadhikaronline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
KHOODEELAAR! legal action - claims against Crossrail hole plotter bureaucrats in Parliament - here, shortly
This page was last edited at 1022 GMT London Sunday August 2008
KHOODEELAAR! legal action - claims against Crossrail hole plotter bureaucrats in Parliament - here, shortly
KHOODEELAAR! legal action - claims against Crossrail hole plotter bureaucrats in Parliament - here, shortly
BBC, the backer of Big Business Crossrail hole agenda, the peddler of poverty-creating scams, openly aiding plot for MPs coup against Brown....
This page was last edited at 1015 GMT London Sunday 3 August 2008
_____________________________________________________
This page was last edited at 0900 GMT London Sunday 3 August 2008
Big Business, ageism are the Guardian Michael White's tools in his part of the Polly Toynbee strategy to sink Gordon Brown...
Big Business, ageism are the Guardian Michael White's tools in his part of the Polly Toynbee strategy to sink Gordon Brown...
Michael White of the perniciously operated Guardian and Observer group now engaged in the Polly Toynbee agenda to sink Gordon Brown, exposed himself to the BBC News Channel this morning.
White was doing the BBC News Channel ‘newspapers’ just as Polly Toynbee the controller of the pernicious controller of the Guardian an Observer group agenda was appearing on the Zainab Badway version of the Andrew Marr show.
BOTH were perniciously against Gordon Brown.... More on the details of their contents shortly.
The main purpose is that the BBC is itself operating the agenda based on the ‘hope’ that Dave Ca-Moron is all but elected! And the more the BBC can show it is doing to sink Gordon Brown the better the BBC’s chances with “Dave’.
It is clear that the BBC has teamed up with the Guardian Polly to do away with society and to TELL the people what to think of Gordon Brown. rather than to report the news and the facts...
So the BBC is doing what Thatcher would have liked to have happened... The abolishing of society...
The NEWS CHANNEL has now done at least three main versions of ‘Sunday papers review on TV’ for this day so far.
The late night edition on saturday 2 August 2008 fronted by Anita McVeigh had George Jodens the retired politics staffer for the Daily Telegraph and the Sunday peoples’; Nigel Nelson. Nelson is not a known political commentator., Not one that has ever made any noteworthy piece of commentating. Until now. He is not only painting Brown as already finished ... He is inciting 40 to 70 Blair Party MPs to stage a coup at Brown's next PMQs. Nigel Nelson is saying that they should boycott PMQs. This is an incitement to MPS to stage a coup. IN a way that has not happened even against Blair on Iraq....
[To be c continued]
_____________________________________________________
This page was last edited at 0900 GMT London Sunday 3 August 2008
Big Business, ageism are the Guardian Michael White's tools in his part of the Polly Toynbee strategy to sink Gordon Brown...
Big Business, ageism are the Guardian Michael White's tools in his part of the Polly Toynbee strategy to sink Gordon Brown...
Michael White of the perniciously operated Guardian and Observer group now engaged in the Polly Toynbee agenda to sink Gordon Brown, exposed himself to the BBC News Channel this morning.
White was doing the BBC News Channel ‘newspapers’ just as Polly Toynbee the controller of the pernicious controller of the Guardian an Observer group agenda was appearing on the Zainab Badway version of the Andrew Marr show.
BOTH were perniciously against Gordon Brown.... More on the details of their contents shortly.
The main purpose is that the BBC is itself operating the agenda based on the ‘hope’ that Dave Ca-Moron is all but elected! And the more the BBC can show it is doing to sink Gordon Brown the better the BBC’s chances with “Dave’.
It is clear that the BBC has teamed up with the Guardian Polly to do away with society and to TELL the people what to think of Gordon Brown. rather than to report the news and the facts...
So the BBC is doing what Thatcher would have liked to have happened... The abolishing of society...
The NEWS CHANNEL has now done at least three main versions of ‘Sunday papers review on TV’ for this day so far.
The late night edition on saturday 2 August 2008 fronted by Anita McVeigh had George Jodens the retired politics staffer for the Daily Telegraph and the Sunday peoples’; Nigel Nelson. Nelson is not a known political commentator., Not one that has ever made any noteworthy piece of commentating. Until now. He is not only painting Brown as already finished ... He is inciting 40 to 70 Blair Party MPs to stage a coup at Brown's next PMQs. Nigel Nelson is saying that they should boycott PMQs. This is an incitement to MPS to stage a coup. IN a way that has not happened even against Blair on Iraq....
[To be c continued]