Wednesday, August 27, 2008

KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action against Crossrail hole plot-inviting controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council: update [74]

This page was last edited at 1328 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 27 August 2008


1305 GMT 1405 uktime London Wednesday 27 august 2008:

Khoodeelaar! constitutional law action against ‘CrossRail hole big business agenda against inner city east end of London’ campaign evidence update…… from 2040 hrs gmt Tuesday 21 February 2006 printed issue number 1002 [b]. That Khoodeelaar! Legal and constitutional law publication contained the then summarised list o grounds for the Khoodeelaar! Campaign’s action against the ‘local’ tower hamlets council. In the time that has passed since 21 February 2006, a number of additional items of confirmation have been found. Those reinforce the Khoodeelaar! Campaign analysis that the CrossRail hole plot-inviting controlling clique on tower hamlets council could have openly and unequivocally passed the motion saying no to the CrossRail hole agenda. How? In the time that has passed since 21 February 2006, various utterances have been made by the controlling clique [and statements made in the name of the controlling clique suggesting that it, the controlling clique, has been ‘in talks’ with ‘CrossRail’ [very brief contextual note by Khoodeelaar! law unit at 1240 gmt London Wednesday 27 august 2008] ‘CrossRail unit’ and the ‘transport for London and its ‘ CrossRail unit’ and the curl company which is nothing without the DfT and the tfl coming into being to give it any accountable, democratic, transparent, relevant administrative reality] ‘seeking to reassure’ the community that it, the Council, ‘is doing something to stop the Crossrail holes being dug here’. Those utterances have been tested against the evidence of the behaviour of the same clique on the same Tower Hamlets Council an din the context of the Crossrail hole agenda. The conclusion is compelling. That the COUNCIL clique has lied to the community. How? By repeatedly making statements to the effect that it had been in ‘Talks’ with ‘CRASSRail’ while providing no evidence that any ‘talks’ have been going on in line with the community’s demand that the Crossrail hoe/s must not be dug here in the E1 area, the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council has only confounded the already heavy pile of CRASSRail hole plot-backing lies. It has also aggravated its liabilities…Had the controlling clique been telling the truth it would also have published evidence showing what it has said that accords with the community’s demand. This is summarised updated number [74] of the KHOODEELAAR! Constitutional law action against Crossrail hole peddlers, agents, touts and propagandists…[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! No to the unconstitutional, UNDEMOCRATIC, socially depressive role by the Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council [73]

This page was last edited at 0555 GMT London Wednesday 27 August 2008


By©Muhammad Haque
0540 Hrs GMT 0640 Hrs UK Time London Wednesday 27 August 2008:


JUST HOW CRASS the role of Tower Hamlets ‘the elected local Council’ has been in acting as an institutionalized tout for Big Business Crossrail hole-inviting agenda is evident in any of the activities that a reasonable observer cares to look at. Like KHOODEELAAR! did on Tuesday 26 August 2008 at a venue, in the 'London Muslim Centre' [a part of the building complex associated with the 'East London Mosque'] on the Whitechapel Road London E1.
If the evidence of what happened there is anything to go by, Tower Hamlets Council is NOT fit for purpose! A phrase that was first uttered by John Reid on the record as he was then about to take over as the titular head of the Blaired UK Interior Ministry. The subject of the event at the ‘London Muslim Centre’ on Tuesday 26 August 2008 was not far from the UK’s Interior Ministry. Given that they have openly admitted to conducting mass spying on the East End as part of the Home Office’s ‘purpose’, the activities that are staged at the London Muslim Centre are assumed to be spied on by the UK Govt quite extensively.

The question is:

Are THEY in any way ENCOURAGING the wholesale stooging - that is, the turning into vegetables of the entirety of the population that visits the complex either for prayers or for 'seminars' the like of which we are examining here - of the local community by abusing their ‘high alert’ access to the ‘London Muslim Centre’?

Has the Home Office decided that if anything called ‘Muslim’ then it does not have to behave democratically towards the Muslim community?

To the community with significant Muslim people in it, like is the case in the East End of London in this context?

Or if any place is called Muslim then no standards of democracy apply to any proceedings staged there? More on these questions in the later parts of this exclusive KHOODEELAAR! series.


KHOODEELAAR! The campaign against the Big Business agenda as contained in the Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London IS also the campaign for constitutionality, democratic standards and accountability by the seekers and the holders of publicly paid for and public maintained decision-making posts and positions in the East End of London….... By the 'elected' local Tower Hamlets Council and BY ALL those who claim to receive funding and or positions IN THE NAMNE of the local community in the East End inner city Borough of Tower Hamlets. KHOODEELAAR! has been observing the ‘use’ of the East London Mosque complex as an extension for propaganda by the Tower Hamlets Council…
A comprehensive report on the typical ‘event’ as staged at the ‘London Muslim Centre’ on Tuesday 26 August 2008 will begin to appear during Wednesday 27 August 2008. Why is it important? Because the publicity about the event had said that the event would be held at 5 PM. KHOODEELAAR! Researchers were waiting for the event to start… It did not do so until well after an hour after that…
Why is that important? Because the ‘event’ was supposed be an ‘open meeting’ for ALL who genuinely [at least we hope!] wanted to take part in a ‘seminar’! About the local young people getting into habits that are not good for them.. We put it very mildy here… What in fact happened was astonishing… Even by the records of brazenness as seen in the behaviour of Tower Hamlets Council!... There was no seminar…. There were spiels from individuals who were not really known IN THE COMMUNITY. Except for a member of the East London Mosque congregation who spoke at the start He was introduced as a leading member of the congregation...…
And about four or five young persons who were allowed to make brief contributions in the end…. The ‘main spots’ were given to ‘COUNCILLORS!’
When KHOODEELAAR! Asked the current ‘leader’ of Tower Hamlets Council why they had been dominating the proceedings, Lutfur Rahman replied that he was not responsible for the event.


He was just a guest as invited by the organizers.


Lutfur Rahman also said that there were ‘only three councillors’ on the stage.
Given that there were a total of six persons on the stage including the ‘three councillors’, that was too many councillors ..


How?

Because the other three were a police officer, and two persons who looked like they belonged to the group of persons that had formally organized the event. The formulation ‘the group of persons’ is being used here to make a distinction between individuals and a list of ‘supporting organisations’. Those exceeded 10 on the leaflet for the event.

That left NOT ONE MEMER of the ordinary community on the stage……

So the community in essence was STOOGED for the benefit of the Tower Hamlets Council and its business image.

And its business – as opposed to ANY democratic - agenda!

[To be continued]