0600 Hrs GMT Londopn Friday 10 April 2009:
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD GORDON BROWN, ALISTAIR DARLING SO! UK Debts-creation policy by the Crossrail agenda-peddling ‘Government’ was wrong, wrong and wrong......
[To be continued]
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Friday, April 10, 2009
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on the culture of theft and sleaze to be found in 'elected' officials including in mayors..
0555 Hrs GMT London Friday 10 April 2009:
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on the culture of theft and sleaze to be found in 'elected' officials including in mayors...showing brazen lack of morality and the stark absence of any values: proof ‘perhaps’ that Brown’s Big Business-pliant ‘vah-loos’ are to blame?
KHOODEELAAR! the campaign against “the greedy Big Business agenda of looting the economy, and making every single one of the ordinary person in society bankrupt as long as the profiteering Big Business can pocket the proceeds of their looting agenda...” telling G Brown to stop the falsification of ‘confidence’ and to start admitting the truth about the crassness behind the Crossrail scam and to scrap the scam .. [To be continued]
----
http://www.recentpoker.com/news/Jayne-Yeomans-2521.html
A former mayor did the crime and is now about to serve the time in a UK case involving theft of almost GBP 40 000 which concluded this week. The accused used the money to pay off online gambling debts at unspecified sites after she became addicted to online gambling, a court heard.
49-year-old Jayne Yeomans was so hooked she forged her husband's signature to raise a mortgage on the family home in addition to stealing from her employer, the Carlisle South End Constitutional Club, where she handled club finances.
Kenneth Hay, prosecuting, said Yeomans developed the "extreme gambling problem" in August 2007 and was eventually exposed after a new club secretary became suspicious. When she was discovered she tried to kill herself with a medicinal drug overdose, the court heard.
Accepting her sterling community service and conduct outside of her addiction, the court sentenced Yeomans to jail for 12 months for theft of GBP 38 726 and falsifying a mortgage document.
Yeomans' legal representative, Gregory Hoare said it was "a very sorry case".
"In many ways it is a story of our modern times - an illustration that many of us might be capable of falling into the thrall of addiction, whether drinking, drugs or in this case gambling," he said before producing good character references for his client.
Saying that the case caused him particular concern, Judge Paul Batty QC said he regretted Yeomans would have to be jailed immediately as a result of her "persistent and deliberate dishonesty over a considerable period of time".
He told Yeomans: "People trusted you and you betrayed their trust in the most appalling way. I take into account your fall from grace which is now absolute and complete. I accept you are a broken woman and in poor health and, when about to be discovered, made a determined effort to end your own life.
"I have in mind your years of fine public service to this city, your charitable works and fine testimonials on your behalf."
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on the culture of theft and sleaze to be found in 'elected' officials including in mayors...showing brazen lack of morality and the stark absence of any values: proof ‘perhaps’ that Brown’s Big Business-pliant ‘vah-loos’ are to blame?
KHOODEELAAR! the campaign against “the greedy Big Business agenda of looting the economy, and making every single one of the ordinary person in society bankrupt as long as the profiteering Big Business can pocket the proceeds of their looting agenda...” telling G Brown to stop the falsification of ‘confidence’ and to start admitting the truth about the crassness behind the Crossrail scam and to scrap the scam .. [To be continued]
----
http://www.recentpoker.com/news/Jayne-Yeomans-2521.html
A former mayor did the crime and is now about to serve the time in a UK case involving theft of almost GBP 40 000 which concluded this week. The accused used the money to pay off online gambling debts at unspecified sites after she became addicted to online gambling, a court heard.
49-year-old Jayne Yeomans was so hooked she forged her husband's signature to raise a mortgage on the family home in addition to stealing from her employer, the Carlisle South End Constitutional Club, where she handled club finances.
Kenneth Hay, prosecuting, said Yeomans developed the "extreme gambling problem" in August 2007 and was eventually exposed after a new club secretary became suspicious. When she was discovered she tried to kill herself with a medicinal drug overdose, the court heard.
Accepting her sterling community service and conduct outside of her addiction, the court sentenced Yeomans to jail for 12 months for theft of GBP 38 726 and falsifying a mortgage document.
Yeomans' legal representative, Gregory Hoare said it was "a very sorry case".
"In many ways it is a story of our modern times - an illustration that many of us might be capable of falling into the thrall of addiction, whether drinking, drugs or in this case gambling," he said before producing good character references for his client.
Saying that the case caused him particular concern, Judge Paul Batty QC said he regretted Yeomans would have to be jailed immediately as a result of her "persistent and deliberate dishonesty over a considerable period of time".
He told Yeomans: "People trusted you and you betrayed their trust in the most appalling way. I take into account your fall from grace which is now absolute and complete. I accept you are a broken woman and in poor health and, when about to be discovered, made a determined effort to end your own life.
"I have in mind your years of fine public service to this city, your charitable works and fine testimonials on your behalf."
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on the length to which the REAL POWER of Big Business CROSSRAIL-craving, City of London extends on UK public lives
0528 Hrs GMT London Friday 10 April 2009
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on the length to which the REAL POWER of Big Business CROSSRAIL-craving, City of London extends over civilian life in the UK
[To be continued]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/10/g20-assault-investigation
Ian Tomlinson death: G20 riot officer in footage has not been interviewed
Paul Lewis and Vikram Dodd
The Guardian, Friday 10 April 2009
Article history
New G20 video shows aftermath of police assault on Ian Tomlinson Link to this video
The police officer who attacked Ian Tomlinson shortly before he died had still not been interviewed by the Independent Police Complaints Commission last night, more than 48 hours after the Guardian revealed footage that showed him hitting the newspaper vendor with a baton and pushing him to the ground.
Scotland Yard said yesterday it had suspended the officer from duty over the death of Tomlinson, 47, who collapsed and died at the G20 protests shortly after the riot officer hit him with a baton and shoved him to the ground.
However, sources with knowledge of the inquiry said the officer from the Met's territorial support group had yet to be interviewed by the IPCC, which declined to confirm or deny whether investigators had spoken to him.
As the Met released a statement insisting the force had not intended to deliberately mislead the public over the death, Nick Hardwick, chairman of the IPCC, defended his organisation's handling of the case. He revealed the watchdog had received witness statements alleging contact between Tomlinson and police as early as Friday. But it was not until five days later that the IPCC investigation became an independent criminal inquiry, rather than one overseen by the watchdog but conducted by City of London police. The announcement came only after the Guardian handed the watchdog a dossier of evidence indicating that Tomlinson, who was not a protester, had been assaulted as he walked home from work.
Defending the time it took the IPCC to take over the investigation, Hardwick told Channel 4 News: "Our investigators were all over this." He added: "This is now a criminal investigation for which someone may face very serious charges."
Hardwick also hinted at the significance of the Guardian's footage when he revealed there were no CCTV cameras in the area where Tomlinson was assaulted.
A second postmortem on Tomlinson's body was conducted by Dr Nathaniel Carey, one the UK's most respected forensic pathologists, yesterday. He is understood to have been instructed to consider injuries Tomlinson may have suffered before his heart attack - identified as the cause of death by the first postmortem.
Carey was advised to inspect whether Tomlinson had been bitten by a police dog, or had bruising to his legs or upper body consistent with being hit with a baton. He also assessed whether there were neurological injuries that may have stemmed from an injury to Tomlinson's head. The second postmortem was jointly ordered by Tomlinson's family and the IPCC.
It is understood that a number of City of London police officers who were at the scene of the assault have come forward.
Harriet Wistrich, who represents the family of Jean Charles De Menezes, the Brazilian shot dead by police who misidentified him as a suicide bomber, said last night that the Guardian's video appeared to show strong evidence that a crime had been committed. "In these circumstances, I can't reason why the officer involved could not be arrested and questioned under caution at this time."
IPCC investigators are looking into whether the attack on Tomlinson was the only assault or, as witnesses suggest, the culmination of a series of attacks by police. Several people in Tomlinson's vicinity around the time of his death received injuries from police batons or dog bites.
One of the key witnesses to Tomlinson's death yesterday questioned how independent the IPCC investigation was. Alan Edwards, 34, from Derbyshire, was standing opposite Tomlinson when he was hit and thrown to the ground.
He expressed surprise that he was asked to go to a City of London police station to give a statement and, when there, was interviewed by a police officer. "I said: it doesn't look that independent if I have to give my statement to a policewoman."
The IPPC said: "Arrangements had already been made for a witness to be seen by City of London Police before the IPCC took full control of the investigation. An IPCC investigator has confirmed directly with that witness that his statement is true and correct."
In its statement Scotland Yard said: "It is now clear that Mr Tomlinson did come into contact with police prior to his death and that a number of the officers depicted in the footage on a national newspaper's website have identified themselves as MPS officers.
"To clarify, there has been no denial from the MPS [Metropolitan police] that this was the case, nor any deliberate intent to mislead. This is information that could only have been known as the investigation progressed, as this was not known at the time of providing medical aid to Mr Tomlinson."
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note on the length to which the REAL POWER of Big Business CROSSRAIL-craving, City of London extends over civilian life in the UK
[To be continued]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/10/g20-assault-investigation
Ian Tomlinson death: G20 riot officer in footage has not been interviewed
Paul Lewis and Vikram Dodd
The Guardian, Friday 10 April 2009
Article history
New G20 video shows aftermath of police assault on Ian Tomlinson Link to this video
The police officer who attacked Ian Tomlinson shortly before he died had still not been interviewed by the Independent Police Complaints Commission last night, more than 48 hours after the Guardian revealed footage that showed him hitting the newspaper vendor with a baton and pushing him to the ground.
Scotland Yard said yesterday it had suspended the officer from duty over the death of Tomlinson, 47, who collapsed and died at the G20 protests shortly after the riot officer hit him with a baton and shoved him to the ground.
However, sources with knowledge of the inquiry said the officer from the Met's territorial support group had yet to be interviewed by the IPCC, which declined to confirm or deny whether investigators had spoken to him.
As the Met released a statement insisting the force had not intended to deliberately mislead the public over the death, Nick Hardwick, chairman of the IPCC, defended his organisation's handling of the case. He revealed the watchdog had received witness statements alleging contact between Tomlinson and police as early as Friday. But it was not until five days later that the IPCC investigation became an independent criminal inquiry, rather than one overseen by the watchdog but conducted by City of London police. The announcement came only after the Guardian handed the watchdog a dossier of evidence indicating that Tomlinson, who was not a protester, had been assaulted as he walked home from work.
Defending the time it took the IPCC to take over the investigation, Hardwick told Channel 4 News: "Our investigators were all over this." He added: "This is now a criminal investigation for which someone may face very serious charges."
Hardwick also hinted at the significance of the Guardian's footage when he revealed there were no CCTV cameras in the area where Tomlinson was assaulted.
A second postmortem on Tomlinson's body was conducted by Dr Nathaniel Carey, one the UK's most respected forensic pathologists, yesterday. He is understood to have been instructed to consider injuries Tomlinson may have suffered before his heart attack - identified as the cause of death by the first postmortem.
Carey was advised to inspect whether Tomlinson had been bitten by a police dog, or had bruising to his legs or upper body consistent with being hit with a baton. He also assessed whether there were neurological injuries that may have stemmed from an injury to Tomlinson's head. The second postmortem was jointly ordered by Tomlinson's family and the IPCC.
It is understood that a number of City of London police officers who were at the scene of the assault have come forward.
Harriet Wistrich, who represents the family of Jean Charles De Menezes, the Brazilian shot dead by police who misidentified him as a suicide bomber, said last night that the Guardian's video appeared to show strong evidence that a crime had been committed. "In these circumstances, I can't reason why the officer involved could not be arrested and questioned under caution at this time."
IPCC investigators are looking into whether the attack on Tomlinson was the only assault or, as witnesses suggest, the culmination of a series of attacks by police. Several people in Tomlinson's vicinity around the time of his death received injuries from police batons or dog bites.
One of the key witnesses to Tomlinson's death yesterday questioned how independent the IPCC investigation was. Alan Edwards, 34, from Derbyshire, was standing opposite Tomlinson when he was hit and thrown to the ground.
He expressed surprise that he was asked to go to a City of London police station to give a statement and, when there, was interviewed by a police officer. "I said: it doesn't look that independent if I have to give my statement to a policewoman."
The IPPC said: "Arrangements had already been made for a witness to be seen by City of London Police before the IPCC took full control of the investigation. An IPCC investigator has confirmed directly with that witness that his statement is true and correct."
In its statement Scotland Yard said: "It is now clear that Mr Tomlinson did come into contact with police prior to his death and that a number of the officers depicted in the footage on a national newspaper's website have identified themselves as MPS officers.
"To clarify, there has been no denial from the MPS [Metropolitan police] that this was the case, nor any deliberate intent to mislead. This is information that could only have been known as the investigation progressed, as this was not known at the time of providing medical aid to Mr Tomlinson."
KHOODEELAAR! No to “crass Crossrail” campaign: evidential update on the CRASSrail scam-pliant NHS bureaucracy's crass behavior in and near Camden....
KHOODEELAAR! No to “crass Crossrail” campaign: evidential update on the CRASSrail scam-pliant NHS bureaucracy's crass behavior in and near Camden.....
[To be continued]
__________
http://www.thecnj.co.uk/camden/2009/040909/news040909_09.html
Camden News - by TOM FOOT
Published: 9 April 2009
Drug clinic location will remain a secret
Health chiefs refuse to consult residents over site
THEY can’t tell you how much it will cost, its size or where it is going to be.
It’s no wonder NHS Camden’s consultation on plans to open a hard drugs treatment centre somewhere in south Camden has left the public feeling confused.
At a meeting at the Camden Centre on Thursday, residents were told they would not be consulted on the location of the centre – which will treat 50 addicts a week.
Similar proposals to open a permanent needle exchange in Tottenham Court Road in 2005 were thrown out after a fierce campaign from residents.
The council’s crime czar, head of community safety Tony Brooks, told the meeting: “You’re not being consulted on the location. This is because the first time we went for this [centre] four years ago we did try to narrow down the location during the consultation. What happened was that we set hares running in those areas – and in the end it didn’t get passed.”
He added: “Whether you agree with us or not, we decided not to go down that route.”
Residents described the approach as “basically flawed” and claimed the move could lead to the “nightmare scenario” of a drug clinic opening “in the house next door”.
King’s Cross Labour ward councillor Jonathan Simpson said: “Drugs are a blight on society and maybe this centre can be one of the solutions.
“But we need to speak to the community properly about it. This consultation is outrageous.”
According to statistics from NHS Camden, which commissions health services in the borough, one in five of Camden’s drug addicts live in south of the Euston Road. They are proposing to bring all south Camden drug treatment services under one roof.
The proposals come in response to the displacement of the Soho needle exchange van, which is being pushed out by the Crossrail development at Tottenham Court Road, and because Westminster Council is considering decommissioning the Hungerford Drugs Project in Wardour Street.
Health chiefs say the south Camden drug clinic will open somewhere in either King’s Cross, Holborn, Covent Garden or Bloomsbury, next year.
NHS Camden’s director of commissioning Rebecca Harrington told the meeting: “The main reason we are doing this is because we’ve got a big drugs problem in Camden.
“We need to get people in to help as quickly as we can. Crime falls by half in addicts once they have been engaged in treatment.
“We do not have a location in mind. We are requiring bids for the service to identify options for building.
“The public will get their chance to comment during the planning stages.”
She added: “We know we don’t want it in alleyways where dealers can hide. We want CCTV. We want it in a bustling area.”
Camden Community Safety and Drugs Team leader Mark Morton told the meeting that he had spoken with drug users and they had said they didn’t want the service in King’s Cross because they would be close to dealers and prostitutes.
NHS Camden said it would select a member of a residents’ group where the centre is being located to sit on a panel that will help finalise the plans.
[To be continued]
__________
http://www.thecnj.co.uk/camden/2009/040909/news040909_09.html
Camden News - by TOM FOOT
Published: 9 April 2009
Drug clinic location will remain a secret
Health chiefs refuse to consult residents over site
THEY can’t tell you how much it will cost, its size or where it is going to be.
It’s no wonder NHS Camden’s consultation on plans to open a hard drugs treatment centre somewhere in south Camden has left the public feeling confused.
At a meeting at the Camden Centre on Thursday, residents were told they would not be consulted on the location of the centre – which will treat 50 addicts a week.
Similar proposals to open a permanent needle exchange in Tottenham Court Road in 2005 were thrown out after a fierce campaign from residents.
The council’s crime czar, head of community safety Tony Brooks, told the meeting: “You’re not being consulted on the location. This is because the first time we went for this [centre] four years ago we did try to narrow down the location during the consultation. What happened was that we set hares running in those areas – and in the end it didn’t get passed.”
He added: “Whether you agree with us or not, we decided not to go down that route.”
Residents described the approach as “basically flawed” and claimed the move could lead to the “nightmare scenario” of a drug clinic opening “in the house next door”.
King’s Cross Labour ward councillor Jonathan Simpson said: “Drugs are a blight on society and maybe this centre can be one of the solutions.
“But we need to speak to the community properly about it. This consultation is outrageous.”
According to statistics from NHS Camden, which commissions health services in the borough, one in five of Camden’s drug addicts live in south of the Euston Road. They are proposing to bring all south Camden drug treatment services under one roof.
The proposals come in response to the displacement of the Soho needle exchange van, which is being pushed out by the Crossrail development at Tottenham Court Road, and because Westminster Council is considering decommissioning the Hungerford Drugs Project in Wardour Street.
Health chiefs say the south Camden drug clinic will open somewhere in either King’s Cross, Holborn, Covent Garden or Bloomsbury, next year.
NHS Camden’s director of commissioning Rebecca Harrington told the meeting: “The main reason we are doing this is because we’ve got a big drugs problem in Camden.
“We need to get people in to help as quickly as we can. Crime falls by half in addicts once they have been engaged in treatment.
“We do not have a location in mind. We are requiring bids for the service to identify options for building.
“The public will get their chance to comment during the planning stages.”
She added: “We know we don’t want it in alleyways where dealers can hide. We want CCTV. We want it in a bustling area.”
Camden Community Safety and Drugs Team leader Mark Morton told the meeting that he had spoken with drug users and they had said they didn’t want the service in King’s Cross because they would be close to dealers and prostitutes.
NHS Camden said it would select a member of a residents’ group where the centre is being located to sit on a panel that will help finalise the plans.