1935 Hr GMT London Monday 20 April 2009
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note [3] on Monday 20 April 2009: This is a reference item only. To refer to MPs' corruption, sleaze.......
Although the piece we have linked to here [and as published by the London DAILY TELEGRAPH web site - the title ‘owned’ not long ago by Conrad the crook Black, jailed in the USA], is apparently about the state of the career of Jacqui Smith, the current UK Interior Minister [in the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired regime ]. It makes extensive references to corruption, sleaze and assorted other traits found in the behaviour of British MPs ['elected' 'Members of Parliament']....
It is those references that KHOODEELAAR! will examine in due course and in context.
That context being the failure and the refusal and the inability on the part of MPs in the UK House of Commons and Peers in the UK House of Peers to look for the truth, hear of the truth or tolerate the telling of the truth about the scam called the Crossrail Bill...
In our finding, the British parliament is not a living thing. So far, it is as diseased as it could be before it gets pronounced a deceased body...[To be continued]
The Home Secretary is a walking disaster
The preposterous Jacqui Smith is a disgrace to the office of Home Secretary.
By Simon Heffer
Last Updated: 1:07PM BST 18 Apr 2009
Comments 92 | Comment on this article
The indescribable Jacqui Smith Photo: PA
I know that people like me are supposed to write newspaper columns because we have a certain command of the English tongue. However, there are times when even the most experienced of us is forced to struggle. How, after all, can one describe Jacqui Smith, our Home Secretary? The adjectives come thick and fast, but all seem insufficient to describe this ambulant catastrophe. Preposterous, corrupt, dim, incompetent, sleazy, incapable: none of them is quite the job.
Miss Smith began by looking corrupt, when it was revealed that she was occupying a room at her sister's house and charging for it as her main residence. She then looked sleazy, dim and preposterous when it emerged that her husband, incarcerated at what was allegedly her second residence, was watching porn films and charging them to the taxpayer. Incompetence and incapability can now be added to the charge sheet following her role in the raiding of the office of Damian Green, a Conservative MP and the party's immigration spokesman: and perhaps one other adjective too – disgraceful.
Related Articles
Jacqui Smith 'mortified' by expenses claim
Expense claims from MPs such as Jacqui Smith are undermining politics
Public opinion demands that Jacqui Smith must go
Jacqui Smith has refused to give her cleaner a pay-rise for five years
MPs salaries 'could be increased in exchange for cuts in allowances'
If we had a respectable Government of serious and decent people, Miss Smith would not hold the great office of state she now occupies. Indeed, it is hard to believe she would ever have been selected to fight a general election and to become an MP. She is where she is for two reasons. First, she is a woman. There are perhaps more able women in this country than there are able men, but the great problem is that comparatively few of them are insane enough to want a career in politics. Hence there is a disproportionate chance, in this age of quotas and tokenism, of those who do clambering up the greasy pole.
Miss Smith also had the second and more important qualification required these days to achieve political power. She is a friend and slavish toady of Gordon Brown. We know from the recent disgusting episode with Damian McBride how well and with what care Mr Brown chooses his friends. Miss Smith is another glittering triumph in that regard.
We cannot doubt that Miss Smith should have resigned already: how someone can be responsible for law and order in this country and be exposed for a form of legitimate peculation is beyond me. But her role in the Green case ought to be the final nail in her coffin – though, sadly, it quite probably will not be. I believe her behaviour has been utterly disgraceful and completely at odds with the responsibilities of her role as a Secretary of State.
Despite her Pontius Pilate act, it smells to me as though Miss Smith detected an opportunity to damage a political opponent and was quite willing to use elements in the Civil Service and in the police force to do her dirty work for her. This sort of impropriety has no place in the governance of Britain, which is not a party-political matter. Instead of worrying about crime going out of control and prisons bursting at the seams, or trying to reverse the tide of illegal immigration, she chose to seek to destroy an opponent who, using methods popularised by Labour during its last spell in opposition, was striving to prove that her department was not doing its job properly.
A politicised and fearful Civil Service would not challenge her on the point. A police force anxious to play the political game went along with the madness of raiding Mr Green's Commons office. It was an attack not just on him, but on Parliament and liberty: not that this would matter a stuff to Miss Smith, even if she had the intellectual grasp to appreciate the fact.
The people who govern us have gone out of control. No freedom, no convention, no aspect of our democracy is safe in the hands of these power-crazed, pathologically dishonest misfits. If Gordon Brown won't sack Jacqui Smith for her outrageous conduct, then perhaps someone should try to prosecute them, too.
We need a Budget to lift the spirits
We have the Budget to look forward to next Wednesday. If it is like its recent predecessors, it will be an opportunity for the Chancellor to lie about the past, the present and the future of an economic disaster that his party has had such a prominent role in aggravating.
We are in deep recession, and the only thing he can (or should) do at such a time is to cut taxes to inspire a revival in demand, and to cut spending on Labour’s client state to pay for it.
One especially abominable idea floating around is that Mr Darling proposes to raise the tax on alcohol. Nothing could better illustrate his, and his party’s, disconnection with how things are. It is not just that the mess Labour has made requires us to drink far more than we would normally do. It is that every time the price of beer goes up, another few hundred pubs close. This doesn’t just put people out of work; it rips the heart out of communities.
The villages around where I live in north Essex are full of places I used to go for a drink. The drink-drive laws are so penal that if you can’t walk to a pub, you won’t go out to one. With pubs goes a huge slice of our culture and way of life. About 40 of them are closing each week. How would it help our economic revival to make that worse?
Closing credits to the grand old man of Carry On
We lost a landmark of our culture this week in Sir Clement Freud, a wit who defied pigeonholing and saw his life as a standing antidote to boredom. Yet the death at the great age of 95 of Peter Rogers, producer of the Carry On films, caused me an even greater pang.
Mr Rogers was working on a film until his death, which is achievement enough; but, more to the point (and like Sir Clement), he devoted his life to the Great Cause of Cheering Us All Up (with benefits to his bank account: he had a new Roller every year). The received wisdom is that his early films were good and the late ones rubbish. I disagree: they were almost all rubbish. However, they served that important end of culture, which was to unify if not a nation, then a big group within it.
He also, probably by accident, made one of the greatest films in the English canon: Carry On Up The Khyber. If you seek to explain our sense of humour to a foreigner, you need go no further. Not even death was taboo for a Carry On joke, and Mr Rogers would have been disappointed had aficionados of his oeuvre not remarked on the sadness of his now being a little stiff.
Magpies bring only sorrow, so shoot one today
In a remarkable move by wildlife campaigners, the Songbird Survival Trust has asked for a cull of magpies. So carefully worded is their appeal that one expects they could already hear the yells from the bunny-huggers, who would much rather kill humans than have any harm done to any form of animal life, however destructive.
I have rarely seen so many magpies around as now. They are the rats of the avian world and, like rats, they unquestionably harm our ecology. So keen is their survival instinct that even if we all went out and shot every one we could find, for weeks on end, there would still be millions of the blighters. They are not, in my view, preferable to woodpeckers, tits, finches and other quite rightly protected species. So, for the good of our wildlife, kill a magpie or six today: and feel free to take a jay or a crow with you while you are at it. The bunny-huggers will hate you, but our beautiful birds will be much in your debt.
A neglectful leader for an uncivil service
It was shocking that Sir Gus O’Donnell, head of the Civil Service, should have ruled that there was no need for an inquiry into the appalling conduct of the civil servant Damian McBride, which led to his departure from Downing Street. However, I was not surprised. Sir Gus used to be press secretary for another failed Prime Minister, John Major, and so knows much about the dark arts in which Mr McBride so distinguished himself.
Sir Gus, as he then wasn’t, would ring up people like me who were “unhelpful” about Mr Major in the newspapers and give us an earful. I used to give him the direct line of my editor and invite him to ring and demand my sacking: it was always a good way to get a pay rise. Sir Gus has turned a blind eye to the rank politicisation of the Civil Service he supposedly leads. Why should he care about the iniquities of Mr McBride?
Rules apply to France, too
Those of you buying this paper in Trouville-sur-Mer or Dinard, but about to head for home, will be relieved that the blockade by fishermen of French ports has ended. I doubt this will last for long. French workers, crippled by EU diktats, an overvalued currency and financial horror, hate the French government and will do what damage they can to make that point. In the months ahead, our travellers and exporters will suffer.
It makes a mockery of EU rules about free movement of goods and people within a single market. Sometimes the EU fines the French for breaking the rules. The French never pay, though: just the rest of us.
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Monday, April 20, 2009
KHOODEELAAR! Action noting [2] a base of lies and fakery behind Boris Johnson's hole school !! [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! Action noting [2] a base of lies and fakery behind Boris Johnson's hole school !! [To be continued]
http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/boris-spends-8m-on-tunnelling-training/20097386
http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/boris-spends-8m-on-tunnelling-training/20097386
KHOODEELAAR! Action flashback to 27 September 2007 - we exposed the CRASS Peddling of Crossrail by Rupert Murdoch-ed Times newspapers
1735 Hrs GMT London Monday 20 April 2009:
KHOODEELAAR! Action flashback to 27 September 2007 - we exposed the CRASS Peddling of Crossrail by Rupert Murdoch-ed Times newspapers
Muhammad Haque coimmented as follows:
'Tunnel Vision'
And underneath in a subheading it says,
"Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital"
Then you quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up!
They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that crossrail will cause.
What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and biog business
Muhammad Haque
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill
0125 Hrs GMT
London
Sun
Muhammad Haque, London, UK
________
From The Sunday Times
September 23, 2007
Tunnel vision
Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital
Lucy Denyer
Maidenhead, in Berkshire, is a pleasant, leafy sort of place. Early in the morning, ducks sail serenely along the Thames and commuters hurry less serenely to the station for the half-hour of strap-hanging to London Paddington, followed by a sweaty Tube journey. Many of the town’s residents work in the capital - all very well for those based in the West End, but not so great for those obliged to trek all the way east, to the City or Canary Wharf.
Things may soon be looking up for the commuters of Berkshire and beyond, however. Crossrail, the most ambitious British transport project since the Channel Tunnel, is about to be given the green light. Linking Maidenhead, in the west, with Shenfield and Abbey Wood, in the east, the route - which will run through more than 13 miles of new tunnel under central London, stopping at Bond Street and Tottenham Court Road - will transform the journeys of thousands of people and turn some backwaters into property hot spots.
By 2015, when the first trains are due to start running, it will be possible to travel from Maidenhead to Liverpool Street in just 52 minutes (a saving of 20 minutes over the current train/Tube journey) and Brentwood to Bond Street in 45. Heathrow will be just 36 minutes from Liverpool Street.
“It’s great news, and badly needed,” says Dominic Grace, head of new homes at Savills estate agency. “From a property point of view, it’s going to be great for those along the way who have a station nearby.” Ed Mead, a director in the Chelsea office of agents Douglas & Gordon, estimates that Crossrail will add a 10% premium to houses “within striking distance” of stations on either side of the capital.
RELATED INTERNET LINKS
Property guides
A guide to househunting on the web
Househunting goes high-tech: technology is transforming the way we search for our next home. Our buyers test-drive top property websites
A step-by-step guide to selling your home
Gumtree founder, Simon Crookall, puts his £1.5m home for sale online
BACKGROUND
Why can’t we sell our home?
‘I didn’t want a profit; I just wanted out’
How to sell your home in a hurry
BACKGROUND
Overseas property: where, how and what to buy
How to get onto the property ladder
Guide to buying above a shop
BACKGROUND
How to sell your home
Buying a property at auction
Home improvement
Eco homes
Step-by-step guide to buying your first property
Traditional commuter areas such as Maidenhead, Taplow and Burnham will be obvious beneficiaries, according to Jim Ward, research director at Savills. “If you look west, it’s surprising how long it takes to get in from some of these places,” he says.
The effect will also be felt further towards the centre, in areas such as West Ealing, Hayes and Southall, where large-scale regeneration is already under way, areas that will be served by up to 10 trains an hour. At the moment, prices in Southall are relatively reasonable: a four-bedroom house will set you back about £330,000, while in West Ealing, a terraced house costs nearer £400,000. Prices in Hayes fall between the two: according to the property portal Findaproperty.com, four bed houses there cost an average of £342,323.
Hari Sothinathan, a senior research analyst at Knight Frank estate agency, says the benefits will be also be felt southeast of the capital. “The main impact will be where there is no connection at present,” he says, citing the last stretch of track from Woolwich to Abbey Wood, which will link the Thames Gateway with the rest of London. Property prices there are among the lowest in the capital: a fourbed house in Abbey Wood costs a modest £235,000.
Ian Rathbone, of Crossrail, says that Whitechapel Tube station will also become an important transport hub. The property market in the area has already seen a boost in prices thanks to the Olympic effect. According to Regent Property Services, a local estate agency, the average cost of a two-bed flat in E1 has jumped to £275,000, from about £220,000 just 18 months ago. And there are more upmarket projects: a one-bedroom flat in a former sugar factory, launched earlier this year by Berkeley Homes, costs £385,000.
Crossrail is not the only significant transport project in the offing. By the time it is completed, trains should already be running - at the same frequency as Tubes - on the East London line extension from Whitechapel down to West Croydon and up as far as Highbury & Islington. The first phase of the service is due to start in 2010, in good time for the London Olympics two years later.
The Docklands Light Railway (DLR), meanwhile, will have been extended to Woolwich Arsenal and Stratford International. Other big transport schemes are also being considered, including a further DLR extension out to Dagenham Dock and a cross-river tram from Camden, in the northwest, to Peckham, in the southeast.
Crossrail has not been universally welcomed. Some critics argue that the £16 billion needed for the project would be better spent on upgrading the existing Tube network, while some local councillors in east London are unhappy about the disruption building work might cause. There has also been concern among the owners of some of the grander properties near Hyde Park and elsewhere in west London - under which the new tunnel will pass on its way from Paddington and Bond Street - about the impact of the tunnelling on the foundations of their homes.
There appears to be little danger, however, that the zen-like calm of their basement extensions will be interrupted by the rumble of a passing Crossrail train. “Burrowing technologies have improved so much these days, so sound and vibration shouldn’t be a problem,” Mead says. “The technology, and the depth at which tunnels are being dug, will mean little hassle for homeowners.” Crossrail; 0845 602 3813, www.crossrail.co.uk
Making tracks
East London line: The line, which links Shoreditch with New Cross and New Cross Gate, will be extended to run from West Croydon, in the south, to Dalston, in the north, by 2010, then on to Highbury & Islington by 2011.
Docklands Light Railway: The City-airport branch, which is being extended to Woolwich Arsenal, is due to open in 2009. The DLR will also run on from Canning Town, via West Ham, to Stratford, connecting with the new Channel Tunnel link, and possibly from Galleons Reach to Dagenham Dock.
Cross River Tram: There are plans for a new service from Camden Town and King’s Cross, in the north, to Brixton and Peckham, in the south.
HAVE YOUR SAY
'Tunnel Vision'
And underneath in a subheading it says,
"Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital"
Then you quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up!
They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that crossrail will cause.
What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and biog business
Muhammad Haque
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill
0125 Hrs GMT
London
Sun
Muhammad Haque, London, UK
KHOODEELAAR! Action flashback to 27 September 2007 - we exposed the CRASS Peddling of Crossrail by Rupert Murdoch-ed Times newspapers
Muhammad Haque coimmented as follows:
'Tunnel Vision'
And underneath in a subheading it says,
"Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital"
Then you quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up!
They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that crossrail will cause.
What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and biog business
Muhammad Haque
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill
0125 Hrs GMT
London
Sun
Muhammad Haque, London, UK
________
From The Sunday Times
September 23, 2007
Tunnel vision
Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital
Lucy Denyer
Maidenhead, in Berkshire, is a pleasant, leafy sort of place. Early in the morning, ducks sail serenely along the Thames and commuters hurry less serenely to the station for the half-hour of strap-hanging to London Paddington, followed by a sweaty Tube journey. Many of the town’s residents work in the capital - all very well for those based in the West End, but not so great for those obliged to trek all the way east, to the City or Canary Wharf.
Things may soon be looking up for the commuters of Berkshire and beyond, however. Crossrail, the most ambitious British transport project since the Channel Tunnel, is about to be given the green light. Linking Maidenhead, in the west, with Shenfield and Abbey Wood, in the east, the route - which will run through more than 13 miles of new tunnel under central London, stopping at Bond Street and Tottenham Court Road - will transform the journeys of thousands of people and turn some backwaters into property hot spots.
By 2015, when the first trains are due to start running, it will be possible to travel from Maidenhead to Liverpool Street in just 52 minutes (a saving of 20 minutes over the current train/Tube journey) and Brentwood to Bond Street in 45. Heathrow will be just 36 minutes from Liverpool Street.
“It’s great news, and badly needed,” says Dominic Grace, head of new homes at Savills estate agency. “From a property point of view, it’s going to be great for those along the way who have a station nearby.” Ed Mead, a director in the Chelsea office of agents Douglas & Gordon, estimates that Crossrail will add a 10% premium to houses “within striking distance” of stations on either side of the capital.
RELATED INTERNET LINKS
Property guides
A guide to househunting on the web
Househunting goes high-tech: technology is transforming the way we search for our next home. Our buyers test-drive top property websites
A step-by-step guide to selling your home
Gumtree founder, Simon Crookall, puts his £1.5m home for sale online
BACKGROUND
Why can’t we sell our home?
‘I didn’t want a profit; I just wanted out’
How to sell your home in a hurry
BACKGROUND
Overseas property: where, how and what to buy
How to get onto the property ladder
Guide to buying above a shop
BACKGROUND
How to sell your home
Buying a property at auction
Home improvement
Eco homes
Step-by-step guide to buying your first property
Traditional commuter areas such as Maidenhead, Taplow and Burnham will be obvious beneficiaries, according to Jim Ward, research director at Savills. “If you look west, it’s surprising how long it takes to get in from some of these places,” he says.
The effect will also be felt further towards the centre, in areas such as West Ealing, Hayes and Southall, where large-scale regeneration is already under way, areas that will be served by up to 10 trains an hour. At the moment, prices in Southall are relatively reasonable: a four-bedroom house will set you back about £330,000, while in West Ealing, a terraced house costs nearer £400,000. Prices in Hayes fall between the two: according to the property portal Findaproperty.com, four bed houses there cost an average of £342,323.
Hari Sothinathan, a senior research analyst at Knight Frank estate agency, says the benefits will be also be felt southeast of the capital. “The main impact will be where there is no connection at present,” he says, citing the last stretch of track from Woolwich to Abbey Wood, which will link the Thames Gateway with the rest of London. Property prices there are among the lowest in the capital: a fourbed house in Abbey Wood costs a modest £235,000.
Ian Rathbone, of Crossrail, says that Whitechapel Tube station will also become an important transport hub. The property market in the area has already seen a boost in prices thanks to the Olympic effect. According to Regent Property Services, a local estate agency, the average cost of a two-bed flat in E1 has jumped to £275,000, from about £220,000 just 18 months ago. And there are more upmarket projects: a one-bedroom flat in a former sugar factory, launched earlier this year by Berkeley Homes, costs £385,000.
Crossrail is not the only significant transport project in the offing. By the time it is completed, trains should already be running - at the same frequency as Tubes - on the East London line extension from Whitechapel down to West Croydon and up as far as Highbury & Islington. The first phase of the service is due to start in 2010, in good time for the London Olympics two years later.
The Docklands Light Railway (DLR), meanwhile, will have been extended to Woolwich Arsenal and Stratford International. Other big transport schemes are also being considered, including a further DLR extension out to Dagenham Dock and a cross-river tram from Camden, in the northwest, to Peckham, in the southeast.
Crossrail has not been universally welcomed. Some critics argue that the £16 billion needed for the project would be better spent on upgrading the existing Tube network, while some local councillors in east London are unhappy about the disruption building work might cause. There has also been concern among the owners of some of the grander properties near Hyde Park and elsewhere in west London - under which the new tunnel will pass on its way from Paddington and Bond Street - about the impact of the tunnelling on the foundations of their homes.
There appears to be little danger, however, that the zen-like calm of their basement extensions will be interrupted by the rumble of a passing Crossrail train. “Burrowing technologies have improved so much these days, so sound and vibration shouldn’t be a problem,” Mead says. “The technology, and the depth at which tunnels are being dug, will mean little hassle for homeowners.” Crossrail; 0845 602 3813, www.crossrail.co.uk
Making tracks
East London line: The line, which links Shoreditch with New Cross and New Cross Gate, will be extended to run from West Croydon, in the south, to Dalston, in the north, by 2010, then on to Highbury & Islington by 2011.
Docklands Light Railway: The City-airport branch, which is being extended to Woolwich Arsenal, is due to open in 2009. The DLR will also run on from Canning Town, via West Ham, to Stratford, connecting with the new Channel Tunnel link, and possibly from Galleons Reach to Dagenham Dock.
Cross River Tram: There are plans for a new service from Camden Town and King’s Cross, in the north, to Brixton and Peckham, in the south.
HAVE YOUR SAY
'Tunnel Vision'
And underneath in a subheading it says,
"Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital"
Then you quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up!
They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that crossrail will cause.
What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and biog business
Muhammad Haque
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill
0125 Hrs GMT
London
Sun
Muhammad Haque, London, UK
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note! It is official.. CRASS role playing Crossrail peddling Boris heads straight for a hole of his own ignorance..
1240 Hrs GMT London Monday 20 April 2009:
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note! It is official.. CRASS role playing Crossrail peddling Boris heads straight for a hole of his own ignorance..
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! evidential note! It is official.. CRASS role playing Crossrail peddling Boris heads straight for a hole of his own ignorance..
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! tells Darling to scrap Crossrail and save £Billions..[1]
KHOODEELAAR! tells Darling to scrap Crossrail and save £Billions..[1]
1205 Hrs GMT London Monday 20 April 2009:
KHOODEELAAR! NO to “Crossrail scam Big Business agenda looting the public, messing up the economy and ruining the environment....” CAMPAIGN continuing to tell Gordon Brown that he must stop faking it.
That he should scrap Crossrail scam and use the funds committed to it instead to support really important services that society and the economy need.. He and Mandy Mandelson did another bout of fakery via the BBC in the past 4 PLUS hours [between 0830 and 0900 Hrs GMT Monday 20 April 2009].
They staged a ‘'bouncing Brown Display in an even starker British flag decorated guise than that claimed by either the former chanters or the current pretenders around ‘the flag’.....Then there was Stephen Glaister, peddled as a ‘Professor’ and also emblazoned with a full ‘CBE’ who did confirm by the words of his promotion for the RAC and the motor industry, that he, Glaister, was just as fake as we had found him to be when we diagnosed his own crass role...
That was the role he played in peddling the crassly conceived Crossrail. Glaister did that along with the other time-server and fake academic and Big Business, City of London agenda-tout Tony Travers who is marketed OTT via the diminishing marketability of the tag ‘LSE’ [London School of Economics... Come to think of it, the other, later, users of the LSE tag, the London Stock Exchange, too, are phenomenally diminishing....].
Glaister and Travers are contained in a list of crassly over-promoted and wrongly ‘credited’ ‘academics’ allegedly making the ‘expert’ case for CRASSrail.... How incredible therefore that Glaister should now do his trade as a peddler of private transport! He said on the BBC today that PUBLIC TRANSPORT was going down....
And that more people were using PRIVATE transport...Witnessing the latest crassness on the part of a ‘key’ ‘academic’ ‘'legitimiser'’ of Crossrail denounce and DISOWN [for whatever that is worth in terms of the case for or against the crass CROSSRAIL scam] the basis of that OTT scam, was like observing his colluder in hype.. Tony Travers reversed his own game and make at least 20 different contradictory statements in endorsing Ken Livingstone's ' City of London-touting' Crassrail-peddling ‘policies’ and even ‘political staying powers’ [!!!!!!!] and in doing the opposite and backing Boris Johnson... and HIS touting for the City of London Big Business CRASSrail scam......
And what is that?
That is like witnessing behaviour of liars who are promoted as experts, and their gravely put on various BBC platforms and their counterparts such as on the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD and so on...
It was like the Crossrail scam hypist Guardian’ transport’ ‘corespondent’ Dan Milmo make a confession about the dire crisis of and in and about funding faced by Transport for London...and then noticing that Dan Milmo has not got the sense to tell the truth without trying to cover up the evidence he himself is relaying ...the undeniable truth..that CRASSrail has been seriously oversold and it is bound to cost more than even its most trenchant critics have so far said it would..... without brining any comparable or citable benefits to the economy that could even conceivably justify Brown succumbing to the lures of the then ‘fake-mate’ Ken Livingstone and ‘committing’ the £Billions of UK public money for the CRASSrail scam contracting conglomerates in the name of the people of London and beyond and at the expense of really vital upgrade and maintenance needs in the EXISTING public transport infrastructure in and around London....... .....
[To be continued]
1205 Hrs GMT London Monday 20 April 2009:
KHOODEELAAR! NO to “Crossrail scam Big Business agenda looting the public, messing up the economy and ruining the environment....” CAMPAIGN continuing to tell Gordon Brown that he must stop faking it.
That he should scrap Crossrail scam and use the funds committed to it instead to support really important services that society and the economy need.. He and Mandy Mandelson did another bout of fakery via the BBC in the past 4 PLUS hours [between 0830 and 0900 Hrs GMT Monday 20 April 2009].
They staged a ‘'bouncing Brown Display in an even starker British flag decorated guise than that claimed by either the former chanters or the current pretenders around ‘the flag’.....Then there was Stephen Glaister, peddled as a ‘Professor’ and also emblazoned with a full ‘CBE’ who did confirm by the words of his promotion for the RAC and the motor industry, that he, Glaister, was just as fake as we had found him to be when we diagnosed his own crass role...
That was the role he played in peddling the crassly conceived Crossrail. Glaister did that along with the other time-server and fake academic and Big Business, City of London agenda-tout Tony Travers who is marketed OTT via the diminishing marketability of the tag ‘LSE’ [London School of Economics... Come to think of it, the other, later, users of the LSE tag, the London Stock Exchange, too, are phenomenally diminishing....].
Glaister and Travers are contained in a list of crassly over-promoted and wrongly ‘credited’ ‘academics’ allegedly making the ‘expert’ case for CRASSrail.... How incredible therefore that Glaister should now do his trade as a peddler of private transport! He said on the BBC today that PUBLIC TRANSPORT was going down....
And that more people were using PRIVATE transport...Witnessing the latest crassness on the part of a ‘key’ ‘academic’ ‘'legitimiser'’ of Crossrail denounce and DISOWN [for whatever that is worth in terms of the case for or against the crass CROSSRAIL scam] the basis of that OTT scam, was like observing his colluder in hype.. Tony Travers reversed his own game and make at least 20 different contradictory statements in endorsing Ken Livingstone's ' City of London-touting' Crassrail-peddling ‘policies’ and even ‘political staying powers’ [!!!!!!!] and in doing the opposite and backing Boris Johnson... and HIS touting for the City of London Big Business CRASSrail scam......
And what is that?
That is like witnessing behaviour of liars who are promoted as experts, and their gravely put on various BBC platforms and their counterparts such as on the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD and so on...
It was like the Crossrail scam hypist Guardian’ transport’ ‘corespondent’ Dan Milmo make a confession about the dire crisis of and in and about funding faced by Transport for London...and then noticing that Dan Milmo has not got the sense to tell the truth without trying to cover up the evidence he himself is relaying ...the undeniable truth..that CRASSrail has been seriously oversold and it is bound to cost more than even its most trenchant critics have so far said it would..... without brining any comparable or citable benefits to the economy that could even conceivably justify Brown succumbing to the lures of the then ‘fake-mate’ Ken Livingstone and ‘committing’ the £Billions of UK public money for the CRASSrail scam contracting conglomerates in the name of the people of London and beyond and at the expense of really vital upgrade and maintenance needs in the EXISTING public transport infrastructure in and around London....... .....
[To be continued]