KHOODEELAAR! Contextual update on 'proceedings in Parliament' about Crossrail on day when Vince Cable was caught unplugged, exposed as Mr Bean!

0855 GMT
London
Wednesday
11 November 2009

KHOODEELAAR! Contextual update on 'proceedings in Parliament' about Crossrail on the same day when Vince Cable was shown up – a few miles to the east from the Palace of Ghostsminster- as a Mr Bean on the subject during his ‘celebrity’ appearance on a Lib Dems party-organised ‘public meeting’ held in Bethnal Green, at the Oxford House in Derbyshire Street London E2.

The IRONIC thing is that the 'written question’ in the House of Commons about Crossrail scam funding was put to the Crossrail agenda-carrying stooges in the UK 'Govt' [DAFT ‘Department for Transport’ = DfT] by Norman Baker, a 'co-league' of Vince Cable’s on the ‘Parliamentary’ Lib Dems Party ‘front bench’.

The written question was answered in predictably glib and unforthcoming style by the stooged bureaucrats. Apart from the glibness, the ‘written answer’ also lacked substance. It failed to answer the main queries in Norman Baker’s question.

However, in the texts as published by Hansard, there is a most telling admission that the CRASSrail scam-peddling elements were not willing to come clean about who was really doing what with how much money.

They hid behind the alleged commercial factor/s.

Which is to say that commercial interests of elements supersede the assumed constitutional sovereignty of the UK Parliament.

Which is why we have been calling the scam CRASS!

Crassly conceived.

Crassly passaged.

Crassly peddled.

[To be continued]

http://services.parliament.uk/hansard/Commons/ByDate/20091015/writtenanswers/part010.html


Transport
Crossrail Line: Finance
Norman Baker: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Transport how much has been (a) spent on and (b) committed to the Crossrail project by (i) the Government and (ii) the private sector; and what estimate he has made of the proportion of the final cost of the project each such figure represents. [293275]
999
Mr. Khan: Crossrail Ltd. (CRL) is delivering Crossrail on behalf of both Project Sponsors (the Department for Transport and Transport for London) and has spent £401 million in relation to the construction of Crossrail (excluding recoverable VAT on land and property purchases) since the granting of Royal Assent on 22 July 2008. In line with undertakings given to the House, expenditure from this date is reported annually, and I refer the hon. Member to the first of these statements, made to the House on 16 July 2009, Official Report, columns 80-81WS.
The profile of direct expenditure by private sector partners is a commercial matter for those partners.
The Crossrail funding package, announced by the Prime Minister in October 2007, is designed to strike a fair balance in securing financial contributions from all those who will benefit from the scheme—Government, businesses and passengers.
Central Government, through the Department for Transport, have committed £5.1 billion of direct funding to Crossrail, which amounts to approximately one third of the funding package, in line with the estimated costs of construction of £15.9 billion.
Private sector commitments to Crossrail include a number of commercial agreements with private sector companies to provide contributions to Crossrail, given the benefits which will flow to businesses as a result of the scheme.
These include agreements with Canary Wharf Group, City of London, Berkeley Homes Group and BAA, as well as wider contributions being made through Business Rate Supplements, the planned Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106 developer contributions. Such commitments constitute approximately one third of the Crossrail funding package.


---------



KHOODEELAAR! On twitter now asserting that KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against CrossRail hole scam agenda:

Twitter, to End POVERTY

follow me on Twitter

KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially REMINDING 'local' councillors & others 'elected' in t’ name of London E1 areas, to SAY NO Crossrail holes in the area

0455 GMT
London
Wednesday
11 November 2009

Editor © Muhammad Haque


KHOODEELAAR! No to "Crossrail holes Big Business scam agenda." is supporting the community in the Bethnal Green South and Stepney parts of the area where the Crossrail holes activities are being concentrated.

In the days, weeks, months to come, we shall be publishing the updated reports here and on all our Internet sites, blogs the reasons why we have been saying for FIVE YEARS and TEN months now [since January 2004] No to Crossrail holes in the East End of London.

We have been saying this with the most extensive research back up on the subject of the Crassrail scam that the agenda behind Crossrail is a sham one. That is not a genuine one about transport. That the fact that the CURRENT touting role-player for Big Business in the name of ‘London’ has been forced to alter the phrase of his utterances shows that we have been vindicated again.

We here refer to the fact that only in the past weeks has Boris Johnson been referring to ‘London underground’ and or ‘London tube’ and or ‘London transport’’ before saying anything about Crossrail.

This is because of years of evidence that we have published showing that CROSSRAIL was crass because it was being peddled LITERALLY at the expense of existing transport infrastructure in London.


We are going to continue to show with updated evidence that the Crossrail holes scam agenda is not intended to 'benefit' the ordinary people and the community in the East End of London.

That the Crossrail holes scam agenda is to benefit Big Business and their touts at the expense of the ordinary people and the community in the East end of London.



[To be continued]

Twitter, to End POVERTY

follow me on Twitter

KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially REMINDING 'local' councillors & others 'elected' in t’ name of London E1 areas, to DO their jobs of defending community.

0. khoodeelaar ___! Quoting "Scary- fifty lorries a day in West End to carry Crossrail" at 0345GMT11Nov2009 from http://www.londonfgss.com/t...less than 5 seconds ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Citing http://bit.ly/1cP3e15 minutes ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Contextually, evidentially returning to Vince Cable as Mr Bean on UK finance and economics [4]. Link next6 minutes ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Contextually [Ditto] [Ditto] [ditto] [3] t’ Daily Telegraph was publishing citing Vince Cable as still backing scrapping Crossrail22 minutes ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Contextually, evidentially returning to [Ditto] [ditto] [2]. On the very day 15 October 2009 when we witnessed his state as Mr Bean....26 minutes ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Contextually, evidentially returning to UK Lib Dems' 'celebrity' 'deputy leader' Vince Cable & our witnessing of him really as Mr Bean...28 minutes ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of failing schools [9]: G Brown's failure to take Rod Eddington’s advice will cost the public dearabout 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of failing schools [8]: G Brown's really fails to TAKE GOOD ADVICE. As today's mess illustrates.about 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of failing schools [8]: G Brown's failure is [DITTO] he is morally independent and free AND CAN MOVE ON....about 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of failing schools [7]: G Brown's real failure is his failure to SHOW that he is NOT A Blair's frontabout 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of failing schools [6]: G Brown's real failure is his failure to tell t' truth on how brazenly schools lieabout 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of failing schools [5]: G Brown has a 'silent' partnership with media tycoons: They approve of failure!about 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of London Councils as LEAs [4]: Despite G Brown's OTT-apology today, he is adamant on vah-loos of failure!about 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of London Councils as LEAs [3]: teachers' cliques glorying in failure, abject failure & perpetual failureabout 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of London Councils as LEAs [2]: They are not fit for EDUCATION. Nor are t’ 'teachers' cliques glorying...about 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! ELUCIDATING on 'our diagnosis' of London bureaucracies, those in & on t’ schools, that are exposing Crossrail scam lies by FAILING.about 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Citing INDIA KNIGHT in effect echoing our diagnosis http://bit.ly/2tO4Taabout 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Citing [next post] INDIA KNIGHT and asking the peddlers of 'Crossrail benefits' lie to explain how so many failed children can 'benefit'about 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Citing 'India Knight' piece on abysmal failures by London schools. Ms Knight is too 'decent' to say it. But t' Councils, 'LEAs' to blameabout 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Evidentially REITERATING Q to all peddlers of CROSSRAIL scam agenda: Show CORRELATION between JOBS LOSSES and 'Crossrail benefits'! NOW!about 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Citing Times re Lloyds cuts jobs http://bit.ly/2TGeOQabout 9 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
0. _khoodeelaar ___! Elucidating on Q. Letts. [26]: This is as applicable to role allowed to Q Letts as it is about the hordes of screaming D Mail 'writers'!about 10 hours ago from web
0. _Delete
0.
_khoodeelaar ___! Elucidating on Q. Letts. [25]: When t' D. MAIL contains feigned outrage at society’s decline it does so by pimping off near naked womenabout 10 hours ago from web

Twitter, to End POVERTY

follow me on Twitter