Sunday, April 11, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! Telling on Sunday 11 April 2010 that all three main 'Parties' are lying. Directly and indirectly. They are faking it as they are fabricating. They are not telling the truth. As for Nick Clegg's claim that his bid to reform UK parliament had been sabotaged by the other two main Parties colluding - his word 'colluding'-is a deeply offensive outrage as it perpetrates a multiplicity of lies by Clegg. His Party is the colluder here. They have colluded in everything that is wrong about the Palace of Ghostsminster. Their collusion was offensively rampant throughout the just-dissolved UK Parliament [House of Commons – the ‘elected’ bit of it] promotion and the peddling for the Big Business agenda CRASSrail Bill. [To be continued]



 KHOODEELAAR! Telling on Sunday 11 April 2010 that all three main 'Parties' are lying. Directly and indirectly. They are faking it as they are fabricating. They are not telling the truth. As for Nick Clegg's claim that his bid to reform UK parliament had been sabotaged by the other two main Parties colluding - his word 'colluding'-is a deeply offensive outrage as it perpetrates a multiplicity of lies by Clegg. His Party is the colluder here. They have colluded in everything that is wrong about the Palace of Ghostsminster. Their collusion was offensively rampant throughout the just-dissolved UK Parliament [House of Commons – the ‘elected’ bit of it] promotion and the peddling for the Big Business agenda CRASSrail Bill. 


[To be continued]

    follow me on Twitter


    UK Lib Dems Party leader Nick Clegg is vacuous and almost farcical when he makes utterances about reforming the UK Houses of Parliament. Why so? How so? Why first: He is vacuous because he comes across as a faker when he aims either of the two other Parties. His words are hollow and pointless as they carry little weight as measured against the record of his Party in the last Parliament. How: When he points the finger, as he literally did on the last broadcast occasion from the formal proceedings of the UK House of Commons, he is not at all convincing because the MPs on his side had spent the previous five years [May 2005 to April 2010] by colluding with the other two Parties. And to bring this diagnostic commentary right up to date to the minute, Norman Baker, the Lib Dems’ [transport spokesman in the House of Commons until last week’s ‘dissolution’ clearing the way for the now scheduled 06 May 2010 ‘elections’], was uttering lies in his ‘assertions’ as stated to the BBC News Channel’s Maxine Mawhinney in the past 10 minutes [in a repeat broadcast of part of the interview]. [To be continued]






    1630 [1625] Hrs GMT
    London
    Sunday
    11 April 2010

    Editor © Muhammad Haque.    

    UK Lib Dems Party leader Nick Clegg is vacuous and almost farcical when he makes utterances about reforming the UK Houses of Parliament. Why so? How so? Why first: He is vacuous because he comes across as a faker when he aims either of the two other Parties.  His words are hollow and pointless as they carry little weight as measured against the record of his Party in the last Parliament. How: When he points the finger, as he literally did on the last broadcast occasion from the formal proceedings of the UK House of Commons, he is not at all convincing because the MPs on his side had spent the previous five years [May 2005 to April 2010] by colluding with the other two Parties. And to bring this diagnostic commentary right up to date to the minute, Norman Baker, the Lib Dems’ [transport spokesman in the House of Commons until last week’s ‘dissolution’ clearing the way for the now scheduled 06 May 2010 ‘elections’], was uttering lies in his ‘assertions’ as stated to the BBC News Channel’s Maxine Mawhinney in the past 10 minutes [in a repeat broadcast of part of the interview]. [To be continued] 



      UK Lib Dems Party leader Nick Clegg is vacuous and almost farcical when he makes utterances about reforming the UK Houses of Parliament. Why so? How so? Why first: He is vacuous because he comes across as a faker when he aims either of the two other Parties.  His words are hollow and pointless as they carry little weight as measured against the record of his Party in the last Parliament./ How: When he points the finger, as he literally did on the last broadcast occasion from the formal proceedings of the UK House of Commons, he is not at all convincing because the MPs on his side had spent the previous five years [May 2005 to April 2010] by colluding with the other two Parties. And to bring this diagnostic commentary right up to date to the minute, Norman Baker, the Lib Dems’ [transport spokesman in the House of Commons until last week’s ‘dissolution’ clearing the way for the now scheduled 06 May 2010 ‘elections’], was uttering lies in his ‘assertions’ as stated to the BBC News Channel’s Maxine Mawhinney in the past 10 minutes [in a repeat broadcast of part of the interview]. [To be continued]

    [To be continued]


    Khoodeelaar!  No to ‘BIG BUSINESS MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX agenda scam crossrail….’ campaign brief comment [at 1625 Hrs GMT Sunday 11 April 2010] comment on the crass bragging in the language of the following crass contract 'news'




    LAING O’ROURKE AND COSTAIN NAB £40M CROSSRAIL PROJECT




    01 April 2010
    Laing O’Rourke and Costain have won a £40m contract to prepare Farringdon station in central London for the coming of Crossrail
    A joint venture between the two is already carrying out work worth £77m at the site as part of the Thameslink upgrade.
    Its work for Crossrail will include demolition of the Cardinal Tower, a sixties office block on Farringdon Road.
    Andy Mitchell, Crossrail’s programme director, said: “They will also do some piling and permanent works for us, because if they didn’t it would be too difficult later.”
    Tenders are due to go out for Crossrail’s works at Farringdon in November, with work due to start on site next year.


    Read more: http://www.building.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3161104#ixzz0kniYZ55e


      follow me on Twitter


      KHOODEELAAR! updating the interrogative as part of our Manifesto of the Community in the inner city deprived East End of London aimed at all; the political parties and their likes now vying for legitimacy via the UK general elections...Khoodeelaar! Stated on 14 February 2009 the following: “no to Crossrail hole agenda, no to Crossrail big business scam, no to poverty-creation plug-pit Crossrail, no to waster of public resource scam Crossrail…Khoodeelaar! Evidentially noting the persistently contradictory words, utterances, actions, decisions and behaviour, plugs and spin by Crossrail hole scam-backer, City of London bonuses-backer Boris Johnson…” we say it again today, Sunday 11 April 2010. We say it because of the perpetration of the big business agenda and its lying claims being repeated by touts in place all over the UK ‘political parties and outfits’. The manifesto of the ordinary people at this moment, just under a month before the scheduled "general elections” in the UK addressing the politicos seeking positions legitimised by ‘elections’ is this: stop lying. Stop faking. Stop deceiving. The “deception” word that has featured in the past week in the fake row between two camps of big business touts is not anywhere near the level it should be. The allegations being paraded by the two numerically biggest parties, aided and abetted by the third, the Lib Dems, are not the reflections of the truth of what is going on. What is going on? The parties are faking the whole thing. Every single one of these parties is engaged in corruption. Yes/. That word, corruption, that the alleged linguist, nick clegg, threw into the rhetorical ring and lobbed it in particular in the direction of the two bigger parties. But does Mr clegg have a clue as to what opposing corruption is, entails? Is he above corruption himself? Has he got any clues as to what most of his party fronters in the various subject areas get up to when it comes to dealing with the real merchants of corruption – the lobbyists? What transparency will Cleggie show in real life? What does he know about policies – ‘home’ and ‘abroad’ that are being promoted, peddled in the name of the UK Lib Dems party by the spokespeople in the two UK houses in the place of Ghostsminster? What is clegg’s explanation – if not justification – as to why the party’s transport spokesman in the UK House of Commons, Norman Baker, has come out as a tout for big business lobby on ‘high-speed rail’? What is the point of HS2? Why promote HS2? What sector of what intellectual rigour and activity in what area in the UK showed what evidence of what correlation between HS2 and the state of the UK economy? What are the breakdowns of the correlation? We are putting this to Nick Clegg in view of the prominent display given to his pitch in this morning’s Guardianised OBSERVER. We shall take him to task on the detailed presentation during the rest of today. And as we prepare to do so, we put this question to Nick Clegg: was it a lobbyists’ ploy to get Norman Baker to appear as the Lib Dems’ transport spokesperson’ in the UK House of Commons? Was the ‘otherwise’ ‘well respected’ ‘campaigning’ Lib Dems party MP [ex] targeted by the core of corruption at the heart of British corruption establishment so that Baker [Norman] would be neutralised and paraded as another lobby fodder in effect? What has Nick Clegg to say about the stupidity, the disconnection and the inexcusable ignorance displayed by Vince Cable on 15 October 2009 when he appeared on a Lib Dems Party stage in Bethnal Green and Bow constituency and said that he did not know whether Crossrail 'came' through the constituency? What does it say about the ‘sainted’ Vince Cable’s ‘knowledge’ of the UK economy – and of the planning in the name of the UK economy - when he made that confession in a part of his delivery containing his VERY STRONG [his words] backing for the very same CrossRail scam? What does it say about the state of awareness of the Nick Clegg-‘led’ Lib Dems Party when we ASSERT that Vince Cable’s unplugged state has not been explained nor apologised for in the SIX MONTHS since we began to report [and update regularly] that extraordinary instance of Vince Cable’s stupidity and ignorance?



      0745 [0655] Hrs GMT
      London
      Sunday
      11 April 2010

      Editor © Muhammad Haque


      KHOODEELAAR! updating the interrogative as part of our Manifesto of the Community in the inner city deprived East End of London aimed at all; the political parties and their likes now vying for legitimacy via the UK general elections...Khoodeelaar! Stated on 14 February 2009 the following: “no to Crossrail hole agenda, no to Crossrail big business scam, no to poverty-creation plug-pit Crossrail, no to waster of public resource scam Crossrail…Khoodeelaar! Evidentially noting the persistently contradictory words, utterances, actions, decisions and behaviour, plugs and spin by Crossrail hole scam-backer, City of London bonuses-backer Boris Johnson…”  we say it again today, Sunday 11 April 2010. We say it because of the perpetration of the big business agenda and its lying claims being repeated by touts in place all over the UK ‘political parties and outfits’. The manifesto of the ordinary people at this moment, just under a month before the scheduled "general elections” in the UK addressing the politicos seeking positions legitimised by ‘elections’  is this: stop lying. Stop faking. Stop deceiving. The “deception” word that has featured in the past week in the fake row between two camps of big business touts is not anywhere near the level it should be. The allegations being paraded by the two numerically biggest parties, aided and abetted by the third, the Lib Dems, are not the reflections of the truth of what is going on. What is going on? The parties are faking the whole thing. Every single one of these parties is engaged in corruption. Yes/. That word, corruption, that the  alleged linguist, nick clegg, threw into the rhetorical ring and lobbed it in particular in the direction of the two bigger parties. But does Mr clegg have a clue as to what opposing  corruption is, entails? Is he above corruption himself? Has he got any clues as to what most of his party fronters in the various subject areas get up to when it comes to dealing with the real merchants of corruption – the lobbyists?  What transparency will Cleggie show in real life?  What does he know about policies – ‘home’ and ‘abroad’ that are being promoted, peddled in the name of the UK Lib Dems party by the spokespeople in the two UK houses in the place of Ghostsminster?   What is clegg’s explanation – if not justification – as to why the party’s transport spokesman in the UK House of Commons, Norman Baker, has come out as a tout for big business lobby on ‘high-speed rail’?  What is the point of HS2?  Why promote HS2?   What sector of what intellectual rigour and activity in what area in the UK showed what evidence of what correlation between HS2 and the state of the UK economy?  What are the breakdowns of the correlation?  We are putting this to Nick Clegg in view of the prominent display given to his pitch in this morning’s Guardianised OBSERVER. We shall take him to task on the detailed presentation during the rest of today.  And  as we prepare to do so, we put this question to Nick Clegg: was it a lobbyists’ ploy to get Norman Baker to appear as the Lib Dems’ transport spokesperson’ in the UK House of Commons? Was the ‘otherwise’ ‘well respected’ ‘campaigning’ Lib Dems party MP [ex]  targeted by the core of corruption at the heart of British corruption establishment so that Baker [Norman] would be neutralised and paraded as another lobby fodder in effect?  What has Nick Clegg to say about the stupidity, the disconnection and the inexcusable ignorance displayed by Vince Cable on 15 October 2009 when he appeared on a Lib Dems Party stage in Bethnal Green and Bow constituency and said that he did not know whether  Crossrail 'came' through the constituency?  What does it say about the ‘sainted’ Vince Cable’s ‘knowledge’ of the UK economy – and of the planning in the name of the UK economy -  when he made that confession in a part of his delivery containing his  VERY STRONG [his words] backing for the very same CrossRail scam?  What does it say about the state of awareness of the Nick Clegg-‘led’ Lib Dems Party when we ASSERT that Vince Cable’s unplugged state has not been explained nor apologised for in the  SIX MONTHS since we began to report [and update regularly] that extraordinary instance of Vince Cable’s stupidity and ignorance?




      [To be continued]