KHOODEELAAR! updating evidential diagnosis of the relevant participants in the still VERY active drama about CRASSrail and the continuing failure by Boris Johnson to apply the skills and the abilities available to him in office to solving the economic, financial and public debts mess that Crossrail has created and the TfL has been neglecting.... This is part One of a series of articles as based on our diagnosis. In this one, we contextually replay a youtube package [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOzvkRSaNGk] about Ken Livingstone’s unconcealed contradictions, unreliability and untruthfulness for Big Business agenda scam Crossrail...
1715 [1705] [1640]
Hrs GMT
London
Sunday
18 April 2010.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
The UK Con party’s ‘London spokeswoman’ Justine Greening has let ‘slip’ that if her Party get s in after the scheduled 6 May 2010 UK election, they may scrap CRASSrail. This has been treated with due attention by the CRASSrail-peddling London EVEBNING STANDARD p[which is beholden to Big Business and perennially peddles their lies] and belatedly ‘dismissed’ by a Bliar Party time-server. Khoodeelaar! takes the view that Justine Greening has got it about right. Why? Because Justine Greening is not naïve. She may be under a spell or two as far as her attitude to Boris Johansson goes. But she is far from being naïve. Had she been naïve, she would not have stuck with John McDonnell and Susan Kramer against the Third Runway. Those two are not exactly of the reliable school. Especially when McDonnell is a card-carrying [rhetorical this 'card carrying' reference, NOT evidential, not borne out by documentary proof that he ahs ever been a member of the 'Communist Party of Great Britain' or of any of its derivates, lined outfits or front organisations] member of the ‘Morning Scar’ and Susan Kramer is as volatile and unproductive as they come. Justine Greening has quietly created a profile for herself, which places her well when it comes to considerations of responsible stewardship of a portfolio, despite the very known limitations of the bureaucratic framework of the 'task' and the 'job'. This is Khoodeelaar” finding and we believe that she was speaking on LBC Radio last week with sufficient access to David Cameron’s plans. Those who have dismissed her may come to regret that. We are confirming our agreement with that statement that she has made: that Crossrail is not important. And we hasten to add that Vince Cable should have stuck to the statement that he had made to .[or via].errr .. the Evening Standard in September 2009 when he had said that Crossrail was not a priority for the Lib Dems. But Cable being Cable, he showed his fragility, caved in to pressures that inevitably followed his utterance of the truth on that rare occasion and then he speedily staged an about turn and confessed that he had always been a fan and a tout of Big Business contrary to the impressions that the fickle media has been attaching to him. But Cable is not the only source of unreliability that has discredited political decision-making. We are of course referring here to Ken Livingstone, the chief tout for Big Business agenda scams in London for the longer parts of the past decade. Did Ken Livingstone do irreparable damage to the cause of serving London people with competent and economy transport? Watch this space for further diagnostic revelations on how Ken Livingstone abused his post as 'mayor' in the name of London and went over the top in acting as the designated tout for Big Business. The 'Morning Scar' never ever looked at the facts of what Livingstone was getting up to. So what was 'socialist’ about Livingstone’s touting for the City of London interests, script-authors and scam-pushers? The first answer is that the ‘Morning Scar’ itself was never about ‘socialism’. So they would not care if Livingstone was being ‘socialist’ or even [here is a give-away!] Stalinist.. And they didn’t. The ‘Morning Scar’ has a cabal of time-servers whose links with the ‘newspaper’ [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????????????????] are defined and determined by their subscription to an undemocratic clique. No wonder that none of the democratic campaigns that are organised by local people uncontaminated by the cliquey corrupt involvement of these time-servers or their likes or endorsees has ever got the support of the ‘Morning Scar’. They have aided and abetted Livingstone in his creepy appearances at ‘community platforms’ that later turn out to have been very shoddy themselves. In contrast with the Morning Star, the interesting audit of UK G Brown regime’s wasteful adventures that the UK Con front outfit the Taxpayers’ Alliance has been doing cannot be dismissed out of hand ONLY BECAUSE these are Con Party sympathisers, activists and most likely [in some cases] members.. The validity or otherwise of their work should be judged solely on the contents of their work. Like the youtube package they have put together as based on the BBC London 'Political Editor' Tim Donovan’s questioning of Livingstone about the funding of Crossrail……. [CLICK on the image on the left panel under the headline 'CRASS talk for Crassrail'] [To be continued]