33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Sunday, May 30, 2010
KHOODEELAAR! Noting that the old Sunday Times [of the Thalidomide campaign note] Editor Harry Evans may be turning back to his old self! Is it another illusion, an image he has contrived by overdoing the photo editing? Assuming that Evans is genuinely turning, his comments this morning [BBC1 0800 Hrs GMT Sunday 30 may 2010] about the USA gulf oil spill and Obama's dilemma is to the point. True Evans doesn't go beyond reiterating his allegiance to capitalism. Evans has again done it. He has spoilt it by praising Richard Nixon! [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially telling UK CONDEM CLEGG to quit being infantile. His 'confidence' in David Laws shows that he, Clegg, is clegging on incredibly! Nothing's changed! Clegg can't have it THAT way too! He is either for 'change' or he is for the status quo! Which one is he for? If Cleggie persists in the state of perpetual contradiction, he alone will be to blame for the repercussions! He is very close to proving that Vince Cable’s oft-rehearsed line against G Brown not only applied to Brown but to Clegg as well. But then for a ‘Party’ leader whose Party performed the parasitic role of swallowing hook, line and sinker the entirety of the Big Business propaganda for CrossRail, what can we expect but more of the same! And this proves that Clegg was unduly allowed to claim that he had achieved some democratic revolution when he appeared on those OTT TV Debases in April 2010! Quit the farcical fantasy, Nick! We never agreed with you in the first place and now, after your Bliar-like ‘endorsement’ of the expenses-exposed David Laws we shall never find any reason to even theoretically contemplate to!
0735 Hrs GMTLondonSunday30 May 2010
Editor © Muhammad Haque
KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially telling UK CONDEM CLEGG to quit being infantile. His 'confidence' in David Laws shows that he, Clegg, is clegging on incredibly! Nothing's changed! Clegg can't have it THAT way too! He is either for 'change' or he is for the status quo! Which one is he for? If Cleggie persists in the state of perpetual contradiction, he alone will be to blame for the repercussions! He is very close to proving that Vince Cable’s oft-rehearsed line against G Brown not only applied to Brown but to Clegg as well. But then for a ‘Party’ leader whose Party performed the parasitic role of swallowing hook, line and sinker the entirety of the Big Business propaganda for CrossRail, what can we expect but more of the same! And this proves that Clegg was unduly allowed to claim that he had achieved some democratic revolution when he appeared on those OTT TV Debases in April 2010! Quit the farcical fantasy, Nick! We never agreed with you in the first place and now, after your Bliar-like ‘endorsement’ of the expenses-exposed David Laws we shall never find any reason to even theoretically contemplate to!
Editor © Muhammad Haque
KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially telling UK CONDEM CLEGG to quit being infantile. His 'confidence' in David Laws shows that he, Clegg, is clegging on incredibly! Nothing's changed! Clegg can't have it THAT way too! He is either for 'change' or he is for the status quo! Which one is he for? If Cleggie persists in the state of perpetual contradiction, he alone will be to blame for the repercussions! He is very close to proving that Vince Cable’s oft-rehearsed line against G Brown not only applied to Brown but to Clegg as well. But then for a ‘Party’ leader whose Party performed the parasitic role of swallowing hook, line and sinker the entirety of the Big Business propaganda for CrossRail, what can we expect but more of the same! And this proves that Clegg was unduly allowed to claim that he had achieved some democratic revolution when he appeared on those OTT TV Debases in April 2010! Quit the farcical fantasy, Nick! We never agreed with you in the first place and now, after your Bliar-like ‘endorsement’ of the expenses-exposed David Laws we shall never find any reason to even theoretically contemplate to!