KHOODEELAAR! Reiterates rejection of HS2, renews support for Drummond Street in the Euston/Kings Crops area in the central London borough of Camden SAYING NO 2 High Speed 2.
[To be continued]
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Saturday, October 15, 2011
Saturday, August 13, 2011
"Record levels of unemployment for Europe’s youth" SAYS an international, left, group. CLICK to view web page
Record levels of unemployment for Europe’s youth
By Stefan Steinberg
13 August 2011
According to the latest figures from the German Statistical Office and Eurostat, youth unemployment across Europe has increased by a staggering 25 percent in the course of the past two and a half years. The current levels of youth unemployment are the highest in Europe since the regular collection of statistics began.
In the spring of 2008, prior to the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the financial crash of that year, the official unemployment rate for youth in Europe averaged 15 percent. The latest figures from the German Statistical Office reveal that this figure has now risen to over 20 percent.
In total, 20.5 percent of young people between 15 and 24 are seeking work in the 27 states of the European Union. At the same time, these numbers conceal large differences in unemployment levels for individual European nations.....
By Stefan Steinberg
13 August 2011
According to the latest figures from the German Statistical Office and Eurostat, youth unemployment across Europe has increased by a staggering 25 percent in the course of the past two and a half years. The current levels of youth unemployment are the highest in Europe since the regular collection of statistics began.
In the spring of 2008, prior to the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the financial crash of that year, the official unemployment rate for youth in Europe averaged 15 percent. The latest figures from the German Statistical Office reveal that this figure has now risen to over 20 percent.
In total, 20.5 percent of young people between 15 and 24 are seeking work in the 27 states of the European Union. At the same time, these numbers conceal large differences in unemployment levels for individual European nations.....
Saturday, July 2, 2011
Exposing the latest idiocy of Iain Duncan Smith: he evidently has never been to an inner city borough in his entire life.
1210 Hrs GMT
London
Saturday
02 July 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
Exposing the latest idiocy of Iain Duncan Smith: he evidently has never been to an inner city borough in his entire life. Had he been there, and had IDS been an honest and an honourable man then he would not have uttered the idiocies that he has uttered, coming across as he has purported to do and as he has been allowed by the still-Murdoched SKY News to come across. IDS is ignorant on the facts. IDS is ignorant of THE facts. So how can this ignorant man be allowed to pontificate on the hyped up media stage while the millions whose lives and livelihoods he thus violates are not allowed a say to counter him?
"Liam Byrne" is the dreadful, two-word phrase that in context is a start of the answer to that question. And then it is Ed. Contrary to the hysterical display from Inverclyde after the poll results were formally declared, there is no "fight back" against the CONDEM assaults, not by Ed Miliband, not by Liam Byrne, not by the alleged Opposition's alleged front bench in the House of Commons. And it is a measure of that emptiness that an utter and demonstrated idiot of Iain Duncan Smith's description can be shown as warranting the entire day's "mainstream Political news focus"! [To be continued]
London
Saturday
02 July 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
Exposing the latest idiocy of Iain Duncan Smith: he evidently has never been to an inner city borough in his entire life. Had he been there, and had IDS been an honest and an honourable man then he would not have uttered the idiocies that he has uttered, coming across as he has purported to do and as he has been allowed by the still-Murdoched SKY News to come across. IDS is ignorant on the facts. IDS is ignorant of THE facts. So how can this ignorant man be allowed to pontificate on the hyped up media stage while the millions whose lives and livelihoods he thus violates are not allowed a say to counter him?
"Liam Byrne" is the dreadful, two-word phrase that in context is a start of the answer to that question. And then it is Ed. Contrary to the hysterical display from Inverclyde after the poll results were formally declared, there is no "fight back" against the CONDEM assaults, not by Ed Miliband, not by Liam Byrne, not by the alleged Opposition's alleged front bench in the House of Commons. And it is a measure of that emptiness that an utter and demonstrated idiot of Iain Duncan Smith's description can be shown as warranting the entire day's "mainstream Political news focus"! [To be continued]
Thursday, June 9, 2011
CONTEXTUAL diagnstic oemmentary on the friviloty and the bankruptcy of the PMQs charade, as witenssed on 8 June 2011
0105 [0038] [0020] Hrs GMT London Thursday 09 June 2011.
The © Muhammad Haque diagnostic Commentary on the state of “English law trade system”.
Referring to the Daily Mirror’s [online] retailing of the utterance by Ed Miliband during Wednesday’s PMQs [08 June 2011].
The real mess is the fact that the Official Opposition in the House of Commons has NEVER even recognised the need for auditing the system in accordance with what I have diagnostically found to be “the criteria that must be based on and derived from universality of equality of entitlement to fair treatment under the law”. So what “progress” can occur from Miliband’s utterance? Zero, in fact. That was an utterance just as empty of substance as had been the other ones that the “communicators” found to be the basis for their assertion that Miliband lacked substance as “leader”. The dearth of substance is displayed in the House of Commons every single time. It is a cabal. Or a collection of smaller ones. The utterances “in Parliament by Parliament members” and their broadcasting cannot be intended to reinforce e the public’s access to auditing tools. The broadcasting of proceedings in fact is reinforced propaganda. And this is more so whenever the particular ritual is treated by the brodacsting outfits as being more important than the otehrs. Hence the focus, the concentration on the PMQs.
By definition, any Society’s “values” – briefly stated: the ones that are accepted as being essential, commonly shared parts of the way that people recognise one another and the level of rights that is commonly actually expienecd, felt, lived – take a long time to be realisable, referrable, and citable by their contents and by their implications.
It follows therefore that whatever values predominate in the behaviour of the “legal system” cannot be altered just by one term of a Government, whether it is a Collation or not. So nothing that the CONDEM Collusion is doing can change the values. What can happen is that c certain other vales or differences may be brought into the arena for ongoing [and spontaneous] debates and discussions that may lead to later changes.
From this standpoint therefore, Ed Miliband’s utterance was more flippant than most people may have realised. Miliband was indulging in trickery that could be seen from his visible attention to something on a piece of paper. A script. He must have been rehearsing for a long time and yet was unsure of what he would end up at performance time. It was plain point scoring. And thereby it was a debasing of the debate! A real, truthful debate is long overdue. But one is hardly likely to take place at PMQs.
And that debate is not, ought not to be about the length of a sentence but about the very idea of justice itself. Including the question: what is a sentence intended to achieve? And how is a custodial sentence different from the criminalisation that goes on in “open” society before the given crime actually takes place?
[To be continued]
The © Muhammad Haque diagnostic Commentary on the state of “English law trade system”.
Referring to the Daily Mirror’s [online] retailing of the utterance by Ed Miliband during Wednesday’s PMQs [08 June 2011].
The real mess is the fact that the Official Opposition in the House of Commons has NEVER even recognised the need for auditing the system in accordance with what I have diagnostically found to be “the criteria that must be based on and derived from universality of equality of entitlement to fair treatment under the law”. So what “progress” can occur from Miliband’s utterance? Zero, in fact. That was an utterance just as empty of substance as had been the other ones that the “communicators” found to be the basis for their assertion that Miliband lacked substance as “leader”. The dearth of substance is displayed in the House of Commons every single time. It is a cabal. Or a collection of smaller ones. The utterances “in Parliament by Parliament members” and their broadcasting cannot be intended to reinforce e the public’s access to auditing tools. The broadcasting of proceedings in fact is reinforced propaganda. And this is more so whenever the particular ritual is treated by the brodacsting outfits as being more important than the otehrs. Hence the focus, the concentration on the PMQs.
By definition, any Society’s “values” – briefly stated: the ones that are accepted as being essential, commonly shared parts of the way that people recognise one another and the level of rights that is commonly actually expienecd, felt, lived – take a long time to be realisable, referrable, and citable by their contents and by their implications.
It follows therefore that whatever values predominate in the behaviour of the “legal system” cannot be altered just by one term of a Government, whether it is a Collation or not. So nothing that the CONDEM Collusion is doing can change the values. What can happen is that c certain other vales or differences may be brought into the arena for ongoing [and spontaneous] debates and discussions that may lead to later changes.
From this standpoint therefore, Ed Miliband’s utterance was more flippant than most people may have realised. Miliband was indulging in trickery that could be seen from his visible attention to something on a piece of paper. A script. He must have been rehearsing for a long time and yet was unsure of what he would end up at performance time. It was plain point scoring. And thereby it was a debasing of the debate! A real, truthful debate is long overdue. But one is hardly likely to take place at PMQs.
And that debate is not, ought not to be about the length of a sentence but about the very idea of justice itself. Including the question: what is a sentence intended to achieve? And how is a custodial sentence different from the criminalisation that goes on in “open” society before the given crime actually takes place?
[To be continued]
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Monday, April 11, 2011
What has Silvio Berlusconi said that belatedly acknowledges something that I had said 20 years ago to the 'leaders' of Western Governments?
AADHIKARonline © Muhammad Haque London Commentary.
0240 [0230] [0200] Hrs GMT
London
Monday
11 April 2011.
What Silvio Berlusconi has done without losing any dignity is to acknowledge a truth that I spoke about twenty years ago. I did so in Britain. I addressed my thoughts primarily to John Major, who was in occupation at No 10 Downing Street. When I spoke I did so in the immediate context of John Major’s then imminent address to the United Nations Organisation. Twenty years ago, the world was significantly less tense. But it didn't feel that way where I was witnessing events. The tension then was not around “terrorism”. But there was a kind of terrorism in the air in the mainstream western media. That tension was being fuelled by daily “media” stories of an invasion. Invasion of the West by the non-Europeans. Mostly people from Africa. Thousands of people were risking their lives trying to get into the West by getting on boats and sometimes boarding ships. The spectre that was being painted by the mainstream media was as it was intended to be. To frighten the people, the indigenous people in the West. So what did I say? I said to John Major - and the leaders of the Western Governments - that they had to face it. Address the issue. Start a programme of dealing with and eradicating hunger and starvation from the countries of origins of the desperate people, seeking new lives in Western Europe. I said that the issue was not as it was being painted by the media in the West. Th media painted the hungry, the starving as something else.
Something like an invading army. Like an army of occupation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The widespread social impact of large numbers of hungry starving people arriving anywhere was something that could not be denied. Ought not to be denied. So I argued that the “leaders” of the Western governments
had to stop being indifferent to the challenge.
I said that the hungry, starving people would increase in number and the Western societies could become very tense if the challenge was not resolved. The way to solve hunger and poverty is to deal with t in the countries of the hungry people. Twenty years on, the leaders of western Governments have stayed silent. Only Berlusconi has now made a most reluctant admission of the problem. How long will it take the others before they face it and start addressing hunger and starvation in Africa? In parts of Asia?
[To be continued]
0240 [0230] [0200] Hrs GMT
London
Monday
11 April 2011.
What Silvio Berlusconi has done without losing any dignity is to acknowledge a truth that I spoke about twenty years ago. I did so in Britain. I addressed my thoughts primarily to John Major, who was in occupation at No 10 Downing Street. When I spoke I did so in the immediate context of John Major’s then imminent address to the United Nations Organisation. Twenty years ago, the world was significantly less tense. But it didn't feel that way where I was witnessing events. The tension then was not around “terrorism”. But there was a kind of terrorism in the air in the mainstream western media. That tension was being fuelled by daily “media” stories of an invasion. Invasion of the West by the non-Europeans. Mostly people from Africa. Thousands of people were risking their lives trying to get into the West by getting on boats and sometimes boarding ships. The spectre that was being painted by the mainstream media was as it was intended to be. To frighten the people, the indigenous people in the West. So what did I say? I said to John Major - and the leaders of the Western Governments - that they had to face it. Address the issue. Start a programme of dealing with and eradicating hunger and starvation from the countries of origins of the desperate people, seeking new lives in Western Europe. I said that the issue was not as it was being painted by the media in the West. Th media painted the hungry, the starving as something else.
Something like an invading army. Like an army of occupation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The widespread social impact of large numbers of hungry starving people arriving anywhere was something that could not be denied. Ought not to be denied. So I argued that the “leaders” of the Western governments
had to stop being indifferent to the challenge.
I said that the hungry, starving people would increase in number and the Western societies could become very tense if the challenge was not resolved. The way to solve hunger and poverty is to deal with t in the countries of the hungry people. Twenty years on, the leaders of western Governments have stayed silent. Only Berlusconi has now made a most reluctant admission of the problem. How long will it take the others before they face it and start addressing hunger and starvation in Africa? In parts of Asia?
[To be continued]
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
It is the same crass, snow-blaming 'finance minister' the CONDEM Osborne who has been also blasé in his defiant backing for Big Business Crossrail!
Twitter, to End POVERTY
2345 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday
25 January 2011
By © Muhammad Haque
The CONDEM Finance minister George Osborne is exposed as an utterly unfit fit purpose holder of the post after he exhibits breathtaking stupidity and blames the recent snow for the crass economic performance recorded in the quarterly statistics published on the day!
It is the same crass Osborne who has been also blasé in his defiant backing for Big Business Crossrail!
[To be continued]