By©Muhammad Haque
2045 GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
How lawbreaking is the controlling clique on and in the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council?
Very.
By ‘law’ of course, I here refer to those sets of laws about which there is universal or near universal agreement. Unlike laws and proposals about which there is little or no agreement.
Two undesirable laws are now in the pipeline. One about the Crossrail hole plot [the ‘Crossrail Bill’] and the other one of course is the 42 day detention without charge ploy, contained in the ‘Counter -Terrorism Bill’ and in associated pieces of draft legislation....
The context of this commentary is defined by the movement for human rights that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign is part of.
The KHOODEELAAR! campaign against “the Tower Hamlets Council’s collusion with the Crossrail hole attacks agenda against the East end of London ...” has always stated, on the relevant evidence, that the clique that controls Tower Hamlets Council, is a corrupt clique.
And we have always published the evidence on each occasion of what forms the basis for our saying that the Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by a clique that is corrupt.
In the case of the recent John Wooster employment tribunal finding, the clique has again confirmed that our analysis is accurate and up to date.
That Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by a corrupt clique.
That it is prepared to rake wrongful decisions in order to maintain its corrupt hold. As in this case, they are making a pathetic bid to come across as if they are the clique of conscientiousness! What a blazing, Blairing lie.
Conscientiousness never enters into the behaviour the claque that is in control precisely because it is devoid of conscientiousness, ethics and morality.
What is that evidence now?
That evidence is contained in Tower Hamlets Council's various statements.
We here quote from the one that they have published on their web site and dated 9 july 2008. It contains the following gem:
“
refusal to extend the notice period to allow an employee to benefit from enhanced pension was right and proper.
“
Why is it a gem?
It is a gem as evidence. Not a gem as the effect on the targets of the Council’s wrongdoing of what the question contains.
The Council clique is here admitting that the Employment tribunal’s finding that Tower Hamlets Council had refused to extend the notice period to the complainant John Wooster did take place, did occur. did happen But in typically corrupt way, the Tower Hamlets Council clique has here twisted its ‘motivation’ and the real reason why it had gone ahead and terminated his employment.
The real reasoning and reason why it had refused to extend the notice period was so that the Council could deprive or help to deprive the employee of the pensions benefits that he would have been entitled to ...
They are also covering up the fact that it was THEY, the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council, who TOOK the initiative and terminated the man’s opportunity... When it was literally months away from coming into active play...
So the initiative to destroy his legal entitlement t was taken by the Council. Not by the claimant John Wooster. So, how many levels is that twisting on?
Read that quotation from the statement issued in the name of the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council:
“
refusal to extend the notice period to allow an employee to benefit from enhanced pension was right and proper.”
They are falsifying the facts and they are doing so by confusing cause and effect .....
They are saying here that the NOTICE period was some sort of a device or an excuse that the claimant had himself invented. They are saying that he must have invented it to benefit from ‘enhanced pretension’...
They are not saying that the man was entitled to enhanced pension as the law provided he was and that they knew it and in order to deprive him of what he was entitled to they took the wrongful acton knowing full well that by doing so they would be braking their obligations and thus deny the man what he was entitled to or would be entitled to in a matter of months...
[To be continued]
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Monday, July 14, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral challenges in Tower Hamlets seats - next update due here at 0001 GMT Tuesday 15 July 2008
KHOODEELAAR! electoral challenges in Tower Hamlets seats - next update due here at 0001 GMT Tuesday 15 July 2008
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance
Crossrail hole plot agenda-promoting decision by Brown was wrong. As is his latest utterance... Before examining Brown’s utterances on the widespread incidents of mainly young people killing other young people across Britain and London, let us take another updated look at how wrong Gordon Brown can be... And then I shall detail why Brown should stop taking part in spin and lies.... And why he should start looking at the evidence of those in publicly paid for positions....posts and platforms
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
1810 Hrs GMT
London
Monday 14 July 2008
When KHOODEELAAR! advised Gordon Brown in early 2004 that he should have nothing whatever to do with the then [yet to be a hybrid Bill-ed] Crassrail scam, we had done so on accurate information we had gathered about the UK Finance ministry's attitude towards the scheme. We had found out that Brown was not supportive of Crossrail because it was not economically justified.
We ourselves have said - and demonstrated the evidence supporting what we have said - all along that the uneconomic nature of the CRASSrail scam is one of its major minus points.
So when we learnt that Brown too was thinking the same way as we had been doing, we treated Brown with a different approach. we did not call him a crass chancellor. Far less an imprudent one. For the evidence available to us in 2004 was that Brown was doing what we would have wanted him to do: say No to CRASSrail.
That line from the UK’s Ministry of Finance [the ‘Treasury’] in effect continued upto even this time last year.
A year ago, in July 2007, the second ‘most influential treasury man’ [in effect the UK’s then deputy Finance minister] as they promoted Ed Balls, was giving out hints and noises that Crossrail would have to be supported otherwise than by public funding,...
That showed that Brown was still not backing Crossrail.
For Ed Balls was nothing if not an echo of Gordon Brown at the Treasury then.
On that evidence, we were logically and evidentially totally opposed to Brown’s NEXT act. That of making utterances just like those ignorant, dishonest and corrupt touts for Big Business had sounded for the years between say February 2004 and June 2007.
Brown was coming across as a fanatical believer in a cult of CROSSRAIL!
He was saying things that the corrupt lobby and City of London elements alone had been saying for the previous 18 months or so.
There was no prudence. No evidence for the new imprudence that Brown was uttering....
[To be continued]
Crass conduct by Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council again exposed over age discrimination...
KHOODEELAAR! No to "the corrupt clique in control of the negligent Tower Hamlets Council FOCUSSING this week on how John Wooster case is not the exception in so far as the policy of violating the rights of people over 50 is concerned... More here soon
Khoodeelaar! No to "Crossrail hole agenda" election Manifesto on Tower Hamlets Council....
Khoodeelaar! No to "Crossrail hole agenda" election Manifesto on Tower Hamlets Council....
The list of the first target wards in the Tower Hamlets Borough will be published in the afternoon on Monday 14 July 2008
The list of the first target wards in the Tower Hamlets Borough will be published in the afternoon on Monday 14 July 2008
Khoodeelaar! No to "Crossrail hole agenda" election Manifesto on Tower Hamlets Council....
Was the 'East London Advertiser', dubbed the 'East London IDIOTISER' by the KHOODEELAAR! campaign based on the UTTERLY UNDENIABLE evidence of idiocy of the ‘local journal’, right to write those pieces?
Like the one it did in January 2006.
In it, the EL IDIOTISER wrote that 'Crossrail' would cost the Blaired party in Tower Hamlets...
Did it?
If so, how much did it do?
And what is the evidence?
The IDIOTISER has not followed up on that.... Nor has it reported on the campaign
TOKENISTIC, dishonestly motivated ‘references’ are not journalism... Let alone putting the community campaign on the record......
The COST to the Blairing corrupt clique will begin to register at the next ward by-election, when one is called... and at the scheduled borough-wide elections in Tower Hamlets.
How will that be so?
The details of that will be announced at this afternoon's news conferences report will be published herein the evening
[To be continued]
Like the one it did in January 2006.
In it, the EL IDIOTISER wrote that 'Crossrail' would cost the Blaired party in Tower Hamlets...
Did it?
If so, how much did it do?
And what is the evidence?
The IDIOTISER has not followed up on that.... Nor has it reported on the campaign
TOKENISTIC, dishonestly motivated ‘references’ are not journalism... Let alone putting the community campaign on the record......
The COST to the Blairing corrupt clique will begin to register at the next ward by-election, when one is called... and at the scheduled borough-wide elections in Tower Hamlets.
How will that be so?
The details of that will be announced at this afternoon's news conferences report will be published herein the evening
[To be continued]