This page was last edited at 1630 GMT
1730 UK Wednesday 13 August 2008:
CONTINUING the KHOODEELAAR! Questions to Tower Hamlets Council
1630 GMT
1730 UK
Wednesday 13 August 2008:
In October 2004, there was a formal meeting of the Tower Hamlets Council’s cabinet, which did refer to the Council’s role in the Crossrail hole plot.
Based on the evidence of what was observed by members of the community present at the meeting, a statement was published by KHOODEELAAR! asserting - repeat ASSERTING - that the then councillor Michael Keith had failed to represent the whole community’s position in his uttered remarks at that cabinet meeting.
This was disputed by Christine Gilbert, then still in post as the Council’s chief executive and Christine Gilbert wrote to CBRUKcentral as part of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign [sponsored by and is in partnership with the wholly voluntary, non-profit, non-careerist ethical and political campaign CBRUK] ASSERTING THAT SHE, Christine Gilbert, had attended the same meeting and that HER RECOLLECTION WAS different from what Khoodeelaar! had published on the utterances by Michael Keith.
To add apparent substance to her assertion, Christine Gilbert wrote to CBRUK stating that she had also seen the minutes of the ‘cabinet’ meeting concerned and that the minutes proved her assertion.
Logically, the KHOODEELAAR! campaign wrote to Christine Gilbert and asked to be given a copy of the minutes which she had asserted to have seen. She never did. There have been over a dozen separate requests or formal demands for the Council to substantiate Christine Gilbert’s assertion in backing Michael Keith.
There has been no substantiation.
The key matter in the Michael Keith utterance was that he had referred to a very small - “numerically, politically, campaign-wise and in terms of local or indeed 'professional' relevance or presence” grouping. He made NOT one single reference to any other organisation. Many exist or were in existence in October 2004 in the same area which have [and di have in October 2004] a bigger and more popular and populous relevance than the one Michael Keith referred to.
Why did Christine Gilbert make that misleading statement?
Why did she fail to substantiate her assertion when asked to do so?
Why had Michael Keith made the reference leaving out all the other groups?
[To be continued]
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
SAVE US FROM CROSSRAIL ! says a banner sized sign, apprently in a picture on a web site. But who wrote, put up and displayed it? Where? When? Why????
1505 GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008:
By©Muhammad Haque: KHOODEELAAR! agrees with that slogan. But we are intrigued by it. We have not come across this before...So the questions include: Who wrote and put up this sign when and where? "SAVE US FROM CROSSRAIL" ! The KHOODEELAAR! research unit came across this at appx. 1450 GMT today Wednesday 13 August 2008 in the course of the regular investigation into the CRASSrail hole plot...We came across it on a web site which does not state any direct description of the Sign nor any other info about it. Also, that site is itself ambivalent, to say the least, on the subject of CROSSRAIL...[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque: KHOODEELAAR! agrees with that slogan. But we are intrigued by it. We have not come across this before...So the questions include: Who wrote and put up this sign when and where? "SAVE US FROM CROSSRAIL" ! The KHOODEELAAR! research unit came across this at appx. 1450 GMT today Wednesday 13 August 2008 in the course of the regular investigation into the CRASSrail hole plot...We came across it on a web site which does not state any direct description of the Sign nor any other info about it. Also, that site is itself ambivalent, to say the least, on the subject of CROSSRAIL...[To be continued]
SAVE US FROM CROSSRAIL ! says a banner sized sign, apprently in a picture on a web site. But who wrote, put up and displayed it? Where? When? Why????
This page was last edited at 1500 GMT Wednesday 13 August 2008
Who wrote and put up this sign when and where? "SAVE US FROM CROSSRAIL"
KHOODEELAAR! research unit came across this at appx 1450 GMT today Wednesday 13 August 2008 in the course of the regular investigation into the CRASSrail hole plot...
We came across it on a web site which does not state any direct description of the Sign nor any other info about it. Also, that site is itself ambivalent, to say the least, on the subject of CROSSRAIL...
[To be continued]
Who wrote and put up this sign when and where? "SAVE US FROM CROSSRAIL"
KHOODEELAAR! research unit came across this at appx 1450 GMT today Wednesday 13 August 2008 in the course of the regular investigation into the CRASSrail hole plot...
We came across it on a web site which does not state any direct description of the Sign nor any other info about it. Also, that site is itself ambivalent, to say the least, on the subject of CROSSRAIL...
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! economic analysis of CRASSrail done in February 2004, is in effect echoed by 'Directors of Finance' in August 2008!
1338 GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to "CRASSrail hole, wasteful project " CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO in February 2004 that the ‘economy’ did not have demand for CRASSrail!
That the ‘local’ London economy could not afford to waste so much money on a scam like CRASSrail.....
That the inner city East End of London ordinary population had more than necessary access to the transport networks, that the East End of London was not suffering BECAUSE of lack of access to a line like CRASSrail but because of other fa factors, like the low level of intelligence of the corrupt clique that ‘controls’ the local Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council and their organisational, institutional, bureaucratic counterparts sited elsewhere in or operated in the name of the people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. Those agencies and institutions and bureaucracies too making similarly stupid and foolish ‘decisions’ that end up doing disservice to the local community in the East End of London Borough of Tower Hamlets.... [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to "CRASSrail hole, wasteful project " CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO in February 2004 that the ‘economy’ did not have demand for CRASSrail!
That the ‘local’ London economy could not afford to waste so much money on a scam like CRASSrail.....
That the inner city East End of London ordinary population had more than necessary access to the transport networks, that the East End of London was not suffering BECAUSE of lack of access to a line like CRASSrail but because of other fa factors, like the low level of intelligence of the corrupt clique that ‘controls’ the local Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council and their organisational, institutional, bureaucratic counterparts sited elsewhere in or operated in the name of the people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. Those agencies and institutions and bureaucracies too making similarly stupid and foolish ‘decisions’ that end up doing disservice to the local community in the East End of London Borough of Tower Hamlets.... [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law commentary and update - Questions to Tower Hamlets Council [30]
This page was last edited at 1235 GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008
What happened to the hundreds of items containing references to Tower Hamlets Councillors claiming expenses in relation to events they claimed to have attended containing references to Crossrail?
By ‘what happened’ is here meant the fact that on the Tower Hamlets Council’s web site, 100s of files were accessible with the information stated above. But those files vanished from the Tower Hamlets Council’s web site after Khoodeelaar! began to put questions about the role of each of the councillors who were claiming expenses for the events cited.
What documentary material have you prepared showing the chronology of the activities and the independent of the corporate Tower Hamlets Council containing ALL the information that do not breach any person's commercial or private or personal interests or privacy but which completely show the Council’s role in relation to representing the community's current, medium term and longer term interests in the most reasonable, honest, constitutional, legal and accountable way over Crossrail?
Why were e-mail addresses containing, carrying, delivering the questions from KHOODEELAAR! being BLOCKED for years? Was it an order made by Christine Gilbert? Or was it an order mace by any councillor? Or by more than one? Or was there some other person or were there some other persons who had made the operative decision?
1225 GMT
1325 UK
13 August 2008
[To be continued]
What happened to the hundreds of items containing references to Tower Hamlets Councillors claiming expenses in relation to events they claimed to have attended containing references to Crossrail?
By ‘what happened’ is here meant the fact that on the Tower Hamlets Council’s web site, 100s of files were accessible with the information stated above. But those files vanished from the Tower Hamlets Council’s web site after Khoodeelaar! began to put questions about the role of each of the councillors who were claiming expenses for the events cited.
What documentary material have you prepared showing the chronology of the activities and the independent of the corporate Tower Hamlets Council containing ALL the information that do not breach any person's commercial or private or personal interests or privacy but which completely show the Council’s role in relation to representing the community's current, medium term and longer term interests in the most reasonable, honest, constitutional, legal and accountable way over Crossrail?
Why were e-mail addresses containing, carrying, delivering the questions from KHOODEELAAR! being BLOCKED for years? Was it an order made by Christine Gilbert? Or was it an order mace by any councillor? Or by more than one? Or was there some other person or were there some other persons who had made the operative decision?
1225 GMT
1325 UK
13 August 2008
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law commentary and update - Questions to Tower Hamlets Council [29]
This page was last edited at 1210 Hrs GMT On Wednesday 13 August 2008
Do you have documentary record of all the contacts on Crossrail hole plot with all external parties?
If you have, have you referred to that record in any communication to Khoodeelaar! ? If yes, when did you make that reference?
What is the evidence of the ‘benefits’ that are exclusively, specifically linked with ‘Crossrail’ hole plot and the ‘benefits’ that could not be otherwise realised or found or created or brought about or delivered?
What is the difference between the Crossrail hole being dug in the Hanbury Street/Princelet Street and in the Woodseer Street?
What is the difference between ‘big infrastructure’ project that is Crossrail hole plot and its analogous projects anywhere else?
In the context of the relevance to the people of and in the East End of London?
[To be continued]
Do you have documentary record of all the contacts on Crossrail hole plot with all external parties?
If you have, have you referred to that record in any communication to Khoodeelaar! ? If yes, when did you make that reference?
What is the evidence of the ‘benefits’ that are exclusively, specifically linked with ‘Crossrail’ hole plot and the ‘benefits’ that could not be otherwise realised or found or created or brought about or delivered?
What is the difference between the Crossrail hole being dug in the Hanbury Street/Princelet Street and in the Woodseer Street?
What is the difference between ‘big infrastructure’ project that is Crossrail hole plot and its analogous projects anywhere else?
In the context of the relevance to the people of and in the East End of London?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law commentary and update -naming and not naming defendants: [28]
This page was last edited at 1150 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008
1145 GMT 1245 UK Time London Wednesday 13 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot against the inner city East End of London...." campaign constitutional law actions programme against the parties who are responsible for the Crossrail hole plot, so far.........The constitutional law parameters: Brief statement as follow up to Mr Muhammad Hackie's conversation with the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Councillor on the ‘phone on 12 August 2008. The reason why KHOODEELAAR! has been offering the option to the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council and to any other employed [or contracted or agency-related person or personnel] in the context of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law actions [due to be filed in the UK court/s in the very near future, as soon as the procedural loose ends have been tied and all the known formalities completed, before the effective filing of the case/s can take place] is summarised below:- The KHOODEELAAR! campaign operates a standard of ethics and constitutionality that includes the treatment of the ‘parties’ with fairness and what is understood by natural justice. It is important to emphasise that it is an integral part of the philosophy of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign to give all concerned due opportunities to make all the relevant information available to us so that we can leave them out of the lists of the intended defendants. This is an important point. A number of defendants will be named and identified as such. The KHOODEELAAR! legal action/s is [are] intended to address named councillors.
And THEIR liabilities.
This is within the democratic and constitutional law context the main group of defendants containing the relevant holders of liability for the relevant wrongs and the relevant acts of illegality and unconstitutionality. If in the particular instance the evidence shows that any other person, other than a councillor, has been so deeply and intimately involved with the operation of a wrong then that person will be included as made plain in our many previously published statements on this. the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council and the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council bare the two employees AT THE RELEVANT time of the LB Tower Hamlets Council who have been found to have been involved in the promotion of the Crossrail hole agenda in ways that make it necessary to have their roles held to public account. If however there exists any evidence that shows that the evidence of their deep involvement is countered by evidence of their being under controlling influences from one or more than one councillor then that will be taken into account and if appropriate the two will be left out of the list. The CURRENT communications are prompted by the KHOODEELAAR! campaign’s policy to ensure that there is no room for any doubt, confusion or lack of clarity left on this either in the mind of the first named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council or in the mind of the other named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council [texts excluded for reasons of evidential integrity] about their own roles and in their separate act or acts of involvement in the Tower Hamlets Council’s promotion of not just the Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London but also in the justificatory plugs, excuses and fabrications that have been issued for the same plot by or in the name of the corporate Tower Hamlets Council. To date. at 1130 GMT on Wednesday 13 August 2008..
.[To be continued]
1145 GMT 1245 UK Time London Wednesday 13 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot against the inner city East End of London...." campaign constitutional law actions programme against the parties who are responsible for the Crossrail hole plot, so far.........The constitutional law parameters: Brief statement as follow up to Mr Muhammad Hackie's conversation with the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Councillor on the ‘phone on 12 August 2008. The reason why KHOODEELAAR! has been offering the option to the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council and to any other employed [or contracted or agency-related person or personnel] in the context of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law actions [due to be filed in the UK court/s in the very near future, as soon as the procedural loose ends have been tied and all the known formalities completed, before the effective filing of the case/s can take place] is summarised below:- The KHOODEELAAR! campaign operates a standard of ethics and constitutionality that includes the treatment of the ‘parties’ with fairness and what is understood by natural justice. It is important to emphasise that it is an integral part of the philosophy of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign to give all concerned due opportunities to make all the relevant information available to us so that we can leave them out of the lists of the intended defendants. This is an important point. A number of defendants will be named and identified as such. The KHOODEELAAR! legal action/s is [are] intended to address named councillors.
And THEIR liabilities.
This is within the democratic and constitutional law context the main group of defendants containing the relevant holders of liability for the relevant wrongs and the relevant acts of illegality and unconstitutionality. If in the particular instance the evidence shows that any other person, other than a councillor, has been so deeply and intimately involved with the operation of a wrong then that person will be included as made plain in our many previously published statements on this. the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council and the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council bare the two employees AT THE RELEVANT time of the LB Tower Hamlets Council who have been found to have been involved in the promotion of the Crossrail hole agenda in ways that make it necessary to have their roles held to public account. If however there exists any evidence that shows that the evidence of their deep involvement is countered by evidence of their being under controlling influences from one or more than one councillor then that will be taken into account and if appropriate the two will be left out of the list. The CURRENT communications are prompted by the KHOODEELAAR! campaign’s policy to ensure that there is no room for any doubt, confusion or lack of clarity left on this either in the mind of the first named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council or in the mind of the other named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council [texts excluded for reasons of evidential integrity] about their own roles and in their separate act or acts of involvement in the Tower Hamlets Council’s promotion of not just the Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London but also in the justificatory plugs, excuses and fabrications that have been issued for the same plot by or in the name of the corporate Tower Hamlets Council. To date. at 1130 GMT on Wednesday 13 August 2008..
.[To be continued]
Is 'Policy Exchange' an exhibition of the consolidation of the stupidity and callousness as shown in Boris Johnson's attacks on Liverpool?
This page was last edited at 1025 GMT London wednesday 13 August 2008
By©Muhammad Haque
1025 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! has said that Boris Johnson must behave in accordance with the requirements of morality, ethics and integrity that put him above the standard [what standard?] 'found' to 'exist' whilst Ken Livingstone was in the post being held by Johnson now.
We repeat that call with the added evidence as provided in the latest antisocial, corrupting and socially exclusive and immoral behaviour of the Policy Emptiness...
The Boris Johnson-linked Tory 'Policy Emptiness' 'recommends' abolishing Liverpool, Manchester and other northern English regions...
The ‘Policy Exchange’ is one of those corrupt entrepreneurs that have sprung up in the age of open defiance of common sense, society and basic decency....
No wonder that Boris Johnson has found them a good place to hide under...
He has a duty to immediately disassociate himself from Policy vacuum’s attack on Liverpool...
Especially Liverpool...
And then look around inside and outside the Onion in London SE1 and spot anyone linked with the crass and the sub-criminal outfit. If there is anyone being paid from the public purse is or has been linked with Policy Absence then Boris should forthwith stop such payment being made any more...
[More on this later ]
The following is one comment on Policy Emptiness from the Liverpool Echo. There are already about 200 different files accessible on the internet denouncing Policy Outrage!
"
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/views/our-view/2008/08/13/think-tank-misses-mark-100252-21524096
"
By©Muhammad Haque
1025 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! has said that Boris Johnson must behave in accordance with the requirements of morality, ethics and integrity that put him above the standard [what standard?] 'found' to 'exist' whilst Ken Livingstone was in the post being held by Johnson now.
We repeat that call with the added evidence as provided in the latest antisocial, corrupting and socially exclusive and immoral behaviour of the Policy Emptiness...
The Boris Johnson-linked Tory 'Policy Emptiness' 'recommends' abolishing Liverpool, Manchester and other northern English regions...
The ‘Policy Exchange’ is one of those corrupt entrepreneurs that have sprung up in the age of open defiance of common sense, society and basic decency....
No wonder that Boris Johnson has found them a good place to hide under...
He has a duty to immediately disassociate himself from Policy vacuum’s attack on Liverpool...
Especially Liverpool...
And then look around inside and outside the Onion in London SE1 and spot anyone linked with the crass and the sub-criminal outfit. If there is anyone being paid from the public purse is or has been linked with Policy Absence then Boris should forthwith stop such payment being made any more...
The following is one comment on Policy Emptiness from the Liverpool Echo. There are already about 200 different files accessible on the internet denouncing Policy Outrage!
"
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/views/our-view/2008/08/13/think-tank-misses-mark-100252-21524096
"
Crossrail hole plot-peddler Guardian Unbelievable peddles the lie on Council housing destruction - and lets off the crooked councils doing it
This page was last edited at 0815 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008:
0815 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! has been citing the contents of the Guardian in plugging the Crossrail Big Business agenda as evidence of the corruption in the propaganda for Crassrail, in the poverty-adding ploys....KHOODEELAAR! has said all along that the Guardian is the most pernicious of the so-called mainstream newspaper titles and news-industry outfits in the UK. The Guardian’s apparently ‘concerned’ history on the ‘decline’ of “Council housing” [published today Wednesday 13 August 2008] conceals the truth of the role played by the lying Guardian itself....
It never has, in all the time it lists, had the morality or the ethics or the knowledge or the familiarity with the truth to publish the truth on the corrupting role played in all the decline by the local councils. Tower Hamlets is only included as a location for one of the sites it includes. But the lying dishonest Guardian fails to point out the depth of the corrupting, poverty-creating role that Tower Hamlets Council has been playing in the destruction of the housing stock.... It also fails to point out that the 1986 legislation is NOT a compulsory provision. that is to say, it does NOT force the councils to do away with the housing stock. By not pointing this out, the lying, pernicious Guardian continues wrongly and inaccurately to suggest that it was the Tories that did it.... Thus removing the real blame from the shoulders of the corrupt councils. Like the clique that is now involved in the invitation to the Crossrail hole agenda upon the East End of London...In the destruction of the council housing provision, the councils have been used as the colluding, corrupt, willing tools to destroy the housing.....But the lying Guardian will never tell that truth .. Because the lying Guardian gets most of its cash on council job advertisements it carries from the councils themselves. The relationship is one of open corruption between the Guardian and its co-corrupt council cliques.....[To be continued]
0815 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! has been citing the contents of the Guardian in plugging the Crossrail Big Business agenda as evidence of the corruption in the propaganda for Crassrail, in the poverty-adding ploys....KHOODEELAAR! has said all along that the Guardian is the most pernicious of the so-called mainstream newspaper titles and news-industry outfits in the UK. The Guardian’s apparently ‘concerned’ history on the ‘decline’ of “Council housing” [published today Wednesday 13 August 2008] conceals the truth of the role played by the lying Guardian itself....
It never has, in all the time it lists, had the morality or the ethics or the knowledge or the familiarity with the truth to publish the truth on the corrupting role played in all the decline by the local councils. Tower Hamlets is only included as a location for one of the sites it includes. But the lying dishonest Guardian fails to point out the depth of the corrupting, poverty-creating role that Tower Hamlets Council has been playing in the destruction of the housing stock.... It also fails to point out that the 1986 legislation is NOT a compulsory provision. that is to say, it does NOT force the councils to do away with the housing stock. By not pointing this out, the lying, pernicious Guardian continues wrongly and inaccurately to suggest that it was the Tories that did it.... Thus removing the real blame from the shoulders of the corrupt councils. Like the clique that is now involved in the invitation to the Crossrail hole agenda upon the East End of London...In the destruction of the council housing provision, the councils have been used as the colluding, corrupt, willing tools to destroy the housing.....But the lying Guardian will never tell that truth .. Because the lying Guardian gets most of its cash on council job advertisements it carries from the councils themselves. The relationship is one of open corruption between the Guardian and its co-corrupt council cliques.....[To be continued]
That ALL the talk about Crossrail is, has been and going to be about how much money Big Business can make through it.
0650 GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008: By©Muhammad Haque:
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda Crossrail hole plot TOLD YOU SO! That ALL the talk about Crossrail is, has been and going to be about how much money Big Business can make through it.... And Big public money is what it craves... Look at the sly City of London interests back pedalling .... when it comes to ITS making any contribution.... That sum is a joke, of course... EVEN if the City of London elements did make that contribution, it would still be puny in comparison with the actual costs.... So the whole ‘debate’ over these contribution is an additional charade and a ploy to hide the truth about the crassly conceived crassrail scam...[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda Crossrail hole plot TOLD YOU SO! That ALL the talk about Crossrail is, has been and going to be about how much money Big Business can make through it.... And Big public money is what it craves... Look at the sly City of London interests back pedalling .... when it comes to ITS making any contribution.... That sum is a joke, of course... EVEN if the City of London elements did make that contribution, it would still be puny in comparison with the actual costs.... So the whole ‘debate’ over these contribution is an additional charade and a ploy to hide the truth about the crassly conceived crassrail scam...[To be continued]