33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot -peddler London EVENING STANDARD's deceptive role: UPDATE on 'the underground deserving ££ priority' ... [105]
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23552728-details/2bn+shortfall+in+cash+needed+to+upgrade+Tube/article.do
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot Big Business agenda examining the pro-Big Business role of the UK CBI [104]
KHOODEELAAR! daily economic commentary
By©Muhammad Haque
0800 Hrs GMT 0900 Hrs UKTime
London tuesday 9 September 2008
What is it that KHOODEELAAR! is saying about Richard Lambert? We are saying that he is wrong to make the banal statements about the Government doing the things when he knows that the things he is referring to are mostly in the control of Big business. And their lobbies. Until and unless the Big business interests, their agencies and their lobbies recognise their responsibilities and until THEY begin to deliver, there will not be the improvement that society requires and needs in the situation.... Let us start with education. As I have already said, Richard Lambert has said in the past weeks things about the dearth of science educated graduates coming out of UK institutions. He means Uk graduates. ‘Indigenous’ UK graduates is what he is referring to. What is the CBI’s record on ‘education’. In its narrow sense and in its correctly contented sense? The brief answer is that the CBI has been responsible for obstructing education. And that the obstruction is as much part of the agenda that is pushing for the conglomerates being allowed to rob the UK public of £Billions under Crossrail as ot is the agenda that keeps the Uk society divided and in conflicting worlds. Disparity, income disparity and discrimination are part and integral parcel of the CBI game. They want to perpetuate inequalities and injustice in society. That way their [profiteering lies. Is guaranteed..... It is the CBI that has CONTRIBUTED to the ‘culture of policy’ causing the emergence of today’s [=contemporary] situation where dearth of appropriately qualified ‘indigenous’ [!!!!] British or UK graduates has occurred and is going to get worse....[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
0800 Hrs GMT 0900 Hrs UKTime
London tuesday 9 September 2008
What is it that KHOODEELAAR! is saying about Richard Lambert? We are saying that he is wrong to make the banal statements about the Government doing the things when he knows that the things he is referring to are mostly in the control of Big business. And their lobbies. Until and unless the Big business interests, their agencies and their lobbies recognise their responsibilities and until THEY begin to deliver, there will not be the improvement that society requires and needs in the situation.... Let us start with education. As I have already said, Richard Lambert has said in the past weeks things about the dearth of science educated graduates coming out of UK institutions. He means Uk graduates. ‘Indigenous’ UK graduates is what he is referring to. What is the CBI’s record on ‘education’. In its narrow sense and in its correctly contented sense? The brief answer is that the CBI has been responsible for obstructing education. And that the obstruction is as much part of the agenda that is pushing for the conglomerates being allowed to rob the UK public of £Billions under Crossrail as ot is the agenda that keeps the Uk society divided and in conflicting worlds. Disparity, income disparity and discrimination are part and integral parcel of the CBI game. They want to perpetuate inequalities and injustice in society. That way their [profiteering lies. Is guaranteed..... It is the CBI that has CONTRIBUTED to the ‘culture of policy’ causing the emergence of today’s [=contemporary] situation where dearth of appropriately qualified ‘indigenous’ [!!!!] British or UK graduates has occurred and is going to get worse....[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! focus on the role of Tim Archer, Tory Councillor for 'Canary Wharf' on Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-backer Council [103]
THIS page was last edited at 0712 GMT 0812 Hrs UK Time London Tuesday 9 September 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! A year ago, ALMOST to the day [ today is 9 September 2008 and a year ago THIS week on Friday 7 September 2007], KHOODEELAAR! did an actin archive on THIS KHOODEELAAR! site and discussed, amongst other things, the role [however small] played by Francis Maude [MP], then the UK Conservative Party ‘leader’ [ April 2006] who had stated his PARTY’s OPPOSITION to the Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane, London E1 area....... And yesterday, 8 September 2008, we came to be aware that today’s Guardian was to publish the item promoting Tory councillor Tim Archer. We have already this morning [Tuesday 9 September 2008] begun to focus on Archer’s role ON TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL so far ..... And we are going to continue the examination of his dubious and lethally anti-community role on Tower Hamlets Council. Before we get to that stage, it is vital to remind visitors of what we had said on 7 September 2007.
“ACTION Archive against Crossrail attack on the East end of London: AADHIKARonline report on the Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone 26.04.2006
London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of AADHIKARonline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude’s backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of AADHIKARonline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude’s backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! Was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone’s role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the AADHIKARonline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone’s dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
[KHOODEELAAR! ACTION UPDATE To be continued along with our examination of the role being played by the Tories, typified by Tim Archer. on the Crossrail hole plot-backer Tower Hamlets Council]
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! A year ago, ALMOST to the day [ today is 9 September 2008 and a year ago THIS week on Friday 7 September 2007], KHOODEELAAR! did an actin archive on THIS KHOODEELAAR! site and discussed, amongst other things, the role [however small] played by Francis Maude [MP], then the UK Conservative Party ‘leader’ [ April 2006] who had stated his PARTY’s OPPOSITION to the Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane, London E1 area....... And yesterday, 8 September 2008, we came to be aware that today’s Guardian was to publish the item promoting Tory councillor Tim Archer. We have already this morning [Tuesday 9 September 2008] begun to focus on Archer’s role ON TOWER HAMLETS COUNCIL so far ..... And we are going to continue the examination of his dubious and lethally anti-community role on Tower Hamlets Council. Before we get to that stage, it is vital to remind visitors of what we had said on 7 September 2007.
“ACTION Archive against Crossrail attack on the East end of London: AADHIKARonline report on the Crossrail hole plotter Ken Livingstone 26.04.2006
London mayor Livingstone obstructs Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of AADHIKARonline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude’s backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
1. Within minutes [on Monday 24 April 2006] of AADHIKARonline reporting the Conservative Party Chair Francis Maude’s backing to Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign, London Mayor Ken Livingstone had his office send a strange communication to Khoodeelaar! The legal and democratic significance of the Ken Livingstone communication are enormous, especially in the last week before the scheduled local elections on 4 May 2006
2. That communication from the head of Ken Livingstone’s transport department, effectively says that the Khoodeelaar! demands for Ken Livingstone to make full disclosure of all his communications with the clique of corrupt controllers of Tower Hamlets Council are too expensive for the London Mayor to comply with !
3. There is no specific item that the London Mayor has identified in his mayor communication to Khoodeelaar on Monday 24 April 2006 as constituting an allegedly over-the-permitted limit of administration cost request under the Freed of Information Act.
4. The key point is that Khoodeelaar! the campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill attacks plan on the Brick Lane London E1 area, has been issuing ken Livingstone with a series of pre-action [letter before claim] communications and the London mayor has now run out of excuses.
5. At the centre of the Khoodeelaar legal action claims against Ken Livingstone lies in the fact that the mayor has persistently misled Londoners generally and the UK Parliament through his undisclosed deals with the Transport Department and in particular the people of the East End community affected by the CrossRail hole plan.
6. Khoodeelaar! delivered the first demand to ken Livingstone for confirming a number of facts that were linked with the mayor’s release of a news item on 24 March 2006.
7. That was followed within a day or two by other calls on Livingstone to disclose the facts of his dealing with the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.
8. It was again repeated by Khoodeelaar! no to Crossrail hole campaign updating their calls on Livingstone to deal with the factual questions that arose about the stunt from the written statement about the CrossRail hole Bill that was issued in the UK House of Commons by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling on 30 March 2006.
9. The mayor is on record as having touted for the enlisting of the ‘leaders’ and ‘lead members’ of a number of local councils, including the then leader of Tower Hamlets Council [Helal Uddin Abbas] in February 2004 as part of the Livingstone lobby for CrossRail plan.
10. In a Crossrail-hole-plan promotional ‘letter’ published in 2004 under the name of Ken Livingstone together with the names of Helal Uddin Abbas and others from other local Councils, the promotion of CrossRail was made without a single qualification let alone reservation.
11. Khoodeelaar! immediately wrote to both Livingstone and demanded that the Evening Standard publish the truth about the CrossRail hole plan. Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque told the Editor of the London EVENING STANDARD that their failure to publish the truth about the CrossRail plan [as it still was - because the CrossRail hole Bill was not put before the House of Commons until 22 February 2005, almost a year after Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque was having the series of demands put on Ken Livingstone and Christine Gilbert to tell the truth of their then role in promoting the CrossRail plan. The EVENING STANDARD failed to publish the truth. As did Ken Livingstone.
12.
That was in February 2004.
13. Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque also wrote to Tower Hamlets Council chief Executive Christine Gilbert in February 2004 and in March 2004 asking for a series of detailed answers to questions about her own role in promoting the CrossRail hole plan including the question as to what advice, if any, had she, Christine Gilbert, given to the ruling clique or group on the Tower Hamlets Council. There was no reply. There has been no reply.
14. When Khoodeelaar! issued the latest then updated series of legal claims against Alistair Darling, ken Livingstone, Christine Gilbert and a few others and said that the application to the High Court in London against them would be filed on Monday 27 March 2006, a number of things immediately happened.
15. Ken Livingstone suddenly issued a news release on 24 March 2006 saying that the CrossRail Dirt hole in the Brick Lane London E1 had been scrapped!
16. And that Ken Livingstone Crossrail-Dirt-hole plan against Brick Lane London E1 area scrapping stunt announcement was then used as the peg for the evening TV news which featured the entire cabal of self-seeking politicos doing their fame slots and assorted other fantasies. They were given more time than Khoodeelaar! campaign organiser Muhammad Haque who did say on the record [BBC London News, Friday 24 April 2006] that as far as Khoodeelaar! Was concerned, they had immediately asked Livingstone to substantiate the claims of the scrapping of the Crossrail Dirty hole plan and demanded that Livingstone to answer the outstanding detailed KHOODELAAR! no to CrossRail hole questions that had been put to him as based on his unqualified plugs for the CrossRail plan over the previous years
17. Accordingly, Muhammad Haque and Khoodeelaar! campaign sent the detailed further questions immediately and also went to City hall on Monday 3 April 2006 and delivered a series of questions for Livingstone to deal with.
18. On the same occasion [3 April 2006] Khoodeelaar demonstrated the campaign’s opposition to Ken Livingstone’s role so far and demanded that Livingstone come out with the overdue answers to the extensive and the very comprehensive KHOODEELAAR! No to the Crossrail hole questions which had arisen from Livingstone’s stunt staged on Friday 24 March 2006 about the alleged scrapping of the CrossRail Dirt hole.
19. Livingstone remained silent
20. Until the AADHIKARonline news carried the first detailed transcripts of the Khoodeelaar! Organiser’s Questions and answers encounter with Conservative party chair Francis Maude in Brick Lane in the mid afternoon of Monday 24 April 2006.
21. Ken Livingstone’s head of Transports sent an e-mail which is full of typical Ken Livingstone’s dissembling. The concept of dissembling as associated with ken Livingstone on 24 April 2006 had already been spotted and identified a month previously [on Friday 24 March 2006] out by Khoodeelaar organiser Muhammad Haque in his news interview with the BBC London political editor Tim Donovan on that date [Friday 24 March 2006].
[KHOODEELAAR! ACTION UPDATE To be continued along with our examination of the role being played by the Tories, typified by Tim Archer. on the Crossrail hole plot-backer Tower Hamlets Council]
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' Big Business agenda CAMPAIGN exposes the Tory Councillor Tim Archer [102 B]
This page was last edited in London at 0050 GMT Tuesday 9 September 2008
0045 GMT 0145 Hrs UK Time London Tuesday 9 September 0058 UK time on Tuesday 9 september 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! the constitutional law campaign against Big Business CROSSRAIL hole agenda peddlers, touts, agents on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council and on the London ‘regional’ Assembly and in the UK Houses of Parliament SAYS it on the record again: that the David Ca-Moroned ‘Conservatives’ are even LESS trustworthy than the Blaired party formerly knows the Labour Party was; that the ‘arrival’ as a ‘group of councillors in Tower Hamlets Borough Council’ of a group of very Right-wing Conservatives is bad news for the people and the community in the East End of London as their behaviour has shown so far; that the so-called official opposition made up of the bunch of Conservatives that in fact are advance guard for the Big Business on the local East End of London Council is NOT an opposition, rather the colluders with the already Big Business-promoting corrupt clique on the current Council; that the corruptly published London Guardian is not telling the truth about ‘deprivation’ when it carries the following item promoting Tim Archer.... that Archer is NOT against deprivation that Archer and his group are for deprivation... Just like the Big business Crossrail agenda is about adding to existing deprivation, causing new deprivation..., and fro making way for Big Business to deprive, dislocate and destroy the existing ordinary community in the inner city East End of London....
That the Guardian is existing its own stupidity and corruption by allowing Tim Archer to refer to ‘deprivation’ and ‘deprived borough’ without giving the facts on how the Tories ARE the causers of deprivation and discrimination.....
KHOODEELAAR! will continue to examine and expose and reject this latest multifaceted lie for the Big Business that the Guardian has peddle just in the past 90 minutes....
That despite the fact that the then Tory ‘Chairman’ Francis Maude DID make a statement to KHOODEELAAR [April 2006] in Brick Lane OPPOSINg the Crossrail hole digging ploy by Alistair Darling NOT one of the Tory councillors who became councillors for the first time on Tower Hamlets Council following the 4 May 20906 council elections, has spoken or voted or acted against the Crossrail hole plot, agenda or against its repercussion... NOT only that, Tim Archer and his co-profiteering capitalist Conservatives have been behaving as the brazen face of the advance guard of take-over as they keep on parading ‘canary Wharf’ as a good thing when it is not... there is no evidence of Tim Archer or any of co-conservative councillors peaking out against the causes of poverty, deprivation and discrimination. Whether on the formal floor of the Council or outside......... That there will NOT BE any opposition from the Tories to the poverty-creating, deprivation-perpetuating agenda currently ongoing or to any that will be brought into operation in the future... That the ordinary community in the inner city East London borough of Tower Hamlets cannot free itself from poverty without also being abel to free itself from the stranglehold of the corrupt and the opportunistic local council and the timeserving careerists that get on it to serve their petty small careers... That the campaign against Crossrail is part and parcel a campaign against poverty creation, deprivation-adding...... as it is against the particular impacts on the environment and on the community of the actual Crossrail scam... [To be continued]
0045 GMT 0145 Hrs UK Time London Tuesday 9 September 0058 UK time on Tuesday 9 september 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! the constitutional law campaign against Big Business CROSSRAIL hole agenda peddlers, touts, agents on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council and on the London ‘regional’ Assembly and in the UK Houses of Parliament SAYS it on the record again: that the David Ca-Moroned ‘Conservatives’ are even LESS trustworthy than the Blaired party formerly knows the Labour Party was; that the ‘arrival’ as a ‘group of councillors in Tower Hamlets Borough Council’ of a group of very Right-wing Conservatives is bad news for the people and the community in the East End of London as their behaviour has shown so far; that the so-called official opposition made up of the bunch of Conservatives that in fact are advance guard for the Big Business on the local East End of London Council is NOT an opposition, rather the colluders with the already Big Business-promoting corrupt clique on the current Council; that the corruptly published London Guardian is not telling the truth about ‘deprivation’ when it carries the following item promoting Tim Archer.... that Archer is NOT against deprivation that Archer and his group are for deprivation... Just like the Big business Crossrail agenda is about adding to existing deprivation, causing new deprivation..., and fro making way for Big Business to deprive, dislocate and destroy the existing ordinary community in the inner city East End of London....
That the Guardian is existing its own stupidity and corruption by allowing Tim Archer to refer to ‘deprivation’ and ‘deprived borough’ without giving the facts on how the Tories ARE the causers of deprivation and discrimination.....
KHOODEELAAR! will continue to examine and expose and reject this latest multifaceted lie for the Big Business that the Guardian has peddle just in the past 90 minutes....
That despite the fact that the then Tory ‘Chairman’ Francis Maude DID make a statement to KHOODEELAAR [April 2006] in Brick Lane OPPOSINg the Crossrail hole digging ploy by Alistair Darling NOT one of the Tory councillors who became councillors for the first time on Tower Hamlets Council following the 4 May 20906 council elections, has spoken or voted or acted against the Crossrail hole plot, agenda or against its repercussion... NOT only that, Tim Archer and his co-profiteering capitalist Conservatives have been behaving as the brazen face of the advance guard of take-over as they keep on parading ‘canary Wharf’ as a good thing when it is not... there is no evidence of Tim Archer or any of co-conservative councillors peaking out against the causes of poverty, deprivation and discrimination. Whether on the formal floor of the Council or outside......... That there will NOT BE any opposition from the Tories to the poverty-creating, deprivation-perpetuating agenda currently ongoing or to any that will be brought into operation in the future... That the ordinary community in the inner city East London borough of Tower Hamlets cannot free itself from poverty without also being abel to free itself from the stranglehold of the corrupt and the opportunistic local council and the timeserving careerists that get on it to serve their petty small careers... That the campaign against Crossrail is part and parcel a campaign against poverty creation, deprivation-adding...... as it is against the particular impacts on the environment and on the community of the actual Crossrail scam... [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' Big Business agenda CAMPAIGN exposes the Tory Councillor Tim Archer [102]
This page was last edited at 0020 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 9 september 2008
0020 GMT London Tuesday 9 september 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' Big Business agenda CAMPAIGN exposes the Tory Councillor Tim Archer [102]
Tim Archer may find it ok to talk to the Alan Rusbridger Guardian, which is so Polly Toynbeed in its ignorance and tokenism and backwardness and corruption that it will not be able to tell a lying timeserving utterance .... Especially one that is made about the ‘deprived’ East End borough fo Tower Hamlets....
The RECORD of Tim Archer on Tower Hamlets Council is one that he cannot be boasting about. It is one of typical opportunism and small minded ness. And of racism. But we are here going to focus on Archer's brazen boast that his party is sticking up for local people against the controlling clique.
The words controlling clique belong with KHOODEELAAR!
Tim Archer has NOT spoken out against capitalism.
He has not spoken out against
property speculation.
He has not spoken on POVERTY at all. Not to OPPose the creation of poverty in the East End.
Tim Archer has been a typical, opportunistic Tory taking advantage of little incidents and episodes to put the controlling clique at a momentary disadvantage.
the strategy is the same . they back the Blairing Council. And they have done in the past 4 years since they got in.
[To be continued]
0058 GMT on Monday 8 september 0058 UK time on Tuesday 9 september 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! the constitutional law campaign against Big Business CROSSRAIL hole agenda peddlers, touts, agents on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council and on the London ‘regional’ Assembly and in the UK Houses of Parliament SAYS it on the record again: that the David Ca-Moroned ‘Conservatives’ are even LESS trustworthy than the Blaired party formerly knows the Labour Party was; that the ‘arrival’ as a ‘group of councillors in Tower Hamlets Borough Council’ of a group of very Right-wing Conservatives is bad news for the people and the community in the East End of London as their behaviour has shown so far; that the so-called official opposition made up of the bunch of Conservatives that in fact are advance guard for the Big Business on the local East End of London Council is NOT an opposition, rather the colluders with the already Big Business-promoting corrupt clique on the current Council; that the corruptly published London Guardian is not telling the truth about ‘deprivation’ when it carries the following item promoting Tim Archer.... that Archer is NOT against deprivation that Archer and his group are for deprivation... Just like the Big business Crossrail agenda is about adding to existing deprivation, causing new deprivation..., and fro making way for Big Business to deprive, dislocate and destroy the existing ordinary community in the inner city East End of London.... That the Guardian is existing its own stupidity and corruption by allowing Tim Archer to refer to ‘deprivation’ and ‘deprived borough’ without giving the facts on how the Tories ARE the causers of deprivation and discrimination.....KHOODEELAAR! will continue to examine and expose and reject this latest multifaceted lie for the Big Business that the Guardian has peddle just in the past 55 minutes....[To be continued]
0020 GMT London Tuesday 9 september 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' Big Business agenda CAMPAIGN exposes the Tory Councillor Tim Archer [102]
Tim Archer may find it ok to talk to the Alan Rusbridger Guardian, which is so Polly Toynbeed in its ignorance and tokenism and backwardness and corruption that it will not be able to tell a lying timeserving utterance .... Especially one that is made about the ‘deprived’ East End borough fo Tower Hamlets....
The RECORD of Tim Archer on Tower Hamlets Council is one that he cannot be boasting about. It is one of typical opportunism and small minded ness. And of racism. But we are here going to focus on Archer's brazen boast that his party is sticking up for local people against the controlling clique.
The words controlling clique belong with KHOODEELAAR!
Tim Archer has NOT spoken out against capitalism.
He has not spoken out against
property speculation.
He has not spoken on POVERTY at all. Not to OPPose the creation of poverty in the East End.
Tim Archer has been a typical, opportunistic Tory taking advantage of little incidents and episodes to put the controlling clique at a momentary disadvantage.
the strategy is the same . they back the Blairing Council. And they have done in the past 4 years since they got in.
[To be continued]
0058 GMT on Monday 8 september 0058 UK time on Tuesday 9 september 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! the constitutional law campaign against Big Business CROSSRAIL hole agenda peddlers, touts, agents on the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council and on the London ‘regional’ Assembly and in the UK Houses of Parliament SAYS it on the record again: that the David Ca-Moroned ‘Conservatives’ are even LESS trustworthy than the Blaired party formerly knows the Labour Party was; that the ‘arrival’ as a ‘group of councillors in Tower Hamlets Borough Council’ of a group of very Right-wing Conservatives is bad news for the people and the community in the East End of London as their behaviour has shown so far; that the so-called official opposition made up of the bunch of Conservatives that in fact are advance guard for the Big Business on the local East End of London Council is NOT an opposition, rather the colluders with the already Big Business-promoting corrupt clique on the current Council; that the corruptly published London Guardian is not telling the truth about ‘deprivation’ when it carries the following item promoting Tim Archer.... that Archer is NOT against deprivation that Archer and his group are for deprivation... Just like the Big business Crossrail agenda is about adding to existing deprivation, causing new deprivation..., and fro making way for Big Business to deprive, dislocate and destroy the existing ordinary community in the inner city East End of London.... That the Guardian is existing its own stupidity and corruption by allowing Tim Archer to refer to ‘deprivation’ and ‘deprived borough’ without giving the facts on how the Tories ARE the causers of deprivation and discrimination.....KHOODEELAAR! will continue to examine and expose and reject this latest multifaceted lie for the Big Business that the Guardian has peddle just in the past 55 minutes....[To be continued]