EVIDENCE of KHOODEELAAR! comments influencing Times online decision to block online comments
More. here. shortly
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! Updating the evidence on the role of Christine Gilbert in INVITING the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
KHOODEELAAR! Updating the evidence on the role of Christine Gilbert in INVITING the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London
YES! It is the very same Christine Gilbert about whose role for CROSSRAIL hole scam we have been publishing now for 5 years...
More UPDATES here shortly
YES! It is the very same Christine Gilbert about whose role for CROSSRAIL hole scam we have been publishing now for 5 years...
More UPDATES here shortly
Christine Gilbert is forced to confess to the EXISTENCE of a forcefully active culture of falsification within local Councils....
By © Muhammad Haque
1600 Hrs GMT London saturday 6 december 2008
Christine Gilbert is forced to confess to the EXISTENCE of a forcefully active culture of falsification within the local Councils, typified on this occasion by the local council of Haringey.
She says so, according to the following report as published by Times online today [London Saturday 6 December 2008]:
I don’t know of ANY organ of the so-called mainstream British media - or of the so-called mainstream media in Britain - that paid [or is paying even now, two years on] ANY attention to the warning that I published on Indymedia to Tony Blair in 2006 asking him to not go ahead with the appointment of Gilbert to OFSTED.….
It is not obvious from the indications available so far that the MPs - who are staging THEIR own spin around OFSTED next week over the ‘outrage and concern’ that have been expressed after the tragedy of the Baby P began to become publicised - will make any signifiant progress away from the culture of entrenched corruption and self-serving parroting that has for DECADES in Britain dominated the proceedings of so many ‘political’ platforms allegedly acting for accountable public services.
Those forums are as corrupt and or as embarrassingly antidemocratic and thus rendered morally near bankrupt and constitutionally irrelevant as the PARTISAN front bench and the back bench [except two male and a female MPs] on the Brown fronted Blair side exhibited in the UK Houses of Parliament this past week on the matter of the arrest of an MP
Why?
One key reason is the agenda being propelled via the likes of the Guardian news organisation including its online spinning apparatus linked to the perpetuation of the culture of local council bureaucracies.... It is already apparent that there is a ‘salvage Christine `Gilbert’ operation afoot.…. And a deeper lobbying of the MPs is even more ferociously on, I can observe!
"
From Times Online
December 6, 2008
Ofsted claims part responsibility for Baby P's death
Simon Alford
The head of Ofsted has admitted the organisation needs to take some responsibility over the death of Baby P in Haringey and vowed she was "not washing her hands of it".
The 17-month-old boy died in August last year after months of abuse. His mother, her boyfriend and a third man Jason Owen have been convicted of causing or allowing his death.
The toddler was on the child protection register and the family had received numerous visits from social services, in north London, before he died.
In an inspection published in December of last year Ofsted, the independent inspector of children's services, ranked the council's work as "good".
RELATED LINKS
Officials who failed Baby P are forced out
Catalogue of failings ‘leaves others at risk’
The Real Lessons of Baby P
Today Christine Gilbert, the chief inspector for education, children's services and skills, admitted mistakes had been made.
“I think if the grades that we gave last December gave a false assurance we have to take some responsibility for that," she said in an interview with The Guardian.
"That’s one of the reasons that I’m saying we’re looking again at our proposal (to reform inspection). We need to do all we can from our position so I’m not washing my hands of it.”
Ms Gilbert said Haringey Council may have been "hiding behind" false data to alter the ratings of child protection register system.
She also raised concerns that there may be other local authorities that also supplied incorrect information.
In a report published last week in to the death of Baby P Ms Gilbert said: “This inspection has identified serious concerns in relation to the safeguarding of children and young people in Haringey which need to be addressed as a priority.
"Haringey needs to take urgent action to ensure vulnerable children are properly protected.”
1600 Hrs GMT London saturday 6 december 2008
Christine Gilbert is forced to confess to the EXISTENCE of a forcefully active culture of falsification within the local Councils, typified on this occasion by the local council of Haringey.
She says so, according to the following report as published by Times online today [London Saturday 6 December 2008]:
I don’t know of ANY organ of the so-called mainstream British media - or of the so-called mainstream media in Britain - that paid [or is paying even now, two years on] ANY attention to the warning that I published on Indymedia to Tony Blair in 2006 asking him to not go ahead with the appointment of Gilbert to OFSTED.….
It is not obvious from the indications available so far that the MPs - who are staging THEIR own spin around OFSTED next week over the ‘outrage and concern’ that have been expressed after the tragedy of the Baby P began to become publicised - will make any signifiant progress away from the culture of entrenched corruption and self-serving parroting that has for DECADES in Britain dominated the proceedings of so many ‘political’ platforms allegedly acting for accountable public services.
Those forums are as corrupt and or as embarrassingly antidemocratic and thus rendered morally near bankrupt and constitutionally irrelevant as the PARTISAN front bench and the back bench [except two male and a female MPs] on the Brown fronted Blair side exhibited in the UK Houses of Parliament this past week on the matter of the arrest of an MP
Why?
One key reason is the agenda being propelled via the likes of the Guardian news organisation including its online spinning apparatus linked to the perpetuation of the culture of local council bureaucracies.... It is already apparent that there is a ‘salvage Christine `Gilbert’ operation afoot.…. And a deeper lobbying of the MPs is even more ferociously on, I can observe!
"
From Times Online
December 6, 2008
Ofsted claims part responsibility for Baby P's death
Simon Alford
The head of Ofsted has admitted the organisation needs to take some responsibility over the death of Baby P in Haringey and vowed she was "not washing her hands of it".
The 17-month-old boy died in August last year after months of abuse. His mother, her boyfriend and a third man Jason Owen have been convicted of causing or allowing his death.
The toddler was on the child protection register and the family had received numerous visits from social services, in north London, before he died.
In an inspection published in December of last year Ofsted, the independent inspector of children's services, ranked the council's work as "good".
RELATED LINKS
Officials who failed Baby P are forced out
Catalogue of failings ‘leaves others at risk’
The Real Lessons of Baby P
Today Christine Gilbert, the chief inspector for education, children's services and skills, admitted mistakes had been made.
“I think if the grades that we gave last December gave a false assurance we have to take some responsibility for that," she said in an interview with The Guardian.
"That’s one of the reasons that I’m saying we’re looking again at our proposal (to reform inspection). We need to do all we can from our position so I’m not washing my hands of it.”
Ms Gilbert said Haringey Council may have been "hiding behind" false data to alter the ratings of child protection register system.
She also raised concerns that there may be other local authorities that also supplied incorrect information.
In a report published last week in to the death of Baby P Ms Gilbert said: “This inspection has identified serious concerns in relation to the safeguarding of children and young people in Haringey which need to be addressed as a priority.
"Haringey needs to take urgent action to ensure vulnerable children are properly protected.”
KHOODEELAAR! evidential update on the suppression of information by the London EVENING STANDARD that has been acting as a corrupting tout for Xrail
By©Muhammad Haque
0425 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 6 December 2008
KHOODEELAAR! evidential update on the suppression of information by the London EVENING STANDARD that has been acting as a corrupting tout for Big Business, City of London CRASSrail...
We AADHIKARonline reproduce below a 'comment' item as carried on the web site of the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD. This is a historic item. How? Because the item contains an almost credible questioning of Crassrail.
Historic, because the lying EVENING nostandards STANDARd does not publish any factual item critical of the crassly conceived Crassrail... By carrying the item concerned on its web site the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD has broken the lying mould. Albeit just for a few dozen lines!
This is also being published here on AADHIKARonline to reinforce the evidentially sustained argument that KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole scam CAMPAIGN has been making for the past 5 years to the effect that the real reason why the crass Crossrail is being ‘funded’ by Brown, darling et al with £Billions of public money in a deepening climate of economic downturn is nothing whatever to do with the transport needs of London or the transport priorities in and of London... the real reason is that Crossrail is a pretext, a tool, an excuse to enable Big Business and the Military Industrial Complex a scope to loot the £Billions from the public …
This is why ‘views’ and ‘comments’ like the one we are here reproducing [see below and on the linked column to the side of this page] do NOT appear on the web site of the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD.
How do we know this ?
Because as participators in the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail for the past 5 years, we have witnessed the literally thousands of factual items EXPOSING Crossrail hole scam being posted on the KHOODEELAAR! web sites and carried on AADHIARonline... Not one of those has been even remotely acknowledged by the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD.
If there has been any unintended vindication by London EVENING nostandards STANDARD of any of the KHOODEELAAR! analyses, predictions and warnings then we have published the facts of those exceptions on this and on allied web sites and pages.
[To be continued]
"
The anti-roads lobby always say that if you provide a road, then traffic will in time fill it, and negate the short-term improvement; they're right.
Is the same not also true of railway capacity? Given the universal assumption that no private developer would provide Crossrail as a profit-making scheme, should we not stand back and ask why not, rather than assume that the public purse should provide it instead?
Why is it assumed that economic activity, especially in this time of instant communication, consists always in packing in more and more people from a bigger and bigger area into the same small space? If I can do business with my bank online, why can't the bank?
My humble suggestion would be to legislate that contracts of employment made an employee's journey to work a cost of the employer: we'd soon see a radical reassessment of where businesses should be located, and where they should be recruiting their staff. Head offices would downsize, and enlarge their back office functions further out into the suburbs, making life easier for job-sharers, and working mothers. If we could reduce the average commute by one-third, the social gain would be huge with no loss of wealth:family life and local voluntary culture of all sorts would revive.
Crossrail has the feel about it of feeding an addiction,or alleviating a symptom, rather than fixing the disease.
- Mdj, Leyton, e10 london
"
0425 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 6 December 2008
KHOODEELAAR! evidential update on the suppression of information by the London EVENING STANDARD that has been acting as a corrupting tout for Big Business, City of London CRASSrail...
We AADHIKARonline reproduce below a 'comment' item as carried on the web site of the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD. This is a historic item. How? Because the item contains an almost credible questioning of Crassrail.
Historic, because the lying EVENING nostandards STANDARd does not publish any factual item critical of the crassly conceived Crassrail... By carrying the item concerned on its web site the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD has broken the lying mould. Albeit just for a few dozen lines!
This is also being published here on AADHIKARonline to reinforce the evidentially sustained argument that KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole scam CAMPAIGN has been making for the past 5 years to the effect that the real reason why the crass Crossrail is being ‘funded’ by Brown, darling et al with £Billions of public money in a deepening climate of economic downturn is nothing whatever to do with the transport needs of London or the transport priorities in and of London... the real reason is that Crossrail is a pretext, a tool, an excuse to enable Big Business and the Military Industrial Complex a scope to loot the £Billions from the public …
This is why ‘views’ and ‘comments’ like the one we are here reproducing [see below and on the linked column to the side of this page] do NOT appear on the web site of the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD.
How do we know this ?
Because as participators in the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail for the past 5 years, we have witnessed the literally thousands of factual items EXPOSING Crossrail hole scam being posted on the KHOODEELAAR! web sites and carried on AADHIARonline... Not one of those has been even remotely acknowledged by the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD.
If there has been any unintended vindication by London EVENING nostandards STANDARD of any of the KHOODEELAAR! analyses, predictions and warnings then we have published the facts of those exceptions on this and on allied web sites and pages.
[To be continued]
"
The anti-roads lobby always say that if you provide a road, then traffic will in time fill it, and negate the short-term improvement; they're right.
Is the same not also true of railway capacity? Given the universal assumption that no private developer would provide Crossrail as a profit-making scheme, should we not stand back and ask why not, rather than assume that the public purse should provide it instead?
Why is it assumed that economic activity, especially in this time of instant communication, consists always in packing in more and more people from a bigger and bigger area into the same small space? If I can do business with my bank online, why can't the bank?
My humble suggestion would be to legislate that contracts of employment made an employee's journey to work a cost of the employer: we'd soon see a radical reassessment of where businesses should be located, and where they should be recruiting their staff. Head offices would downsize, and enlarge their back office functions further out into the suburbs, making life easier for job-sharers, and working mothers. If we could reduce the average commute by one-third, the social gain would be huge with no loss of wealth:family life and local voluntary culture of all sorts would revive.
Crossrail has the feel about it of feeding an addiction,or alleviating a symptom, rather than fixing the disease.
- Mdj, Leyton, e10 london
"
KHOODEELAAR! evidential update on the suppression of information by the London EVENING STANDARD that has been acting as a corrupting tout for Xrail
"
The anti-roads lobby always say that if you provide a road, then traffic will in time fill it, and negate the short-term improvement; they're right.
Is the same not also true of railway capacity? Given the universal assumption that no private developer would provide Crossrail as a profit-making scheme, should we not stand back and ask why not, rather than assume that the public purse should provide it instead?
Why is it assumed that economic activity, especially in this time of instant communication, consists always in packing in more and more people from a bigger and bigger area into the same small space? If I can do business with my bank online, why can't the bank?
My humble suggestion would be to legislate that contracts of employment made an employee's journey to work a cost of the employer: we'd soon see a radical reassessment of where businesses should be located, and where they should be recruiting their staff. Head offices would downsize, and enlarge their back office functions further out into the suburbs, making life easier for job-sharers, and working mothers. If we could reduce the average commute by one-third, the social gain would be huge with no loss of wealth:family life and local voluntary culture of all sorts would revive.
Crossrail has the feel about it of feeding an addiction,or alleviating a symptom, rather than fixing the disease.
"
The anti-roads lobby always say that if you provide a road, then traffic will in time fill it, and negate the short-term improvement; they're right.
Is the same not also true of railway capacity? Given the universal assumption that no private developer would provide Crossrail as a profit-making scheme, should we not stand back and ask why not, rather than assume that the public purse should provide it instead?
Why is it assumed that economic activity, especially in this time of instant communication, consists always in packing in more and more people from a bigger and bigger area into the same small space? If I can do business with my bank online, why can't the bank?
My humble suggestion would be to legislate that contracts of employment made an employee's journey to work a cost of the employer: we'd soon see a radical reassessment of where businesses should be located, and where they should be recruiting their staff. Head offices would downsize, and enlarge their back office functions further out into the suburbs, making life easier for job-sharers, and working mothers. If we could reduce the average commute by one-third, the social gain would be huge with no loss of wealth:family life and local voluntary culture of all sorts would revive.
Crossrail has the feel about it of feeding an addiction,or alleviating a symptom, rather than fixing the disease.
"