KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole scam CHALLENGING the Mail on Sunday peddling an alleged ban on 'New Year Honours' by the Crown and against the City of London! It is NOT true!
By © Muhammad Haque
1815 Hrs GMT London Sunday 28 December 2008-12-28
The Mail on Sunday [28 December 2008] is publishing utter rubbish by putting on its front page this heading, "QUEEN’S CITY HONOURS BAN"
It is ALSO WRONG, for the n’th time, to misrepresent in the same piece carried into an inside page the concept of ‘leftwing journalist’ and refer to the former staff member on Time Out and City Limits without making it clear that the campaigning journalist Duncan Campbell is NOT the one who is linked with the actress Julie Christie.
The Mail on Sunday itself fawns over barons, peers and assorted other recipients of the Crown’s ‘honours’. The phrase to denounce the dishonesty in the Mail on Sunday about these matters is not available in the known vocabulary.
What the Mail on Sunday is doing is reinforcing the entitlement of the City of London elements to receive some sort of honours.
And in the accompanying write up, the Mail on Sunday totally fails to get to grips with the real problem that the City of London represents and is.
It fails to mention the knighthood that was PROCURED for Crossrail scam-peddler Michael Snyder earlier in the year.
Thus the Mail on Sunday, despite the false headline splashed on the front-page, fails to identify the ‘ban’ as a ban at all…
The Crown and especially the Crown prerogative and all the other undemocratic and unconstitutional ‘powers’ that are operated by the bureaucracy stationed at No 10 Downing Street, VERY MUCH NEED the fiddlers the dissemblers, the deceivers, and the profiteers, looters and the usurers known as the ‘City of London’.
The economics of fraud and corruption that the City of London typifies is also the cult that is worshipped by the likes of the proprietors of BOTH the Mail on Sunday and of the Times newspaper… which promoted Michael Snyder in April; 2008 a few weeks before he was confirmed as a Knight……… And the Murdoch Times [the 'Business' touting operation based at the Times] praised Snyder as the ‘Crossrail’ ‘champion…
[To be continued]
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Sunday, December 28, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! Updating on the 'role' on Crossrail 'by' the 'local' MP ]Bethnal Green and Bow] George Galloway
By Muhammad Haque
1750 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 28 December 2008
The main updater point is to ask: what has the 'local' MP for Bethnal Green and Bow been 'saying or 'doing' about ‘Crossrail’?
The researches that KHOODEELAAR! has been able to carry out in the time between Sunday 21 December 2008 and today, Sunday 28 December 2008, show that ON THE RECORD - nay, on the PUBLISHED RECORDS- George Galloway as not been noticeably active at all on the subject of Crossrail...
One research organisation tested by KHOODEELAAR! Research unit found Galloway being reported as having ‘signed’ 36 ‘Early day Motions’.
In 2005 when the ‘Crossrail Bill’ was being processed through the UK House of Commons by the then UK Transport Secretary Alistair Darling [now the UK Finance secretary or the ‘lead’ cabinet minister fronting financial affairs], and less than two months after the [May 2005] General Election at which Galloway was successful as the candidate for Bethnal green and Bow, he did oppose the Crossrail Bill.
He also spoke in opposition to the same Bill on 19 July 2008.
Khoodeelaar! has already recorded that fact and elaborated on it on more than 100 separate public and published occasions…
What happened between 19 July 2005 and 19 July 2006?
That was also the period which contains the highest number of references by or on behalf of George Galloway as the MP for the relevant constituency [the 'relevance' is to Khoodeelaar! that defends the immediate parliamentary constituency of Bethnal green and Bow as against the Crossrail; Big Business agenda] and on the topic of Crossrail.
After he appeared before the House of Commons ‘Crossrail Bill Select committee’ [in June 2006], coincidentally chaired by Alan Meale who addressed Galloway in positive terms and acknowledged a long acquaintance with him, Galloway has not made any comment, speech or statement on the well-defined context and subject of the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London, that can be descried as objectively significant. Or any comment or statement on Crossrail that can be objectively described as significant.
In fact the recently very favourable coverage that Galloway has been receiving in the ‘East London Idiotiser’ has not included any mentionable reference to Crossrail that Galloway has made. This is borne out by the absence of any reference to Crossrail in any of the items published about Galloway as ‘the local MP’ for the constituency concerned by the Idiotiser or their associated web site [which was launched not long ago]..
The frequency of complementary contents appearing in the ‘East London Idiotiser’ about Galloway is in stark contrast with the Idiotiser’s publishing agenda up until the middle of 2007.
[To be continued]
1750 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 28 December 2008
The main updater point is to ask: what has the 'local' MP for Bethnal Green and Bow been 'saying or 'doing' about ‘Crossrail’?
The researches that KHOODEELAAR! has been able to carry out in the time between Sunday 21 December 2008 and today, Sunday 28 December 2008, show that ON THE RECORD - nay, on the PUBLISHED RECORDS- George Galloway as not been noticeably active at all on the subject of Crossrail...
One research organisation tested by KHOODEELAAR! Research unit found Galloway being reported as having ‘signed’ 36 ‘Early day Motions’.
In 2005 when the ‘Crossrail Bill’ was being processed through the UK House of Commons by the then UK Transport Secretary Alistair Darling [now the UK Finance secretary or the ‘lead’ cabinet minister fronting financial affairs], and less than two months after the [May 2005] General Election at which Galloway was successful as the candidate for Bethnal green and Bow, he did oppose the Crossrail Bill.
He also spoke in opposition to the same Bill on 19 July 2008.
Khoodeelaar! has already recorded that fact and elaborated on it on more than 100 separate public and published occasions…
What happened between 19 July 2005 and 19 July 2006?
That was also the period which contains the highest number of references by or on behalf of George Galloway as the MP for the relevant constituency [the 'relevance' is to Khoodeelaar! that defends the immediate parliamentary constituency of Bethnal green and Bow as against the Crossrail; Big Business agenda] and on the topic of Crossrail.
After he appeared before the House of Commons ‘Crossrail Bill Select committee’ [in June 2006], coincidentally chaired by Alan Meale who addressed Galloway in positive terms and acknowledged a long acquaintance with him, Galloway has not made any comment, speech or statement on the well-defined context and subject of the Crossrail hole attacks on the East End of London, that can be descried as objectively significant. Or any comment or statement on Crossrail that can be objectively described as significant.
In fact the recently very favourable coverage that Galloway has been receiving in the ‘East London Idiotiser’ has not included any mentionable reference to Crossrail that Galloway has made. This is borne out by the absence of any reference to Crossrail in any of the items published about Galloway as ‘the local MP’ for the constituency concerned by the Idiotiser or their associated web site [which was launched not long ago]..
The frequency of complementary contents appearing in the ‘East London Idiotiser’ about Galloway is in stark contrast with the Idiotiser’s publishing agenda up until the middle of 2007.
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail, no to big business greed business agenda of making East End of London poorer……. [444.b]
By© Muhammad Haque
1248 Hrs GMT London Sunday 28 December 2008
Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail, no to big business greed business agenda of making East End of London poorer……. [444]
The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has again been vindicated. This time it has come from a widely reported statement jointly made by a group of Anglican clergymen.... They have expressed serious concern at the politics of debts-creation!
Debts-creation is not the phrase they used. But that is what described what they have said..
At last, we say, a group of persons ordinarily associated with morality in society has come out and said it about Gordon Brown's regime...
KHOODEELAAR! has made the argument, in our written and other communications to Gordon Brown starting in February 2004…. And we have made this argument in detailed evidential, factual demonstrations for the past five years on daily sometimes hourly bases
The ‘same’ applies even more vigorously with the return of Peter Mandelson
One of the faked scenarios is of course with CrossRail agenda of Big Business and how Gordon Brown's regime has been 'misled' [this is putting it generously, as is the norm without ethical spstson] by Big Business touts in London to make funding commitments running into Billions of Sterling of money that ordinary people will have to pay.
The key fallacy in the Brown commitment of public funding to the Crossrail scam is in the fact that it is not needed by the public. It is not the public's priority..... It is not the priority by the standards of even the transport for London's own analysis.... It will NOT produce the economic benefit that the touts keep placing before the people in the propaganda…
They have never, and Gordon has never, stated where the economic case for Crossrail is.
Or where the 'economic benefits' will come from...... Before Boris Johnson became snared into the lobby and toutery for Big Business forces rtating in the UK and via the UK state agencies and Departments, Ken Livingstone was the mouthpiece for the same elements....
What Livingstone mouthed had been scripted for him by his allies and prompters.... The same has BECOME and
been the case with Boris Johnson..
The one serious problem that remains with Johnson’s repetition
of Livingstone’s
fakery for CrossRail is this: There is no evidence to support the ‘case’ they make on their fakery….
Where is the evidence for saying that Crossrail is needed?
The cost of CrossRail is a clear case of deliberate debt-creation where there is no need for it… money...in the Billions of pounds that Brown is going to put into CrossRail
at a time when the essential services that the ECONIOMY needs and relies on are being neglected ....
Health
Housing
Education
And
EXISTING TRANSPORT infrastructure
[To be continued]
1248 Hrs GMT London Sunday 28 December 2008
Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail, no to big business greed business agenda of making East End of London poorer……. [444]
The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign has again been vindicated. This time it has come from a widely reported statement jointly made by a group of Anglican clergymen.... They have expressed serious concern at the politics of debts-creation!
Debts-creation is not the phrase they used. But that is what described what they have said..
At last, we say, a group of persons ordinarily associated with morality in society has come out and said it about Gordon Brown's regime...
KHOODEELAAR! has made the argument, in our written and other communications to Gordon Brown starting in February 2004…. And we have made this argument in detailed evidential, factual demonstrations for the past five years on daily sometimes hourly bases
The ‘same’ applies even more vigorously with the return of Peter Mandelson
One of the faked scenarios is of course with CrossRail agenda of Big Business and how Gordon Brown's regime has been 'misled' [this is putting it generously, as is the norm without ethical spstson] by Big Business touts in London to make funding commitments running into Billions of Sterling of money that ordinary people will have to pay.
The key fallacy in the Brown commitment of public funding to the Crossrail scam is in the fact that it is not needed by the public. It is not the public's priority..... It is not the priority by the standards of even the transport for London's own analysis.... It will NOT produce the economic benefit that the touts keep placing before the people in the propaganda…
They have never, and Gordon has never, stated where the economic case for Crossrail is.
Or where the 'economic benefits' will come from...... Before Boris Johnson became snared into the lobby and toutery for Big Business forces rtating in the UK and via the UK state agencies and Departments, Ken Livingstone was the mouthpiece for the same elements....
What Livingstone mouthed had been scripted for him by his allies and prompters.... The same has BECOME and
been the case with Boris Johnson..
The one serious problem that remains with Johnson’s repetition
of Livingstone’s
fakery for CrossRail is this: There is no evidence to support the ‘case’ they make on their fakery….
Where is the evidence for saying that Crossrail is needed?
The cost of CrossRail is a clear case of deliberate debt-creation where there is no need for it… money...in the Billions of pounds that Brown is going to put into CrossRail
at a time when the essential services that the ECONIOMY needs and relies on are being neglected ....
Health
Housing
Education
And
EXISTING TRANSPORT infrastructure
[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail, no to big business greed business agenda of making East End of London poorer……. [444]
Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail, no to big business greed business agenda of making East End of London poorer……. [444]
Wanted! a daily reminder of the need to tell the truth! Now even the irresponsible GUARDIAN echoes KHOODEELAAR! No to debts...
Wanted! a daily reminder of the need to tell the truth! Now even the Daily Mail group echoes KHOODEELAAR! as published by AADHIKAR
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Morality has GOT TO BE at the heart of any responsible political policy - and practice
What KHOODEELAAR! has been saying is being vindicated even by a group of Anglican clergy!