1930 GMT
London
Sunday
06 December 2009
Editor © Muhammad Haque
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! The ‘Baroness Young' 'controversy' merely proves the dishonesty at the centre of Quangos, publicly-paid-for spin bodies.
And going by the evidence of the failure of MPs to expose these outfits, it is no wonder that the UK 'management of the economy' is in the state that it is in.
On ‘education’, on ‘health’, on ‘jobs, employment, pensions’ and on poverty creation, the UK MPs are manifestly silent, inactive.
As they are on real deterioration of universally understood and recognised freedom, liberty and accountability.
As published by the BBC on their Andrew Marr/David Frost slot this morning [Sunday 06 December 2009], there is a tangible component in the so-called ‘election strategy’ which is based on the ‘glamourising’ of Sarah Brown. This is sure sign of desperation on the part of whoever is ‘advising’ and ‘devising’ there.
Had Gordon Brown the democratic strengths in his ‘regime’ he would have highlighted and emphasised those. He has not got those. And he can’t blame Blair for that. In the period since he got into the ‘official address’ after the universally identified role of Blair as a most unfit incumbent, Brown has done nothing to substantiate his previous claim to be a ‘rival’ to Blair.
It is fast becoming confirmed that Brown is even less significant than Blair’s then propagandists and spinmeisters had painted G Brown to be.
And in this context, Cherie Booth’s often reported revulsion aimed at Gordon Brown [during Blair’s tenure at No 10 Downing Street] becomes unavoidable as a contextual point of reference.
Especially so when the BBC allowed Janine di Giovanni to actually link the [still attempted and ‘uncriticised’] ‘glamourisation of Sarah Brown under the de facto influence of Carla Bruni Sarkozy. The operation in the British election ‘season’ of the 'Carla Bruni Sarkozy' 'factor' as Ms di Giovanni put it.
Incredible as it is, there was no logical extension to the reference and so there was no expression of views about what that said about the ‘British vah-loos’ of which Gordon Brown so often utters emptily, especially when he perceives the audience to be ‘non-British’ and therefore ‘less’ worthy of claims to ANY values!
The ordinarily French-resident Ms di Giovanni did not comment on the previous week’s news stories about Sarkozy's claims that France had taken steps enabling it to control the British financial services [what 'services'!?] [Big Business and looters'] centre the ‘City of London’.
For the BBC to allow that subject to be examined would be too much. The David Frosted Andrew Marr slot is not intended to allow serious discussion. Let alone admission of he truth about the core of the crisis-ridden culture.
Like the Frost-Marr BBC slots, the British Parliament is similarly subdued, used as a medium for polishing lies and hiding the truth.
What is most striking about the stooged state of the British Parliament is the fact that it is being used to give appearance of legality to steps that are pushing the country into debts and a state of [what KHOODEELAAR! Is asserting is bound to be a] perennial economic morass. With the attendant social implications for the worse.
It thus follows that the wasteful, CRASSLY conceived and crassly peddled Big Business agenda Crossrail scam would not have even reached this stage had the UK MPs been doing their job.
So the contradiction of Alistair Darling that we have been exposing as based on his utterances as shown on the BBC thins morning [Sunday 06 December 2009], is not unrelated to the level of the UK MPs' competence and rigour and diligence. All three concepts are really absent from the conduct of the MPs.
No wonder that even Darling doesn't know which of the headlines about the debts-ridden dire economy he should believe.
Confusion is not a good place for the so-called Chancellor of the Exchequer to be.
And he was blatantly confused in his utterances as shown on the BBC this morning.
[To be continued]