Saturday, January 30, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! AGAIN advising Boris Johnson to remember what we had told him in 2007: Set a standard that is higher than the one exhibited by Ken Livingstone. Faking on about 'exempting' small businesses on CROSSRAIL penalty while grandstanding it in Davos is not good enough. Boris has made a totally false claim in uttering that he has let off 80 percent of London businesses over the CRASSrail tax. Boris must come clean and confess all. Small businesses in London are being penalised by other, mostly secret [that is unpublicised, unaudited, unaccountable], back doors.


2038 GMT
London
Saturday
30 January 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque


KHOODEELAAR!  AGAIN advising Boris Johnson to remember what we had told him in 2007: Set a standard that is higher than the one exhibited by Ken Livingstone. Faking on about 'exempting' small businesses on CROSSRAIL penalty while grandstanding it in Davos is not good enough. Boris has made a totally false claim in uttering that he has let off 80 percent of London businesses over the CRASSrail tax. Boris must come clean and confess all. Small businesses in London are being penalised by other, mostly secret [that is unpublicised, unaudited, unaccountable], back doors. 

And Boris knows it. He is the one that is doing that. So he must withdraw his Davos boast and confess that he is attacking small businesses in London for CRASSrail Big Biz  agenda.


 Boris also must show what the point is of his being the ‘democratic’ component on the MPA. What is democratic about the status quo? Boris must also explain how he squares his alleged wisdom on bankers with the reality of the bankruptcy of the financial life of most ordinary people in London as caused by the City of London and their allies in the financial sector. Boris cannot make utterances and then expect to be let off from the duty he has to discharge and to be seen to be discharging accountability to the people of London in whose name he assumes and stays in the post in the Onion in London SE1


[To be continued]


KHOODEELAAR! This morning [Saturday 30 January 2010] observing the completion of SIX years of continuous campaign against Crossrail Big Business agenda attacks on the ordinary community and society in the inner city East End of London. Conceptual, constitutional, democratic, ethical, economic, environmental, legal campaign against all that Big Business MIC agenda scam Crossrail entails, typifies and represents. In defence of the ordinary people in the immediate East End of London…Our campaign against Crossrail hole scam attacks began on Saturday 31 January 2004 with a public meeting held at a location in the Hanbury Street London E1. Six years later, we can record this: We have stopped the Crossrail hole attacks on the immediate area... We have to stop the other attacks and violations that are still continuing....



0700 [0645] GMT
 London 
Saturday 
30 January 2010. 
Editor © Muhammad Haque. 

KHOODEELAAR!  This morning [Saturday 30 January 2010] observing the completion of SIX years of continuous campaign against Crossrail Big Business agenda attacks on the ordinary community and society in the inner city East End of London. Conceptual, constitutional, democratic, ethical, economic, environmental, legal campaign against all that Big Business MIC agenda scam Crossrail entails, typifies and represents. In defence of the ordinary people in the immediate East End of London…Our campaign against Crossrail hole scam attacks began on Saturday 31 January 2004 with a public meeting held at a location in the Hanbury Street London E1. Six years later, we can record this: We have stopped the Crossrail hole attacks on the immediate area... We have to stop the other attacks and violations that are still continuing.... We here publish a piece which we had published last year on the occasion of the ignorant London EVENING STANDARD going OTT and wobbly on Anne McElvoy's  fabricated, careeristically rhetorical knees with obscene excitement over the image being created by their grotesquely patronising Obama as he was being formally installed in the USA White House.. All the McElvoys along with their designated,. approved 'ethnic surrogates' in place across the UK agencies, institutions and operational outfits were equally on display showing their stupidity, ignorance and racist patronage... They compared Obama to a USA 'Kennedy' [JF and Robert] .  And they even cited corrupting ethnicity linked 'names' from the list of approved surrogates as possible 'British Obamas'. As they did so, they persisted with their violations of the universally understood and recognisable human rights of the main bodies of the violated peoples in the UK the disproportionate numerical majority of whom were the people who would  and did LOOK like the 'British Obamas' or their immediate race and ethnicity linked relatives and families.....KHOODEELAAR! campaign is about exposing the patronisers. Stooge-makers’ lies and by exposing their lies also about stopping their lies and the effects of their lies… on the communities, on the economies, on the environments and on the mental frame and mentality of the peoples targeted for institutional, individual violations… We say again:  No to Big Business Military Industrial Complex agenda Crossrail scam and everything that resembles that scam...[1].

[To be continued]



Historic day from deprived East London: Voicing off on Black Kennedys!
AADHIKARonline in association with KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business CROSSRAIL | 20.01.2009 14:43 | Anti-racism | Indymedia | Social Struggles
The historic thing about today, Tuesday 20 January 2009 in East London any way is the availability of the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD. It seems that the title is still being published in English! And it is still lying.. It carries a fantastic piece by Anne McElvoy, who claims to have foreseen as long as 4 years ago that Obama was the Black Kennedy!



By © Muhammad Haque
1435 Hrs GMT
London
Tuesday 20 January 2009



The historic thing about today, Tuesday 20 January 2009 in East London any way is the availability of the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD. It seems that the title is still being published in English! And it is still lying.. It carries a fantastic piece by Anne McElvoy, who claims to have foreseen as long as 4 years ago that Obama was the Black Kennedy! Almost by coincidence, the year 2004 which McElvoy cites, was also the years when the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Big Business Crossrail hole scam began in East London. McElvoy, who is the executive editor, does not see us in the ordinary community, and she does not recognize any of us in that campaign. Now we know why! For in 2004 we did not wear the Obama masks and we did not come across to McElvoy as anything like any sort of a Kennedy!



Inner London deprived Tower Hamlets is recognized as such. In the words of a former ‘MP’, Tower Hamlets is deprived. Most deprived.

The fact that successions of post-holders in the name of the people so deprived have been among the cause do the deprivation keeps escaping the ‘centre o awareness’ of these time-servers.

In the words of a former ‘leader’ on the plastic local council, Tower Hamlets is most deprived. In the experience of most people in the area known as Tower Hamlets, there is hardly any democracy. And there is such a backlog of claims against the local council.

And countless lists of complaints against assortments of ‘politicos’ who seek and make all manner of careers in the name of the same deprived Borough and the people.

Most of the peoples’ claims against the Council and against other seekers and holders of elected posts [and their paid tributaries and sub-agencies, all paid in the name of the people] are on grounds that the wrongdoing Council and the equally wrongdoing, failing politicos are continuing to deprive the community...

There is no redress against these failures. In fact there is not meant to be any redress.

Tower Hamlets, in so far as the ordinary population here are concerned, is intended to deteriorate in deprivation.. This suits the core the clique that is in ACTUAL control of the deprived Borough ‘Tower Hamlets Council’. The difference between the formal control and actual control is seriously implied here.

They use the festering deprivation statistics as a STRONG GROUND for their bargaining with the UK central Govt. and through them with the EU.

Poverty is a good business tool for the career makers. No wonder they do what they can to keep Tower Hamlets in poverty! 


  .     




    follow me on Twitter


    KHOODEELAAR! This morning [Saturday 30 January 2010] observing the completion of SIX years of continuous campaign against Crossrail Big Business agenda attacks on the ordinary community and society in the inner city East End of London. Conceptual, constitutional, democratic, ethical, economic, environmental, legal campaign against all that Big Business MIC agenda scam Crossrail entails, typifies and represents. In defence of the ordinary people in the immediate East End of London


    0645 GMT
    London
    Saturday
    30 January 2010

    Editor © Muhammad Haque


    KHOODEELAAR!  This morning [Saturday 30 January 2010] observing the completion of SIX years of continuous campaign against Crossrail Big Business agenda attacks on the ordinary community and society in the inner city East End of London. Conceptual, constitutional, democratic, ethical, economic, environmental, legal campaign against all that Big Business MIC agenda scam Crossrail entails, typifies and represents. In defence of the ordinary people in the immediate East End of London…Our campaign against Crossrail hole scam attacks began on Saturday 31 January 2004 with a public meeting held at a location in the Hanbury Street London E1. Six years later, we can record this: We have stopped the Crossrail hole attacks on the immediate area... We have to stop the other attacks and violations that are still continuing.... We here publish a piece which we had published last year on the occasion of the ignorant London EVENING STANDARD going OTT and wobbly on Anne McElvoy's  fabricated, careeristically rhetorical knees with obscene excitement over the image being created by their grotesquely patronising Obama as he was being ofrmally installed in the USA White House.. All the McElvoys along with their designated,. approved 'ethnic surrogates' in place across the UK agencies, institutions and operational outfits were equally on display showing their stupidity, ignorance and racist patronage... They compared Obama to a USA 'Kennedy' [JF and Robert] .  And they even cited corrupting ethnicity linked 'names' from the list of approved surrogates as possible 'British Obamas'. As they did so, they persisted with their violations of the universally understood and recognisable human rights of the main bodies of the violated peoples in the UK the disproportionate numerical majority of whom were the people who would  and did LOOK like the 'British Obamas' or their immediate race and ethnicity linked relatives and families.....KHOODEELAAR! campaign is about exposing the patronisers. Stooge-makers’ lies and by exposing their lies also about stopping their lies and the effects of their lies… on the communities, on the economies, on the environments and on the mental frame and mentality of the peoples targeted ofr institutional, individual violations… We say again:  No to Big Business Military Industrial Complex agenda Crossrail scam and everything that resembles that scam...[1].

    [To be continued]



    Historic day from deprived East London: Voicing off on Black Kennedys!
    AADHIKARonline in association with KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business CROSSRAIL | 20.01.2009 14:43 | Anti-racism | Indymedia | Social Struggles
    The historic thing about today, Tuesday 20 January 2009 in East London any way is the availability of the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD. It seems that the title is still being published in English! And it is still lying.. It carries a fantastic piece by Anne McElvoy, who claims to have foreseen as long as 4 years ago that Obama was the Black Kennedy!



    By © Muhammad Haque
    1435 Hrs GMT
    London
    Tuesday 20 January 2009



    The historic thing about today, Tuesday 20 January 2009 in East London any way is the availability of the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD. It seems that the title is still being published in English! And it is still lying.. It carries a fantastic piece by Anne McElvoy, who claims to have foreseen as long as 4 years ago that Obama was the Black Kennedy! Almost by coincidence, the year 2004 which McElvoy cites, was also the years when the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Big Business Crossrail hole scam began in East London. McElvoy, who is the executive editor, does not see us in the ordinary community, and she does not recognize any of us in that campaign. Now we know why! For in 2004 we did not wear the Obama masks and we did not come across to McElvoy as anything like any sort of a Kennedy!



    Inner London deprived Tower Hamlets is recognized as such. In the words of a former ‘MP’, Tower Hamlets is deprived. Most deprived.

    The fact that successions of post-holders in the name of the people so deprived have been among the cause do the deprivation keeps escaping the ‘centre o awareness’ of these time-servers.

    In the words of a former ‘leader’ on the plastic local council, Tower Hamlets is most deprived. In the experience of most people in the area known as Tower Hamlets, there is hardly any democracy. And there is such a backlog of claims against the local council.

    And countless lists of complaints against assortments of ‘politicos’ who seek and make all manner of careers in the name of the same deprived Borough and the people.

    Most of the peoples’ claims against the Council and against other seekers and holders of elected posts [and their paid tributaries and sub-agencies, all paid in the name of the people] are on grounds that the wrongdoing Council and the equally wrongdoing, failing politicos are continuing to deprive the community...

    There is no redress against these failures. In fact there is not meant to be any redress.

    Tower Hamlets, in so far as the ordinary population here are concerned, is intended to deteriorate in deprivation.. This suits the core the clique that is in ACTUAL control of the deprived Borough ‘Tower Hamlets Council’. The difference between the formal control and actual control is seriously implied here.

    They use the festering deprivation statistics as a STRONG GROUND for their bargaining with the UK central Govt. and through them with the EU.

    Poverty is a good business tool for the career makers. No wonder they do what they can to keep Tower Hamlets in poverty! 


      .     



    Friday, January 29, 2010

    KHOODEELAAR! noting that Boris Johnson, who 'pleaded' to the Big Biz bankers at Davos yesterday, treated ordinary London businesses with contempt as he let Simon Milton issue additional burdens on them and forced them to pay for CRASSrail ..


    1200 GMT
    London
    Friday
    29 January 2010

    Editor © Muhammad Haque

    KHOODEELAAR! noting that Boris Johnson, who 'pleaded' to the Big Biz bankers at Davos yesterday, treated ordinary London businesses with contempt as he let Simon Milton issue additional burdens on them and forced them to pay for CRASSrail ..


    [To be continued]







    Boris Johnson ignores pleas as firms hit with maximum Crossrail tax
    Ross Lydall and Pippa Crerar
    29.01.10



    Thousands of firms will see their business rates increased by a minimum of £1,100 a year after decided to press ahead with the maximum possible levy to help fund Crossrail.
    The Mayor has rejected pleas to ease the introduction of the levy, which will be imposed for up to 31 years from April across all 33 boroughs, to avoid placing extra costs on businesses struggling to recover from the recession.
    But Mr Johnson has exempted a further 4,000 small firms from the fee by raising the rateable value threshold of businesses eligible for the charge from £50,000 to £55,000.
    The fee, which will help fund £4.1 billion towards the £15.9 billion commuter line, will be paid by 46,500 medium and large firms — half based in the City or Around 80 per cent of London firms will be unaffected.
    Mr Johnson said he was “acutely aware” of the effect of the recession, but the funding for Crossrail “must be protected”. There remains the fear that the line could fall victim to a cost-cutting Tory government.
    The line will run from Maidenhead and in the west to Shenfield and in the east. It is due to open in 2017 and will boost London's rail capacity by 10 per cent.
    Mr Johnson said: “I cannot overstate the importance of this rail project. The Tube and rail network will heave a huge, collective sigh of relief as breathing room is created on previously packed-to-capacity commuter lines.”
    City Hall estimates that around 23,000 of the firms paying the charge will pay £2,500 or less each year. Charities and sports clubs will pay 20 per cent. The levy will also be imposed on empty buildings.
    Initially the Mayor only planned to impose the charge on 41,000 firms but a revaluation increased the rateable values of thousands of firms, taking them above the £55,000 threshold.
    Business groups welcomed the Mayor's decision. of London First, which represents the capital's leading businesses, said: “This small concession shows he has listened. It's not as much as we would have liked — we would have preferred a small concession for all contributors — but it does demonstrate that Boris is sympathetic to our concerns.”






    follow me on Twitter


    KHOODEELAAR! noting the REUTERS news agency paraphrasing the FT as Boris Johnson takes advantage of the convenient 'news day' [preoccupied with Tony Bliar's Chilcot brazenness, due to start in 4 hours from now, at 0930 GMT Friday 29 January 2010] to announce penalty for London ordinary businesses which Boris is lumbering with 25 year long tax for CRASSrail scam [1]




    0530 GMT

    London
    Friday
    29 January 2010


    Editor© Muhammad Haque

    KHOODEELAAR! noting the REUTERS news agency paraphrasing the FT as Boris Johnson takes advantage of the convenient 'news day' [preoccupied with Tony Bliar's Chilcot brazenness, due to start in 4 hours from now, at 0930 GMT Friday 29 January 2010] to announce penalty for London ordinary businesses which Boris is lumbering with 25 year long tax for CRASSrail scam [1]


    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE60S00H20100129?type=marketsNews





    MAXIMUM CROSSRAIL LEVY TO HIT COMPANIES


    London mayor Boris Johnson will announce plans on Friday for the capital's businesses to pay the maximum extra levy to fund Crossrail for the next quarter of a century. Johnson's plan to impose the two pence in the pound business rate supplement from April comes in spite of warnings that the tax could damage companies' chances of recovering from recession. The levy is being introduced to finance 4.1 billion pounds of the Greater London Authority's contribution to the 16 billion pound Crossrail scheme.


    KHOODEELAAR! TOLD London FT for six years: Crossrail is crass. Crossrail will stifle business. It will be debts-causing, wasteful. Now, the FT confesses! Yet it fails to correlate all key facts and events. Causes, effect and costs


    0045 GMT
    London
    Friday
    29 January 2010

    Editor © Muhammad Haque


    KHOODEELAAR! TOLD London FT for six years: Crossrail is crass. Crossrail will stifle business. It will be debts-causing, wasteful. Now, the FT confesses!  Yet it fails to correlate all key facts and events. Causes, effect and costs
    [To be continued]

    Business faces maximum Crossrail levy
    By Bob Sherwood, London and South-East Correspondent
    Published: January 29 2010 00:03 | Last updated: January 29 2010 00:03
    London businesses will pay the maximum extra levy to fund Crossrail for the next 25 years, in spite of warnings that the tax will hurt companies’ chances of recovering from recession.
    Boris Johnson, London’s mayor, will announce his decision on Friday to impose the maximum allowable 2p in the pound business rate supplement from April, coinciding with a big jump in rates for many central London companies.
    EDITOR’S CHOICE
    Business organisations had advised him to hold back from levying the full rate, which is being introduced to finance £4.1bn of the Greater London Authority’s contribution to the £16bn Crossrail scheme.
    The British Retail Consortium warned last year that there would be “considerable opposition” to the levy, while London First, which represents large businesses and has been a champion of Crossrail funding, urged the mayor to set the supplement at less than the maximum and phase it in.
    But the only concession the mayor will make is to raise the threshold for the increase to businesses with a rateable value of £55,000 from £50,000. He said that would exempt up to 4,000 properties, excusing more small and medium-sized businesses from the levy. However, many of those properties will be occupied by public sector and not-for-profit bodies such as schools, meaning the number of companies excused will be lower than the 4,000 headline figure.
    The timing of the supplement has been a problem for the mayor as a national revaluation, also taking effect in April, has pushed up average London rates while those in almost every other region have fallen.
    But Sir Simon Milton, the mayor’s chief of staff, said the rate revaluation would raise up to £20m more than budgeted, which allowed the mayor to increase the threshold to help more small businesses. He denied that delaying the levy or phasing it in was a realistic option as it would increase borrowing costs. He told the Financial Times: “Delay will end up costing more.”
    Advisers indicated that the mayor was determined not to renege on London’s commitment to pay for Crossrail for fear a future government might also backtrack on the deal. Sir Simon added: “When one part of the funding agreement starts to get unstitched, you are increasing the risk of unstitching the rest.”
    The supplement will continue for 24-31 years. As businesses in the core districts of Westminster, the City and Canary Wharf have higher rateable values, those companies in boroughs with Crossrail stations will automatically contribute more to the cost of the rail project. Those in Westminster are expected to contribute £67m towards the £219m raised in 2010-11.
    Mr Johnson said: “I understand that in these difficult times the additional business rate will be a greater burden to our smaller businesses.
    “Our final proposals now set the right balance by exempting a further 4,000 of those firms that initially faced a disproportionate burden to those larger organisations in the centre, the West End and the financial districts that will benefit significantly from Crossrail and should therefore pay the greatest share of the construction costs.’”
    Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.


      follow me on Twitter


      Thursday, January 28, 2010

      KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Boris Johnson is still being allowed by the BBC to fake on about the Big Business Crossrail scam.



      2150 GMT
      London
      Wednesday
      27 January 2010

      Editor © Muhammad Haque


      AADHIKARonline reporting on BBCLondonNews still not doing an overdue update on the CRASSrole played by the latest holder of the post at the Onion in London SE1 Wednesday 27 January2010



      follow me on Twitter


      Wednesday, January 27, 2010

      KHOODEELAAR! telling you how the OTT-hyped BBC 'Business Editor' has got his Davos facts ridiculously wrong. He has promoted B Obama into the House of Peers, calling him 'Lord Obama'! With that kind of propensity, redolent of a mental prostration in the direction of the ‘White House’ [!!!] is it any wonder that Peter Goldsmith had deferred to secret USA 'advice' and ignored his duties to the [token] UK Parliament! Given the UK parliament’s stooge role in peddling Big Business CrossRail Bill, it is no wonder whatever!


      2250 GMT
      London
      Wednesday
      27 January 2010

      Editor © Muhammad Haque

      KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Boris Johnson is still being allowed by the BBC to fake on about the Big Business Crossrail scam. The image the BBC ‘news programmes’ and ‘factual units’  are presenting of their coverage of London events is false. They are not telling the facts about CrossRail. Why is that wrong? Because the transport ‘infrastructure’ in London is in crisis and the crisis is very much linked with the wrong things that the City of London does, peddles. It is also the ‘core’ that Boris Johnson has been referring to in the context of his promotion of the ‘economic centre of the British economy’ which he ahs been irresponsibly and inaccurately boasting to be the City of London.  BBC London knows the facts but the BBC Policy is to play the crisis down. Hence the BBC London doing an apparently high-profile piece of today’s announcement that Boris Johnson was stepping down from the token chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority [MPA]. Contrast that with BBC London  NOT covering real economic issues. There is hardly any investigation into the ‘London economy’. Or indeed into the ‘London communities’ on the so-called ‘BBC London News;’.  The MPA is itself the subject of widespread criticism. It is NOT the accountable 'Police Authority' that it is claimed to be. It never could be. NOT when it was created by Tony Bliar. EVERYTHING that Blair has ‘legislated’ FOR CAN be exposed on evidence as mala fide. But with an absent Parliament, with no realm democratic  forum of universal legitimacy for the expression of the truth about the various serious issues affecting the quality of peoples’ lives in the country, the extent of Bliar’s assaults on democratic accountability are being kept secret, hidden from public knowledge. There is thus an important need to look for Boris Johnson has not been the real chair of the MPA, it has been his unelected appointee Kit Malthouse. More diagnostics on  Kit Malthouse  in a later piece in the context of the role Malthouse has been given to play IN THE NAME of the holder of the post of Mayor at the expense of the people of London. ITV London Tonight has just stated  [2232 GMT27January 2010] that Boris Johnson’s relinquishing  of the post of Chair of the MPA has broken an election pledge he had made in 2008. 
      What about the peddling that Boris has been doing for Big Business and the bankers? 
      What about the ‘credibility’ that Boris has been adding to the lying polices  and practices [abuses, unaccountability and fraudulence] of  'agencies' 'extensions' and’ institutions’ that keep causing NEW poverty on top of existing poverty in inner London, in London and in ‘greater’ London ? 
      What about the misallocation of public funds for the benefit of Big Business and away from the essential services and uses that Boris has been backing via the peddling of the agenda of Big Business?

       [To be continued]


      KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO 4 six years. Crossrail scam-backer "leader of the House of Commons' Harriet Harman is a significant causer of poverty and inequality in Britain. The real benefits that Big Business have 'brought' to the East End of London is the outrage of Canary Wharf and all that it entails. All that property speculation typifies and represents. All that the criminal bragging of underachieving, not-achieving, underperforming and under-expecting schools and corrupt ‘colleges’ in Tower Hamlets tell us about HOW they are keeping the people and ordinary communities in and across the East End of London in poverty and in distress…We look more at poverty creation as being engineered via the 'local' Tower Hamlets Council, here next.



      1940 [1918] GMT 
      London 
      Wednesday 
      27 January 2010. 
      Editor © Muhammad Haque. 



      Khoodeelaar, the campaign against “corruption created and maintained all over the world by Big Business controlling the agenda of states, States and Governments and Parliaments – as we have been chronicling for six years as part of the evidence exposing the London CrossRail scam ”  has also exposed the culture of lying that inhabits and dominates the individualized agendas of ALL the careerist ‘political parties’, outfits that do business for their cabals in Britain while pretending to represent ‘voters’, communities and society. Today’s report published by the UK ‘Office for National Statistics’ admitting , as [irony!] Rupert Murdoch’s SUN puts it, that “Poverty gaps is the widest since WW2” , PROVES, beyond any doubt that even the UK State bodies and outfits know that disparity within the UK is widening between peoples. So how is this being ‘explained’ by the ‘leader’ of the UK House of Commons, Harriet Harman? The careerist Harriet is often portrayed by the Daily Mail is being over the top for ‘equality’ in the face [as the DAILY MAIL fakes it] of evidence and common sense. The Daily Mail has not understood Harriet Harman. She is one of the CAUSES  and causers of inequality in Britain.  Always has been. Her image evolves with the currently. Right now,  she is being manufactured to suit a trend that is being backed by the corrupt bureaucracies of some trade unions in the country. These trade union bureaucracies are seriously liable and responsible for the persistence and rise in poverty in the country. They have openly colluded with the corrupt careerists and time-servers in Parliament to promote the myth that the Brown-fronted Blaired cabal is ‘against poverty, inequality and discrimination in Britain’. It is nothing of the kind. The cabal is a significant causer and backer of poverty and inequality and discrimination and LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY and Transparency in Britain. As Harriet Harman’s role in shielding crooked MPs over the expenses cover up confirmed in 2009. No wonder that Harriet hurried MPs to rubber stamp the ‘CrossRail Bill’ in July 2008. [To be continued]    Published= by the Rupert Murdoched SUN Wednesday 27 January 2010: 

      http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2826383/Poverty-gap-is-the-widest-since-World-War-Two.html  




      THE gap between rich and poor under Labour is wider than at any time since World War Two, a shock report out today reveals. The damning verdict comes despite the Government throwing billions of pounds at the problem. Last night the Tories accused Labour of the biggest betrayal of the poor for 65 years. Shadow equalities minister Theresa May said: "It is unbelievable that Labour thinks it can claim to be the party of aspiration when its failure to tackle the causes of poverty have let down so many lives." She vowed the Conservatives would bring in "radical policies" to turn the tide. The independent National Equality Panel examined data going back to 1961 after finding the poverty gap had got steadily worse over the past five years. It was unable to unearth direct figures from before then, so drew a comparison using how much people pay in tax. The stark conclusion is that Brits now face "the highest levels of income inequality since soon after the Second World War". Almost a fifth of the country - 19 per cent - are in poverty. The EU average is 16 per cent. Poor kids who get good exam results are still less likely to go to university. Meanwhile the PAY gap between the sexes has continued. Men leaving university are twice as likely as women to be on salaries of £30,000-plus after being employed for four years. Equalities minister Harriet Harman insisted: "We have made progress over the last 13 years - especially in tackling poverty." She claimed Labour had "halted the rising growth of inequality that dates back to the 1980s and which we still see the effects of today". She vowed: "We will do more to increase social mobility and tackle barriers that hold people back unfairly."






        follow me on Twitter


        Tuesday, January 26, 2010

        KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO 4 six years. UK G Brown has been imprudent. So say the 'Establishment' 'experts' today! The alleged news is the alleged end of the recession in the UK economy !



        1705 GMT

        London
        Tuesday

        26 January 2010



        Editor © Muhammad Haque



        KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! That the economic downturn, the crunch, the recession, had been caused by imprudence! Nobody of any note, other than the Khoodeelaar! Campaign itself, had said this for six years. Until this afternoon. Only  in the past hour or so, when the UK Establishment began to see the evidence and admit to doing so! Howard Davies [Oops! The ‘ennobled’ Howard Davies] of the London School of Economics [confusing abbreviation  shared by BOTH the ‘LSE’+LSE=London Stock Exchange] was launched. Davies said the behaviour of UK Govt had  not  been prudent. Even the FT’s ex editor and the Big Business tout now fronting the Big Biz lobby the CBI [Confederation of British Industry] in effect echoed that. As did the next ‘expert’ hauled in by the BBC to opine on the alleged end of the recession. And as if that were not bad enough. Vince UNPLUGGED Cable too was at it again. He has been carrying the  latest confected OTT-imagery around for the predicted  delivery during the day of the sound bytes he has now delivered today by moulting a pack of clinical phrases. But not a single one of these ‘talking faces’ actually said the truth. What it is that had really caused the recession. Why has the alleged recession allegedly stopped.  [to be continued]




        From the website of the
        Financial Times London

        Inflation and debt fears point to a nervous recovery
        By Chris Giles and Daniel Pimlott
        Published: January 3 2010 22:31 | Last updated: January 3 2010 22:31
        After the terror of the crisis comes a nervous recovery. That is the message delivered in the views of economists and policymakers on the risks to the economy as the UK exits recession.
        By far the biggest fears keeping analysts awake at night are a sovereign debt crisis – in the UK or internationally – and inflation.
        Of the 79 respondents to the FT’s survey, 37 were worried that a failure to sufficiently tighten public spending or raise taxes could leave the country facing much higher costs from servicing the national debt, or even the possibility that investors will stop lending to the UK. “The major risk is the loss of confidence in the government’s ability to get the public finances back under control,” said Howard Davies, director of the London School of Economics.
        “Major fiscal consolidation is needed, and more concrete plans should be developed and communicated as early as possible,” said Henrik Braconnier, who monitors the UK for the OECD.
        A number of economists worried that an end to extraordinary policies such as quantitative easing – the £200bn programme mostly made up of purchases of government debt – could reveal public borrowing to be even less sustainable than it now appears.
        Pierre Cailleteau, managing director of Moody’s Global Sovereign Risk Group, warned of “a disorderly exit from highly stimulating policies, leading to an abrupt increase in long term interest rates and/or sharp currency realignments”.
        Annexed to the fear that public debt is out of control is the threat – seen by more than a third of economists surveyed – of an inflationary surge. The chief worries are that quantitative easing itself could spur sharp price rises, or that booming recoveries in China and India would do little to help Britain’s meagre exports but would drive up commodity prices. “Over the next few months it is highly likely that we get an intensifying ‘inflation scare’ if growth surprises on the upside,” said former MPC member Sushil Wadhwani.
        Economists were sharply divided on inflation, with many believing that the risks of a price surge were overdone and that a Japan-like “lost decade” of slow growth accompanied by weak inflation was still possible. Similarly, however, many economists said the size of the national debt was not an issue. “People worry too much about the level of government debt and inflationary risk,” said Andrew Scott of the London Business School.
        Policy misjudgment was a further area for concern – particularly in relation to inflation. Some economists warned that high inflation in the short term might lead the Bank of England to move too early to tighten monetary policy, or that the government would misjudge the severity of the recession and cut public spending before recovery was entrenched.
        Sixteen respondents view- ed policy error as a significant risk, and 16 also believed that the economy could slip back into recession, or experience very weak growth. This could also happen if the kraken of the banking crisis were to reawake.
        It is perhaps unsurprising that about a quarter of respondents were worried that a hung parliament or political weakness might threaten the UK’s outlook.
        Slightly more analysts viewed the victimisation of bankers as a threat than thought climate change would be a problem this year.
        Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.


        ____________




        We shall publish  the following item at a later date and time:


        KHOODEELAAR! No to the “Big Business -Military Industrial Complex [=’MIC’] agenda scam Crossrail…” CAMPAIGN rebutting a pack of new lies at the expense of the 'deprived East End of London' being spread by Ken Livingstone's 'Business adviser' of '8 years' .






          follow me on Twitter


          Monday, January 25, 2010

          Khoodeelaar! diagnosis of Big Biz Crossrail scam is AGAIN vindicated de facto by the London Financial Times. Crossrail and the 2012 Games Hosting scam, says the FT in effect, are providing the UK construction business rare and badly needed business.. [Updater 1]







           0228 GMT
          London
          Sunday 25 January 2010

          Editor © Muhammad Haque

          The London ‘FT’ has AGAIN confessed to the fact that the 2012 Hosting and Crossrail are ABOUT Building contracts. And that they are the main projects providing ‘respite’ to the building industry which has undergone the most contraction in ‘business’.

          This confession again vindicates the Khoodeelaar! Diagnosis that we have made and published daily about CrossRail and only to a smaller extent about the 2012 Games Hosting scam.

          The London Financial Times []=‘FT’] web site is deceptive. Its URL addresses OFTEN don't lead to articles that area supposed to be accessible through the addresses. So for evidential purposes only we publish the full texts of that piece which the following URL originally yielded but then failed to show it later when we tested the link for verification:




          http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/997e2d0c-0951-11df-ba88-00144feabdc0.html

          Tough times ahead as the gloom lingers on
          By Sharlene Goff
          Published: January 25 2010 02:00 | Last updated: January 25 2010 02:00
          The construction industry is in a grim mood as the economy emerges from the downturn, with public spending cuts adding to pressure on levels of building activity that are already historically low.
          The industry was the single biggest contributor to redundancies during the recession. Now, after a slump of 12 per cent in output last year - the sharpest fall since records began in 1955 - a further 3 per cent contraction is forecast this year.
          For some contractors, government-funded infrastructure projects have been a boon during the past 18 months, as residential and commercial development dried up.
          There is, however, concern that, whichever party triumphs at the election, the industry will be hit by lower investment in schools, hospitals and transport infrastructure in the next few years.
          Housebuilders have joined the chorus of contractors and building materials groups predicting that 2010 will be a difficult year, with low levels of mortgage availability.
          Furthermore, while the market improved slightly during the second half of 2009, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors this month said the number of properties sold was still a third lower than the start of 2007.
          Repair and maintenance have offered a rare bright spot for building groups, while big projects such as the Olympics, Crossrail and the widening of the M25 will continue to provide much-needed contracts.
          However, even the most optimistic predictions do not foresee a recovery for the sector until early 2011.
          Ed Hammond
          The effect of the downturn will continue to be felt by aerospace companies for some time.
          British Airways, the flag carrier that relies on business class travellers for a big portion of its revenues, reported record losses last year as business and first class traffic slumped by as much as a fifth in February 2009, compared with the same month a year earlier.
          Conditions have improved since, but first and business class traffic is still down and Willie Walsh, chief executive, has warned that business travel may never recover.
          Low-cost carriers such as EasyJet, fared much better.
          Andy Harrison, EasyJet chief executive, was able to boast late last year that his was one of the few European airlines to remain profitable over the previous 12 months. He confirmed last week that the airline was still on track to "deliver substantial profit improvement in 2010".
          Airbus, the European aerospace manufacturer that employs more than 9,500 people at its Filton and Broughton plants, has shown resilience so far, thanks to a backlog of more than six years' worth of work amassed during the boom years.
          Pilita Clark
          The pharmaceutical industry has so far emerged relatively unscathed from the domestic downturn in the UK, although broader global pressures are likely to take a toll.
          Multinational groups do not split out sales for the UK, although revenues have been protected - as in many developed countries - because medical services are largely funded by government, and the importance of health to individuals helps support spending.
          Paradoxically, the weakness of sterling against the euro in recent months means some UK pharmaceutical subsidiaries have been able to book higher revenues in the local currency, as intermediaries have brought drugs priced more cheaply for resale elsewhere in Europe.
          However, structural processes under way in the sector even before the downturn mean a reduction in jobs in the UK, with fewer sales staff required and pressure growing for cost-cutting in manufacturing and other divisions.
          Two big US mergers last year - Pfizer with Wyeth and Merck with Schering-Plough - also led to cuts in UK staff.
          The prospects of ever- tighter budgets could add other constraints. More broadly, the NHS has refused to pay for a handful of innovative high-priced but relatively low-volume drugs, notably for cancer. Red tape, slow recruitment and high costs are also still driving clinical trials abroad. That could mean diminished investment in research and development in the UK.
          Andrew Jack
          Banks were at the epicentre of the downturn, and while many have staged recoveries faster than expected, they are likely to suffer some of the most severe and enduring consequences.
          Regulators around the world are introducing rules that will constrain the amount and type of business that banks and other financial institutions can do. In the UK, they will be forced to hold more capital and a greater proportion of liquid assets. They are also
          facing tougher tax measures.
          This will increase the cost of doing business - the most secure and liquid assets tend to generate low returns - restrict trading, particularly around riskier but potentially lucrative investment banking activities, and curb their ability to grow.
          Retail banks will face a tougher time as limited access to wholesale funding means they will have to push up saving rates to attract retail deposits.
          Banks' ability to lend will also be constrained by the requirements to keep a higher capital buffer.
          Banks that have been bailed out by the government are taking action to shrink their balance sheets. Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Banking Group are cutting back their activities while a number of building societies are also retrenching.
          The financial sector has previously contributed about 8 per cent to the UK's gross domestic product, according to Capital Economics. The research consultancy believes this could drop to 6-7 per cent over the next few years.
          Sharlene Goff
          Britain may be a nation of shopkeepers but it is also a nation of shoppers. Such people helped retailers in the downturn, with tills ringing more than anyone would have imagined this time last year.
          Consumers who have kept their jobs have seen their spending power boosted by low mortgage costs and energy bills, while increases in food prices moderated throughout the year. Shoppers were also simply fed up with being fed up and treated themselves over Christmas. These factors were epitomised by John Lewis, which enjoyed a record festive season.
          Store groups that survived the bloodbath before Christmas 2008 were also able to pick up sales from defunct rivals worth £14bn, according to retail research group Verdict.
          However, many senior executives fear this year could be much tougher, with the pain expected in 2009 put off until 2010.