KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! In less than a few hours since we published the dissection of UK CON D Cameron’s 'campaign' as being worse than anything seen before he confirms the worst of our suspicions: he is NOT about sorting out the economy but is bent on exacerbating it by getting into an even zealous war mode!

2030 GMT
London
Saturday
02 January 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque


KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO!
In less than a few hours since we published the dissection of UK CON D Cameron’s 'campaign' as being worse than anything seen before he confirms the worst of our suspicions: he is NOT about sorting out the economy but is bent on exacerbating it by getting into an even zealous war mode!

David Cameron offers Labour and Lib Dems seats in 'war cabinet'


David Cameron has attempted to steal a march on Labour and the Liberal Democrats by announcing plans for a cross-party "war cabinet" to take charge of operations in Afghanistan.



By Patrick Hennessy, Political Editor

Published: 8:00PM GMT 02 Jan 2010



Conservative party leader David Cameron speaks at the Oxford School of Drama studios in Woodstock, Oxfordshire Photo: PA

In a speech billed as the launch of his party's general election campaign, the Conservative leader said his message was one of "unity" rather than of the political "dividing lines".



He said he would invite the leaders of the other two main parties to attend key sessions of his planned new national security council if the Tories won power.





Related Articles

Cameron promises 'fairer, safer, green country'

Local elections: Labour suffers humiliating defeat

Bedford council local election 2009

Isle of Wight council local election 2009

Somerset county council local election 2009

Bristol city council local election 2009"When a nation is at war it needs to come together and to pull together," Mr Cameron told an audience in Oxfordshire.



His speech on Saturday, attacked by Labour as "all spin and no substance", came as Sir John Major, the former prime minister, criticised Tony Blair over the way the war in Iraq had been presented.



Sir John told Radio 4's Today programme he had reluctantly backed the war because he believed Mr Blair's claims about weapons of mass destruction (WMD).



However, the Chilcot Inquiry had suggested there were doubts about WMD even before the 2003 invasion – leaving Saddam Hussein's status as a "bad man" the only reason for toppling him.



"The argument that someone is a bad man is an inadequate argument for war and certainly an inadequate and unacceptable argument for regime change," Sir John added.



Tory sources said Mr Cameron's national security council would include key cabinet ministers and defence chiefs. The Labour and Liberal Democrat leaders would not attend every meeting but would be invited "regularly", they added.



A key part of Mr Cameron's strategy for the election, which must be held by early June, is to paint the Tories as forward-looking and united, in contrast with what he sees as Mr Brown's divided Labour Party.



He spoke of the need for "tough decisions" but in a generally upbeat address stressed Britain had a "bright economic future".



Mr Cameron added: "If we win this year's election, Britain will be under new economic management. We will send out the loudest signal that this country is back open for business and ready for investment."



He insisted that a Conservative administration would "redistribute power from the political elite to the man and woman in the street", with the "most radical decentralisation of power this country has seen for generations".



The Conservative leader pledged new action to tackle the scandal of MPs' expenses, claiming: "Government will enter a new era of transparency.



"And a strong, unbroken line of democratic accountability will be restored between the people and those that make the decisions that affect their lives.



"Over the past four years, we have always tried to work with other parties rather than looking for political dividing lines where none exist.



"We backed Tony Blair's school reforms and renewing Trident even though on both occasions we could have inflicted a damaging defeat on the Government.



"And we worked with the Liberal Democrats to get justice for the Gurkhas."



For Labour, Ben Bradshaw, the Culture Secretary, said: "The next election will be a big choice about the change we want for Britain.



"Labour offers change for the mainstream middle. Helping families to keep their homes and jobs during the downturn, investing in education and apprenticeships, and helping people to get on – not just get by.



"It is clear that 2010 will be a year of sound bites not substance from David Cameron, but no amount of expensive and slick PR can disguise the fact that the Conservatives would scrap your right to see a cancer specialist within two weeks and target tax cuts on the wealthiest few."

Twitter, to End POVERTY

follow me on Twitter

KHOODEELAAR! Showing how the Guardian lies about the East End of London. That phrase ‘Guardian reader’ is NOT a complementary one. Not in the context of the Guardian’s record of lying about the East End of London.

1312 GMT


London

Saturday

02 January 2010



Editor © Muhammad Haque





KHOODEELAAR! Showing how the Guardian lies about the East End of London. That phrase ‘Guardian reader’ is NOT a complementary one. Not in the context of the Guardian’s record of lying about the East End of London.



However, it is not obvious that the Guardian is lying UNLESS each of its perpetrations is looked at carefully.



So when the Big Business City of London decided to annexe the site of the former Spitalfields Market in the late 1980s, the Guardian faked a few pieces bout the alleged ‘concerns’ about it.



But instead of reporting the facts of the actual community and telling the truth about the City of London annexation and about the people and the community who were going to be undermined, attacked and dislocated, the Guardian decided to pick up two agents of the same interests but as the agents were included in the ethnicity-linked packaging of the pernicious-agenda-edited Guardian, the end result of the ‘Guardian journalism’ was that it did not make any difference to the annexation agenda.



As ALWAYS, the Guardian DELIBERATELY suppressed the truth about what the actual people defending the community were saying.



That emptiness, that blanking of the people and the superimposition in their place of ethnicity linked stooges approved of by the likes of the Big Business tout Ken Livingstone, has been the real TREND of the Guardian’s ‘journalism’.



It is this RECORD that makes the Guardian insidious, pernicious.



Nearly 20 years later, the Guardian has been doing the same thing about the same area. It is again peddling the City of London agenda of annexing the East End of London.



In the course of its distortion of the campaign against CrossRail, the Guardian decided to send Hugh Muir to Brick Lane.



Now, Muir, who was brainwashed via the Daily Telegraph before being given slots on the Guardian and the likes and thereby in effect recruited to the ethnic surrogate petty-careerists brigade by Ken Livingstone and mates, is NOT , CANNOT be allowed to pretend to know what the East End of London is politically historically and culturally like.



Yet the fact that he was capable of being involved as a packaged item in the Guardian's racist ethnicity-linking, the Alan Rusbridger gang sent him to ‘cover’ the ‘community.



And Muir, as has been his record, MISSED the main plot.



He did not know what Crossrail was all about.



He did not see the agenda. He did not know the London transport system.



He did not know the UK economy.



He did not know anything of substance in context.



He did not even see the community.



Just as his ‘leader’ and ‘inspiration’ Ken Livingstone would have liked it!





[To be continued]

Twitter, to End POVERTY

follow me on Twitter

KHOODEELAAR! Telling London 'Financial Times' and its 'ex-Editor' the UK CBI's Richard Lambert that they BOTH lack credibility. Especially as they peddle the Tories' line about the nearly £200 Bn deficit in the UK economy. This deficit is directly linked with the POLICY that FUNDS wasteful CRASS Crossrail! BOTH the FT and R Lambert have been backing the deficit economic adventures as indulged in and flaunted by G Brown and both have backed UK G Brown’s follies of OTT-hyping his [G Brown’s] ‘historic sense of managing the economy’.

0330 GMT 

London 

Saturday 

02 January 2010: 

Editor © Muhammad Haque. 

KHOODEELAAR! Telling London 'Financial Times' and its 'ex-Editor' the UK CBI's Richard Lambert that they BOTH lack credibility. Especially as they peddle the Tories' line about the nearly £200 Bn deficit in the UK economy. This deficit is directly linked with the POLICY that FUNDS wasteful CRASS Crossrail! BOTH the FT and R Lambert have been backing the deficit economic adventures as indulged in and flaunted by G Brown and both have backed UK G Brown’s follies of OTT-hyping his [G Brown’s] ‘historic sense of managing the economy’.  That hype, as we have briefly put it here, will go down as probably the most dishonest one peddled by G Brown.  On all four counts, all of them are wrong, have been wrong and they are all further confounding their fallacies by now faking a new layer of pretension. We have told off all three for their fakery and we have shown in then past years how each of them got it wrong. We now tell the FT and Lambert to admit that they had got it wrong to back CRASS Crossrail and that they were wrong to back the debts-causing adventures that do not address the core of the needs and demands in the ordinary UK economy. We ask them to call for the scrapping of Crossrail and similar scams.[To be continued]

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/86c245e8-f73d-11de-9fb5-00144feab49a.htmlAction on deficit not yet credible, says CBI

By Jean Eaglesham, Chief Political Correspondent

Published: January 2 2010 02:00 | Last updated: January 2 2010 02:00

Britain's leading business organisation has attacked the adequacy of government plans to tackle the £178bn budget deficit, saying ministers have not set out a "credible pathway" back to financial stability.

The CBI's criticism will increase pressure on Alistair Darling to take more rapid action to cut record UK borrowing. The chancellor is likely to come under Conservative fire on Tuesday over the pace of his planned deficit reduction, during the second reading of the fiscal responsibility bill in parliament.

This legislation is de-signed to give legal force to the government's pledge to halve the deficit over four years as a share of national income. The Treasury has also pledged to cut borrowing every year until 2015-16.

Yesterday, Richard Lambert, the CBI's director-general, questioned the effectiveness of the bill. "It's a bit like me saying I'm going to join the gym and that means I'm fit already," Mr Lambert told the BBC. The legislation was no substitute for measures to address the "big structural problems" in the public finances.

He called on ministers to bring forward credible plans to deal with the deficit within the lifetime of the next parliament, rather than "leaving a lot of the heavy lifting . . . to the parliament after next".

"I'm certainly not satisfied with the government's plans," he said. Ministers had not "set out yet a credible pathway back to financial, fiscal stability".

The Tories saw his remarks as support for their own policy of taking faster action to tackle the deficit.

"Richard Lambert's comments strike a blow at the heart of Gordon Brown's baseless assertion that dealing with the deficit would damage recovery," said Philip Hammond, shadow chief secretary to the Treasury. "The CBI has added to the long list of commentators who agree that Britain urgently needs a credible plan to deal with the deficit to secure recovery."

Mr Lambert suggested that a Tory election victory this year would have little effect on public spending until the second half of 2011. "That is one reason why there is such a terrific amount of uncertainty about the economy."

He also criticised the education system in England for producing exam results "we ought to be ashamed of" and failing pupils from poorer homes. He told the Guardian newspaper that ministers had failed to ensure increased funding was spent efficiently.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.