KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law commentary and update against the UK Department for Crossrail hole agenda

This page was last edited at 1030 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 12 August 2008



By©Muhammad Haque
1030 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 12 August 2008

This is prompted by a strange and indecipherable e-mail received from Ruth kelly's Department. Strange because it has no name. Indecipherable because it could not be even opened. part of the CRASSness of the Crossrail hole DfT is that they never communicate straight. They never tell it straight. It is a bent line, off-line, off the rail...... CRASSrail...


The KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law commentary and update against the UK Department for Crossrail hole agenda, as fronted by Ruth Kelly [who has followed Douglas Alexander who had followed Alistair Darling as the occupant of the Crossrail hole in the Department for Transport!!!]

KHOODEELAAR! is still waiting for Ruth Kelly to answer ALL outstanding Questions about Crossrail hole agenda that the KHOODEELAAR! campaign has put to the UK Department for Transport, starting in February 2004. That is, starting well before the actual formal presentation of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ in the UK House of Commons by Alistair Darling on 22 February 2005.

KHOODEELAAR! has put up with the DfT bureaucracy stalling.
And stalling.
And stalling.
And then lying.
And then provoking with more lies and illegalities.
KHOODEELAAR! has said all along that one main lawful way the campaign against the Big Business Crossrail hole plot would be - and will-be conducted would be through the application of the constitutional law. KHOODEELAAR! is now preparing court papers to seek the constitutional law to be applied against the crassly conceived Crossrail hole plot. The necessary notices of this have been sent to the DfT as well as to the bureaucracies involved in the operation of the stooged select committees on ‘Crossrail’ staged in the two Houses of UK ‘Parliament’.
The DfT bureaucracy, which has been acting as an agency for Big Business interests on Crossrail has shown contempt to constitutionality. As has the bureaucracy at the CLRL itself. This is not surprising. Accountability via or in Parliament,nt is not a norm in the UK. Nor has it been in the case of the Ken CROSSRAIL hole plot-peddler Livingstone-occupied London assembly.

As illustrated by Livingstone's notorious outburst against one session of the London Assembly which Livingstone denounced for daring to ask questions of Livingstone over his then latest scandalised behaviour


The result is that ALL the questions, all the flaws, all the defects, all the damages that Crossrail hole plot raises, contains and causes will now be put to the UK domestic court for the relevant scrutiny and examination as part of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenge to the Crossrail hole plot legislation.

By legislation is here meant the pre and the post ‘Bill’ conduct, purpose and repercussions and implications as well.

It goes without saying that the ‘CROSSRAIL BILL’ will be the centre of the challenge....

Most of those issues could and should have been attended to by the sitting or the existing ‘Secretary of State’ at the DfT.

The evidence shows that this has not been done.
The fact that it has not been done will be cited as evidence of the deliberate policy of defiance of the constitutional obligations by the UK Secretary of State for Transport at the given time.

At all the given times.

[To be continued]