KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law commentary and update -naming and not naming defendants: [28]

This page was last edited at 1150 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 13 August 2008


1145 GMT 1245 UK Time London Wednesday 13 August 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot against the inner city East End of London...." campaign constitutional law actions programme against the parties who are responsible for the Crossrail hole plot, so far.........The constitutional law parameters: Brief statement as follow up to Mr Muhammad Hackie's conversation with the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Councillor on the ‘phone on 12 August 2008. The reason why KHOODEELAAR! has been offering the option to the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council and to any other employed [or contracted or agency-related person or personnel] in the context of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law actions [due to be filed in the UK court/s in the very near future, as soon as the procedural loose ends have been tied and all the known formalities completed, before the effective filing of the case/s can take place] is summarised below:- The KHOODEELAAR! campaign operates a standard of ethics and constitutionality that includes the treatment of the ‘parties’ with fairness and what is understood by natural justice. It is important to emphasise that it is an integral part of the philosophy of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign to give all concerned due opportunities to make all the relevant information available to us so that we can leave them out of the lists of the intended defendants. This is an important point. A number of defendants will be named and identified as such. The KHOODEELAAR! legal action/s is [are] intended to address named councillors.

And THEIR liabilities.

This is within the democratic and constitutional law context the main group of defendants containing the relevant holders of liability for the relevant wrongs and the relevant acts of illegality and unconstitutionality. If in the particular instance the evidence shows that any other person, other than a councillor, has been so deeply and intimately involved with the operation of a wrong then that person will be included as made plain in our many previously published statements on this. the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council and the named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council bare the two employees AT THE RELEVANT time of the LB Tower Hamlets Council who have been found to have been involved in the promotion of the Crossrail hole agenda in ways that make it necessary to have their roles held to public account. If however there exists any evidence that shows that the evidence of their deep involvement is countered by evidence of their being under controlling influences from one or more than one councillor then that will be taken into account and if appropriate the two will be left out of the list. The CURRENT communications are prompted by the KHOODEELAAR! campaign’s policy to ensure that there is no room for any doubt, confusion or lack of clarity left on this either in the mind of the first named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council or in the mind of the other named employee in the Crossrail hole plot-inviter LB Tower Hamlets Council [texts excluded for reasons of evidential integrity] about their own roles and in their separate act or acts of involvement in the Tower Hamlets Council’s promotion of not just the Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London but also in the justificatory plugs, excuses and fabrications that have been issued for the same plot by or in the name of the corporate Tower Hamlets Council. To date. at 1130 GMT on Wednesday 13 August 2008..

.[To be continued]