KHOODEELAAR! court actions on 'Crossrail hole plot'-inviters [27]Tower Hamlets Council

This page was last edited at 1720 GMT London Sunday 10 August 2008


KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot - ACTION ARCHIVE


FRIDAY, MARCH 10, 2006
Khoodeelaardotcom10March2006


http://www.khoodeelaar.com


KHOODEELAAR!
The Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole-tunnel ‘project, scheme, plan’ Bill [that is ‘the Crossrail Bill’ now in the UK House of Commons]

LEGAL DISCLAIMER 0830 Hrs GMT on Friday 10 March 2006
The contents published on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site are written, authored and created by the Editor and they belong to the Editor unless otherwise stated in relation to individual items published here. The name Khoodeelaar is the intellectual property of the Editor and Author. All materials are published here purely and solely for educational purposes. That is, NO part of the items published or cited as original trailers here on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be used for commercial, immoral, illegal or party political or sectarian or propaganda purposes or for any purposes that are anathema to the universally accepted and recognised codes of ethics and morality. Intellectual property rights action shall be taken to protect the integrity of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole attacks plan scheme project and their contractors, touts and agencies. NO part of the contents of the Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be included in any promotion of the interests against whose continuation and existence the khoodeelaardotom web site is created authored written and published. That means that none of these materials must be used to show Crossrail programme in any positive light as to do so would contradict the aims and objects of the contents of this web site. And that would amount to illegal and immoral distortion of the contents of this Khoodeelaardotcom web site.


This [the 1st] edition [of the day] Updated at 0830 Hrs GMT on Friday 10 March 2006



Editor© Muhammad Haque

Produced by CBRUK for Khoodeelaar!

Political organisation by
London Community Audit Network
Constitutional law support services
by
Lawcompliance






Produced and published by CBRUK for Khoodeelaar!

Constitutional law services are provided by Lawcompliance and

The London Community Audit Network


lawmedia@hotmail.com




lawcompliance@hotmail.co.uk






Khoodeelaaronline publication arrangement on Friday 10 March 2006 effective 1800 Hrs GMT

These EXCLUSIVELY written Khoodeelaaronline items are linked with the way that the CROSSRAIL hole attacks on the East End have been conceived and are being pushed against the community

1. Exclusive report on Tower Hamlets Council’s corrupt deals with the Crossrail promoters – new evidence
2. Exclusive report on how the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council has been lying to the community via bribery of the ‘ethnic’ press circulating in the area
3. The fuller review of the ‘local’ East London Idiotiser coverage of the ‘last full Council meeting’ of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council held on Wednesday 1 March 2006 before the scheduled elections for a ‘new’ Council on 4 May 2006
4. What was Tony McNulty doing in that photocall in the Brick Lane London E1 Area? [2300 Hrs GMT ]
5. Why was Hilary Benn gob-smacked when asked to explain why the Blair regime was attacking the East End with the Crossrail assault plan?
6. And who was the cheer-leader when Hilary Armstrong descended on Brick Lane E1 area for half a second to do a ritualistic glee-dance in her uniquely obscene style at the expense of George Galloway? In what way was Hilary Armstrong as obscene as she was claiming Galloway had been in his alleged feline impersonations?



Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Seminar Update

Time 1530 Hrs Sunday 19 March 2006

Venue – Brick Lane London E1 area

Seminar will be addressed by George Galloway MP for Bethnal Green and Bow

Seminar Background papers and related materials are being sent to all registered candidates. The papers should reach everyone by Saturday 11 March 2006

All inquiries about the Khoodeelaar Manifesto Seminar should be sent to

Lawcompliance@hotmail.co.uk
The following version is being posted on this web site at 2044 Hrs GMT Thursday 9 March 2006



The Editor /Khoodeelaar/CBRUK/Lawmedia
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006
Part K 1700 Hrs GMT Thursday 9 March 2006
Questionnaires to candidates for Council elections scheduled to be held in Tower Hamlets on 4 May 2006
The Constitutional and democratic context and resample to Part K
Khoodeelaar! is actively engaged in devising ways locally for HELPING the creation of a democratic, transparent and accountable atmosphere which should be sustained throughout the year, every year, for the designated four years following the scheduled May 2006 Council elections to be held in [and for the democratic elected constitution of ] the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
This is being done to fill the wide gap that has been waiting to be filled.
The gap of absence of significant sustained and substantial opposition to the controlling clique.
The other principal and the complementary reason is to ensure that those elected do not assume any sense of ethical, moral or social superiority for themselves as compared with the loci, the status of the individual electors or of the collective electorate or of the wider community – whether there are actively voting electors or not.
The final reason [in this summarised version] is to make sure that the Tower Hamlets Council does the job of representing the people of the Borough irrespective of which individual actually cast any vote or not or when they did cast any vote whether they cast the vote in favour of candidate a or b or c or whoever.
This means that the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto is putting these questions to every single candidate and these questions are also going to be circulated in print with effect from 1700 Hrs GMT on Thursday 9 March 2006
1. Do you accept that as a councillor you must not tell lies, that you must not collude with lying and you must not assume that once a councillor you have got a licence to lie or to misinform or to mislead members of the public or employees of the Council or others whose work or actions are linked with the due and the honest and the competent discharge of your duties as an elected councillor whether you are actively participating in any faction on the Council that may have access to the control of the Council or not ?
2. Do you undertake to actively engage with all the people in the community generally and to do so specifically when any member of the community raises issues that have ramifications on your being a councillor whether the person rising the matter is of any opining that may or may not accord with your own?
3. Do you undertake to abandon personal greed, ambition and schemes and projects which can only be achieved by betraying the electorate and or by colluding with interest, agencies and forces that are in fact and on all reasonable evidence inimical to the democratic the social; and the economic, environmental and the moral interests of the community, the electorate and the London borough of Tower Hamlets?
4. What factual evidence can you cite to support your answer/s and to assume that we the community should take your answers as being credible as based on the independently and objectively verifiable record of your relevant career, involvement etc in the context of these questions?
[Questions 6 to 10 are due to be published before 1500 Hrs GMT on Friday 10 March 2006]












A khoodeelaaronline special report at 1740 Hrs GMT Thursday 9 March 2006


An earlier version posted here read as follows


Part K Written at 1700 Hrs GMT Thursday 9 March 2006
Questionnaires to candidates for Council elections scheduled to be held in Tower Hamlets on 4 May 2006-03-09
The Constitutional and democratic context and resample to Part K
Khoodeelaar! is actively engaged in devising ways locally for HELPING the creation of a democratic, transparent and accountable atmosphere which should be sustained throughout the year, every year, for the designated four years following the scheduled May 2006 Council elections to be held in [and for the democratic elected constitution of ] the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.
This is being done to fill the wide gap that has been waiting to be filled.
The gap of absence of significant sustained and substantial opposition to the controlling clique.
The other principal and the complementary reason is to ensure that those elected do not assume any sense of ethical, moral or social superiority for themselves as compared with the loci, the status of the individual electors or of the collective electorate or of the wider community – whether there are actively voting electors or not.
The final reason [in this summarised version] is to make sure that the Tower Hamlets Council does the job of representing the people of the Borough irrespective of which individual actually cast any vote or not or when they did cast any vote whether they cast the vote in favour of candidate a or b or c or whoever.
This means that the Khoodeelaar! Manifesto is putting these questions to every single candidate and these questions are also going to be circulated in print with effect from 1700 Hrs GMT on Thursday 9 March 2006







Why Khoodeelaar! Says that Tower Hamlets Council is doomed to sink down the Crossrail hole?

The answer is linked with but not completely contained in the fact that the Blair regime has announced today [Thursday 9 March 2006] that it is going to give London Mayor Ken Livingstone even more powers over transport in London than has been the case so far..

What this means is that Livingstone is going to swallow up even more of the ‘local’ ‘democracy’ pretences which are symbolised by the name of ‘the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council’ than he has done already.

It is a fact that Livingstone wants to abolish local councils. It is a fact that Livingstone wants to assume the powers personally and declare local elections redundant as far as those relate to electing councillors to make up local councils such as Tower Hamlets.

And that fact has been suppressed by the controlling clique on the present Tower Hamlets Council. The reason why they have suppressed that fact is also linked with the personal greed and dishonesty and the corruption of the key members of the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council.

Several key members of the controlling clique on the present Tower Hamlets Council have been receiving cash payments under guises of ‘representing’ Tower Hamlets Council on formally described ‘external’ bodies

Some of those ‘external bodies’ include huge Big Business looting-of-public-cash operations fronted via the Odious ODPM department like the Thames Gateway programmes.

Yet there has been no accounting to the formally constituted Tower Hamlets Council by anybody sitting on any part of the Thames gateway programme in the name of the elected London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.

Hundreds of smaller operations, all designed to facilitate the impoverishment of those already pushed into and kept in poverty and low income across inner London and across the inner city parts of ’greater’ London and to enrich the Big Business companies and their agents.

The trend has been to undermine the idea of local people having a democratic say on our own locally elected council. This has been done by the active participation of the allegedly democratically active clique that has been controlling Tower Hamlets Council for the past five years.

And that betrayal of 'local democracy' by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council has been done with no little help from a mainly passive official Opposition.

There is no evidence of any major political issue being initiated by the official opposition on Tower Hamlets Council at all.

There is no evidence either of the official Opposition taking any significant and original steps in the past five years that could reasonably have propelled the controlling clique into action that would comply with the democratic demand that is implicit in the fact of the existence of a locally elected Council.


And no issue, no frame of reference could have been more appropriate for testing this thesis than the issue of the Crossrail hole attacks plan on our Borough, on our community across the East End of London.

[To be continued] This commentary written and first posted on http://www.khoodeelaar.com
At 1600 Hrs GMT Thursday 9 March 2006









Yesterday’s
Publication arrangements at 0930 on Tuesday 8 March 2006

Contents in this edition


Updater comment at 1745 Hrs GMT Wednesday 8 March 2006

What is the evidence on which the community can base any expectation that after the 4th May 2006 Council election, the quality of accountability by Tower Hamlets Council to the community would get any better?

The Khoodeelaar campaign position is that there is no significant evidence that it will be.

Exceptions do exist. Certain candidates are there who are better disposed to relating to the community than can be said about any of the current lot of councillors.

So, what happens to the Crossrail hole after the 4 May 2006 elections?

If the elections are held as scheduled ands if nothing happens to interrupt the ordinary run of things in the country, then the ONLY way to defeat the Crossrail hole plan is by the local community doing the campaigning even after the n council election.

There is already evidence that not one single ‘political party’ or their counterparts in the ‘independent candidate’ section [going about getting stuck into phases of electioneering talks and noises] has any idea about what to do with the Crossrail attack from the position of being in control of the elected Tower Hamlets Council.

KHOODEELAARonline has looked for evidence everywhere during the day Wednesday 8 March 2006

Khoodeelaar online investigation into the four known political groupings over the past 10 weeks has produced no evidence that no mater what the particular groupings may have been saying that they will do on Crossrail, there is nothing written down about what they will do if they get anywhere within the controlling positions on the Tower Hamlets council.

In contrast to those groupings, as such, the statements the local MP George Galloway have been very noticeably clear [we have already published the reports quoting George Galloway from all the meetings that he has addressed and or spoken at].

The question then is: so where the opposition to the Crossrail hole is to come from

We know that the alertness on the parts of the council groupings now is related much to the proximity of the council election. Once the election is over, we do not expect the council – however it is balanced, to do anything that will protect the community from the Crossrail attacks.

The reason for continuing campaign therefore will remain even after the council elections.

During today, khoodeelaaronline has spoken to the available members of all the groupings from all the main ‘political’ parties. And we have also spoken n to George Galloway in his position as the leader of the RESPECT coalition.

Based on all those contacts we can say that the final struggle to defend the community against the Crossrail hole will continue to be carried on by the community.

The Council will not be able to be counted on in quite the way that we would like it to be

We shall show in the next instalments, why we are saying what we are saying



[To be continued]


Contents unto the 2nd edition

1. How the local ‘press’ misrepresents the community’s battle against the Crossrail hole Council – Khoodeelaaronline review of the New ham Recorder – disguised as ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’, issued number 065 [City 2205] dated Wednesday 8 March 2006
2. Who can stop the Crossrail hole Council and bring about a democratic Tower Hamlets Council that at once represents the people and stands up for Tower Hamlets to Crossrail hole Bill pushers and their behind-the-scene controllers?
3. Khoodeelaar Seminar for council ‘candidates’ and sitting councillors – last day for registration.

The items published on this site on 7 March 2006 will be gradually deleted as the allocated site space is taken up by newer posts. To obtain archives copies, visitors need to make a specific request by e-mail.


Please send your request to

lawmedia@hotmail.com



Details this edition 0930 GMT Tuesday 7 March 2006-03-08
1. How the local ‘press’ misrepresents the community’s battle against the Crossrail hole Council – Khoodeelaaronline, first review of the New ham Recorder – disguised as ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’, issue number 065 [City 2205] dated Wednesday 8 March 2006

The main headline in this token [the latest] edition of the ‘Tower Hamlets’ [New ham!] Recorder is given to ‘Child porn of ex-councillor’, a story on a ‘former councillor’ and his string of convictions for sex offences.


It is very difficult to spot what Council he was a councillor on. Until the fifth paragraph which contains the offender’s party affiliation and the name of the council.

He is ‘ex’ Green Party and an ex Hackney councillor. ‘Jail for man with fetish for under age girls in swim outfits’ is the bold description of the man’s latest offence. The paper is divisible into 6 columns, if the space given to the ‘Crossrail rumpus’ item is any guide. By that criterion, the space given to the “porn of ex-councillor” is way out of proportion.

For one thing, that story was about a HACKNEY councillor, ex or not. For another thing, THAT amount of space need not have been given to DRAW ATTENTION to the ‘outrages’ of child sex offence. It is a given that CHILD SEX OFFENCE is one of the worst offences, in anybody’s language.

People are not in need of extra help to recognise how absolutely dangerous anyone who has any inclination towards that offence is and can be. There is universal opposition to child sex offenders.

Half of the space given to that item would be enough to keep the proportion and the attention alive and the moral and social alert very much on. The other half, the rest of the space, could easily have been given to the Crossrail threat to TOWER HAMLETS and that item should have been the top item.

Why?

because that story had at least ten CURRENT news and campaign events components in it.

All those things happened in the course of the six days between the last edition of the so-called Tower Hamlets Recorder and the day it is actually finalised [the front and back pages at least – which is Tuesday 7 march 2006]

But this is wishful thinking.

To expect the disguised version of the New ham Recorder misusing the words ‘Tower Hamlets’ - for sheer petty trade – to report on the appropriate political and social struggles and campaigns actually taking place in the East End borough is expecting too much.

The ‘publishers’ are not in the 'newspaper' business to report on the community’s battle for democracy, representation and the defence of the local community or the local environment from attacks by big business. Or attack by a negligent controlling cliquey on Tower Hamlets Council. The publishers are in business to make money. Money first. Money second. And make money the last.

So why bother commenting on their abysmal conduct to type?

Answer: Just to put the facts on the record.


Who can stop the Crossrail hole Tower Hamlets London Borough Council and bring about a democratic Tower Hamlets Council in its place that at once represents the people and stands up for Tower Hamlets to Crossrail hole Bill pushers and their behind-the-scene controllers?

This file will appear here during Wednesday 8 March 2006


Khoodeelaar Manifesto 2006
Seminar for sitting councillors and would-be councillors

3.30 PM
Sunday 19 March 2006

To be held at a venue in the Brick Lane London E1 Area


Last date for registration is today 8 March 2006

Send your request for registration by e-mail to lawmedia@hotmal.com







East London says No to Crossrail attacks

BOW WEST in the Bethnal Green and Bow Constituency of George Galloway
Supports Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole attacks



Campaign against Crossrail hole
Meeting
First Khoodeelaaronline reports



additional files from BOW WEST SAYS NO to Crossrail can be viewed on

http://www0.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/03/335335.html?c=on#c143887



Political crooks now controlling the East London borough of Tower Hamlets Council would be kicked out of the Council at the scheduled 4th May 2006 local elections.

the new council that would come into being following the election will stand up for the local people. Together we shall defend the community against the Crossrail attack.



This was the declaration by the MP George Galloway addressing the meeting held in Bow West to oppose Crossrail.

Galloway followed Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque who spoke of the disaster that was Tower Hamlets Council.




Muhammad Haque said that the failure of the official Opposition on Tower Hamlets Council for years was a disgrace and it must not be allowed to remain so after the 4 May 2006 local elections.



The George Galloway - Muhammad Haque appearance on the platform at the Bow West meeting against Crossrail was publicised on the internet and locally in print versions for a week.



It had such an effect on the current Council leader Michael Keith that he turned up with an entourage of Blair party placemen and women.

At the meeting were also present former deputy leader and close Michael Keith ally Cllr Denise Jones, current council leader Abdus Shukur and prospective Blairite councillor Joshua Peck.

After the two main speeches by Muhammad Haque and George Galloway, there were comments from members of the audience. These included the comments from two women.

Two women at the Bow West campaign meeting against Crossrail attacks on the East End spoke about the way that Oona King had let the community down.

Two women at the Bow West campaign meeting against Crossrail attacks on the East End spoke about the way that Oona King had let the community down.

The women were speaking in response to the campaign speeches by local MP George Galloway and Khoodeelaar! Organiser Muhammad Haque, held at the St Paul's way Church in Bow East London

The meeting was chaired by community activist Carole Swords who is also seeking election to Tower Hamlets Council at the 4 May 2006 elections.

The meeting was politically charged top boiling point at times.

This was caused by the response there of a batch of Blairite Oona King baggage carriers of the pre 5 May 2005 days.

One was fingered as soon as he opened his mouth.

George Galloway pounced on Josh Peck and described him a lair and accused Peck of extreme ignorance about Parliamentary procedure.

This was caused by Peck’s accusation that Galloway had not been doing enough parliamentary representation of the relevant matter.

The other tense moments involved Michael Keith whose presence at the meeting was extensively ridiculed by the sponsor of the meeting, George Galloway.






this file at 2310 hrs GMT on Tuesday 7 March 2006

[Further reports from the Bow West Says No to Crossrail campaign meeting will follow overnight]

Political crooks now controlling the Tower Hamlets Council br/>
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Seminar

3.30 PM Sunday 19 March 2006

to be held in
The Brick Lane London E1 Area

For Councillors and would be councillors

Registration essential

To register by 1700 Hrs GMT Wednesday 8 March 2006, send your details by e-mail to

Lawcompliance@hotmail.co.uk




Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole news wires as carried on the indymedia sites as at 1410 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 7 March 2006

To access any of the pages, just copy the address [quoted below] and paste it on your internet browser address line and click GO’

http://www0.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/03/335286.html

http://www0.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/03/335237.html

http://www0.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/03/335196.html

http://www0.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/03/335127.html

A Khoodeelaar! Statement on why there are so many ‘positive’ references to George Galloway in our internet news bulletins and commentary items

[This was written in response to a post on the indymedia site, accessed by khoodeelaaronline on 7 March 2006]

© The AUTHOR / KHOODEELAAR / CBRUK /LAWMEDIA 2006

No, Danny, George Galloway is not Khoodeelaar! Campaign’s boss.

Khoodeelaar! exists to inform the community of the dangers of Crossrail.

It also exists to oppose the threats posed by Crossrail to the East End of London.

It so happens that the only elected MP from anywhere across the East End [and to the East] of London who is actively engaged in discussions over the Crossrail hole attacks plans on the East End is George Galloway.

George Galloway is also the elected MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, the part of East End which is most at risk from the Crossrail planned attacks.

We have stated more than once, we do not belong to any party or grouping along party political lines.

Khoodeelaar! welcomes the support that George Galloway has given so far. We record his statements. We report on the related events.

We are not going to deprive George Galloway the citations and the references because to do so would be inconvenient to some whose agenda is to do George Galloway down.

We are – dare we say it – more than able to organise our campaign activities without compromising the main aims and objects.

Why are you apparently annoyed with our factually justified and journalistically warranted and ethically consistent and frequent inclusion of positive references to George Galloway?

Are you perhaps one of those internet users - visitors – or surfers- who may have been exposed to may be too much anti-George Galloway plugs on the internet, perhaps staring with the results of the election on 6 May 2005?

The day that the Blaired BBC inaugurated the most poisonous programme via the media of vilification within minutes of the results of the 5 May 2005 election being announced.

We have not forgotten how vicious, unfair, inaccurate, misleading, offensive and dishonest and biased Jeremy Paxman was.

We have not forgotten what the late Tony Banks said in his typically racist patronising comments allegedly uttered on behalf of Oona King and at the expenses of all genuine supporters of elected democracy.

We have not overlooked the more than 5 Million ‘items’ of anti-Galloway drivel and rubbish and lies that were placed on the internet in January 2006.

We have fuller knowledge than you may think as to who created those initial hysterical racist rubbish by vilifying George Galloway.

We do not have to belong to the RESPECT grouping that George Galloway at the present time politically organisationally belongs to.

But we do not have to suspend judgement or sense far less take leave of our ability to make rational decisions as to who is the proper voice that the community needs to be represented by on a given issue in the correct and the right context EITHER

Given that the Crossrail hole attacks plan was BROUGHT to the East End by the clique of conspiring and corrupt controllers of the resources and the name of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council, given that the MP for the area for eight years unto 5 May 2005 [Oona King] failed to recognise the momentous importance to the community of the Crossrail attacks, given that the man – Tony McNulty – who as a Minister as the time in the Department of Transport [that has been acting as the promoter in parliament of the Crossrail attacks] played a key role in the final ‘internal negotiations’ on the contents of what is now the House of Commons Crossrail Bill was married – and remains married [as we write this at 1330 Hrs GMT on Tuesday 7 march 2006] to Christine Gilbert who as the occupant of the post of Chief Executive in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council was formally advising the clique that controlled the Tower Hamlets Council as it acted as the collective tout for the Crossrail attacks on the East End, do you think it so ‘improper’ for the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against Crossrail hole attacks to include the support being expressed to our campaign by the elected MP George Galloway?

Were you perhaps motivated by the spin and the lies that have been produced by the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council against George Galloway in January 2006?

Were you may be drawn to positively view the glee-dance that was staged for three seconds before a camera crew by the disgraced Blair Whip in the UK House of Commons, Hilary Armstrong?

Are you by any chance, perhaps related to John Biggs, the Greater London Assembly member for the area including Bethnal Green and Bow?

Whatever your real name is, whoever you may, you have not got anything to worry about over the Khoodeelaar campaign's links with anybody.

We are not linked in any way that could be compared with what we have described as the Tessa Jowell type of a link.


We are ordinary people trying to do what we legitimately can to defend our community that big business and big political forces are set to crush.

If you are an ordinary person [that is, if you are not employed as a Blairing spin operators or holder of a Blairing patronaged post or position], think about these things before you may wish to pen another hostile post.





The following contribution has been submitted to Khoodeelaar today by a supporter of the campaign against Crossrail hole

We have recognised their preference to not have their name published


"Bethnal Green and Bow Constituency members have the opportunity tonight to lend their support to the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole attacks plan on the East End of London.

The meeting is at 7 PM at St Paul's Church in St Stephens Road in Bow.


Campaigners against the Crossrail attacks on the East End will be joined by others opposing the stock Transfer of Tower Hamlets Council housing away from public control.

The Khoodeelaar! Movement is helping to revive the sprit of community action in London in a way that the Blairing looters of public resource had thought would not happen.

Oliur Rahman, a speaker at the Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Tower Hamlets Council on Wednesday 1 March 2006 descried as crooks the individuals who had been controlling the Tower Hamlets Council. Come the 4 May election, Oliur Rahman promised, the looters will be thrown out of the Tower Hamlets Town Hall.

To make that a reality, all opponents of corruption and abuse of public resource must unite and focus on the looters as the target. Defend the community by uniting on the principles of social solidarity.
"





How the Crossrail plan has been corrupting the East End of London

With John Prescott being ‘in control’ [!!] of the Odious programme fronted by a department called ODPM that is assaulting local democracy right left and centre, it is no wonder that local people are being lied to by Blaired councillors with no restraint at all.

Just how callously irresponsible and unconstitutional can the Blaired batches of councillors [forming any controlling –‘majority’, ‘ruling’- clique on any local council] can get when there is no effective and ethically active elected Opposition on the same council is seen in the behaviour of the Crossrail-hole-backing clique that has been in control of Tower Hamlets Council.

It has been confirmed by the khoodeelaaronline investigation [see reports below and for the rest of this week, starting on Sunday 5 March 2006] that even though the Crossrail Bill is still only a theory, a drat Bill and not part of the UK laws, the planned Crossrail assault has been being ‘progressed’ [=implemented] by the Blaired regime in clear defiance of the ‘constitution’.

As we have already pointed out when describing the illegality of Transport Secretary Alistair Darling’s statement in the UK House of Commons when he introduced the Crossrail Bill [22 February 2005] by falsely stating that it had been drafted by fully complying with the European Convention on Human Rights, so we can point out again that the behaviour of Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique promoting the Crossrail hole plan has been equally in defiance of the law.

New Visitors to our site [www.khopodeelaar.com] reading this commentary [6 March 2006] may blot be aware of the catalogue of illegalities by the Tower Hamlets Council that we have published already.

Those illegalities will be included as evidence of their negligence and wrongfulness when we finally take court actions against them.

Court actions already announced will be taken against a range of personnel and against the entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council. Those actions will include claims that they

1. lied for Crossrail and against the community – the electorate
2. lied to even other councillors [those councillors who were both on the Opposition benches and on the back benches of the controlling side] whom the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council consistently kept in the dark about what they were doing as they had secret meetings and communications with Crossrail promoters
3. conspired to expose the Brick Lane London E1 area (and the other parts affected by the Crossrail hole plan, including the Mile End Park area and beyond) to serious health, environmental, social, economic danger and risk and uncertainty in return for their [ the controlling clique members] personal benefits
4. made deals with Crossrail promoters and agents of other external interests whose aim was to displace the community in the Eats End and to make the affected parts of the East End ready for exploitation by property speculators and other similarly anti-social interest
5. abused their access to Council’s financial decisions and spent money in buying propaganda spaces in locally circulating ‘newspapers’ or media outlets that were 'persuaded' to leave out of their 'reports' on the Tower Hamlets Council controlling clique’s role on Crossrail hole the crucial facts about the Crossrail attacks
6. made criminally prosecutable deals with other propaganda outfits whom they promised benefits by making land or similar belonging to the entity of Tower Hamlets Council available in return for inclusion of propaganda telling the controlling clique’s lies about Crossrail hole plan.

[This file was posted on khoodeeelar.com at 1740 Hrs GMT Monday 6 March 2006. The rest of the grounds will be published here in the next 72 hours]



Why did the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets Council take that Crossrail bribe?

How has the East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council been abused by the controlling clique that has been making secret deals with the Crossrail company and with other promoters of the Crossrail attack plan against the people of the East End?

The answer is being sought in this campaign.



And as part of the evidence on which we have founded our campaign has been only just been confirmed by one of the campaigners against the Crossrail hole.

Kay Jordan, the Director of the SSBA, Spitalfields Small Business Association, that is based in the Brick Lane London E1 area, has confirmed to Khoodeelaaronline that
She was informed by Crossrail Company themselves that Crossrail had paid cash to Tower Hamlets Council!

What was the cash paid for?



The answer is – for Tower Hamlets Council agreeing to Crossrail doing something that they would otherwise not be able to do.

And what was that?

Surprise surprise – Crossrail would get a foothold in the area to start digging!

So what was the cover for the cash payment?

The cover was the Idea Store at Whitechapel.



And the detail of the cover was that Tower Hamlets Council had made a particular ‘design’ for the yet-to-be-finalised- ‘Idea Store’ at Whitechapel which ‘design’ was suddenly in need of revision !

And so the revision could not be done without Tower Hamlets Council selling the East End community short.

The alleged revision or redesign for the Whitechapel Idea Store was to be carried out with bribe from Crossrail.

And in return for the bribe, Crossrail would get the privilege of doing digging holes and of destroying the community in the East End of London.

The fact that that bribery deal took place YEARS ago and today, Monday 6 March 2006 there is nobody on Tower Hamlets Council able or prepared to legally justify their corrupt deal for Crossrail hole, shows that the controlling clique was adamant about wantonly defying the community for Crossrail hole all the way.






The East London Idiotiser gives Crossrail-hole-Michal Keith an unwarranted credit over democracy. This Khoodeelaaronline commentary is the second in a series we are publishing on the idiocy of the East London Advertiser, which has been dubbed the East London Idiotiser by the Khoodeelaar! Campaign Organiser based on the superfluity of idiocies that are contained in the so-called news reporting in that title. The following item was based on their ‘report’ at page 10 of the EL Idiotiser dated 9 March 2006. The fuller version will be published here on Friday 10 March 2006.


To the Editor and the Publisher of the ‘East London Idiotiser’


• Do you know – or have you been made aware by anyone – of what, if any, reference to the No to Crossrail motion [tabled on 1 March 2006] – had been made at the ‘Blair Party’ councillors group on Tower Hamlets Council?

• If you know of any reference having been made, do you know what the substance of the reference was?

• If you don’t know anything of that sort then you should make a point of publishing that gap in your knowledge.

• Why you are being told about the gap in your knowledge.br/>
• Because of your very banal promotion [ East London Advertiser, 9 March 2006 – “CROSSRAIL CONTEMPT Labour councillors shout down their opponents’ call for debate”] of Michael Keith as an alleged ‘supporter of the need for a debate’ at the Tower Hamlets Council meeting of 1 March 2006 shows really contemptuous ignorance of the truth and of the facts.

1. It was the very same Michael Keith who told every single one of the Blair side councillor on Tower Hamlets Council to stay quiet about any debate.
2. It was the very same Michael Keith who banned every one else on the Blair side of the Council from saying anything.
3. It was he who had encouraged them to laugh at the councillors speaking in the Council chamber against the Crossrail hole.
4. It was the very same Michael Keith who had been called a liar a hundred times in both the Council Chamber and outside the Council Town Hall [Mulberry Place, London E14 2BG] and elsewhere in the Borough at tens of public meetings by campaigners against the Crossrail hole attacks during the presentation of the facts on the Crossrail hole over the past 26 months
5. It was the very same Michael Keith who had been fingered as the tout and the corrupt link with the Crossrail promoters.
6. It was the very same Michael Keith who was identified as being the key tout in the promotion of the Crossrail attacks package in the paid for ‘letter’ printed in the London Evening Standard on 30 June 2003.
7. It was the very same Michael Keith who is the key defendant in a defamation action that is being prepared over his poisonous smearing and his lying on Crossrail hole and on his defamatory lies against key campaigners against the Crossrail in Tower Hamlets.


How is it that you seem so totally innocent of all those facts and paint the key devil as if it was his generosity and democratic disposition that allowed Councillor Louise Alexander and or her ‘co-Opposition’ colleague/s’ to have any respite from the otherwise jeering and bullying obstructions of the Blair side of ‘councillors’?