KHOODEELAAR! Constitutional law evidential update on why Boris Johnson must say No to Crossrail [142].

This page was last edited at 1940 GMT London Tuesday 30 September 2008/ Eid al Fitr 1429 AH

.We are asking Boris Johnson to look very carefully at one sentence that has appeared in the report published by the Transport Editor of the London EVEBING Nostandards STANDARD Dick Murray.

That sentence reads as follows

“The Government has already ruled out using funds allocated to the £16 billion Crossrail project, despite transport experts advising that the Tube network upgrade is a higher priority.”
We are also asking Boris Johnson to take a look at what Rod Eddington said about Crossrail.

Eddington was the man appointed by Gordon Brown to do a study of the transport needs of the UK.

His report did NOT recommend CrossRail.

As if there is any doubt about that, Boris Johnson can watch the Channel 4 News report on that as published in October 2007.

Channel 4 news clearly reported that Gordon Brown had given the go ahead to Crossrail against the advice of Rod Eddington.

Then there was the small item earlier this year in PRIVATE EYE , saying that one of Douglas Alexander’s close aides had been working for Bechtel who were the real influence behind Brown’s ‘backing’ for Crossrail


[To be continued]


http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-mayor/article-23562139-details/Boris+in+3bn+battle+to+rescue+Tube+upgrade/article.do


Read this


“The Government has already ruled out using funds allocated to the £16 billion Crossrail project, despite transport experts advising that the Tube network upgrade is a higher priority.”
This is unbelievable!
This little sentence contained at the end of a piece hidden in the inner pages of the London EVENBIN nostandards STANDARD is an OPPOSITE statement to literally THOYDSANDS of plugs that the same EVEBING nostandards STANDARD pushed over the period of the past six years…. So crazy had the EVENINGF nostandards STANDARD’s peddling of CrossRail been that KHOODEELAAR! Gave the evidentially valid and accurate description ‘no standards’ to the publication as a regular statement of our view that the publication [the EVEBNING nostandards STANDARD] was wrong to promote CRASSrail and that its backing of CRASSRAIL too was wrong. It should not back Crossrail. We have shown that the EXISTING infrastructure and the existing transport provisions NEEDED a higher priority to be given than CrossRail…

We have argued this case, shown the evidence for it for almost 5 years…now

The EVENING nostandards STANDARD has regularly failed to publish what we have said.. And here, for the first time that we can find, their Transport editor Dick Murray has resurfaced after years of the coverage being given to other ‘writers’ as far as CRASSRAIL is concerned.

And the transport Editor [!!!!] let slip the very 'acknolwedgement' that has been overdue for 6 years….


[To be continued]