Khoodeelaar! Questions to Julia N Jones About Crossrail payment to Tower Hamlets Council on Whitechapel Idea Store [261]

This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 0540 GMT London Tuesday 28 October 2008

ACTION ARCHIVE against the corrupt practices of the Tower Hamlets 'local' Council acting as the tout for Big business Crossrail scam....

"
Christine Gilbert, one of the defendants in the court actions announced by Khoodeelaar!, was sent the following questions on 7 March 2006 about the corrupt deal that the controlling clique on Tower Hamlets had made with the CrossRail promoters some years ago.

These questions are self-explanatory:-


KHOODEELAARONLINE QUOTE Lawcompliance asking [7 March 2006] Christine Gilbert the ‘chief executive’ of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council questions convening the Whitechapel Idea Store and the bribery deal that the corrupt clique made with the Crossrail hole plan promoters:




LAWCOMPLIANCE
Lawcompliance@hotmail.co.uk


Questions from
Lawcompliance@hotmail.co.uk
On the instructions of
Khoodeelaar!
The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole “plan, scheme, project” Bill 2006


These questions are based on the evidence we have obtained from a number of different sources including through our ongoing research into the links between Crossrail pyrometers ands individual in control of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council at the given time.


You are being asked these questions because when we tried to speak to you we were repeatedly given the run around on Monday 6 March 2006.

Your name was in fact mentioned by one of the senior employees of the Council.

Then we tried to get the information from Heather Wills, but she was said to be forever unavailable.

There is in our experience a pattern of behaviour on the parts of employees concerned when it comes to getting them to disclose ordinary information about ordinary matters.

We are asking these questions the response to which will be published by Khoodeelaar! on their print and the internet bulletins and sites.


Questions:

Subject The Idea Store Whitechapel CROSSRAIL payment

1. When did Tower Hamlets Council first have any contact with the Crossrail company [CLRL] [or with any other outfit that may at the relevant time not have been called CLRL but by another name or designation or acronym] about the Idea Store Whitechapel and who represented or acted or spoke or appeared on behalf of OR IN THE NAME OF the LBTH Council and what had in fact prompted that particular reference or set of references at whose centre lay or stood the ‘Idea Store’ ‘Whitechapel’?
2. Who had initiated the relevant references and who made the link between the “Idea Store” and its "design” and the “Cash” that Crossrail eventually paid about that or with reference to that?
3. How much money was paid by Crossrail about the “Idea Store”?
4. When was the payment sought?
5. When was the payment received?
6. What legal advice was sought by Tower Hamlets Council if any was in fact at all sought about the deal?
7. Who acted as the advisor [in any legal advice engagement or briefing]?
8. What constitutional basis was said to exist at the time when the cash deal was being made for the Crossrail the payment to Tower Hamlets Council?
9. Did anyone go on the record and are there minutes of the meetings and are there documents showing all the contacts and the communications that took place between the Tower Hamlets Council and the Crossrail interests at the time and covering the whole deal?
10. Given that the Crossrail plan is yet a theory - as distinct from a legally implementable programme- and the hybrid Crossrail Bill was not even introduced to the UK House of Commons until 22 February 2005, who decided to even contemplate involving the legal and the constitutional entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council in a clearly speculative, illegal deal?
11. If Tower Hamlets Council has been paying cash to so-called ethnic language titles circulating in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council [especially in the past two months] making all manner of claims to the effect that it – the controlling collection of personnel acting as and in the name of the LBTH Council – has not behaved dishonestly, that it has not concealed the core facts from the community about the Council’s behaviour on the Crossrail hole plan, that it has abided by the demands of the community as expressed at the meeting on 22 January 2006 in the motion spoken and moved by Mr Muhammad Haque – then how is it that we are still, at 7 March 2006 having to ask these detailed questions of so many ‘senior’ employees in the LBTH Council about what the Council did in its clearly speculative and unrepresentative deals with Crossrail for any cash payments?

12. Why hasn’t Tower Hamlets Council published the facts about its receipt of cash from Crassrail with reference to the Idea Store?


Part 1 of the Khoodeelaar! Questions to Julia N Jones
About Crossrail payment to Tower Hamlets Council on
Whitechapel Idea Store


1645 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 7 March 2006

KHOODEELAARONLINE UNQUOTE Lawcompliance asking [7 March 2006] Christine Gilbert the ‘chief executive’ of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council questions convening the Whitechapel Idea Store and the bribery deal that the corrupt clique made with the Crossrail hole plan promoters:



"