KHOODEELAAR! UPDATING the EVIDENTIAL focus on the DAILY MAIL group and the BBC

0245 Hrs GMT London Sunday 30 November 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! HAS TOLD THE TRUTH against Big Business lies and the connivance with Big Business by holders of decision-making posts in the Blaired administration... We have seen no mention of any of these serious observations in the Daily Mail... As we have not got on the BBC. In any significant way whatever... yet every single observation we made in the past 5 years about the wastefulness of Crossrail has come true.. As has every one of our contextual comments and forecasts... yet the Daily mail has pretended to not notice what we have been saying...As has the BBC.…. yet the BBC’s Business Editor, economics Editor and Political editors COMBINED have not said anything that has amounted to a fraction of the long term analysis that we have made and published .… Why? Because BOTH the DAiLY MAIOL group [that includes the mail on sunday] and the BBC are prisoners of their own prejudice, ignorance , bias and dishonesty, opportunism,.…They would rather suppress the truth than get rid of their prejudice.… We are TELLING the ‘Opposition' Conservatives and the DAILY Mail: Get your morality right, first! YOU have brought about the Police State! Now free society from it!And if there has been any 'erosion' of the UK House of Com,mons in the Blaired years then that has been BACKED by YOU! And if you doubt the evidential basis of what we are telling you, then just look back at your treatment of the key issues of freedom, democracy, sovereignty of parliament and see how you behaved on and after 12 June 2008 following David Davis's resignation statement made at the entrance to the building called the Palace of Westminster...You have NOT made freedom, democracy, sovereignty of parliament really serious [if any] issues at all in the months since June 2008. Or EVER! And you have allowed the Blairing executive to pass ‘laws’ that have made sure that a de facto and a more brazen police state was being built on top of the one that was under construction for the 60 years that went before the 42 day attempt....This is true despite the fact that the particular 42 days motion got temporarily ‘defeated’. By default. [To be continued]