Khoodeelaar! NO to “Crossrail hole agenda...” CAMPAIGN constitutional law claims against Ruth Kelly, Douglas Alexander, Alistair Darling, et al 20 July 2008
By©Muhammad Haque
1445 GMT
London
Sunday
20 July 2008
These are as follows:
[This list of summarised headings will be published over the next few days]
That these named ones, each as the holder at the time concerned of the post of the UK cabinet Minister for the Department of Transport and acting as the promoter of the Crossrail Bill, either lied or were negligent about the contents and about the falsehood or the truthfulness and about the accuracy or otherwise of their statements made in the UK parliament about the contents of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ being ‘compatible with the European Conventions
That these named ones, each as the holder at the time concerned of the post of the UK cabinet Minister for the Department of Transport and acting as the promoter of the Crossrail Bill, either lied or were negligent about the contents and about the falsehood or the truthfulness and about the accuracy or otherwise of their statements made in the UK parliament regarding the correlation between the actually existent transport infrastructure in the region covered by the ‘Crossrail Bill’ and the resulting infrastructure as logically expected to be provided ONLY and solely and correlatively by the enactment of the ‘Crossrail Bill’ and that they also lied or were careless about the contents of their statements in the UK Parliament and to the UK Parliament about the relationship between the UK economy, the burden on the ordinary council tax paying and fare-paying public and the benefit that specifically would accrue to each one of the public or to the overwhelming majority of the public as the direct result of the promised construction of the “Crossrail’ line
That these named ones, each as the holder at the time concerned of the post of the UK cabinet Minister for the Department of Transport and acting as the promoter of the Crossrail Bill, either lied or were negligent about the contents and about the falsehood or the truthfulness and about the accuracy or otherwise of their statements made in the UK parliament about the state of transport in London and in the rest of the UK concerning all material aspects of the matter and in specific terms about the use and abuse by their Department and by their Govt of the powers and the money that they had access to in relation to the transport needs as experienced and known and re[ported by ordinary members of the public and as distinguished from the lobbies which acted on behalf of unidentified but known elements ts that are almost entirely not motivated by any primary mission to meet the needs of transport but sheer profit, greed and corporate and personal craving for money from the public under cover of the ‘Crossrail’ London scam.
[To be continued]
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law claims against Alistair Darling over poverty-creating London Crossrail hole scam...UPDATER files
By©Muhammad Haque
1200 GMT
London Sunday
20 July 2008
BACKGROUND archives on the KHOODEELAAR! Constitutional law action against the UK Govt over the ‘Crossrail Bill’ being published now at 1158 GMT Sunday 20 July 2008 in advance of the 'Crossrail hole Bill' being declared 'UK law' this coming week.
KHOODEELAAR! court actions will commence as soon after that announcement as procedures in place in the UK courts permit.
"
Wednesday, July 12, 2006
© Muhammad Haque
By Muhammad Haque
Organiser
The Brick Lane and the Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole Bill
0930 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 12 July 2006
That ‘Crossrail Bill’ is now in the UK House of Commons, 12 July 2006 being allegedly ‘scrutinised’ by the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’]
Khoodeelaar! court action may bring wider attention to Crossrail attack on the East End of London than may at first appear to be the case.
For a start, the series of actions that is about to begin, will include by definition the type of detailed examination of the evidence against Crossrail that has not been allowed to happen by the CrossRail Bill Select Committee in the UK House of Commons.
Although that examination should have taken place, if the claim - that the process of law making in the UK parliament was taking place – or does take place - at the highest democratic and accountable level were to be justifiable
The realities as we have observed in June 2006 make that [above] expectation a most unrealistic one. The 'meetings' of the UK House of Commons 'Select committee' on the Crossrail Bill were conducted in an openly hostile way to those who had any serious objections to put against the Crossrail Bill.
For a start there is no culture of democratic accountability in the UK parliament. No wonder that even a die-hard Tory like Quentin Hogg, himself no stranger to constitutional law, was forced to conclude that the system of ‘parliament’ that existed in the UK was one he could describe as an elected dictatorship.
A dictatorship, albeit an elected one.
But then, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party too had got elected at one stage,!
So what is the difference?
I shall report on the expected spaces that make up any alleged difference and on the danger of letting the elected dictatorship extinguish any remaining democratic values from the plastic parliament.
Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to?
I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London.
Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to?
I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London.
Crossrail threatens to blight most of the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area community. It threatens to drive out of business a very large section of the small business enterprises. And to make the environment a hundred times worse than it currently is.
All for nothing.
Mainly to make Canary Wharf expand to the City of London!
The mind boggles!
We are not expecting anything like the length of the McLibel cases. But we are most empathetically about to commence something that may well end up as being the second such court action. Are we right to embark on this? Are we right to say that court actions would cost less person hours than organising and maintaining massive demonstrations involving thousands of human beings would entail?
These questions are pertinent right now as we have reached the last phase before formal foiling of constitutional law challenges in court against the promoters and other institutionalised and institutional touts for the CrossRail project and its threat to the East End of London.
Long before the Crossrail Bill Select Committee [House of Commons] formally 'heard' some of the evidence against the CrossRail hole Bill threat to the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area, Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail had decided on a set of actions that included a specific constitutional dimension. After witnessing the blatant obstruction against key presenters of anti-CrossRail evidence in the Committee during June 2006, Khoodeelaar! Has now decided to test the UK law in a way that will perhaps bring the Human Rights Act 1998 into very unexpected focus.
1. The main constitutional law allegation that I could find against the Secretary of State was that he lied in and to Parliament, he misled parliament and he wrongly failed to tell the House of Commons fully and duly of the requirement that UK law had to comply with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms.
2. That was based on the preliminary and literal reading of the contents of the Crossrail Bill, as introduced to the House of Commons by [the then] Transport Secretary Alistair Darling on 22 February 2005.
3. Having observed since that date the many activities of the Transport Secretary and the rest of the groupings that make up the ‘promoter’ of the Crossrail Bill, it is clear that compatibility with constitutional requirements is not at the top of the priorities of the UK executive seeking to get the Crossrail Bill through Parliament.
4. It has been clear from the behaviour of the two successive holders of the office of Secretary of State at the UK Department for Transport over the past 24 months that compliance with the Treaty obligations on ECHR is nothing more than a nuisance to them and to the Blair regime. They have shown remarkably consistent evidence of hostility to the rule of law and due process and constitutionality for the promotion of the CrossRail project
5. It was only through the sustained campaign on the ground over the past 31 months backed up with original Khoodeelaar!! Legal analyses of the UK executive's behaviour that we have been able to show that the Secretary of State was wrong to have introduced the Crossrail Bill in the shape it was introduced and that he was wrong to have flouted the UK’s constitutional law making treaty obligations that he did.
Especially, as I have pointed out on dozens of occasions already including in pieces carried on indymedia UK and international sites, about the abuses of the executive powers to make several hundred million £ available to the promoters without any justification.
That abuse of public money has included the abuses of the local tiers of peoples and community representation.
Where Ruth Kelly herself lives, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council has been one abysmally antidemocratic, anti-community, cabal of corruption, misrepresentation of the local people that is found anywhere in the whole of the UK.
And has Ruth Kelly’s aid a word in opposition to the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council?
Has she spoken a word in support of the community that is threatened by Crossrail?
To those who have sought to make light of our legal action programme, we can only s ay, WATCH this space.
1200 GMT
London Sunday
20 July 2008
BACKGROUND archives on the KHOODEELAAR! Constitutional law action against the UK Govt over the ‘Crossrail Bill’ being published now at 1158 GMT Sunday 20 July 2008 in advance of the 'Crossrail hole Bill' being declared 'UK law' this coming week.
KHOODEELAAR! court actions will commence as soon after that announcement as procedures in place in the UK courts permit.
"
Wednesday, July 12, 2006
© Muhammad Haque
By Muhammad Haque
Organiser
The Brick Lane and the Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against Crossrail hole Bill
0930 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 12 July 2006
That ‘Crossrail Bill’ is now in the UK House of Commons, 12 July 2006 being allegedly ‘scrutinised’ by the ‘Crossrail Bill Select Committee’]
Khoodeelaar! court action may bring wider attention to Crossrail attack on the East End of London than may at first appear to be the case.
For a start, the series of actions that is about to begin, will include by definition the type of detailed examination of the evidence against Crossrail that has not been allowed to happen by the CrossRail Bill Select Committee in the UK House of Commons.
Although that examination should have taken place, if the claim - that the process of law making in the UK parliament was taking place – or does take place - at the highest democratic and accountable level were to be justifiable
The realities as we have observed in June 2006 make that [above] expectation a most unrealistic one. The 'meetings' of the UK House of Commons 'Select committee' on the Crossrail Bill were conducted in an openly hostile way to those who had any serious objections to put against the Crossrail Bill.
For a start there is no culture of democratic accountability in the UK parliament. No wonder that even a die-hard Tory like Quentin Hogg, himself no stranger to constitutional law, was forced to conclude that the system of ‘parliament’ that existed in the UK was one he could describe as an elected dictatorship.
A dictatorship, albeit an elected one.
But then, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party too had got elected at one stage,!
So what is the difference?
I shall report on the expected spaces that make up any alleged difference and on the danger of letting the elected dictatorship extinguish any remaining democratic values from the plastic parliament.
Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to?
I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London.
Can a programme of court actions produce results that a rally of thousands might not be able to?
I think it can do. And I am of the view after organising this Khoodeelaar! Campaign for the past 31 months to stop CrossRail digging holes in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area and mounting other assaults on the community in the East End of London.
Crossrail threatens to blight most of the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area community. It threatens to drive out of business a very large section of the small business enterprises. And to make the environment a hundred times worse than it currently is.
All for nothing.
Mainly to make Canary Wharf expand to the City of London!
The mind boggles!
We are not expecting anything like the length of the McLibel cases. But we are most empathetically about to commence something that may well end up as being the second such court action. Are we right to embark on this? Are we right to say that court actions would cost less person hours than organising and maintaining massive demonstrations involving thousands of human beings would entail?
These questions are pertinent right now as we have reached the last phase before formal foiling of constitutional law challenges in court against the promoters and other institutionalised and institutional touts for the CrossRail project and its threat to the East End of London.
Long before the Crossrail Bill Select Committee [House of Commons] formally 'heard' some of the evidence against the CrossRail hole Bill threat to the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area, Khoodeelaar! the campaign against CrossRail had decided on a set of actions that included a specific constitutional dimension. After witnessing the blatant obstruction against key presenters of anti-CrossRail evidence in the Committee during June 2006, Khoodeelaar! Has now decided to test the UK law in a way that will perhaps bring the Human Rights Act 1998 into very unexpected focus.
1. The main constitutional law allegation that I could find against the Secretary of State was that he lied in and to Parliament, he misled parliament and he wrongly failed to tell the House of Commons fully and duly of the requirement that UK law had to comply with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms.
2. That was based on the preliminary and literal reading of the contents of the Crossrail Bill, as introduced to the House of Commons by [the then] Transport Secretary Alistair Darling on 22 February 2005.
3. Having observed since that date the many activities of the Transport Secretary and the rest of the groupings that make up the ‘promoter’ of the Crossrail Bill, it is clear that compatibility with constitutional requirements is not at the top of the priorities of the UK executive seeking to get the Crossrail Bill through Parliament.
4. It has been clear from the behaviour of the two successive holders of the office of Secretary of State at the UK Department for Transport over the past 24 months that compliance with the Treaty obligations on ECHR is nothing more than a nuisance to them and to the Blair regime. They have shown remarkably consistent evidence of hostility to the rule of law and due process and constitutionality for the promotion of the CrossRail project
5. It was only through the sustained campaign on the ground over the past 31 months backed up with original Khoodeelaar!! Legal analyses of the UK executive's behaviour that we have been able to show that the Secretary of State was wrong to have introduced the Crossrail Bill in the shape it was introduced and that he was wrong to have flouted the UK’s constitutional law making treaty obligations that he did.
Especially, as I have pointed out on dozens of occasions already including in pieces carried on indymedia UK and international sites, about the abuses of the executive powers to make several hundred million £ available to the promoters without any justification.
That abuse of public money has included the abuses of the local tiers of peoples and community representation.
Where Ruth Kelly herself lives, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council has been one abysmally antidemocratic, anti-community, cabal of corruption, misrepresentation of the local people that is found anywhere in the whole of the UK.
And has Ruth Kelly’s aid a word in opposition to the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council?
Has she spoken a word in support of the community that is threatened by Crossrail?
To those who have sought to make light of our legal action programme, we can only s ay, WATCH this space.
How Tower Hamlets Council CROSSRAIL hole plot and agenda -inviting clique makes the East End borough poor and keeps poverty going AS POLICY ......
This page of AADHIKARonline was last edited at 0815 GMT Sunday 20 july 2008
Constitutional law commentary and update
by©Muhammad Haque
0815 Hrs GMT
LOndon Sunday 20 July 2008
COMING HERE in the next hours, including the following:-
1. How Tower Hamlets Council CROSSRAIL hole plot and agenda -inviting clique makes the East End borough poor and keeps poverty going AS POLICY as well as CULTURE
2. The full list of claims against Alistair Darling [who will be co-defendant with amongst other Ruth kelly and Douglas Alexander] as the claims are being filed in court after next Tuesday's Crossrail hole plot 'Royal Assent'
3. The list of allegations against the London Assembly and the Tfl [Transport for London] and DFT ][Department for Transport] on Crossrail hole plot
4. The list of allegations against the bureaucracies involved in the Crossrail Bill select committees in the UK House of Commons and the UK "legislative' House of Lords
5. Other legal, evidential items
[To be continued]
Constitutional law commentary and update
by©Muhammad Haque
0815 Hrs GMT
LOndon Sunday 20 July 2008
COMING HERE in the next hours, including the following:-
1. How Tower Hamlets Council CROSSRAIL hole plot and agenda -inviting clique makes the East End borough poor and keeps poverty going AS POLICY as well as CULTURE
2. The full list of claims against Alistair Darling [who will be co-defendant with amongst other Ruth kelly and Douglas Alexander] as the claims are being filed in court after next Tuesday's Crossrail hole plot 'Royal Assent'
3. The list of allegations against the London Assembly and the Tfl [Transport for London] and DFT ][Department for Transport] on Crossrail hole plot
4. The list of allegations against the bureaucracies involved in the Crossrail Bill select committees in the UK House of Commons and the UK "legislative' House of Lords
5. Other legal, evidential items
[To be continued]
If Brown can think of doing an 'about-turn' abroad, why not do a sensible and much needed about turn at home by scrapping the wasteful Crossrail hole
This page was last edited at 0600 GMT London Sunday 20 July 2008
KHOODEELAAR! commentary at 0558 GMT London Sunday 20 July 2008 :
If Gordon Brown can stage an about-turn! on Iraq, so he can do the same 'domestic policy'. As he is set to do on borrowing... Why not do something really important, like halting the craze for wasting £Billions in making the looting rich richer at the expense of ordinary people Why not save £Billions by halting the Crossrail hole scam? Why not actually look at the transport needs of and in London and find an intelloiegnt, ecimically and nevoenmenatllys oudn and socally jist way to make the transport exeoeence in London better fro ordainry peopel in and of London?[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! commentary at 0558 GMT London Sunday 20 July 2008 :
If Gordon Brown can stage an about-turn! on Iraq, so he can do the same 'domestic policy'. As he is set to do on borrowing... Why not do something really important, like halting the craze for wasting £Billions in making the looting rich richer at the expense of ordinary people Why not save £Billions by halting the Crossrail hole scam? Why not actually look at the transport needs of and in London and find an intelloiegnt, ecimically and nevoenmenatllys oudn and socally jist way to make the transport exeoeence in London better fro ordainry peopel in and of London?[To be continued]
Khoodeelaar! Says No to the ADDING of poverty via Crossrail hole agenda in the East End and in the inner city London...
KHOODEELAAR! comment on James Purnell and the KHOODEELAAR! coining of a new description for the DWP ..
“Destruction of Welfare and creator of Poverty”.. at 0545 GMT Sunday 20 July 2008 ...
The Blairing assault of lies about poverty in the UK is given another legitimacy-linked plug, as the fabricator, poverty-creator James Purnell [placed by Gordon Brown to complete the Blairing task as the 'Cabinet minister' 'heading' the Destruction of Welfare and creator of Poverty = DWP]
The MUHAMMAD HAQUE ECONOMIC COMMENTARY ON JAMES PUNELL'S LIES against the inner cities communities, coming here during Sunday 20 July 2008
“Destruction of Welfare and creator of Poverty”.. at 0545 GMT Sunday 20 July 2008 ...
The Blairing assault of lies about poverty in the UK is given another legitimacy-linked plug, as the fabricator, poverty-creator James Purnell [placed by Gordon Brown to complete the Blairing task as the 'Cabinet minister' 'heading' the Destruction of Welfare and creator of Poverty = DWP]
The MUHAMMAD HAQUE ECONOMIC COMMENTARY ON JAMES PUNELL'S LIES against the inner cities communities, coming here during Sunday 20 July 2008
CRASSrail Compulsory Purchase Orders 'news'
Quoting from the web site of the Times newspapers [as 'Sunday Times']
at 0510 GMT Sunday 20 July 2008
"
Crossrail go-ahead
THE £16 billion Crossrail project is expected to get the final green light this week when the bill approving its construction receives royal assent in parliament.
The sign-off will allow the promoters of the line to start work on the raft of compulsory purchase orders that are necessary before building work can begin.
Crossrail is a new line that will run east to west across the capital, with the first trains running in 2017.
"
at 0510 GMT Sunday 20 July 2008
"
Crossrail go-ahead
THE £16 billion Crossrail project is expected to get the final green light this week when the bill approving its construction receives royal assent in parliament.
The sign-off will allow the promoters of the line to start work on the raft of compulsory purchase orders that are necessary before building work can begin.
Crossrail is a new line that will run east to west across the capital, with the first trains running in 2017.
"
As the degenerating, poverty-creating, Big Business Crossrail hole agenda gets MPs rubber stamp on Tuesday, how the UK medi aid the poverty-creators!
This AADHIKARonline page was last edited at 0445 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 July 2008:
By©Muhammad Haque 0435 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Corral hole Big Business agenda’ CAMPAIGN has pointed out for years that the so-called ‘prudent financial journal’ the FT was a platform of corrupt journalism, often misleading the ‘readers’ on the actual economic conditions, trends and the correlated facts, events and plots In the context of the Big Business Crassrail hole plot, the FT has published lies. Just like the London EVENING Nostandards STANDARD, the FT has published fabricated accounts on the cots, the need and the relevance of the Crassrail hole project. The FT is frequently promoted as having been written by ‘professional journalist’ who are socially aware , in fact even ‘conventionally left wing’. This is another lie. The FT is corrupt. And the record of the FT’s corruption is to be found on its pages [as well as in its so-called special reports published] throughout its existence. The FT and the Guardian have been parts of the so-called mainstream British media triumvirate along with the BBC which has afforded space to the other falsely painted left wing time serving agent of Big Business capitalism, Ken Livingstone. The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have failed to tell the truth on the domestic economic and asocial conditions... Just as Saturday’s ‘journalism’ showed, even the Rupert Murdoch Times did a better piece of financial journalism than the FT did. Or the BBC. Or the Guardian. That interview with the UK Finance minister - and the bringer of the CRASSrail Bill Alistair Darling, would have been the sort of reporting that the FT should have been able to do. The agenda on the FT has never been clear. It is coloured pink but it is also morally very very dubious. The result is that the FT misspeaks ... By peddling the wasteful obsolete and bogus Crossrail scam, the FT is serving the secret ‘constituency’;, the Big Business while failing to report on the transport needs, the economic needs and the capacities. If Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling [whichever is the ‘face’] fails to make the right decisions, then the ‘ atmosphere of public opinion’ in which they do so will have been as much their fault as it will be the fault of the FT, the Guardian and the BBC... The fault being to tell the truth about the economic facts.... and the social and democratic adverse effects of making the wrong economic decisions...The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have all been pretence-’sympathiser’ with the ‘socially excluded’ but they are as corrupt and as much on the side of the economic and the social degenerators as their more obvious ‘rival’ publications and media are and have been... The BBC, the FT and the Guardian NEED there to be social disparities... So that they can then practise [as claiming, falsely, to be concerned for social justice which they NEVER are about] their corrupt craft of playing at being ‘sympathetic. Their corruption of society stinks Because they collude with the creators of social deprivation by making the economic disparity.... As they are showing by their wring and unjustified and unjust promotion of Crossrail which will be another big vehicle to apply to widen the social and economic discrimination, bias and disparities in and AGAINST communities and people in inner city areas like in the East End of London... [To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque 0435 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘Corral hole Big Business agenda’ CAMPAIGN has pointed out for years that the so-called ‘prudent financial journal’ the FT was a platform of corrupt journalism, often misleading the ‘readers’ on the actual economic conditions, trends and the correlated facts, events and plots In the context of the Big Business Crassrail hole plot, the FT has published lies. Just like the London EVENING Nostandards STANDARD, the FT has published fabricated accounts on the cots, the need and the relevance of the Crassrail hole project. The FT is frequently promoted as having been written by ‘professional journalist’ who are socially aware , in fact even ‘conventionally left wing’. This is another lie. The FT is corrupt. And the record of the FT’s corruption is to be found on its pages [as well as in its so-called special reports published] throughout its existence. The FT and the Guardian have been parts of the so-called mainstream British media triumvirate along with the BBC which has afforded space to the other falsely painted left wing time serving agent of Big Business capitalism, Ken Livingstone. The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have failed to tell the truth on the domestic economic and asocial conditions... Just as Saturday’s ‘journalism’ showed, even the Rupert Murdoch Times did a better piece of financial journalism than the FT did. Or the BBC. Or the Guardian. That interview with the UK Finance minister - and the bringer of the CRASSrail Bill Alistair Darling, would have been the sort of reporting that the FT should have been able to do. The agenda on the FT has never been clear. It is coloured pink but it is also morally very very dubious. The result is that the FT misspeaks ... By peddling the wasteful obsolete and bogus Crossrail scam, the FT is serving the secret ‘constituency’;, the Big Business while failing to report on the transport needs, the economic needs and the capacities. If Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling [whichever is the ‘face’] fails to make the right decisions, then the ‘ atmosphere of public opinion’ in which they do so will have been as much their fault as it will be the fault of the FT, the Guardian and the BBC... The fault being to tell the truth about the economic facts.... and the social and democratic adverse effects of making the wrong economic decisions...The FT, the Guardian and the BBC have all been pretence-’sympathiser’ with the ‘socially excluded’ but they are as corrupt and as much on the side of the economic and the social degenerators as their more obvious ‘rival’ publications and media are and have been... The BBC, the FT and the Guardian NEED there to be social disparities... So that they can then practise [as claiming, falsely, to be concerned for social justice which they NEVER are about] their corrupt craft of playing at being ‘sympathetic. Their corruption of society stinks Because they collude with the creators of social deprivation by making the economic disparity.... As they are showing by their wring and unjustified and unjust promotion of Crossrail which will be another big vehicle to apply to widen the social and economic discrimination, bias and disparities in and AGAINST communities and people in inner city areas like in the East End of London... [To be continued]