1438 Hrs GMT London Sunday 11 January 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! Told you so!
By © Muhammad Haque…
KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole scam, Big Business ploy…” campaign UPDATING the evidence of the continuing corruption of ‘mainstream’ ‘journalism’. That the likes of the London ‘Independent on Sunday’ [or the weekday INDEPENDENT] fake it when they pose, as the following item on their web site this afternoon [Sunday 11 January 2009] poses, that they, the editorial decision-makers on the INDEPENDENT newspapers, are on the side of the truth, or on the side of protecting the environment and that they are for ethical and democratic debate and process in Britain that is accountable for the British Government’s and the British State’s decision-making and uses of powers in Government and on behalf of the State in Britain..…. The Independent has often been associated with the Guardian Media Groups’ own fakery as a liberal outlet for the allegedly liberal thinking in the UK…. The fact is that BOTH the INDEPENDENT and the GUARDIAN have been licking the worst side of the entity of the power wielding state and that they have shown this in their blanket promotion of Crossrail,. Scam…. In contrast with that, BOTH have posed as being ‘interested’ in promoting the opposition to the Third Runway at Heathrow……This is for a more obvious reason than may appear to be the case. BOITH the Guardian and the INDEPENDENT belong to the corrupt school of British liberalism and racism….
They BOTH identify with the racist Matthew Parris who in 2005 urged Blair to drive Crossrail through Brick Lane as a de facto punishment for the East End constituency that had voted out Oona King… Oona King, to matthew parries and to the cabals and sewers of his co-racist ‘thinkers’ and presenters given platforms by the BBC and Rupert Murdoch… is not just ‘wholly British’ as compared to the ‘Brick Lane voters’ as RACISTLY DEFINED and prejudicially seen and mispainted by Parris, but she, Oona King, is even ‘more British than the British’….
And when the Bethnal Green and Bow constituency electors voted her out [May 2005], they in fact voted out everything that ‘British’ represented as racistly perceived and prejudicially and wrongly interpreted by the South African-reared, apartheid-imbiber, apartheid-perpetrator Matthew Parris who includes writing speeches and doing research for Margaret Thatcher among his ‘achievements’……
Did Matthew Parris make any contribution to Thatcher’s ‘swamping’ spiel of 1978 ??? The very same racist attack which Thatcher made on the ITV ‘current affairs’ slot then and thus defining herself as the ‘hope and glory’ of a still racist Britain as against the ‘immigrants’ who were making people ‘rather worried’ about being ‘swamped’ by these ‘immigrants’? THIRTY YEARS on, in January 2008, almost an identical ‘swamping’ spirit has been given voice to by ‘Prince’ Harry……..That he could make the ‘Paki’ comment in the way that he did make it is not in itself surprising… But that the Royal Family’ establishment has issued one of the explanations for the ‘Paki’ tag speech/utterance by Harry, is indicative of the atmosphere of racism in the Jacqui Smith-ed, Gordon Brown-fronted BLAIRED state of Britain that influences the ‘thinking’ of every Tom Dick and Harry that is worth mentioning in relation to what constitutes the ‘British Royal family establishment’, says a lot about why they are able to pretend that CROSSRAIL is not only GOOD but vital.…..
Whereas the 3rd Runway at Heathrow is bad and must be stopped…… What is the ‘Paki’ tag that they are attaching to which one of the two liability projects is NOT at all such a deep mystery, as Matthew parries can tell his fellow- British ‘thinkers, commentators, lobbyist and Big Business touts on the ‘mainstream’ ‘British’ media… [To be continued]
"
Heathrow’s controversial third runway – due to be given the green light by ministers this week – is unlikely ever to be built because it will fall foul of new European pollution laws, environmentalists and senior government advisers believe.
The airport’s two existing runways already cause air pollution which breaches compulsory European Union air-quality standards, which Britain will have to observe by 2015. Neither anti-runway campaigners nor the Government’s Environment Agency see how these can possibly be met if the number of flights rises by 50 per cent as planned.
The Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties have vowed to block the new runway if they are in a position to do so after the next election. They plan to force a parliamentary vote on the project, which would be almost certain to attract Labour rebels.
The go-ahead – pencilled in for confirmation by Geoff Hoon, the Secretary of State for Transport, on Thursday – is to be presented as the centrepiece of a New Deal-style series of public works, like the one president-elect Barack Obama is expected to push through in the US after taking office later this month.
In an attempt to reduce the impact of one of the most hotly contested planning decisions for years, the move will be accompanied by a list of multibillion-pound projects designed to demonstrate the Government’s commitment to improving transport and other facilities across the nation. It will be linked to the establishment of “an international rail hub” at the airport, the Crossrail project, preparations for the London Olympics and plans to accelerate the Government’s school-building programme.
Ministers will also insist that the plans for the runway will have to ensure that the air around Heathrow – already polluted by road traffic as well as by existing flights – does not breach EU limits for nitrogen dioxide, due to come into force next year. Britain can apply for a five-year delay but will have to observe them by 2015.
The British Airports Authority says that new technology and cleaner planes will reduce pollution as to enable the standards to be met, but critics do not see how this can be done if flights rise to more than 700,000 a year, when the existing 480,000 already help to put parts of the area over the limit.
Lord Smith, the chairman of the Environment Agency, said yesterday that the runway could not go ahead unless “very strict pollution limits” were set. He was sceptical that the EU standards could be met, and would prefer that the runway was not built.
John Stewart, the chairman of Hacan Clearskies, which leads opposition
"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.