KHOODEELAAR! constitutional and democratic diagnosis of the hypocritical role played today by Tom Brake, 'MP' re the G20 violence and obstructions

1620 [1550] Hrs GMT London Tuesday 21 April 2009

KHOODEELAAR! evidential comment, about the G20 protest 'campaign film-maker' MP !!!! Tom Brake in the spotlight

The spot lasts only a couple of minutes or so. But it is a spotlight nevertheless. And Tom Brake may think that his itsy bitsy and the evidentially pretentious claim to be another campaigner for what in essence is civil liberties, is going to be accepted on face value.

It is not.
By a long measure.
Tom Brake has been a stooge-role-playing MP in the stooged UK House of Commons.

Brake ‘barked’ in his own way for the agenda set by Big Business pushing the CROSSRAIL scam through the UK Houses of Parliament.

Brake brayed in favour of Big Business.

Brake stayed silent and refused and failed to back campaigners who made formal objections against Crossrail.

Brake failed to support campaigners establish the evidential ground against CRASS Crossrail.

Brake’s appearance today [Tuesday 21 April 2009] on the media suggesting that he is a campaigner against Police violence and brutality at the London G20 demo earlier this month has to be seen in the context of Brake’s opportunistic role.

Brake did not risk his career. He in fact has behaved just as loosely selflessly as MPs are known to do.

How?

Because it is NOT the primary task of an MP to behave as if he has no platform to raise issues of concern relating to the very constitutional position of Police men and women.

Is Brake known for raising a single issue about Policing in the past? If so, what was the impact of any such intervention?

How often has Brake spoken in the Commons on policing matters?


ALSO and ‘incidentally’ the G20 demo, if anything, was against the global agenda of BIg Business.

Big Business that includes the Military Industrial Complex operator Bechtel Corp of the USA.

As we have been reporting, EVEN the Ian Hislop-fronted PRIVATE EYE ‘satirical magazine’ [updates on THAT one in due course, here] has had to confess to being ‘concerned’ that Bechtel Corp pushed the ‘Crossrail Bill’ through the UK Houses of Parliament, aided and abetted by a ‘former’ aide to Douglas Alexander, the Crossrail Bill-peddler Minister [that was in place after Alistair Darling and before Ruth Kelly]

What acointacts, if any, had Tom Brake witH Bechtel and their lobbyists?

What breach of parliamentary ‘sovereignty’ [what IS that ?] had Tom Brake cited in any questions he might have put to the ‘House of Commons’ ‘authorities’ ‘protesting’ against the interference by Bechtel or similar outside agencies and interests?



[To be continued]