KHOODEELAAR! First comment on the London Guardian's confession that the PRESS COMPLAINTS COMMISSION is a Big Business poodle: WE TOLD THE GUARDIAN SO!

0620 GMT
London
Monday
09 November 2009



Editor © Muhammad Haque

KHOODEELAAR! First comment on the London Guardian's confession that the PRESS COMPLAINTS COMMISSION is a Big Business poodle: WE TOLD THE GUARDIAN SO!

KHOODEELAAR! Told the London GUARDIAN SO!
That it was COLLUDING with the PCC!
Now the Guardian claims to be in a 'fight' to make the PCC do its job!

We told the Guardian on many occasions. And we did so on the World Wide Web for years.

In fact our diagnosis of the Guardian’s mala fide role has been consistently chronicled and has been vindicated on each and every occasion.

As has our diagnosis of the Guardian-colluding Press Complaints Commission.

Yet we find ourselves this Monday morning 9 November 2009 faced with a confession by the same lot on the Guardian that had been denying our assertions about their role and the fact that the PCC was a poodle outfit for Big Business media now admitting that we had told the truth. After all.

The Guardian web sites do not carry the confession saying in words that the AADHIKARonline publishing the findings and the reports of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign has been vindicated once again.,

But the contents of the Guardian’s reports on the PCC in effect constitute that vindication and that acknowledgement.
We start this long overdue updater diagnostic report [at 0600 Hrs GMT Monday 09 November 2009] by taking each component of the PCC and the UK mainstream Media lying operation in context and one at a time.

The ‘dedication’ by the Alan Rusbridger-Polly Toynbee Guardian is being published on the Guardian’s websites after the Press Complaints Commission [=PCC] in London rejected the Guardian’s recent and earlier claims about Rupert Murdoch’s employees in particular on the ‘News of the World’ [the Sunday version of the SUN, with even more personal stories than the SUN carries with sex-related innuendos and alleged exposures etc etc] that they were tapping telephones of people including those of Mps and assorted celebrities and people in the so-called public life.

The Khoodeelaar! Campaign against “Big Business scam agenda Crossrail” has been issuing periodic complaints against the ‘local’ East London Idiotiser [that goes by the trade name of ‘East London Advertiser’] for several years now. In fact our complaints began in the context of the campaign against Crossrail in late 2004. That was when the then ‘editorial’ ’regime’ at the Idiotiser continued its own ‘tradition’ of publishing lies.

As the community campaign in defence of the widespread economic, environmental and related Crossrail-attacks on the community, we had to rebut, reject and expose that lie.

The particular lie in the ‘East London Advertiser’ that we objected to in October 2004 was the assertion [as printed in their weekly edition of Thursday 28 October 2004] the title then attributed to a ‘leader’ of the Crossrail hole scam-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets Council.

The significance of the IDIOTISER’s lying decision can be recognised also from the fact the lie was carried on the same page of the ‘local’ ‘newspaper’, which had contained the longer texts and report about our first main street demonstration over the Tower Hamlets Council’s Crossrail hole-inviting role.

That demonstration had taken place on Friday 22 October 2004 in the street where the official ‘ward surgery by councillors’ from the Brick Lane area was based. That address is still the same today, Monday 9 November 2009.

On the day of the demonstration, Friday 22 October 2004, we learnt that the ’promise’ we had been given by a ‘leading’ local councillor that they would meet with our campaign in a bid to avert any public demonstration against them or against the Council, had been a sham one.

We were therefore additionally convinced that the defence of the area against the Crossrail hole scam agenda attacks could not be assumed to be done by the local Council. In fact we found that the Tower Hamlets Council clique was performing the role of the POODLE Council carrying out the agenda of Biog Business against the local community.

We learnt, from the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign researches, that one of the elements installed in a ‘leading’ post on Tower Hamlets Council and playing the role as a member of the Council clique facilitating the Big Business takeover bid on the East End of London had been on the record as far back as 1990 in apparently saying that Big Business City of London was embarked then of taking over Brick Lane and other parts of the East End of London and of driving the ordinary people out of the area as part of that agenda and process.

Apart from the difference in the dates, - June 1990 when the claim against the City of London Big Business agenda was published – and the date of our demonstration against the role of the two ‘local Councillors’ from the Council ward that includes Brick Lane London E1 area – the substance of the claim was very much the same.

The difference was that we, the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign against the Crossrail Big Business agenda were still saying it whereas the council clique-member who had been publicly reported as saying the same thing against the City of London interests was saying the OPPOSITE now, October 2004.


We knew from related facts verified by our campaign investigations, that the blunt assertion as carried by the East London IDIOTISER [on Thursday 28 October 2004] about the alleged ulterior motives of the campaign against the Council’s collusion with the Crossrail hole scam agenda could only have been cooked up in direct consultation with those Big Business CrossRail hole scam agenda interests and that it could not have been based on any truthful awareness let alone recognition of the situation on the ground.

[To be continued]

Twitter, to End POVERTY

follow me on Twitter