Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Khoodeelaar! Challenging the BBC on its admission - after almost 7 years of denial - that the London Crossrail was [if not a crassly conceived diversionary scam but then at least, as far as the bbc goes, at today’s date, a scheme that is open to drastic cuts!] Not a transport priority. Khoodeelaar! Contextually notes the assertion made on BBC London in their 1830 hrs bulletin [fronted by Louisa Preston] about the USA having opened a ‘Harry Potter’ ‘visitor attraction’. Whoever ‘advised’ Boris Johnson to make that ‘plea’ was as ignorant, unwise as anybody who might have scripted all those peddling lines that Boris keeps churning out about ‘Crossrail’, the ‘City of London’, ‘the Banks’ and anything that Big Bizness cares to bid to have a contract on. . Taken together, all the peddling that Boris has done for big business and the city of London have amounted to a big zero. As big [if not bigger than] as the embarrassing one that Ken Livingstone had confected by his crass role over the relevant years during which he was entitled to claim to speak in the name of [often at the expense of] the people in a and around ‘London’. The alleged rivals are indistinguishable when measured against their touting mouthing for biog business forces at the expense of ordinary people of and in London. We have shown now every day a new and distinct item of evidence constituting ground for scrapping Crossrail altogether. To this day, we have not seen or heard of a single evidential rebuttal from a single one of the placemen or place women that big Bizness has put in place. So we say again: Scrap Crossrail. It is not worth it. [To be continued]


Where could spending axe fall?

Page last updated at 16:39 GMT, Tuesday, 8 June 2010 17:39 UK
We have been told painful public spending cuts are on the way, but where should the axe fall?
That is the question Prime Minister David Cameron's government has posed to the British public as they seek to plug an estimated £71bn a year black hole in the nation's finances.
How things might look in years to come will depend on the decisions made by Chancellor George Osborne's in his forthcoming emergency budget and spending review. Below we set out in detail some of the tax and spending choices the country faces.

VAT

Some experts have predicted the government will increase VAT in its emergency budget.
Cash raised
About £11bn a year, if it is increased from the current level of 17.5% to 20%, according to Credit Suisse.
Political risk
The easiest and quickest way to raise a lot of money, but it comes with economic risks. It would push up the inflation rate, potentially forcing the Bank of England to put interest rates up. It was not proposed by either the Conservatives or the Lib Dems in their election manifestos either, although David Cameron has refused to rule it out. Business Secretary Vince Cable would be forced to explain why he had changed his mind, after speaking out against increasing the rate before the election.

WELFARE

A range of benefits could be frozen in George Osborne's emergency budget.
Cash raised
Freezing all benefits could raise about £15bn over three years. Axing child benefit for better off families could save £1.3bn a year. Taxing the winter fuel allowance for better off pensioners, in line with proposals in a select committee report last year, could save £250m a year. Axing it altogether would save £2.7bn a year.
Political risk
Freezing benefits across the board would raise a lot of money quickly but hit the poor and most vulnerable the hardest - something the coalition has pledged to avoid. Ministers could, alternatively, enact the Liberal Democrat policy of axing child credits for couples on a joint income of more £26,000. Means testing the winter fuel allowance is another option, although the BBC understands this is not being considered.

INCOME TAX

The biggest single contributor to the exchequer's coffers - and a perennial source of extra revenue for cash-strapped chancellors, particularly in the year after an election.
Cash raised
Putting 1p on the basic rate of income tax would raise about £4bn a year, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
Political risk
George Osborne would find it very difficult to increase the basic rate. A less headline-grabbing alternative would be to reduce tax relief for high earners saving for their retirement, although they have already been clobbered by measures in Alistair Darling's last budget and business groups have been protesting it will drive wealth creating talent from the UK. Mr Osborne is expected to change personal allowances to help the low paid, in line with Lib Dem policy, to be paid for by changes to capital gains tax.

NATIONAL INSURANCE

The budget will confirm that most of next year's planned increase in National Insurance will not go ahead. Plans to increase it by 1% for employees are likely to go ahead but the same increase for employers' NI - dubbed Labour's "jobs tax" by Mr Cameron - is to be shelved.
Cash raised
Increasing National Insurance by one percentage point raises £8.8bn a year in extra revenue, according to the IFS.
Political risk
Could raise billions at a stroke but would hit Tory-voting high and middle income workers.

CAPITAL GAINS TAX

Non-business capital gains tax, which is levied on the profits made by individuals when they sell second homes, shares or other assets, is set to be increased from 18% to 40% or 50%.
Cash raised
Hotly disputed. Some accountants argue that it could be as low as £500m a year, if it is tapered to prevent penalising long-term investors. The Lib Dems, who proposed it, say it would raise about £1.9bn a year, although this would be used to pay for the planned increase in personal tax allowances rather than to pay off the deficit. Some Tory MPs argue it could actually cost money, as collection rates fall.
Political risk
It is already in the coalition agreement so will not come as a surprise. The only question is whether Mr Osborne will taper it to soften the impact on long-term investors. If he does not he could face a backbench rebellion from Tory MPs who see it as a tax on entrepreneurs and people saving for their retirement. The Lib Dems say increasing CGT to the same level as income tax is essential to make the tax fairer.

GREEN TAXES

The budget is expected to adopt Lib Dem proposals of switching from a per-passenger air duty to per-plane, but as with capital gains, the reform will help to fund an increase in the personal allowance.
Cash raised
None from the air tax changes (see above). But further green taxes could be included in the budget.
Political risk
The coalition has called for a higher proportion of tax revenues to come from environment taxes, although any move to increase fuel duty beyond that already announced by the previous government would spark an outcry.

PUBLIC SECTOR PAY

The government has already committed itself to a public sector pay freeze for all but the lowest paid workers next year. The budget could also include below-inflation pay rises for state employees.
Cash raised
The CBI claims selected public sector pay and recruitment freezes could save £18bn in the next two years.
Political risk
The government is doing its best to keep public sector workers onside by trying to involve them in deciding where the spending axe will fall but, with inflation running at 5%, a pay freeze would amount to a cut for many workers and could spark industrial action.

BIG CAPITAL PROJECTS

The government is committed to a number of expensive long-term projects including new London rail network Crossrail, a high speed rail network and replacing Trident nuclear missiles.
Cash raised
The government is reported to be considering making up to £5bn of cuts to the £16.9bn Crossrail scheme. Delaying the £20bn Trident upgrade would save a lot of money. The Lib Dems have been promised a "value for money" review of the project.
Political risk
The Conservatives could not afford to be seen as going weak on defence, although delaying Trident would please the Lib Dems. Crossrail looks more vulnerable.

HEALTH

Health is the only area of spending - apart from the relatively modest international development budget - that has been protected from frontline cuts, although the NHS will have to make 3% efficiency savings and IT projects have been axed.
Cash raised
The NHS annual budget is £106bn. Some experts say it is nonsense to suggest further savings cannot be made from it.
Political risk
Protecting the NHS from cuts was a key Tory election pledge - but the Lib Dems argued it should not be ring-fenced, which could provide some cover if Mr Osborne decided to rein back its budget.

EDUCATION

Core school budgets, 16 to 19-year-olds and Sure Start will be protected but many additional services could be facing the chop, particularly if those providing them work for local authorities or quangos.
Cash raised
Savings of £670m have already been announced by scrapping the new primary curriculum and axing quangos, among other things, but this is a drop in the ocean compared with the savings that are likely to be made over the next few years from the £63bn annual education budget. The teachers' final salary pension scheme, which costs about £10bn a year, could be one casualty.
Political risk
Care will be taken to avoid anything that impacts too obviously on children's education. The government's plans for academies and free schools will also be a priority. But it may be hard to avoid protests if local services for children and youths are cut.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Local government is likely to come under pressure to save money by outsourcing services or handing them over to voluntary groups. Leisure services, residential care and public libraries are among the budgets thought to be in the firing line. Charges could be introduced for other services such as recycling and home help. Conservative plans to freeze council tax for two years also appear to have been dropped.
Cash raised
Local councils are already being forced to shed up to 300,000 jobs and staff pensions and benefits face a squeeze. But the £35bn spent annually on local government is still likely to come under further pressure.
Political risk
Huge public sector job losses could damage the economy in some parts of the country. Popular local services could also suffer.

DEFENCE

Defence spending is protected in the current year but a full Strategic Defence Review is expected to recommend deep cuts when it reports in November. The army could be cut from 98,000 personnel to about 80,000, according to press reports, and orders for new fighter jets and other equipment scaled back, although the government remains committed to replacing Trident nuclear missiles.
Cash raised
In addition to anticipated manpower cuts, the Ministry of Defence is set to review about 20 equipment procurement projects, worth £10bn in total, according to media reports. The Lib Dems have been promised a "value for money" review of the project.
Political risk
Cuts to the nation's defence capability are likely to meet heavy resistance from the Conservative benches. With so many British troops committed in Afghanistan, it is also an emotive subject for the public.

RETIREMENT AGE

The coalition government has announced a review of the retirement age. Under current plans, it is due to rise from 65 to 66 from 2024 but the Conservatives have said they want this change to happen from 2016 for men and from 2020 for women.
Cash raised
Adopting the Conservative proposals would eventually save £13bn a year.
Political risk
Relatively low, given that the retirement age is already going up, although any benefit would be so far in the future as to make it worthless as a short-term deficit reduction measure.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.