KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenge is that the Crossrail Bill was introduced and pushed through the two Houses of Parliament UNCONSTITUTIONALLY

This page was last edited at 1425 GMT London Sunday 3 August 2008

The briefest reasonable statement of the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenge is that the Crossrail Bill was introduced and pushed through the two Houses of Parliament in contravention of the UK’s treaty obligations. In particular the contents of the Crossrail Bill was NOT compatible with the ‘Convention’.

The ‘Convention’ here means the ‘European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’.

The OTHER grounds include the fact that no evidence was produced to substantiate the plug that Crossrail was the economic benefit-bringer that the peddlers have claimed it to be.

SECONDLY, NO evidence was produced to substantiate the £100 Million grant made to the CLRL under Section 6 of the ‘Railways Act 2005’. That ‘Railways Act 2005’ itself is externe,y dodgy and in ordinary language, it was a criminal device which had been itself passed in a stealthy way through Parliament to do precisely the kind of thing that Alistair Darling did in making the £100 Million grant to CLRL in 2005.
[To be continued]




This page was last edited at 1305 GMT LOndon Sunday 3 August 2008


Gordon Brown should DISS Big Business, cut off the secret, insidious links that Blair had contrived with the sleazebags...


[To be continued]