This page was last edited at 2200 Hrs GMT London Saturday 30 April 2008
2155 GMT London Saturday 30 August 2008:
There is one word that can END Alistair Darling's misery! And end the 'gloom' for the rest of the Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired regime! CRASSrail! All that they need to say is unite, like they did with the sneaky Ken Livingstone in march and April 2008, and chant 'CRASSrail'! Why are we in the KHOODEELAAR! campaign giving this unique, timely and highly economically efficient and prudent and competent advice worth £Billions for free? because unlike Alistair darling, we care about and for the truth.. And we shall continue to care.... Unlike Gordon Brown and his hocus pocus vahloos! WE do have values. We do attach great value to the veracity of what we say before we say it.... Even though what we say may not be greeted with the display of oozing appreciation which Gordon Brown pits on. It is an embarrassing spectacle when Gordon Brown, often portrayed as gloomy [as he has been portrrayed in the media throughout these past months and today Saturday 30 August 2008] g, twists his lips and quivers as a fawning teenager......
It is not half as embarrassing and unforgivable as when Gordon Brown behaves a s a tout for the biggest liars in the world ... Big Business that have held the UK 'Parliament' [the 'elected' 'House of Commons' and the unelected 'House of Peers'] and the UK Govt to ransom in all but name..
That is what was acknowledged by the highly state-linked 'Private Eye' magazine, edited by Ian Hislop, an extremely fanatical and brazen backer of everything the Big Business-led UK state agenda-setters want done....Ian Hislop's 'Private Eye' has not reported on the multi£Billion big business scam at all.
Except on that one occasion and in one single issue.
But they did report that the CRASSrail package was being pushed through the UK Parliament, by someone that had been linked with Douglas Alexander. And that that person was representing BECHTEL....
Apart from that one occasion and that one journal, NO BRITISH media of any description [other than the campaigning web sites and blogs led by KHOODEELAAR!] has carried any reports about the strange phenomenon of the CRASSrail scam being pushed through the Parliament' without any scrutiny....
Given that the same media are now agog with stories, comments, human interest angles, sketches, anecdotal items and updates by the hour about the worsening crisis in the UK economy - and the NY Times 'weekend edition' dated today Saturday 30 August 2008 admitting as much gloom about the USA and the 'economy' 'over there' ... isn't it the media's duty to now clamour for Brown to EXPEDITE the bringing about of the 'miracle'?????
Which is how the liars have been peddling the Bechtel CRASSrail ?!!!!
Spread the 'magic of CRASSrail oil on all and every element of the ailing UK economy' and the 'cure' will assert itself and the gloom, will be gone and the economy will start dancing in a world class fashion..... from Caracas [where CRASSrail hole peddler Livingstone has just bagged 'transport consultant to Hugo Chavez' job for himself [Livingstone, Kenneth- besuited and be-guiarded as never before!!!!]] to crackpots and to every other lunatic point and destination and station, stop, junction in between....!!
[To be continued]
33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Saturday, August 30, 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASSrail hole Big Business-prompted unconstitutionality by Alistair Darling: UPDATE [84]
KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASSrail hole Big Business-prompted unconstitutionality by Alistair Darling: UPDATE [84]
More, here, shortly
More, here, shortly
KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence on the Big Business pro-Crossrail hole scam role by the ARCHANT company owned 'local' East London Idiotiser [84]
This page was last edited at 1030 GMT London on saturday 30 August 2008
KHOODEELAAR! constsonal law acton programme is this week adding to the list of edveince the ebjhvauoru of the Pr
This page was last edited at 1040 GMT London on Saturday 30 August 2008
By©Muhammad Haque
1030 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 30 August 2008
KHOODEELAAR! Constitutional law action programme is this week adding to the list of evidence the behaviour of the Press complaints commission.
The Press Complaints Commission [=PCC], London, is not a real regulator of newspapers. It is in effect owned by some of the big print media conglomerates in the UK. The PCC therefore never really has any influence on the 'press' in the UK. Except when it needs to promote its own existence. And this is done whenever a 'royal' or a similarly 'celebrity complaint' is lodged with it.
For ordinary people and communities, the PCC is an insult to the intelligence.
And the PCC is just as bad if not worse than OFCOM, the so-called broadcasting regulatory outfit.
How is this conclusion arrived at?
For the purpose of understanding what has been going on in the 'East End of London, we refer and shall refer in this context to the behaviour of the 'local' 'East London Idiotiser'.
Twisting of the truth 'via' Tower Hamlets Council……
The ‘local ‘ ‘newspaper’ circulating in decreasing numbers in the area corresponding to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets is again boasting about its power and influence on the local Tower Hamlets Council.
It has posted a piece on its web site [which is very recent as compared to some real local newspapers in London areas] making the point that Tower Hamlets Council began to backtrack on the ‘extension of Ramadan rule to non Muslims [including to non Muslim councillors] soon after the ‘East London Idiotiser’ got contracted about the original item.
This is not the first such assertion.
The ARCHANT-owned ‘newspaper’ has been carrying frequently claims that its power and influence are unparalleled.
Looking at the number of lies that it has been initiating as the Rightwing elements in the UK media follow its ‘tip offs’ by publishing plainly racist pieces aimed at the ‘Muslim composition’ of the council, it is a fact that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ has become the main taunter of the ‘Muslim’ component of the Council.
The ‘East London Idiotiser’ is also in close collaboration with the pro-racists elements that want to promote the Metropolitan Police as being particularly attentive on finding ‘Muslims’ engaged in crime.
Similarly, the ‘East London Idiotiser' is also in close contact with the likes of the racist ‘Queen Mary College’ which is as actively engaged as an institution in propaganda against ‘Muslims’ as it could ever do without the country changing into a fully fledged officially racist one.
The evidence of the racist resurgence by ARCHANT-owned ‘East London Idiotiser’ is writ all over the ‘Idiotiser’
We shall be taking an issue-by-issue look at the Racist Idiotiser in the course of this series.
Back to the pro-racist aping by the ‘English language’ titles in some English language-colonially ‘remote’ parts of the world.
In Qatar for instance, there is a title that is as ignorantly ‘edited’ as the ‘East London Idiotiser’.
They appear to have picked up the ‘story’ and decided to ‘search’ via Google for a picture of the man they describe on their web site as ‘John Williams’.
To such an extent that they have even created a wholly ‘bearded’ photo of a man they are calling ‘John Williams’ whose ‘request’ about ‘eating during meetings’ was used by the ‘leader’ of a group of 4 councillors to cause the latest propaganda onslaught against the image of ‘Muslims’ in the East End borough.
The man shown in the photograph is NOT the John Williams who is the ‘head of democratic services’ at Tower Hamlets Council.
John Williams does not have a beard.
The man shown in the photograph does.
But that is not the only distortion of the truth.
The other is that John Williams did not, could not, order councillors to do anything.
And he did not order any councillor to do anything in his particular memo either.
What his memo, even in the incomplete texts that have been publicised by the Rightwing media, says is makes a request that has nothing wrong in it at all.
It REQUESTS councillors to show respect to those councillors who may be fasting.
The showing of the respect would have been ASSUMED in a Council if it was known to have members who needed no education about the community.
But more important than this is the fact that the ‘memo’ got taken up by the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ at all.
What is the point of giving the requ4est the anti-Muslim publicity that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ did give it?
The answer is quite clear: the ‘East London Idiotiser’ is desperate for attention.
And the attention - the only attention that it can get about the ‘local Council’ is by having a go at ‘the Muslim’ councillors!
How is that so?
By the records of the ‘East London Idiotiser’.
We shall come to the records later in this series.
The pattern being followed by the circulation-losing ‘East London Idiotiser’ is that it is forever looking out for weird, politically irrelevant and insignificant elements to be featured in the ‘newspaper’.
The Idiotiser has NOT ONCE in the past 100 years played ANY sustained ‘campaigning’; role about anything that maters to ordinary people in the East End of London.
Yet the ‘ARCHANT’-employed ‘journalists’ on the Idiotiser are now prancing about all manner of ‘achievements’ by the 'paper' that the facts do not support.
The fantasy ‘news’ items that the Idiotiser has been apparently running - by ‘apparently’ we here mean carrying in flyers, in promotion pieces that by association SUGGEST that they are news when the fact is that they are plain lies - include the assertion that Patsy Kensit is a HISTORIAN!
Not that Patsy Kensit was the subject of one of the BBC’s own self-promoting features concerning sub-celebrities and their family ‘backgrounds’, but a historian. No condition attached to that brazen assertion….
The other fantasy is the claim the Idiotiser has been making about being the ‘campaigner’ to save the ‘local history library’.
And the conferring of the title of ‘historian’ on Patsy Kensit is linked with the fact that she was GUIDED under the BBC’s control to look at her East End of London ancestry….
But the Idiotiser cannot tell the truth about Patsy Kensit!
Even when it desperately needs to show that a ‘star’ is ‘backing the Idiotiser’ in its fatuously asserted campaign…
The real campaigns are ignored by the Idiotiser as always…
No wonder the ‘title’ has lost another 4 per cent of readers in the last year under audit…
[To be continued]…
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1219960891327&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout
ess complkauinst commission.
The Press Complaints Commission [=PCC] is not a real regulator of newspapers. it is in effect owned by some of the Big print media conglomerates in the UK. The PCC ytehrefore never really has any influence on the 'press' in the UK. Exccepot when it needs to promote oits own exsietnce. And this is done whenevr a 'royal' or a similarkly 'eclebrity'comop,auint is lodged with it.
For ordianry people and communities, the PCC is an insuslt to the intelligfence.
Andf the PCC is just as bad if not worse than OFCOM, the so-called braiadcstjkg regiulator outfit.
How is this comnclsuson arrived at?
For the puirpsoe fo udneryanding what has been going oin in the 'East End of Londpon, we refer and shaqll refer in this context to the ebjhavioru fo the 'local' 'East London Idtsoer'.
Twisting of the truth 'via' Tower Hamlets Council……
The ‘local ‘ ‘newspaper’ circulating in decreasing numbers in the area corresponding to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets is again boasting about its power and influence on the local Tower Hamlets Council.
It has posted a piece on its web site [which is very recent as compared to some real local newspapers in London areas] making the point that Tower Hamlets Council began to backtrack on the ‘extension of Ramadan rule to non Muslims [including to non Muslim councillors] soon after the ‘East London Idiotiser’ got contracted about the original item.
This is not the first such assertion.
The ARCHANT-owned ‘newspaper’ has been carrying frequently claims that its power and influence are unparalleled.
Looking at the number of lies that it has been initiating as the Rightwing elements in the UK media follow its ‘tip offs’ by publishing plainly racist pieces aimed at the ‘Muslim composition’ of the council, it is a fact that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ has become the main taunter of the ‘Muslim’ component of the Council.
The ‘East London Idiotiser’ is also in close collaboration with the pro-racists elements that want to promote the Metropolitan Police as being particularly attentive on finding ‘Muslims’ engaged in crime.
Similarly, the ‘East London Idiotiser' is also in close contact with the likes of the racist ‘Queen Mary College’ which is as actively engaged as an institution in propaganda against ‘Muslims’ as it could ever do without the country changing into a fully fledged officially racist one.
The evidence of the racist resurgence by ARCHANT-owned ‘East London Idiotiser’ is writ all over the ‘Idiotiser’
We shall be taking an issue-by-issue look at the Racist Idiotiser in the course of this series.
Back to the pro-racist aping by the ‘English language’ titles in some English language-colonially ‘remote’ parts of the world.
In Qatar for instance, there is a title that is as ignorantly ‘edited’ as the ‘East London Idiotiser’.
They appear to have picked up the ‘story’ and decided to ‘search’ via Google for a picture of the man they describe on their web site as ‘John Williams’.
To such an extent that they have even created a wholly ‘bearded’ photo of a man they are calling ‘John Williams’ whose ‘request’ about ‘eating during meetings’ was used by the ‘leader’ of a group of 4 councillors to cause the latest propaganda onslaught against the image of ‘Muslims’ in the East End borough.
The man shown in the photograph is NOT the John Williams who is the ‘head of democratic services’ at Tower Hamlets Council.
John Williams does not have a beard.
The man shown in the photograph does.
But that is not the only distortion of the truth.
The other is that John Williams did not, could not, order councillors to do anything.
And he did not order any councillor to do anything in his particular memo either.
What his memo, even in the incomplete texts that have been publicised by the Rightwing media, says is makes a request that has nothing wrong in it at all.
It REQUESTS councillors to show respect to those councillors who may be fasting.
The showing of the respect would have been ASSUMED in a Council if it was known to have members who needed no education about the community.
But more important than this is the fact that the ‘memo’ got taken up by the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ at all.
What is the point of giving the requ4est the anti-Muslim publicity that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ did give it?
The answer is quite clear: the ‘East London Idiotiser’ is desperate for attention.
And the attention - the only attention that it can get about the ‘local Council’ is by having a go at ‘the Muslim’ councillors!
How is that so?
By the records of the ‘East London Idiotiser’.
We shall come to the records later in this series.
The pattern being followed by the circulation-losing ‘East London Idiotiser’ is that it is forever looking out for weird, politically irrelevant and insignificant elements to be featured in the ‘newspaper’.
The Idiotiser has NOT ONCE in the past 100 years played ANY sustained ‘campaigning’; role about anything that maters to ordinary people in the East End of London.
Yet the ‘ARCHANT’-employed ‘journalists’ on the Idiotiser are now prancing about all manner of ‘achievements’ by the 'paper' that the facts do not support.
The fantasy ‘news’ items that the Idiotiser has been apparently running - by ‘apparently’ we here mean carrying in flyers, in promotion pieces that by association SUGGEST that they are news when the fact is that they are plain lies - include the assertion that Patsy Kensit is a HISTORIAN!
Not that Patsy Kensit was the subject of one of the BBC’s own self-promoting features concerning sub-celebrities and their family ‘backgrounds’, but a historian. No condition attached to that brazen assertion….
The other fantasy is the claim the Idiotiser has been making about being the ‘campaigner’ to save the ‘local history library’.
And the conferring of the title of ‘historian’ on Patsy Kensit is linked with the fact that she was GUIDED under the BBC’s control to look at her East End of London ancestry….
But the Idiotiser cannot tell the truth about Patsy Kensit!
Even when it desperately needs to show that a ‘star’ is ‘backing the Idiotiser’ in its fatuously asserted campaign…
The real campaigns are ignored by the Idiotiser as always…
No wonder the ‘title’ has lost another 4 per cent of readers in the last year under audit…
[To be continued]…
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1219960891327&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout
KHOODEELAAR! constsonal law acton programme is this week adding to the list of edveince the ebjhvauoru of the Pr
This page was last edited at 1040 GMT London on Saturday 30 August 2008
By©Muhammad Haque
1030 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 30 August 2008
KHOODEELAAR! Constitutional law action programme is this week adding to the list of evidence the behaviour of the Press complaints commission.
The Press Complaints Commission [=PCC], London, is not a real regulator of newspapers. It is in effect owned by some of the big print media conglomerates in the UK. The PCC therefore never really has any influence on the 'press' in the UK. Except when it needs to promote its own existence. And this is done whenever a 'royal' or a similarly 'celebrity complaint' is lodged with it.
For ordinary people and communities, the PCC is an insult to the intelligence.
And the PCC is just as bad if not worse than OFCOM, the so-called broadcasting regulatory outfit.
How is this conclusion arrived at?
For the purpose of understanding what has been going on in the 'East End of London, we refer and shall refer in this context to the behaviour of the 'local' 'East London Idiotiser'.
Twisting of the truth 'via' Tower Hamlets Council……
The ‘local ‘ ‘newspaper’ circulating in decreasing numbers in the area corresponding to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets is again boasting about its power and influence on the local Tower Hamlets Council.
It has posted a piece on its web site [which is very recent as compared to some real local newspapers in London areas] making the point that Tower Hamlets Council began to backtrack on the ‘extension of Ramadan rule to non Muslims [including to non Muslim councillors] soon after the ‘East London Idiotiser’ got contracted about the original item.
This is not the first such assertion.
The ARCHANT-owned ‘newspaper’ has been carrying frequently claims that its power and influence are unparalleled.
Looking at the number of lies that it has been initiating as the Rightwing elements in the UK media follow its ‘tip offs’ by publishing plainly racist pieces aimed at the ‘Muslim composition’ of the council, it is a fact that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ has become the main taunter of the ‘Muslim’ component of the Council.
The ‘East London Idiotiser’ is also in close collaboration with the pro-racists elements that want to promote the Metropolitan Police as being particularly attentive on finding ‘Muslims’ engaged in crime.
Similarly, the ‘East London Idiotiser' is also in close contact with the likes of the racist ‘Queen Mary College’ which is as actively engaged as an institution in propaganda against ‘Muslims’ as it could ever do without the country changing into a fully fledged officially racist one.
The evidence of the racist resurgence by ARCHANT-owned ‘East London Idiotiser’ is writ all over the ‘Idiotiser’
We shall be taking an issue-by-issue look at the Racist Idiotiser in the course of this series.
Back to the pro-racist aping by the ‘English language’ titles in some English language-colonially ‘remote’ parts of the world.
In Qatar for instance, there is a title that is as ignorantly ‘edited’ as the ‘East London Idiotiser’.
They appear to have picked up the ‘story’ and decided to ‘search’ via Google for a picture of the man they describe on their web site as ‘John Williams’.
To such an extent that they have even created a wholly ‘bearded’ photo of a man they are calling ‘John Williams’ whose ‘request’ about ‘eating during meetings’ was used by the ‘leader’ of a group of 4 councillors to cause the latest propaganda onslaught against the image of ‘Muslims’ in the East End borough.
The man shown in the photograph is NOT the John Williams who is the ‘head of democratic services’ at Tower Hamlets Council.
John Williams does not have a beard.
The man shown in the photograph does.
But that is not the only distortion of the truth.
The other is that John Williams did not, could not, order councillors to do anything.
And he did not order any councillor to do anything in his particular memo either.
What his memo, even in the incomplete texts that have been publicised by the Rightwing media, says is makes a request that has nothing wrong in it at all.
It REQUESTS councillors to show respect to those councillors who may be fasting.
The showing of the respect would have been ASSUMED in a Council if it was known to have members who needed no education about the community.
But more important than this is the fact that the ‘memo’ got taken up by the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ at all.
What is the point of giving the requ4est the anti-Muslim publicity that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ did give it?
The answer is quite clear: the ‘East London Idiotiser’ is desperate for attention.
And the attention - the only attention that it can get about the ‘local Council’ is by having a go at ‘the Muslim’ councillors!
How is that so?
By the records of the ‘East London Idiotiser’.
We shall come to the records later in this series.
The pattern being followed by the circulation-losing ‘East London Idiotiser’ is that it is forever looking out for weird, politically irrelevant and insignificant elements to be featured in the ‘newspaper’.
The Idiotiser has NOT ONCE in the past 100 years played ANY sustained ‘campaigning’; role about anything that maters to ordinary people in the East End of London.
Yet the ‘ARCHANT’-employed ‘journalists’ on the Idiotiser are now prancing about all manner of ‘achievements’ by the 'paper' that the facts do not support.
The fantasy ‘news’ items that the Idiotiser has been apparently running - by ‘apparently’ we here mean carrying in flyers, in promotion pieces that by association SUGGEST that they are news when the fact is that they are plain lies - include the assertion that Patsy Kensit is a HISTORIAN!
Not that Patsy Kensit was the subject of one of the BBC’s own self-promoting features concerning sub-celebrities and their family ‘backgrounds’, but a historian. No condition attached to that brazen assertion….
The other fantasy is the claim the Idiotiser has been making about being the ‘campaigner’ to save the ‘local history library’.
And the conferring of the title of ‘historian’ on Patsy Kensit is linked with the fact that she was GUIDED under the BBC’s control to look at her East End of London ancestry….
But the Idiotiser cannot tell the truth about Patsy Kensit!
Even when it desperately needs to show that a ‘star’ is ‘backing the Idiotiser’ in its fatuously asserted campaign…
The real campaigns are ignored by the Idiotiser as always…
No wonder the ‘title’ has lost another 4 per cent of readers in the last year under audit…
[To be continued]…
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1219960891327&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout
ess complkauinst commission.
The Press Complaints Commission [=PCC] is not a real regulator of newspapers. it is in effect owned by some of the Big print media conglomerates in the UK. The PCC ytehrefore never really has any influence on the 'press' in the UK. Exccepot when it needs to promote oits own exsietnce. And this is done whenevr a 'royal' or a similarkly 'eclebrity'comop,auint is lodged with it.
For ordianry people and communities, the PCC is an insuslt to the intelligfence.
Andf the PCC is just as bad if not worse than OFCOM, the so-called braiadcstjkg regiulator outfit.
How is this comnclsuson arrived at?
For the puirpsoe fo udneryanding what has been going oin in the 'East End of Londpon, we refer and shaqll refer in this context to the ebjhavioru fo the 'local' 'East London Idtsoer'.
Twisting of the truth 'via' Tower Hamlets Council……
The ‘local ‘ ‘newspaper’ circulating in decreasing numbers in the area corresponding to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets is again boasting about its power and influence on the local Tower Hamlets Council.
It has posted a piece on its web site [which is very recent as compared to some real local newspapers in London areas] making the point that Tower Hamlets Council began to backtrack on the ‘extension of Ramadan rule to non Muslims [including to non Muslim councillors] soon after the ‘East London Idiotiser’ got contracted about the original item.
This is not the first such assertion.
The ARCHANT-owned ‘newspaper’ has been carrying frequently claims that its power and influence are unparalleled.
Looking at the number of lies that it has been initiating as the Rightwing elements in the UK media follow its ‘tip offs’ by publishing plainly racist pieces aimed at the ‘Muslim composition’ of the council, it is a fact that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ has become the main taunter of the ‘Muslim’ component of the Council.
The ‘East London Idiotiser’ is also in close collaboration with the pro-racists elements that want to promote the Metropolitan Police as being particularly attentive on finding ‘Muslims’ engaged in crime.
Similarly, the ‘East London Idiotiser' is also in close contact with the likes of the racist ‘Queen Mary College’ which is as actively engaged as an institution in propaganda against ‘Muslims’ as it could ever do without the country changing into a fully fledged officially racist one.
The evidence of the racist resurgence by ARCHANT-owned ‘East London Idiotiser’ is writ all over the ‘Idiotiser’
We shall be taking an issue-by-issue look at the Racist Idiotiser in the course of this series.
Back to the pro-racist aping by the ‘English language’ titles in some English language-colonially ‘remote’ parts of the world.
In Qatar for instance, there is a title that is as ignorantly ‘edited’ as the ‘East London Idiotiser’.
They appear to have picked up the ‘story’ and decided to ‘search’ via Google for a picture of the man they describe on their web site as ‘John Williams’.
To such an extent that they have even created a wholly ‘bearded’ photo of a man they are calling ‘John Williams’ whose ‘request’ about ‘eating during meetings’ was used by the ‘leader’ of a group of 4 councillors to cause the latest propaganda onslaught against the image of ‘Muslims’ in the East End borough.
The man shown in the photograph is NOT the John Williams who is the ‘head of democratic services’ at Tower Hamlets Council.
John Williams does not have a beard.
The man shown in the photograph does.
But that is not the only distortion of the truth.
The other is that John Williams did not, could not, order councillors to do anything.
And he did not order any councillor to do anything in his particular memo either.
What his memo, even in the incomplete texts that have been publicised by the Rightwing media, says is makes a request that has nothing wrong in it at all.
It REQUESTS councillors to show respect to those councillors who may be fasting.
The showing of the respect would have been ASSUMED in a Council if it was known to have members who needed no education about the community.
But more important than this is the fact that the ‘memo’ got taken up by the ‘local’ ‘East London Idiotiser’ at all.
What is the point of giving the requ4est the anti-Muslim publicity that the ‘East London Idiotiser’ did give it?
The answer is quite clear: the ‘East London Idiotiser’ is desperate for attention.
And the attention - the only attention that it can get about the ‘local Council’ is by having a go at ‘the Muslim’ councillors!
How is that so?
By the records of the ‘East London Idiotiser’.
We shall come to the records later in this series.
The pattern being followed by the circulation-losing ‘East London Idiotiser’ is that it is forever looking out for weird, politically irrelevant and insignificant elements to be featured in the ‘newspaper’.
The Idiotiser has NOT ONCE in the past 100 years played ANY sustained ‘campaigning’; role about anything that maters to ordinary people in the East End of London.
Yet the ‘ARCHANT’-employed ‘journalists’ on the Idiotiser are now prancing about all manner of ‘achievements’ by the 'paper' that the facts do not support.
The fantasy ‘news’ items that the Idiotiser has been apparently running - by ‘apparently’ we here mean carrying in flyers, in promotion pieces that by association SUGGEST that they are news when the fact is that they are plain lies - include the assertion that Patsy Kensit is a HISTORIAN!
Not that Patsy Kensit was the subject of one of the BBC’s own self-promoting features concerning sub-celebrities and their family ‘backgrounds’, but a historian. No condition attached to that brazen assertion….
The other fantasy is the claim the Idiotiser has been making about being the ‘campaigner’ to save the ‘local history library’.
And the conferring of the title of ‘historian’ on Patsy Kensit is linked with the fact that she was GUIDED under the BBC’s control to look at her East End of London ancestry….
But the Idiotiser cannot tell the truth about Patsy Kensit!
Even when it desperately needs to show that a ‘star’ is ‘backing the Idiotiser’ in its fatuously asserted campaign…
The real campaigns are ignored by the Idiotiser as always…
No wonder the ‘title’ has lost another 4 per cent of readers in the last year under audit…
[To be continued]…
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1219960891327&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout
KHOODEELAAR! No to "CRASSrail hole plot Big Business agenda..." CAMPAIGN exposing the latest lying 'journalism' by the Guardian
This page was last edited at 0140 Hrs GMT London Saturday 30 August 2008
0135 GMT London Saturday 30 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! The CRASSness of the propaganda by the Guardian for Crossrail hole scam is seen in every single piece of the lying guardian's allegedly 'objective' financial and economic 'journalism..
How?
By concealing the truth of the Guardian's endorsement of the corrupt Big Business, the Guardian perpetrates an offence against the truth and against responsible journalism every time it peddles an apparently 'unbiased' news item... This piece about the Zoom airline should be read with a deep sense of outrage because the lying Guardian would not have allowed any warning about the operator or its type if any were put to it... The Guardian of the poisonous Polly Toynbee endorses every pernicious venture, so long as it appears to be 'in'...no matter how how out of touch with reality and how untruthful that is...In Peddling the Crossrail hole scam, the Guardian 'transport' 'corespondent' DAN MILMO confected and
published Any set of lies and rubbish. No respite from the lying London Guardian which boasts a whole range of 'internal regulation' against lies, lying and journalistic fraud and fabricating.. Society loses out for the leis of the Guardian.... Society is damaged by the lying Guardian... Which stubbornly fails to correct its lies..... [To be continued]
0135 GMT London Saturday 30 August 2008:
KHOODEELAAR! The CRASSness of the propaganda by the Guardian for Crossrail hole scam is seen in every single piece of the lying guardian's allegedly 'objective' financial and economic 'journalism..
How?
By concealing the truth of the Guardian's endorsement of the corrupt Big Business, the Guardian perpetrates an offence against the truth and against responsible journalism every time it peddles an apparently 'unbiased' news item... This piece about the Zoom airline should be read with a deep sense of outrage because the lying Guardian would not have allowed any warning about the operator or its type if any were put to it... The Guardian of the poisonous Polly Toynbee endorses every pernicious venture, so long as it appears to be 'in'...no matter how how out of touch with reality and how untruthful that is...In Peddling the Crossrail hole scam, the Guardian 'transport' 'corespondent' DAN MILMO confected and
published Any set of lies and rubbish. No respite from the lying London Guardian which boasts a whole range of 'internal regulation' against lies, lying and journalistic fraud and fabricating.. Society loses out for the leis of the Guardian.... Society is damaged by the lying Guardian... Which stubbornly fails to correct its lies..... [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASSrail hole plot questions Brown and Darling: on their flawed records
B©Muhammad Haque
2345 GMT
London friday 29 August 2008
"
What evidence can either Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling cite to support any claim either of them may make to be treated as credible when they give any 'opinion' about the UK economy? BOTH have been involved in the 10p tax fiasco. BOTH have pumped £Billions into coffers of Big Business. "
Posted on the London Times web site as a comment on their story about Alistair Darling under pressure
2345 GMT
London friday 29 August 2008
"
What evidence can either Gordon Brown or Alistair Darling cite to support any claim either of them may make to be treated as credible when they give any 'opinion' about the UK economy? BOTH have been involved in the 10p tax fiasco. BOTH have pumped £Billions into coffers of Big Business. "
Posted on the London Times web site as a comment on their story about Alistair Darling under pressure
KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASSrail hole Big Business-prompted unconstitutionality by Alistair Darling: UPDATE
KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASSrail hole Big Business-prompted unconstitutionality byAlistair Darling: UPDATE
By©Muhammad Haque
2215 Hrs GMTLondon Friday 29 August 2008
The BBC has reported in its 2100 GMT news bulletin on the NEWS Channel thatAlistair Darling has confessed to being surprised that people are 'pissedoff' with the Blaired party....'Part of the blame lies with the cabinetitself', says Karin Giannone, the presenter who took over at 2130 GMT fromthe previous one in the evening who had fronted the 2100 GMT news.... This 'candid' confession by Alistair Darling has been described by theBBC to be 'usual' and uncharacteristic and as a possible'fightback' by darling facing a likely demotion in a touted aboutreshuffle by Gordon Brown in his cabinet. Whatever the full truth, it is clear from Darling's dressed up'diatribe' issued by the pernicious, the poisonous Guardian, that theDarling cabinet man is involved in a tussle with one or more than one
of hiscolleagues inside the Brown-fronted Blaired 'team'. The intervention is likely to be 'chewed over' by all sorts of mediatalking heads over the weekend. As far as Khoodeelaar! is concerned. we can say without any speculation being necessary, that WE TOLD YOU SO!that Alistair darling is not to be trusted. Especial; when he makes bold claims for which there is no substance in fact. Like when he stated on 22 February 2005 that he was 'satisfied' thatthe 'Crossrail Bill' which he was on that date formally presenting inthe UK House of Commons [the so-called lower, the only elected chamber of theUK parliament] was 'compatible with the Convention'. On the day after that utterance, KHOODEELAAR! Told Darling to withdraw thatfalse statement. And on almost a hundred separate occasions since 22 February2005, Khoodeelaar! has told Alistair Darling that the statement he made aboutthe Crossrail Bill being compatible with the Convention was
untrue and untenableand unjustified. We have asked him to withdraw that statement and to scrap the Bill. Darling did not listen to us.For years. From February 2005 to February 2006 to February 2007 to February 2008. He took part in the parade of lies dressed up as 'harmless spin' forBig Business in the promotion of the lie that CRASSrail was a vital MAKER OFMONEY FOR THE UK ECONOMY... That Lie has now been caught out by Darling's own involvement in thedesperate, career-linked web of lies..... Darling will pay more dearly for lying for Big Business CRASSrail than he hasappeared to realise so far. And the Guardian's own poisonous promotion of CRASSrail hole plot is alsoexposed in this latest sneaky job that that pernicious 'newspaper'has done for the second time involving a Brown-cabinet-careerist. The lies will be referred to and cited by KHOODEELAAR! in the constitutional lawaction against the CRASSrail hole legislation... And instead of
listening to reason, to the truth and to the impeccably arguedcase which has been frequently vindicated by all events and by all objectivelyverifiable; criteria he has allowed two of his successors in the post as the UKcabinet minister for transport affairs,. to repeat that untruth about theCrossrail hole Bill being compatible with the European Convention for theProtection of Human rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
[To be continued]
By©Muhammad Haque
2215 Hrs GMTLondon Friday 29 August 2008
The BBC has reported in its 2100 GMT news bulletin on the NEWS Channel thatAlistair Darling has confessed to being surprised that people are 'pissedoff' with the Blaired party....'Part of the blame lies with the cabinetitself', says Karin Giannone, the presenter who took over at 2130 GMT fromthe previous one in the evening who had fronted the 2100 GMT news.... This 'candid' confession by Alistair Darling has been described by theBBC to be 'usual' and uncharacteristic and as a possible'fightback' by darling facing a likely demotion in a touted aboutreshuffle by Gordon Brown in his cabinet. Whatever the full truth, it is clear from Darling's dressed up'diatribe' issued by the pernicious, the poisonous Guardian, that theDarling cabinet man is involved in a tussle with one or more than one
of hiscolleagues inside the Brown-fronted Blaired 'team'. The intervention is likely to be 'chewed over' by all sorts of mediatalking heads over the weekend. As far as Khoodeelaar! is concerned. we can say without any speculation being necessary, that WE TOLD YOU SO!that Alistair darling is not to be trusted. Especial; when he makes bold claims for which there is no substance in fact. Like when he stated on 22 February 2005 that he was 'satisfied' thatthe 'Crossrail Bill' which he was on that date formally presenting inthe UK House of Commons [the so-called lower, the only elected chamber of theUK parliament] was 'compatible with the Convention'. On the day after that utterance, KHOODEELAAR! Told Darling to withdraw thatfalse statement. And on almost a hundred separate occasions since 22 February2005, Khoodeelaar! has told Alistair Darling that the statement he made aboutthe Crossrail Bill being compatible with the Convention was
untrue and untenableand unjustified. We have asked him to withdraw that statement and to scrap the Bill. Darling did not listen to us.For years. From February 2005 to February 2006 to February 2007 to February 2008. He took part in the parade of lies dressed up as 'harmless spin' forBig Business in the promotion of the lie that CRASSrail was a vital MAKER OFMONEY FOR THE UK ECONOMY... That Lie has now been caught out by Darling's own involvement in thedesperate, career-linked web of lies..... Darling will pay more dearly for lying for Big Business CRASSrail than he hasappeared to realise so far. And the Guardian's own poisonous promotion of CRASSrail hole plot is alsoexposed in this latest sneaky job that that pernicious 'newspaper'has done for the second time involving a Brown-cabinet-careerist. The lies will be referred to and cited by KHOODEELAAR! in the constitutional lawaction against the CRASSrail hole legislation... And instead of
listening to reason, to the truth and to the impeccably arguedcase which has been frequently vindicated by all events and by all objectivelyverifiable; criteria he has allowed two of his successors in the post as the UKcabinet minister for transport affairs,. to repeat that untruth about theCrossrail hole Bill being compatible with the European Convention for theProtection of Human rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
[To be continued]