0755 Hrs GMT
London
'Bank Holiday' Monday
13 April 2009
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda, making a definitive [2] historic intervention to 'rescue' Gordon Brown! By Exposing Crossrail-backer Chris Grayling as one of the Tory front benchers who are failing to do their real job [collectively] of holding the Government to account.
The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser has just posted the following comment on the SPECTATOR magazine’s web site. They may or may not publish it. If they do then that will also be a miniature act of 'history'. Because of the deeply relevant contents of the particular comment.
The comment is in response to the magazine’s carrying an item from A Campbell apparently referring to the McBride and Draper email disclosures scandal…
In the later parts of this commentary, we shall focus on Chris Grayling’s role as a peddler of the Big Business Crossrail agenda and as a de facto opponent of parliamentary scrutiny of executive action as long as the action is in continuation of the agenda of Big Business…
[To be continued]
The challenge is really about the location of the official Opposition Vis a Vis ethics, morality, accountability, honesty and transparency. The ordinary people in the UK are not being served at all well by the mainstream media frenzies. They are the ones who have had to benefit most by the behaviour of McBride and Draper.. It is only a matter of time before one of the tabloid titles or even a broadcasting outfit engaged in similar commercial pursuits reveals further details about the ‘leaking’; to or the ‘discovery’ by Guido F of the particular communications… Once the particular saga is over, the will move on to the next sensation lasting a 24 hour period… The people are not served by the official Opposition either… In their collective roles as MPs since they became elected. Did David Cameron, William Hague and Chris Grayling have not contributed anything to the cause of constitutionality. Not a single one of them is known as a democracy campaigner… Not a campaigner for constitutionality. Nor for accountability. It is important to point out these basic facts and to put the current media sport into perspective. On poverty, on civil liberty and on the Blaired collusion with the GW Bush regime in the war against innocent people [as opposed to and distinguished from the legitimate ground for UNO-sponsored and internationally legally valid and warranted and justified and supportable focus on the people liable for all the violations of human rights in countries and regions in any part of the contemporary world] William Hague, David Cameron and Chris Grayling have contributed nothing for democracy… Or for accountability.
Did any of them go on the broadcast media and pronounce anything at all against MPs expenses and other unacceptable conduct? If they did, when did they do it? My observation is that the McBride e-mails and Derek Draper's reappearance as a Blaired Party spinmeister is more the product of some spin-traders seeking to make profitable mischief than it is about any even conceivable difference between the two mainstream Parties 'of Government' in Britain. On the matters that do matter, like the violation of civil liberties and the open, the brazen introduction of new breaches of the rile fo law and the entrenchment of existing lawlessness as applicable to most organs of the state, Chris Grayling has been failing big time. Likewise, Cameron is not questioning Brown's preaching in anything like an original opposition leader should or could do on the available evidence. And the less said about William Hague the better. The three of them have featured as the main sources or entities in the current Tory Opposition front bench as implying dire retributions against Brown and his lot over the McBride affair. But what has any of them to say on the issues of the UK being embroiled in unnecessary, unjustified, unwanted and unjust international engagements? How does Grayling justify HIS failure on the G20 priorities and the hypes that the City of London interests embarked on in the pre-'summit' days? What are the comparative lessons for 'our democratic society' of the events surrounding the Guardian's reports about Ian Tomlinson’s and the McBride e-mail 'stories'?
And has any of the three frontbench Opposition leaders had anything to say about global poverty? Oops! Or even about poverty in Britain?
How much did THEY support of the Blair-Brown strategy for creating poverty in the UK?
Why did the Tories hire David Freud, the man who as unable to answer simple questions about his big plan against the poor when he was quizzed by news bulletin presenter ion Channer 4 news? As for the Spectator’s tactical use of the name of the ‘records’ of Mr A Campbell, the less said the better. How could the Spectator be presenting A Campbell as a source of impartial opinion on the very matter for which he was compared with some of Adolph Hitler’s henchmen in the time that he spent as Tony Blair’s own spinmeister?
Also, what about Bernard Ingram? What role did he play in doing down democratic accountability as far as he created some fo the grounds which A Campbell later used to brow beat those in the ‘lobby’ who had dared to ask questions almost verging on democracy?
Has the BBC deleted all the episodes of Bernard Ingram’s appearances on the various ‘news’ slots? He was shamelessly anti-accountability and was openly insulting those who wanted accountability from Margaret Thatcher… Has Chris Grayling or David Cameron noticed that role? As for William Hague, he is the boy who dreamt of being like Thatcher… He could not see anything at all beyond that barrier to democracy which he typically misunderstood as a visage and worshipped as a reflection almost akin to divinity…. These are not sources to lecture the public about any standards
0745 Hrs GMT London 'Bank Holiday' Monday 13 April 2009
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.