33rd year AADHIKAR
0225 GMT Thursday 06 June 2013
AADHIKAR Media Foundation Editor © Muhammad Haque
Founding News Editor
Shah M Azizul Haque
AADHIKAR Media Foundation established with the publication of AADHIKAR the weekly on Monday 19 December 1980 from London E1 UK.
Monday, April 13, 2009
KHOODEELAAR! putting on the record the UNDENIABLE evidential point that the BBC is pandering to LYING to the public BIG TIME .....
325 Hrs GMT
London ‘Bank Holiday’ Monday 13 April 2009
KHOODEELAAR! putting on the record the UNDENIABLE evidential point that the BBC is pandering to LYING to the public BIG TIME
In peddling the assortment of alleged opposition to Gordon Brown the BBC is obsessed about the alleged smearing emails and linked plot. That is not good enough. The BBC should also report the content and the constitutional facts. That the mainstream Opposition party, in this case the Tories, has been as bad in deception and contriving scenarios to mislead, delude, hoodwink, derail, divert and deceive the public as has Gordon Brown's particular spinmeister and lies and lying-’adviser’ Damian McBride has been found out to have been.
The BBC also have an even bigger duty to tell the truth about the abject lack of real standards on the Tories side when it comes tow aging war on the people abroad and on denying civil rights to people at home...
But the embarrassingly stupid “gender-heads’ [=tokens peddled and promoted and displayed to tick a gender box as in any other tokenistic box] that the BBC keeps exhibiting, do not show the remotest awareness of that duty let alone the perspective..
The BBC is “spiralling out” of all justification for the licence fee...That is taken straight from one of the BBC;s racist, Crusader-scripts that they allowed J Gosling to use not so long ago... A script that the Tories have been very happy about and a script that is at the centre of the corruption of the Corporation for lies... at the expense of the truth and at costs to the UK public...
[To be continued]
London ‘Bank Holiday’ Monday 13 April 2009
KHOODEELAAR! putting on the record the UNDENIABLE evidential point that the BBC is pandering to LYING to the public BIG TIME
In peddling the assortment of alleged opposition to Gordon Brown the BBC is obsessed about the alleged smearing emails and linked plot. That is not good enough. The BBC should also report the content and the constitutional facts. That the mainstream Opposition party, in this case the Tories, has been as bad in deception and contriving scenarios to mislead, delude, hoodwink, derail, divert and deceive the public as has Gordon Brown's particular spinmeister and lies and lying-’adviser’ Damian McBride has been found out to have been.
The BBC also have an even bigger duty to tell the truth about the abject lack of real standards on the Tories side when it comes tow aging war on the people abroad and on denying civil rights to people at home...
But the embarrassingly stupid “gender-heads’ [=tokens peddled and promoted and displayed to tick a gender box as in any other tokenistic box] that the BBC keeps exhibiting, do not show the remotest awareness of that duty let alone the perspective..
The BBC is “spiralling out” of all justification for the licence fee...That is taken straight from one of the BBC;s racist, Crusader-scripts that they allowed J Gosling to use not so long ago... A script that the Tories have been very happy about and a script that is at the centre of the corruption of the Corporation for lies... at the expense of the truth and at costs to the UK public...
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! to 'Gordon Brown's rescue'! Historic commentary on Crossrail hole scam Big Business agenda backer, bankers' tout Chris Grayling-2
1240 Hrs GMT London 'Bank Holiday' Monday 13 April 2008:
The media's frenetic posturing on 'standards’ and 'ethics' around the Damian McBride-Derek Draper 'e-mail disclosures' do not amount to journalism that is most urgently needed. KHOODEELAAR! has said this morning that the details and the actualite concerning the ‘access to the e-mails’ will be the subject of further media ‘trade’. But the true crisis is the absence of any morality in the Tory Opposition party. Come to that, the same blank dominates ALL the ‘British’ ‘mainstream’ [= approved!!!!] parties. And that is the real scandal.. The fact that peripheral time-serving ‘politicos’ are now making the appearances, including the BBC’s ‘Tory-side’, Laura K and the BBC’s ‘Milibrandit’ [another KHOODEELAAR! coinage, you have seen HERE] Vicki Young, shows that as far as the mainstream media and politicos go, there is no chance in the UK of any improvement in standards in the foreseeable future..No chance of British politicians - or even politicians in British political offices- telling the truth.. No chance of accountability being extracted from the Government by the Opposition on issues that really matter to people ....[
To be continued]
The media's frenetic posturing on 'standards’ and 'ethics' around the Damian McBride-Derek Draper 'e-mail disclosures' do not amount to journalism that is most urgently needed. KHOODEELAAR! has said this morning that the details and the actualite concerning the ‘access to the e-mails’ will be the subject of further media ‘trade’. But the true crisis is the absence of any morality in the Tory Opposition party. Come to that, the same blank dominates ALL the ‘British’ ‘mainstream’ [= approved!!!!] parties. And that is the real scandal.. The fact that peripheral time-serving ‘politicos’ are now making the appearances, including the BBC’s ‘Tory-side’, Laura K and the BBC’s ‘Milibrandit’ [another KHOODEELAAR! coinage, you have seen HERE] Vicki Young, shows that as far as the mainstream media and politicos go, there is no chance in the UK of any improvement in standards in the foreseeable future..No chance of British politicians - or even politicians in British political offices- telling the truth.. No chance of accountability being extracted from the Government by the Opposition on issues that really matter to people ....[
To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! to 'Gordon Brown's rescue'! Historic commentary on Crossrail hole scam Big Business agenda backer, bankers' tout Chris Grayling-1.b
0745 Hrs GMT London 'Bank Holiday' Monday 13 April 2009
[This version, edited [1] for typography was published at
1156 Hrs GMT
London
“Bank Holiday” Monday
13 April 2009]
The challenge is really about the location of the official Opposition Vis a Vis ethics, morality, accountability, honesty and transparency.
The ordinary people in the UK are not being served at all well by the mainstream media frenzies.
They are the ones who have had to benefit most by the behaviour of McBride and Draper.. It is only a matter of time before one of the tabloid titles or even a broadcasting outfit engaged in similar commercial pursuits reveals further details about the ‘leaking’ to or the ‘discovery’ by Guido F of the particular communications…
Once the particular saga is over, the will move on to the next sensation lasting a 24 hour period…
The people are not served by the official Opposition either… In their collective roles as MPs since they became elected.
David Cameron, William Hague and Chris Grayling have not contributed anything to the cause of constitutionality. Not a single one of them is known as a democracy campaigner…
Not a campaigner for constitutionality.
Nor for accountability.
It is important to point out these basic facts and to put the current media sport into perspective.
On poverty, on civil liberty and on the Blaired collusion with the GW Bush regime in the war against innocent people [as opposed to and distinguished from the legitimate ground for UNO-sponsored and internationally legally valid and warranted and justified and supportable focus on the people liable for all the violations of human rights in countries and regions in any part of the contemporary world] William Hague, David Cameron and Chris Grayling have contributed nothing for democracy…
Or for accountability.
Did any of them go on the broadcast media and pronounce anything at all against MPs expenses and other unacceptable conduct? If they did, when did they do it? My observation is that the McBride e-mails and Derek Draper's reappearance as a Blaired Party spinmeister is more the product of some spin-traders seeking to make profitable mischief than it is about any even conceivable difference between the two mainstream Parties 'of Government' in Britain.
On the matters that do matter, like the violation of civil liberties and the open, the brazen introduction of new breaches of the rile of law and the entrenchment of existing lawlessness as applicable to most organs of the state, Chris Grayling has been failing big time.
Likewise, Cameron is not questioning Brown's preaching in anything like an original opposition leader should or could do on the available evidence. And the less said about William Hague the better.
The three of them have featured as the main sources or entities on the current Tory Opposition front bench as implying dire retributions against Brown and his lot over the McBride affair. But what has any of them to say on the issues of the UK being embroiled in unnecessary, unjustified, unwanted and unjust international engagements?
How does Grayling justify HIS failure on the G20 priorities and the hypes that the City of London interests embarked on in the pre-'summit' days? What are the comparative lessons for 'our democratic society' of the events surrounding the Guardian's reports about Ian Tomlinson’s and the McBride e-mail 'stories'? And has any of the three front-bench Opposition leaders had anything to say about global poverty?
Oops! Or even about poverty in Britain?
How much did THEY support of the Blair-Brown strategy for creating poverty in the UK? Why did the Tories hire David Freud, the man who as unable to answer simple questions about his big plan against the poor when he was quizzed by news bulletin presenter ion Channel 4 news?
As for the Spectator’s tactical use of the name of the ‘records’ of Mr A Campbell, the less said the better. How could the Spectator be presenting A Campbell as a source of impartial opinion on the very matter for which he was compared with some of Adolph Hitler’s henchmen in the time that he spent as Tony Blair’s own spinmeister?
Also, what about Bernard Ingram? What role did he play in doing down democratic accountability as far as he created some of the grounds which A Campbell later used to brow beat those in the ‘lobby’ who had dared to ask questions almost verging on democracy?
Has the BBC deleted all the episodes of Bernard Ingram’s appearances on the various ‘news’ slots?
He was shamelessly anti-accountability and was openly insulting those who wanted accountability from Margaret Thatcher…
Has Chris Grayling or David Cameron noticed that role?
As for William Hague, he is the boy who dreamt of being like Thatcher…
He could not see anything at all beyond that barrier to democracy which he typically misunderstood as a visage and worshipped as a reflection almost akin to divinity….
These are not sources to lecture the public about any standards
0745 Hrs GMT London 'Bank Holiday' Monday 13 April 2009
[This version, edited [1] for typography was published at
1156 Hrs GMT
London
“Bank Holiday” Monday
13 April 2009]
The challenge is really about the location of the official Opposition Vis a Vis ethics, morality, accountability, honesty and transparency.
The ordinary people in the UK are not being served at all well by the mainstream media frenzies.
They are the ones who have had to benefit most by the behaviour of McBride and Draper.. It is only a matter of time before one of the tabloid titles or even a broadcasting outfit engaged in similar commercial pursuits reveals further details about the ‘leaking’ to or the ‘discovery’ by Guido F of the particular communications…
Once the particular saga is over, the will move on to the next sensation lasting a 24 hour period…
The people are not served by the official Opposition either… In their collective roles as MPs since they became elected.
David Cameron, William Hague and Chris Grayling have not contributed anything to the cause of constitutionality. Not a single one of them is known as a democracy campaigner…
Not a campaigner for constitutionality.
Nor for accountability.
It is important to point out these basic facts and to put the current media sport into perspective.
On poverty, on civil liberty and on the Blaired collusion with the GW Bush regime in the war against innocent people [as opposed to and distinguished from the legitimate ground for UNO-sponsored and internationally legally valid and warranted and justified and supportable focus on the people liable for all the violations of human rights in countries and regions in any part of the contemporary world] William Hague, David Cameron and Chris Grayling have contributed nothing for democracy…
Or for accountability.
Did any of them go on the broadcast media and pronounce anything at all against MPs expenses and other unacceptable conduct? If they did, when did they do it? My observation is that the McBride e-mails and Derek Draper's reappearance as a Blaired Party spinmeister is more the product of some spin-traders seeking to make profitable mischief than it is about any even conceivable difference between the two mainstream Parties 'of Government' in Britain.
On the matters that do matter, like the violation of civil liberties and the open, the brazen introduction of new breaches of the rile of law and the entrenchment of existing lawlessness as applicable to most organs of the state, Chris Grayling has been failing big time.
Likewise, Cameron is not questioning Brown's preaching in anything like an original opposition leader should or could do on the available evidence. And the less said about William Hague the better.
The three of them have featured as the main sources or entities on the current Tory Opposition front bench as implying dire retributions against Brown and his lot over the McBride affair. But what has any of them to say on the issues of the UK being embroiled in unnecessary, unjustified, unwanted and unjust international engagements?
How does Grayling justify HIS failure on the G20 priorities and the hypes that the City of London interests embarked on in the pre-'summit' days? What are the comparative lessons for 'our democratic society' of the events surrounding the Guardian's reports about Ian Tomlinson’s and the McBride e-mail 'stories'? And has any of the three front-bench Opposition leaders had anything to say about global poverty?
Oops! Or even about poverty in Britain?
How much did THEY support of the Blair-Brown strategy for creating poverty in the UK? Why did the Tories hire David Freud, the man who as unable to answer simple questions about his big plan against the poor when he was quizzed by news bulletin presenter ion Channel 4 news?
As for the Spectator’s tactical use of the name of the ‘records’ of Mr A Campbell, the less said the better. How could the Spectator be presenting A Campbell as a source of impartial opinion on the very matter for which he was compared with some of Adolph Hitler’s henchmen in the time that he spent as Tony Blair’s own spinmeister?
Also, what about Bernard Ingram? What role did he play in doing down democratic accountability as far as he created some of the grounds which A Campbell later used to brow beat those in the ‘lobby’ who had dared to ask questions almost verging on democracy?
Has the BBC deleted all the episodes of Bernard Ingram’s appearances on the various ‘news’ slots?
He was shamelessly anti-accountability and was openly insulting those who wanted accountability from Margaret Thatcher…
Has Chris Grayling or David Cameron noticed that role?
As for William Hague, he is the boy who dreamt of being like Thatcher…
He could not see anything at all beyond that barrier to democracy which he typically misunderstood as a visage and worshipped as a reflection almost akin to divinity….
These are not sources to lecture the public about any standards
0745 Hrs GMT London 'Bank Holiday' Monday 13 April 2009
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda Crossrail scam, making a historic [2] intervention to expose the fakers over the McBride 'emails'
0755 Hrs GMT
London
'Bank Holiday' Monday
13 April 2009
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda, making a definitive [2] historic intervention to 'rescue' Gordon Brown! By Exposing Crossrail-backer Chris Grayling as one of the Tory front benchers who are failing to do their real job [collectively] of holding the Government to account.
The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser has just posted the following comment on the SPECTATOR magazine’s web site. They may or may not publish it. If they do then that will also be a miniature act of 'history'. Because of the deeply relevant contents of the particular comment.
The comment is in response to the magazine’s carrying an item from A Campbell apparently referring to the McBride and Draper email disclosures scandal…
In the later parts of this commentary, we shall focus on Chris Grayling’s role as a peddler of the Big Business Crossrail agenda and as a de facto opponent of parliamentary scrutiny of executive action as long as the action is in continuation of the agenda of Big Business…
[To be continued]
The challenge is really about the location of the official Opposition Vis a Vis ethics, morality, accountability, honesty and transparency. The ordinary people in the UK are not being served at all well by the mainstream media frenzies. They are the ones who have had to benefit most by the behaviour of McBride and Draper.. It is only a matter of time before one of the tabloid titles or even a broadcasting outfit engaged in similar commercial pursuits reveals further details about the ‘leaking’; to or the ‘discovery’ by Guido F of the particular communications… Once the particular saga is over, the will move on to the next sensation lasting a 24 hour period… The people are not served by the official Opposition either… In their collective roles as MPs since they became elected. Did David Cameron, William Hague and Chris Grayling have not contributed anything to the cause of constitutionality. Not a single one of them is known as a democracy campaigner… Not a campaigner for constitutionality. Nor for accountability. It is important to point out these basic facts and to put the current media sport into perspective. On poverty, on civil liberty and on the Blaired collusion with the GW Bush regime in the war against innocent people [as opposed to and distinguished from the legitimate ground for UNO-sponsored and internationally legally valid and warranted and justified and supportable focus on the people liable for all the violations of human rights in countries and regions in any part of the contemporary world] William Hague, David Cameron and Chris Grayling have contributed nothing for democracy… Or for accountability.
Did any of them go on the broadcast media and pronounce anything at all against MPs expenses and other unacceptable conduct? If they did, when did they do it? My observation is that the McBride e-mails and Derek Draper's reappearance as a Blaired Party spinmeister is more the product of some spin-traders seeking to make profitable mischief than it is about any even conceivable difference between the two mainstream Parties 'of Government' in Britain. On the matters that do matter, like the violation of civil liberties and the open, the brazen introduction of new breaches of the rile fo law and the entrenchment of existing lawlessness as applicable to most organs of the state, Chris Grayling has been failing big time. Likewise, Cameron is not questioning Brown's preaching in anything like an original opposition leader should or could do on the available evidence. And the less said about William Hague the better. The three of them have featured as the main sources or entities in the current Tory Opposition front bench as implying dire retributions against Brown and his lot over the McBride affair. But what has any of them to say on the issues of the UK being embroiled in unnecessary, unjustified, unwanted and unjust international engagements? How does Grayling justify HIS failure on the G20 priorities and the hypes that the City of London interests embarked on in the pre-'summit' days? What are the comparative lessons for 'our democratic society' of the events surrounding the Guardian's reports about Ian Tomlinson’s and the McBride e-mail 'stories'?
And has any of the three frontbench Opposition leaders had anything to say about global poverty? Oops! Or even about poverty in Britain?
How much did THEY support of the Blair-Brown strategy for creating poverty in the UK?
Why did the Tories hire David Freud, the man who as unable to answer simple questions about his big plan against the poor when he was quizzed by news bulletin presenter ion Channer 4 news? As for the Spectator’s tactical use of the name of the ‘records’ of Mr A Campbell, the less said the better. How could the Spectator be presenting A Campbell as a source of impartial opinion on the very matter for which he was compared with some of Adolph Hitler’s henchmen in the time that he spent as Tony Blair’s own spinmeister?
Also, what about Bernard Ingram? What role did he play in doing down democratic accountability as far as he created some fo the grounds which A Campbell later used to brow beat those in the ‘lobby’ who had dared to ask questions almost verging on democracy?
Has the BBC deleted all the episodes of Bernard Ingram’s appearances on the various ‘news’ slots? He was shamelessly anti-accountability and was openly insulting those who wanted accountability from Margaret Thatcher… Has Chris Grayling or David Cameron noticed that role? As for William Hague, he is the boy who dreamt of being like Thatcher… He could not see anything at all beyond that barrier to democracy which he typically misunderstood as a visage and worshipped as a reflection almost akin to divinity…. These are not sources to lecture the public about any standards
0745 Hrs GMT London 'Bank Holiday' Monday 13 April 2009
London
'Bank Holiday' Monday
13 April 2009
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda, making a definitive [2] historic intervention to 'rescue' Gordon Brown! By Exposing Crossrail-backer Chris Grayling as one of the Tory front benchers who are failing to do their real job [collectively] of holding the Government to account.
The KHOODEELAAR! Campaign organiser has just posted the following comment on the SPECTATOR magazine’s web site. They may or may not publish it. If they do then that will also be a miniature act of 'history'. Because of the deeply relevant contents of the particular comment.
The comment is in response to the magazine’s carrying an item from A Campbell apparently referring to the McBride and Draper email disclosures scandal…
In the later parts of this commentary, we shall focus on Chris Grayling’s role as a peddler of the Big Business Crossrail agenda and as a de facto opponent of parliamentary scrutiny of executive action as long as the action is in continuation of the agenda of Big Business…
[To be continued]
The challenge is really about the location of the official Opposition Vis a Vis ethics, morality, accountability, honesty and transparency. The ordinary people in the UK are not being served at all well by the mainstream media frenzies. They are the ones who have had to benefit most by the behaviour of McBride and Draper.. It is only a matter of time before one of the tabloid titles or even a broadcasting outfit engaged in similar commercial pursuits reveals further details about the ‘leaking’; to or the ‘discovery’ by Guido F of the particular communications… Once the particular saga is over, the will move on to the next sensation lasting a 24 hour period… The people are not served by the official Opposition either… In their collective roles as MPs since they became elected. Did David Cameron, William Hague and Chris Grayling have not contributed anything to the cause of constitutionality. Not a single one of them is known as a democracy campaigner… Not a campaigner for constitutionality. Nor for accountability. It is important to point out these basic facts and to put the current media sport into perspective. On poverty, on civil liberty and on the Blaired collusion with the GW Bush regime in the war against innocent people [as opposed to and distinguished from the legitimate ground for UNO-sponsored and internationally legally valid and warranted and justified and supportable focus on the people liable for all the violations of human rights in countries and regions in any part of the contemporary world] William Hague, David Cameron and Chris Grayling have contributed nothing for democracy… Or for accountability.
Did any of them go on the broadcast media and pronounce anything at all against MPs expenses and other unacceptable conduct? If they did, when did they do it? My observation is that the McBride e-mails and Derek Draper's reappearance as a Blaired Party spinmeister is more the product of some spin-traders seeking to make profitable mischief than it is about any even conceivable difference between the two mainstream Parties 'of Government' in Britain. On the matters that do matter, like the violation of civil liberties and the open, the brazen introduction of new breaches of the rile fo law and the entrenchment of existing lawlessness as applicable to most organs of the state, Chris Grayling has been failing big time. Likewise, Cameron is not questioning Brown's preaching in anything like an original opposition leader should or could do on the available evidence. And the less said about William Hague the better. The three of them have featured as the main sources or entities in the current Tory Opposition front bench as implying dire retributions against Brown and his lot over the McBride affair. But what has any of them to say on the issues of the UK being embroiled in unnecessary, unjustified, unwanted and unjust international engagements? How does Grayling justify HIS failure on the G20 priorities and the hypes that the City of London interests embarked on in the pre-'summit' days? What are the comparative lessons for 'our democratic society' of the events surrounding the Guardian's reports about Ian Tomlinson’s and the McBride e-mail 'stories'?
And has any of the three frontbench Opposition leaders had anything to say about global poverty? Oops! Or even about poverty in Britain?
How much did THEY support of the Blair-Brown strategy for creating poverty in the UK?
Why did the Tories hire David Freud, the man who as unable to answer simple questions about his big plan against the poor when he was quizzed by news bulletin presenter ion Channer 4 news? As for the Spectator’s tactical use of the name of the ‘records’ of Mr A Campbell, the less said the better. How could the Spectator be presenting A Campbell as a source of impartial opinion on the very matter for which he was compared with some of Adolph Hitler’s henchmen in the time that he spent as Tony Blair’s own spinmeister?
Also, what about Bernard Ingram? What role did he play in doing down democratic accountability as far as he created some fo the grounds which A Campbell later used to brow beat those in the ‘lobby’ who had dared to ask questions almost verging on democracy?
Has the BBC deleted all the episodes of Bernard Ingram’s appearances on the various ‘news’ slots? He was shamelessly anti-accountability and was openly insulting those who wanted accountability from Margaret Thatcher… Has Chris Grayling or David Cameron noticed that role? As for William Hague, he is the boy who dreamt of being like Thatcher… He could not see anything at all beyond that barrier to democracy which he typically misunderstood as a visage and worshipped as a reflection almost akin to divinity…. These are not sources to lecture the public about any standards
0745 Hrs GMT London 'Bank Holiday' Monday 13 April 2009