From the DAILY MAIL web site: London Wednesday 13 May 2009
"
Middle-class children have better genes, says former schools chief... and we just have to accept it
By LAURA CLARK
Last updated at 12:10 AM on 13th May 2009
Comments (15)
Add to My Stories
Middle-class children are more likely to be clever than those from poorer families because they have 'better genes', former Ofsted chief Chris Woodhead said yesterday.
The comments caused an immediate storm, with critics calling them insulting and 'crazy'.
However, Mr Woodhead won support in some quarters - including the backing of an evolutionary psychologist, who said research had shown there was a link between class and average IQ.
Ex-chief inspector of schools Chris Woodhead believes middle-class children are, in general, 'born with better genes'
Mr Woodhead called for a return to selection by ability at 11.
He suggested that grammar school pupils were more likely to be middle-class because 'the genes are likely to be better if your parents are teachers, academics, lawyers, whatever, and the nurture is likely to be better'.
In an interview with the Guardian, he argued that Labour had betrayed a generation by refusing to accept that some children were not suited to formal secondary education.
More...
Anger as pigs raised 'as pets' by primary school children are turned into sausages and sold to parents
14 pupils injured after heating duct collapses on top of them during exam
Pupils behaving badly: Hull tops Ofsted list with the 'worst school discipline' in the country
The Government had tried to make education 'accessible' rather than ' rigorous', he said.
Ministers should accept that some youngsters are simply born 'not very bright' and allow them to pursue practical training instead of forcing them into the classroom.
'I've taught, and I can still remember trying to interest children who had no interest whatsoever in English,' he said. 'They didn't want to be in the classroom.
'If I'm honest I didn't want them to be there either - because they were disruptive to children who did want to learn. What was the point?'
But political scientist Alan Ryan, who is the warden of New College, Oxford, criticised Mr Woodhead's views on genes as 'garbage'.
'All the evidence is that initial genetic endowment is pretty much random across social classes, and everything depends on a nurturing environment,' he said.
'The idea that you look for some genetic underpinning to go with it seems crazy.'
The Department for Children, Schools and Families also rejected Mr Woodhead's arguments. 'We do not accept the inevitability of pupils' socio-economic backgrounds shaping their attainment and their futures,' a spokesman said.
However, there was support from Dr Bruce Charlton, an expert in evolutionary psychiatry from Newcastle University.
'Chris Woodhead is basically correct, and there's nothing new about it,' he said.
Dr Charlton insisted that intelligence was 'mostly inherited', adding that family background and education 'probably makes a small difference but nothing like as much as people think'.
Print this article Read later Email to a friend
Share this article:
Digg itDel.icio.usRedditNewsvineNowpublicStumbleUponFacebookMySpaceFark
Add your comments Comments (15)
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.
Newest
Oldest
Best rated
Worst rated
View all
What a load of rubbish. I passed my 11 plus and went to Grammar School and my parents certainly weren't middle class although they may have achieved that 'status' now through sheer hard work!
- anne, feltham, 12/5/2009 10:09Click to rate Rating 53
This man is talking a load of rubbish. It is often to do with economy. Poorer families do not have the opportunity to do well. It is much better than in my day children do have a better chance. The better schools are not available for the poorer familes due to "the old boys network". I came from a family where my father died when I was 15 years old and my mother had to work to enable us to eat. I did well because of my chosen profession but the fact that my family were poor did prevent me from doing some things I wanted.
"its in the genes"---I think not. Its in the economy.
- Ann, Hartlepool, 12/5/2009 10:05Click to rate Rating 33
Teachers are middle class? Don't make me laugh. Maybe 40 years ago, but today in modern Britain they are all ineffectual working class oiks.
- Charles, Uk, 12/5/2009 10:01Click to rate Rating 160
What a sensible chap.
People are not equal and never can be. (It is only some MP's that are more equal than others !)
- Alastair, Swindon, 12/5/2009 09:51Click to rate Rating 389
What a numpty - they are simply born with more money!!! That allows their parents to buy a better education etc for them! as the public school system is a shambles.
- Rimmel, Notts UK, 12/5/2009 09:48Click to rate Rating 157
This guy has a first class degree in idiocy.
- Ian, Scotland, 12/5/2009 09:46Click to rate Rating 178
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do n
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.