Saturday, June 26, 2010

Monday, June 21, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! Advising UK CONDEM Collusion’s George Osborne: do not repeat the lies of your alleged predecessor in post. Do not repeat the poverty-creation, debt-creation of the fakers whom you feign to decry! Do not commit new lies to justify the Military Industrial Complex Big Biz agenda Crossrail scam..

KHOODEELAAR! Advising UK CONDEM Collusion’s George Osborne: do not repeat the lies of your alleged predecessor in post. 

Do not repeat the poverty-creation, debt-creation of the fakers whom you feign to decry! 

Do not commit new lies to justify the Military Industrial Complex Big Biz agenda Crossrail scam..

Monday, June 14, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! No to " Big Business agenda Crossrail hole scam..." campaign.. tells ALISTAIR DARLING [who ‘protests’ via the Guardian today] against the COPN-DEM’s own fakery about the ‘debts’ burden, that he, Alistair Darling. Is in no position to fake a moral stance! HE paid £100 million of public money [dated December 2005 when Darling was the holder of the post of Secretary of State at the UK DAFT, the Department ‘for’ Transport = DfT] to the then CLRL under the dubiously enacted ‘Railways Act 2005’ and without EVER asking for that sum to be accounted for in public truthfully and responsibly. It is quite true to say that the current CONDEM COLLUSION is engaged in a massive spin and fakery operation of its own. However, that does NOT excuse Alistair Darling’s part in fakery and in fabrication and in lying. The Big Business agenda is am agenda of lying to the people, against the rights of the people and against the reasonably understood future entitlements of the people. Ordinary people. Alistair Darling is as much guilty of aiding and abetting Big Business agenda as are his ‘successors’ in the current CONDEM Collusion. The beginning of the long overdue accountability must be made by Darling admitting to his part in the misinformation and in the abuse of position and power that he was involved in. He can also add to that list of confessions his role in faking the ‘benefits’ of Crossrail. What are the ‘benefits’ of Crossrail? That word must be replaced by the phrase 'reasonably verifiable transport projects' and the project known as Crossrail should be scrapped and only parts of the various lines should be built. Any reasonable and truthful examination of the proposed line and the various bits of it will show that there is not one single line called Crossrail. It is various bits and pieces. And those bits and pieces should be treated as individuals bits in their own areas. If this is done then most of the unnecessary bits can be dropped and only the most important bits built. The cost will be brought down to a quarter of its currently estimated level.

1920 [1915] [1905] Hrs GMT
London
Monday
14 June 2010 :

Editor © Muhammad Haque
KHOODEELAAR! No to " Big Business agenda Crossrail hole scam..." campaign.. tells ALISTAIR DARLING [who ‘protests’ via the Guardian today] against the COPN-DEM’s own fakery about the ‘debts’ burden, that he, Alistair Darling. Is in no position to fake a moral stance! HE paid £100 million of public money [dated December 2005 when Darling was the holder of the post of Secretary of State at the UK DAFT, the Department ‘for’ Transport = DfT]  to the then CLRL under the dubiously enacted ‘Railways Act 2005’ and without EVER asking for that sum to be accounted for in public truthfully and responsibly. It is quite true to say that the current CONDEM COLLUSION is engaged in a massive spin and fakery operation of its own. However, that does NOT excuse Alistair Darling’s part in fakery and in fabrication and in lying. The Big Business agenda is am agenda of lying to the people, against the rights of the people and against the reasonably understood future entitlements of the people. Ordinary people. Alistair Darling is as much guilty of aiding  and abetting Big Business agenda as are his ‘successors’ in the current CONDEM Collusion. The beginning of the long overdue accountability must be made by Darling admitting to his part in  the misinformation and in the abuse of position and power that he was involved in. He can also add to that list of confessions his role in faking the ‘benefits’ of Crossrail. What are the ‘benefits’ of Crossrail? That word must be replaced by the phrase 'reasonably verifiable transport projects' and the project known as Crossrail should be scrapped and only parts of the various lines should be built. Any reasonable and truthful examination of the proposed line and the various bits of it will show that there is not one single line called Crossrail. It is various bits and pieces. And those bits and pieces should be treated as individuals bits in their own areas. If this  is done then most of the unnecessary bits can be dropped and only the most important bits built. The cost will be brought down to a quarter of its currently estimated level.

[To be continued]

Sunday, June 13, 2010

KHOODEELAAR! Telling UK Dave “CLEGGERON” Cameron to heed this universally valid advice: Quit faking. Quit peddling untruths. Stop lying. Do this NOW. Scrap ALL contradictory, unsustainable, unwanted scams. SHOW that YOU understand prudence, responsible decision-making. If you ignore this advice then you can be certain that you shall not stay in office for long. Why? Because if you persist in faking, telling untruths and lying for power then you shall be seen for what you are and you shall lose all traces of legitimacy in public office, all claims to stay in public office…Can you handle this one? YES? Then scrap Crossrail. And start talking about transport. If you can do this then all appropriate investments in London's transport needs can be reconciled with at least an approximation of the truth. It will take years to reach a truthful decision making state in London. So many decades of lying done by the 'main Parties' have created heaps of barriers to getting there. But a start is most overdue. You should do the decent thing and scrap the culture of lies and lying. Ignore the touts of Big Business. Remember what you feigned - yes, you faked it in the run up to the ‘democratic UK elections held on 6 May 2010’ but that was the 'best' you could manage. You feigned understanding of the need to be honest with the people. Now is your chance. Now is your only moment, Scrap the lies scams. There is the only chance of making a start.

    follow me on Twitter

    Saturday, June 12, 2010

    Dave CLEGGERON Cameron’s contradictory stances, as ‘lamented’ by the Daily Mail echoing the British Big Biz outfit ‘BP’, are not confined to the contamination of the waters off the USA by the BP adventures but also to the idea – if ‘Dave’ ever had a pure idea about ethics and morality – of ‘reverence’. He used the concept of reverence to the ‘British soldiers’ who were standing there surrounding him as he gave them words of praise and undermined the role of ‘journalists’ and all other vocations in the bringing about of ‘liberty’. How eerily ‘Dave’ looked as he reminded of the plastic performer Gordon Brown only a few weeks earlier… And how amoral, how sterile, how petty the ‘purpose’. Just as petty as the role that ‘Dave’ has been assigned by the secret movers of the ‘agenda’ via the UK state. The task of reconciling true liberty and its requirements with the powers and the almost inevitable abuse of them by the occupiers in the offices of the state remains as remote as it ever was. Yet that task could not be more urgent. Notwithstanding the performances of ‘repair and reinstatement in ’ the ‘special relationship’ that have been issued after the stated communication between ‘Dave’ and his ‘new best mate across the Atlantic ocean, the fact is that if the ‘BP' or ‘British petroleum’ or whatever else it is called is seen to have failed to do its duty by the people and the environment it has contaminated and threatened, serious damage will be done to more careers and careerists than just ‘Dave’ and his Colluders in the Cleggeron. Including the two OTT-'British Patriotism'-byting 'partners' Nick Clegg and C Huhne who have been the only two from the Lib Dumbs faction on the record so far this weekend threatening [!] retaliation against the USA for the latter's 'President' daring to question the Big Biz BP Pollution! Some ‘change’! INDEED! No wonder that the UK Lib Dumbs, before they came out in their Tory colours, voted FOR Big Biz CRASSRail scam, as did the ‘Dave’ flank. Stooged, touting and totally untransparent! How dare THEY even pretend that THEY represent ‘change’ from the culture of sleaze and corruption under the guise of ‘elected’ ‘democracy’? No ‘deficit’ will be reduced if those claiming fitness and competence to be treated as legitimately installed to carry out the ‘reduction’ turn out, so dearly on to be just as unaccountable, just as dishonest and just as useless!


    2135 [2130] [2035] Hrs GMT 
    London Saturday 12 June 2010. 
    Editor © Muhammad Haque. 

    Dave CLEGGERON Cameron’s contradictory stances, as ‘lamented’ by the Daily Mail echoing the British Big Biz outfit ‘BP’, are not confined to the contamination of the waters off the USA by the BP adventures but also to the idea – if ‘Dave’ ever had a pure idea about ethics and morality – of ‘reverence’. He used the concept of reverence to the ‘British soldiers’ who were standing there surrounding him as he gave them words of praise and undermined the role of ‘journalists’ and all other vocations in the bringing about of ‘liberty’. How eerily ‘Dave’ looked as he reminded of the plastic performer Gordon Brown only a few weeks earlier… And how amoral, how sterile, how petty the ‘purpose’. Just as petty as the role that ‘Dave’ has been assigned by the secret movers of the ‘agenda’ via the UK state. The task of reconciling true liberty and its requirements with the powers and the almost inevitable abuse of them by the occupiers in the offices of the state remains as remote as it ever was. Yet that task could not be more urgent. Notwithstanding the performances of ‘repair and reinstatement in ’ the ‘special relationship’ that have been issued after the stated communication between ‘Dave’ and his ‘new best mate across the Atlantic ocean, the fact is that if the ‘BP' or ‘British petroleum’ or whatever else it is called is seen to have failed to do its duty by the people and the environment it has contaminated and threatened, serious damage will be done to more careers and careerists than just ‘Dave’ and his Colluders in the Cleggeron. Including the two OTT-'British Patriotism'-byting  'partners' Nick Clegg and C Huhne who have been the only two from the Lib Dumbs faction on the record so far this weekend threatening [!] retaliation against the USA for the latter's 'President' daring to question the Big Biz BP Pollution! Some ‘change’!  INDEED! No wonder that the UK Lib Dumbs, before they came out in their Tory colours, voted FOR Big Biz CRASSRail scam, as did the ‘Dave’ flank. Stooged, touting and totally untransparent! How dare THEY even pretend that THEY represent ‘change’ from the culture of sleaze and corruption under the guise of ‘elected’ ‘democracy’? No ‘deficit’ will be reduced if those claiming fitness and competence to be treated as legitimately installed to carry out the ‘reduction’ turn out, so dearly on to be just as unaccountable, just as dishonest and just as useless! 


    [To be continued]

    Tuesday, June 8, 2010

    Khoodeelaar! Challenging the BBC on its admission - after almost 7 years of denial - that the London Crossrail was [if not a crassly conceived diversionary scam but then at least, as far as the bbc goes, at today’s date, a scheme that is open to drastic cuts!] Not a transport priority. Khoodeelaar! Contextually notes the assertion made on BBC London in their 1830 hrs bulletin [fronted by Louisa Preston] about the USA having opened a ‘Harry Potter’ ‘visitor attraction’. Whoever ‘advised’ Boris Johnson to make that ‘plea’ was as ignorant, unwise as anybody who might have scripted all those peddling lines that Boris keeps churning out about ‘Crossrail’, the ‘City of London’, ‘the Banks’ and anything that Big Bizness cares to bid to have a contract on. . Taken together, all the peddling that Boris has done for big business and the city of London have amounted to a big zero. As big [if not bigger than] as the embarrassing one that Ken Livingstone had confected by his crass role over the relevant years during which he was entitled to claim to speak in the name of [often at the expense of] the people in a and around ‘London’. The alleged rivals are indistinguishable when measured against their touting mouthing for biog business forces at the expense of ordinary people of and in London. We have shown now every day a new and distinct item of evidence constituting ground for scrapping Crossrail altogether. To this day, we have not seen or heard of a single evidential rebuttal from a single one of the placemen or place women that big Bizness has put in place. So we say again: Scrap Crossrail. It is not worth it. [To be continued]


    Where could spending axe fall?

    Page last updated at 16:39 GMT, Tuesday, 8 June 2010 17:39 UK
    We have been told painful public spending cuts are on the way, but where should the axe fall?
    That is the question Prime Minister David Cameron's government has posed to the British public as they seek to plug an estimated £71bn a year black hole in the nation's finances.
    How things might look in years to come will depend on the decisions made by Chancellor George Osborne's in his forthcoming emergency budget and spending review. Below we set out in detail some of the tax and spending choices the country faces.

    VAT

    Some experts have predicted the government will increase VAT in its emergency budget.
    Cash raised
    About £11bn a year, if it is increased from the current level of 17.5% to 20%, according to Credit Suisse.
    Political risk
    The easiest and quickest way to raise a lot of money, but it comes with economic risks. It would push up the inflation rate, potentially forcing the Bank of England to put interest rates up. It was not proposed by either the Conservatives or the Lib Dems in their election manifestos either, although David Cameron has refused to rule it out. Business Secretary Vince Cable would be forced to explain why he had changed his mind, after speaking out against increasing the rate before the election.

    WELFARE

    A range of benefits could be frozen in George Osborne's emergency budget.
    Cash raised
    Freezing all benefits could raise about £15bn over three years. Axing child benefit for better off families could save £1.3bn a year. Taxing the winter fuel allowance for better off pensioners, in line with proposals in a select committee report last year, could save £250m a year. Axing it altogether would save £2.7bn a year.
    Political risk
    Freezing benefits across the board would raise a lot of money quickly but hit the poor and most vulnerable the hardest - something the coalition has pledged to avoid. Ministers could, alternatively, enact the Liberal Democrat policy of axing child credits for couples on a joint income of more £26,000. Means testing the winter fuel allowance is another option, although the BBC understands this is not being considered.

    INCOME TAX

    The biggest single contributor to the exchequer's coffers - and a perennial source of extra revenue for cash-strapped chancellors, particularly in the year after an election.
    Cash raised
    Putting 1p on the basic rate of income tax would raise about £4bn a year, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
    Political risk
    George Osborne would find it very difficult to increase the basic rate. A less headline-grabbing alternative would be to reduce tax relief for high earners saving for their retirement, although they have already been clobbered by measures in Alistair Darling's last budget and business groups have been protesting it will drive wealth creating talent from the UK. Mr Osborne is expected to change personal allowances to help the low paid, in line with Lib Dem policy, to be paid for by changes to capital gains tax.

    NATIONAL INSURANCE

    The budget will confirm that most of next year's planned increase in National Insurance will not go ahead. Plans to increase it by 1% for employees are likely to go ahead but the same increase for employers' NI - dubbed Labour's "jobs tax" by Mr Cameron - is to be shelved.
    Cash raised
    Increasing National Insurance by one percentage point raises £8.8bn a year in extra revenue, according to the IFS.
    Political risk
    Could raise billions at a stroke but would hit Tory-voting high and middle income workers.

    CAPITAL GAINS TAX

    Non-business capital gains tax, which is levied on the profits made by individuals when they sell second homes, shares or other assets, is set to be increased from 18% to 40% or 50%.
    Cash raised
    Hotly disputed. Some accountants argue that it could be as low as £500m a year, if it is tapered to prevent penalising long-term investors. The Lib Dems, who proposed it, say it would raise about £1.9bn a year, although this would be used to pay for the planned increase in personal tax allowances rather than to pay off the deficit. Some Tory MPs argue it could actually cost money, as collection rates fall.
    Political risk
    It is already in the coalition agreement so will not come as a surprise. The only question is whether Mr Osborne will taper it to soften the impact on long-term investors. If he does not he could face a backbench rebellion from Tory MPs who see it as a tax on entrepreneurs and people saving for their retirement. The Lib Dems say increasing CGT to the same level as income tax is essential to make the tax fairer.

    GREEN TAXES

    The budget is expected to adopt Lib Dem proposals of switching from a per-passenger air duty to per-plane, but as with capital gains, the reform will help to fund an increase in the personal allowance.
    Cash raised
    None from the air tax changes (see above). But further green taxes could be included in the budget.
    Political risk
    The coalition has called for a higher proportion of tax revenues to come from environment taxes, although any move to increase fuel duty beyond that already announced by the previous government would spark an outcry.

    PUBLIC SECTOR PAY

    The government has already committed itself to a public sector pay freeze for all but the lowest paid workers next year. The budget could also include below-inflation pay rises for state employees.
    Cash raised
    The CBI claims selected public sector pay and recruitment freezes could save £18bn in the next two years.
    Political risk
    The government is doing its best to keep public sector workers onside by trying to involve them in deciding where the spending axe will fall but, with inflation running at 5%, a pay freeze would amount to a cut for many workers and could spark industrial action.

    BIG CAPITAL PROJECTS

    The government is committed to a number of expensive long-term projects including new London rail network Crossrail, a high speed rail network and replacing Trident nuclear missiles.
    Cash raised
    The government is reported to be considering making up to £5bn of cuts to the £16.9bn Crossrail scheme. Delaying the £20bn Trident upgrade would save a lot of money. The Lib Dems have been promised a "value for money" review of the project.
    Political risk
    The Conservatives could not afford to be seen as going weak on defence, although delaying Trident would please the Lib Dems. Crossrail looks more vulnerable.

    HEALTH

    Health is the only area of spending - apart from the relatively modest international development budget - that has been protected from frontline cuts, although the NHS will have to make 3% efficiency savings and IT projects have been axed.
    Cash raised
    The NHS annual budget is £106bn. Some experts say it is nonsense to suggest further savings cannot be made from it.
    Political risk
    Protecting the NHS from cuts was a key Tory election pledge - but the Lib Dems argued it should not be ring-fenced, which could provide some cover if Mr Osborne decided to rein back its budget.

    EDUCATION

    Core school budgets, 16 to 19-year-olds and Sure Start will be protected but many additional services could be facing the chop, particularly if those providing them work for local authorities or quangos.
    Cash raised
    Savings of £670m have already been announced by scrapping the new primary curriculum and axing quangos, among other things, but this is a drop in the ocean compared with the savings that are likely to be made over the next few years from the £63bn annual education budget. The teachers' final salary pension scheme, which costs about £10bn a year, could be one casualty.
    Political risk
    Care will be taken to avoid anything that impacts too obviously on children's education. The government's plans for academies and free schools will also be a priority. But it may be hard to avoid protests if local services for children and youths are cut.

    LOCAL GOVERNMENT

    Local government is likely to come under pressure to save money by outsourcing services or handing them over to voluntary groups. Leisure services, residential care and public libraries are among the budgets thought to be in the firing line. Charges could be introduced for other services such as recycling and home help. Conservative plans to freeze council tax for two years also appear to have been dropped.
    Cash raised
    Local councils are already being forced to shed up to 300,000 jobs and staff pensions and benefits face a squeeze. But the £35bn spent annually on local government is still likely to come under further pressure.
    Political risk
    Huge public sector job losses could damage the economy in some parts of the country. Popular local services could also suffer.

    DEFENCE

    Defence spending is protected in the current year but a full Strategic Defence Review is expected to recommend deep cuts when it reports in November. The army could be cut from 98,000 personnel to about 80,000, according to press reports, and orders for new fighter jets and other equipment scaled back, although the government remains committed to replacing Trident nuclear missiles.
    Cash raised
    In addition to anticipated manpower cuts, the Ministry of Defence is set to review about 20 equipment procurement projects, worth £10bn in total, according to media reports. The Lib Dems have been promised a "value for money" review of the project.
    Political risk
    Cuts to the nation's defence capability are likely to meet heavy resistance from the Conservative benches. With so many British troops committed in Afghanistan, it is also an emotive subject for the public.

    RETIREMENT AGE

    The coalition government has announced a review of the retirement age. Under current plans, it is due to rise from 65 to 66 from 2024 but the Conservatives have said they want this change to happen from 2016 for men and from 2020 for women.
    Cash raised
    Adopting the Conservative proposals would eventually save £13bn a year.
    Political risk
    Relatively low, given that the retirement age is already going up, although any benefit would be so far in the future as to make it worthless as a short-term deficit reduction measure.

    KHOODEELAAR! Noting Simon Jenkins [now mildly] calling for scrapping of Crossrail by the UK CLEGGERON regime

    KHOODEELAAR! Noting Simon Jenkins [now mildly] calling for scrapping of Crossrail by the UK CLEGGERON regime

    KHOODEELAAR! Noting Simon Jenkins [now mildly] calling for scrapping of Crossrail by the UK CLEGGERON regime



      Whether that will apply now is doubtful. I have seen three London recessions. They have some upsides. Crowds thin. Tubes are less jammed. It is easier to get a taxi, a theatre ticket, help in the house and a seat in a pub. This time round, we might hope to see fewer roadworks and thus fewer traffic jams.
      Look on the bright side. There is a silver lining to every cloud. The cuts programme previewed by David Cameron yesterday will involve “momentous decisions that will affect Britain's whole way of life”. He did not add whether it would be for better or worse.
      In every recession some fool invokes the spirit of the Blitz. Enough research has been done into wartime London to eradicate the Churchillian myth of a metropolis girding its loins to love its neighbour and fight the enemy. The war was bad, breaking families, unhinging minds, destroying neighbourhoods and plaguing London with spivs. But some sense of courage in adversity rose from the ashes and probably did no harm.
      House-buying is less prone to gazumping. Streets will no longer ring to the cry of twentysomethings claiming to be “investment bankers” or “consultants”. The frenzied city will take a breather, calm down, re-examine itself.
      We all have our Gilbert and Sullivan “little lists” of things that might be cut to general advantage, from the Olympics to Crossrail, from road engineering to bureaucracy. I notice the new £38 million Metropolitan Police computer — flogged to the Home Office by a Swiss firm as “saving £12 million a year in human resources” — is now costing £48 million and rising, with no known completion date. There is no end to the waste to which a useful axe could be taken, always remembering that even the most wasteful service is someone's job.
      But such cuts do not constitute a change in the way Londoners live. That is a grander threat, and one requiring some lateral thinking. It is an opportunity to look wider. InParis this week the mayor inaugurated a policy of targeted planning to revitalise street life and protect small businesses. Some vacant shops in the 5th arrondissement are having their use-class stipulated as bookshops so as to maintain their current character. The result is three new bookshops suddenly come to life. Butchers, bakeries and tabacs are likewise protected. Such meticulous planning is what has made France's urban street life so celebrated.
      There is every reason to replicate it in London. The recession may well decimate local branch libraries while also threatening bookshops. Why not merge the two? The demise of the net book agreement led to a cut in book prices and a reduction in public library borrowing. These libraries are also bereft of purchase funds. Partnership could see local bookshops merging with branch libraries, with second-hand books brought in by the public for others to borrow or buy.
      In my street a similar conceptual gulf exists between the NHS surgery and alternative medicine “surgeries” next door, some crackpot but some worthwhile. Schools are dark in the evening while vocational night-classes, for computing, accounting or languages, flourish in neighbouring upstairs rooms.
      The gulf between public and private sector may be hard to bridge nationally but local can be flexible. Across the capital, communal services are still divided into national silos, prevented from the sort of local collaboration that should be natural, and save money.
      The key to breaking this is to end the local of political devolution. The Paris initiative required a mayor in league with lively lower-tier government. This week's report from the think tank Demos pleads for more freedom for just such neighbourhood authority, even as small as wards, to be allowed to “tax-and-spend” for services like parks, crèches, clinics and job centres, with “micro-mayors” to tackle litter and antisocial behaviour. It is a community version of the New York “business improvement district”. What may seem madcap to Britons is common practice in most other countries.
      Micro-planning as in Paris requires micro-politics to stimulate it. One national government after another has promised London neighbourhood councils with modest taxing and spending powers, parallelling parish in the provinces. They were inLabour's 2005 manifesto. They have never happened, any more than Hazel Blears' incoherent “community kitties” did. The truth is that MPs — and local councils — hate seeing power devolved to localities in any form as detracting from their status.
      Spending cuts should mean less money available for new buildings, and thus more scope for reusing old ones. It should encourage the saving of existing high streets and shopping areas and fewer destructive hypermarkets and shopping malls.
      The most vital neighbourhoods in London are still those comprised by strong immigrant communities, as in Southall and Brixton. Their streets and small businesses are protected by residents fiercely loyal to their ethnic services, even to schools and doctors. That loyalty needs to be encouraged across the city.
      Most of London's urban environment has been left to the vagaries of the property market and public projects. It has been sucked dry by insensitive architecture, with large blocks replacing streets, and by a lack of concern for what happens when big multiples replace local stores.
      The trauma of public-sector cuts should be a chance to re-empower neighbourhood government. It will happen only if neighbourhoods are allowed to elect leaders to do it. For decades London has been cheated of the localism proffered to rural areas, or to similar cities abroad.
      If Nick Clegg can worry about voting systems, parliamentary constituencies and Lords reform, he might spend a few minutes honouring the localism so often preached by his parliamentary colleagues, yet not delivered. If the economic wreckage of the past three years really must change our way of life, let it be to revitalise local control over city streets and services that national control has so betrayed.

      Sponsored links

      Ads by Google

      Save up to 80% on Pre Booked Train Tickets to London

      London Zoo Deal 50-90% Off Register Now To Get New Deals!

      Ideally located near British Museum and other attractions. Book Direct!

      Local IT Support for London Call 0207 494 2121

      Reader views (0)

      No comments have so far been submitted.

      Add your comment

       

      We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.
      For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.