1950 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 19 April 2009
KHOODEELAAR! action dissection of the lies and fabrications of PHIL WOOLAS! He may next say he is defecting to the Tories!
You read it here first, folks!
KHOODEELAAR! is ‘minded’ to predict that Woolas may be one of several Blaired Party [what ‘Party’!!!!!!!!!] time-servers seriously contemplating a move over to the other side ......
He may in fact have already worked out HIS time tale. Even of Gordon Brown is unable to work out one for a democratic society....
If the evidence of the disarray in the Brown regime [Oops! ‘Bunker’ as Neil Kinnock, of all people, uttered on the BBC this morning] is anything to go by, it is quite possible that Brown in fact is even shallower than Alice Mahon [ex MP for Halifax, Yorkshire, England] indicated in the substance of her statements and reasoning for resigning as published during yesterday [Saturday 18 April 2009]..As if those did not constitute enough of a warning about the future of this country and society, the Original LIAR himself added his updater lies in the broadcast plug under the typically fake headline of the ‘faith foundation’ today on the BBC Radio 4.
He confessed! that he had not sported out his CONCEPTIONS [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] before he got involved in the practicalities. He now says [on the BBC] that he should have got those sorted out first.....God help us! And these are the ‘key’ people who have been telling us that Big Business Crossrail is’ vital’! What do they know?????[To be continued]
Sunday, April 19, 2009
KHOODEELAAR! action focus on the CRASS role for Crossrail scam by the Guardian
1910 Hrs GMT London Sunday 19 April 2009:
KHOODEELAAR! action focus on Alan Rusbridger's LYING Guardian: CRASS role for Crossrail scam by the Guardian
Now the Guardian’s ‘transport’ correspondent Dan Milmo - whose ignorant, incompetent and prejudiced [against objective truth] peddling for Big Business Crassail has been featuring in our coverage for more than a year now - has confessed, AGAIN!
As if he had not had cause before to make the same confession.
He has confessed more starkly today than he has been found on the record of the Guardian's publications about Crossrail so far...
The confession is that he had been publishing lies for Crossrail.
True, he does not use those words. But the CORE of the ‘fact’ that he retails today confirms that that is exactly what Dan Milmo had been doing...
We have said for more than 5 years now that the ‘management of transport in London WAS out of order, that huge amounts of public money were being wasted and instead being allowed to be looted by conglomerates in the ‘profession’ of transport instead of being put to services that were in need of the money, that the ‘London Assembly’ or the ‘Greater London Assembly’ [whatever the title at the given time for the stooged body] was failing to uphold any standards of accountability as owed to the people of London by the holder of the post of mayor in the name of the people and the communities across London, that the holder of the post [ditto] was acting as IN FACT and in EFFECT as a tout for interests in the City of London and in Big Business and the Military Industrial Complex. RATHER than being actively accountable for their conduct and behaviour to the people of London. And, we have been also saying with daily evidence hourly updated at times, that THE CRASSNESS of their peddling of the crassly conceived Crossrail scam shows that... [To be continued]
_______________________________
Transferring tube upgrade to public
sector 'will save taxpayers money'
Private contractor Tube Lines rejects claim that troubled PPP
project could be abandoned
Dan Milmo
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 19 April 2009 15.32 BST
Article history
Taxpayers will get a better deal if the entire £30bn programme to overhaul
the tube network is carried out in-house instead of being awarded to a
public-private partnership, the head of London Underground (LU) has
claimed.
Tim O'Toole, who leaves his post at the end of the month, also warned that
the troubled PPP project could be abandoned entirely if its last remaining
contractor, Tube Lines, fails to plug a £2bn funding gap. His comments drew
an angry response from Tube Lines, which accused LU of repeating "old
arguments".
O'Toole's claim comes at a crucial period in negotiations between the
publicly owned LU and Tube Lines, which are attempting to thrash out terms
for a seven-year work programme that includes expensive projects such as
an upgrade of the Piccadilly Line. The departing tube boss challenged the
rationale behind the PPP by making a case for transferring the work to the
public sector.
Referring to the profit-making imperative behind private sector involvement
in PPP projects, he told the Guardian: "I think we can deliver it at a lower
cost because I don't have to pay a premium in the form of equity returns and
other excesses."
O'Toole added that Tube Lines believed it could deliver the work more
cheaply, and quicker, than his organisation but he warned that the
government could decide to scrap the PPP project altogether if a row over
the cost of the work programme up to 2017 is not resolved.
"It brings into question whether or not the remaining part of the PPP is
viable," O'Toole said.
The PPP programme is one of the most controversial legacies of Gordon
Brown's 10-year reign as chancellor. Introduced despite the stern opposition
of Ken Livingstone, the former London mayor, it handed out 30-year
contracts to the private sector to maintain and upgrade the tube. However,
the contractor awarded two-thirds of the programme, Metronet, collapsed
two years ago and was effectively nationalised by LU with Brown's tacit
blessing.
Tube Lines, the only vestige of the PPP left, is embroiled in a row with LU
over its 2010 to 2017 programme, which it claims will cost £7.2bn but is
priced at between £5.1bn and £5.5bn, according to an independent estimate,
leaving a funding gap of up to £2.1bn. The gap is wider still if based on
figures from LU, which pays Tube Lines for the work. It claims that the
programme will cost £4.1bn.
Terry Morgan, the Tube Lines chief executive, said there was "no evidence"
that LU had saved taxpayers money by taking over Metronet. "The PPP
brought huge transparency to how much it cost to do a project. I have seen
no evidence to date that Metronet is more efficient now." Morgan added that
Tube Lines "inherited a track record of non-performance" when it took over
LU's maintenance work in 2003.
He said: "I am disappointed that these old arguments keep being used. My
concern is that by having these arguments, people with other investment
programmes get a higher priority from the government."
Tube Lines is co-owned by Bechtel, the project management specialist, and
the support services group Amey, whose parent is Ferrovial, the majority
shareholder in the airport group BAA.
Transport for London (TfL), LU's parent, has warned ministers that a recent
£40bn funding settlement is not enough to pay for the construction of the
£16bn trans-London Crossrail project and the tube upgrade. However, the
Department for Transport is adamant that no more money is available.
TfL's funding problems, highlighted by the Tube Lines dispute, have been
exacerbated by the recession, which led to a year-on-year decline in tube
passengers in January. TfL has slashed tube revenue forecasts for the
2009-10 financial year to £1.7bn, which means that turnover must rise by 9%
in order to meet the 2010-11 target of £1.84bn.
The revenue gap has stoked speculation that the mayor, Boris Johnson,
might have to implement huge fare rises. However, O'Toole said the
politically unpalatable price hikes could be avoided by "moving around"
TfL's multibillion-pound capital expenditure programme.
"You just cannot assume that there will have to be extraordinary fare
increases."
KHOODEELAAR! action focus on Alan Rusbridger's LYING Guardian: CRASS role for Crossrail scam by the Guardian
Now the Guardian’s ‘transport’ correspondent Dan Milmo - whose ignorant, incompetent and prejudiced [against objective truth] peddling for Big Business Crassail has been featuring in our coverage for more than a year now - has confessed, AGAIN!
As if he had not had cause before to make the same confession.
He has confessed more starkly today than he has been found on the record of the Guardian's publications about Crossrail so far...
The confession is that he had been publishing lies for Crossrail.
True, he does not use those words. But the CORE of the ‘fact’ that he retails today confirms that that is exactly what Dan Milmo had been doing...
We have said for more than 5 years now that the ‘management of transport in London WAS out of order, that huge amounts of public money were being wasted and instead being allowed to be looted by conglomerates in the ‘profession’ of transport instead of being put to services that were in need of the money, that the ‘London Assembly’ or the ‘Greater London Assembly’ [whatever the title at the given time for the stooged body] was failing to uphold any standards of accountability as owed to the people of London by the holder of the post of mayor in the name of the people and the communities across London, that the holder of the post [ditto] was acting as IN FACT and in EFFECT as a tout for interests in the City of London and in Big Business and the Military Industrial Complex. RATHER than being actively accountable for their conduct and behaviour to the people of London. And, we have been also saying with daily evidence hourly updated at times, that THE CRASSNESS of their peddling of the crassly conceived Crossrail scam shows that... [To be continued]
_______________________________
Transferring tube upgrade to public
sector 'will save taxpayers money'
Private contractor Tube Lines rejects claim that troubled PPP
project could be abandoned
Dan Milmo
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 19 April 2009 15.32 BST
Article history
Taxpayers will get a better deal if the entire £30bn programme to overhaul
the tube network is carried out in-house instead of being awarded to a
public-private partnership, the head of London Underground (LU) has
claimed.
Tim O'Toole, who leaves his post at the end of the month, also warned that
the troubled PPP project could be abandoned entirely if its last remaining
contractor, Tube Lines, fails to plug a £2bn funding gap. His comments drew
an angry response from Tube Lines, which accused LU of repeating "old
arguments".
O'Toole's claim comes at a crucial period in negotiations between the
publicly owned LU and Tube Lines, which are attempting to thrash out terms
for a seven-year work programme that includes expensive projects such as
an upgrade of the Piccadilly Line. The departing tube boss challenged the
rationale behind the PPP by making a case for transferring the work to the
public sector.
Referring to the profit-making imperative behind private sector involvement
in PPP projects, he told the Guardian: "I think we can deliver it at a lower
cost because I don't have to pay a premium in the form of equity returns and
other excesses."
O'Toole added that Tube Lines believed it could deliver the work more
cheaply, and quicker, than his organisation but he warned that the
government could decide to scrap the PPP project altogether if a row over
the cost of the work programme up to 2017 is not resolved.
"It brings into question whether or not the remaining part of the PPP is
viable," O'Toole said.
The PPP programme is one of the most controversial legacies of Gordon
Brown's 10-year reign as chancellor. Introduced despite the stern opposition
of Ken Livingstone, the former London mayor, it handed out 30-year
contracts to the private sector to maintain and upgrade the tube. However,
the contractor awarded two-thirds of the programme, Metronet, collapsed
two years ago and was effectively nationalised by LU with Brown's tacit
blessing.
Tube Lines, the only vestige of the PPP left, is embroiled in a row with LU
over its 2010 to 2017 programme, which it claims will cost £7.2bn but is
priced at between £5.1bn and £5.5bn, according to an independent estimate,
leaving a funding gap of up to £2.1bn. The gap is wider still if based on
figures from LU, which pays Tube Lines for the work. It claims that the
programme will cost £4.1bn.
Terry Morgan, the Tube Lines chief executive, said there was "no evidence"
that LU had saved taxpayers money by taking over Metronet. "The PPP
brought huge transparency to how much it cost to do a project. I have seen
no evidence to date that Metronet is more efficient now." Morgan added that
Tube Lines "inherited a track record of non-performance" when it took over
LU's maintenance work in 2003.
He said: "I am disappointed that these old arguments keep being used. My
concern is that by having these arguments, people with other investment
programmes get a higher priority from the government."
Tube Lines is co-owned by Bechtel, the project management specialist, and
the support services group Amey, whose parent is Ferrovial, the majority
shareholder in the airport group BAA.
Transport for London (TfL), LU's parent, has warned ministers that a recent
£40bn funding settlement is not enough to pay for the construction of the
£16bn trans-London Crossrail project and the tube upgrade. However, the
Department for Transport is adamant that no more money is available.
TfL's funding problems, highlighted by the Tube Lines dispute, have been
exacerbated by the recession, which led to a year-on-year decline in tube
passengers in January. TfL has slashed tube revenue forecasts for the
2009-10 financial year to £1.7bn, which means that turnover must rise by 9%
in order to meet the 2010-11 target of £1.84bn.
The revenue gap has stoked speculation that the mayor, Boris Johnson,
might have to implement huge fare rises. However, O'Toole said the
politically unpalatable price hikes could be avoided by "moving around"
TfL's multibillion-pound capital expenditure programme.
"You just cannot assume that there will have to be extraordinary fare
increases."
KHOODEELAAR! action archive from 2004 to Sunday 19 April 2009: We TOLD THEM ALL SO! that LYING did not pay
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2005
Khoodeelaar! Campaign Archives [January 2004 to 12 October 2005]
KHOODEELAAR ! (58) PLUS
KHOODEELAAR ! (57)
CBRUK campaign against the CROSSRAIL Plan for attacking the community in the Brick Lane, London E1 area
By © Muhammad Haque
0320 Hrs GMT
London Friday 24 September 2004
The Plausible liars in the
‘ethnicised’ colony in and around the
Brick Lane area
London E1
How to spot the colonialist liars
and the real muggers, deniers
sucking the lifeblood out
of the community in the
Brick Lane E1 area
in furtherance of the
agenda of the City of London
and all that the City
wants and craves
.....
By their ‘soliciting’
for the City !
By their ‘solicitors’
from the City !
By their be-suiting
of surrogates
in the ‘styles’ of the City
By their ‘buffeting’
celebrations of the latest loots
‘grants and project bids’
in the comforts
of the City
By their grooming
of the ‘ethnic’ dummies
in the shadow of the City
By their grooming
of the ‘ethnic’ crummies
for the purposes
of the City
By their washing the
lot of the brains
of the surrogates ‘ethnics’
whom they ‘accommodate’
defying all ethics!
By their grooming of the
ethnic vulnerable
ill-schooled empty-heads
By their contemptible brothelling
in rushing the victims
to obscene beds
By their distortion of the names of the
local ordinary folk
By their wanton mocking of the
peoples’ cause as another joke
while the muggers, the liars themselves comply
with every City demand against the community
at whose expense the muggers reply
to the satisfaction of the City
in volumes of lying scams
to expose which will require an eternity !
The liars deniers muggers who rob
the local community
rob the people not just of wealth
resource and facility
but they rob the local community
of life tomorrow in the near future
depriving the people of basic certainty
The liars muggers thieves who
scheme and scam every day
have found that their professional
‘suit-wearing’ tie-flaunting
ethnic surrogate minders
will mind after them every day
The ‘suit-wearing’ ‘tie-flaunting’
ethnic surrogates will be by their side
whenever the City-linked liars
City-linked muggers City-linked thieves
run out of what to say
in the latest round of
State-controlled
bids-scramble
let loose for the season and
taking place in the City Side !
By their violence of intent
to rob the local people
By their violence of plots
to fool the local people
By their violence of contempt
against the rights
of the local people
By their violence of prejudice
hatred against the
defenders of the local people
By the violence of their
daily excuses barring the
local people
By the plausiblities of their lies
dressed up daily as anguished sighs
in their pretence
to be ‘with’ the local people
while all the while
undermining every
element of every part
of the protection of the local people
.....”
KHOODEELAAR ! (56)
CBRUK campaign against the CROSSRAIL Plan for attacking the community in the Brick Lane, London E1 area
By © Muhammad Haque
2144 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 23 September 2004
“The be-suited, tie-topped symbols of surrogation to the colonialist oppressive setting and agenda which was on display at the ’meeting’ on Tuesday 27 July 2004, reminded also of the ‘hope’ that every professional, careerist racist violator would cherish and nurture in their chest.
That of seeming to be ‘concerned. That of seeming to care. When in fact taking part in preventing the community from fending off the attacks, planned and imminent.
The ‘stage’ set up to facilitate the presentation delivery of a colonialist symbol of ‘acceptable face of expertise was a stage that would serve the purpose of preventing the ‘trouble-makes’, the ‘native agitators’ who might, just might, spring to action and articulate opposition to the scheme.
That would not be permissible, not in a dozen years , not when the funded surrogates and ethnic token users, ‘manger’s, little ‘bosses’ had set their ‘sights’ on allowing a platform to the ‘duly elected representatives and parliamentary personalities’ !
Thus it was that the whole charade was achieved by keeping the majority of the local community out of the ‘meeting’ place. What turned up as ‘local residents and tenants’ were left in the same state of knowledge about the Crossrail planned threat against the local community when they left the ‘Brady Centre’ as when they had got in there.
The only satisfied faces were the faces of the ‘controllers’ behind the event. Who were they ?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (55)
By © Muhammad Haque
2120 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 22 Sept. 2004
CROSSRAIL Plan for attacking the community in the Brick Lane, London E1 area was INVITED to be brought to the area ! This was done by the attackers using the mental slavery on the parts of the particular sets of operatives who are given cash ‘grants’ and other ‘facilities by the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council...
How Tower Hamlets Council is openly FUNDING ‘community-based’ operatives who are engaged in routinely creating deprivation of the very community where each group of these operatives is based...
These operatives are to be found at stages of the ‘personnel’ involved in the mini-colonialism of the Brick lane London E1 area.
These operatives operate mostly in brad day light.
These operatives, many of them, even wear ‘suits’ !
These ‘suits’ and attached attire are paid for with cash that these operatives are handed IN THE NAME and AT THE EXPENSE of the local community in and around the Brick Lane, London E1 area.
Who are ‘the local community’ ?
All the people who are not paid participants in the obstruction, the denial and the deprivation of the local community in and around the Brick Lane London E1 area.
The anti-social operatives are paid by the state through the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council on tasks that are ‘apparently legitimised’ by the anti-social assignments being put on formal ‘official’ records by using formal, ‘legally-formatted’ documents and ‘contracts’ and validation instruments.
No-one in the local Brick Lane, London E1 area community who is not a paid member of one of the several anti-social criminalising, deprivation-adding, degeneration-creating anti-social projects has any access to the documents.
The ordinary community members have no ‘right’ either to demand to see what the terms of the various contracts, agreements in and on the ‘projects’ in the local community area are on paper.
It follows that the community has no manifest enforced right to demand to see whether the ‘projects’ are in fact delivering what they ‘might be said to be about’ on the actual papers and documents.
The lack of rights may no be quite the formal constitutional position if it is stated or interpreted by any paid professional apologist of the corrupt state.
Like an ‘expert’ who ‘addressed ! ‘ the gathering of alleged tenants and alleged residents held at the Brady Centre (in Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane, London E1) on Tuesday 27 July 2004 when the alleged gathering was allegedly got together to allegedly discuss the response of the alleged tenants and alleged residents to the planned Crossrail attack......
The ‘expert’ was a man who could not hope for a more edifying, gratifying set-up and stage whence to assert the latent ambition and hopes of any flesh and blood imperialist and colonialist !
The ‘expert’ was installed on stage to ‘address’ the gathering that had been so designed and anticipated and manipulated as to be mainly if not wholly of ‘an ethnic background’, such that at least a significant part of that gathering would be ‘additionally handicapped’ if they wee not ‘aided’ and ‘helped’ out of their own
linguistic, intellectual, cultural orientation, mooring and background !
And how to ‘aid’ and ‘help’ the alleged ‘ethnic’ tenants and residents ?
Why with the aid of a collection of morally empty, intellectually non-existent , politically vacant ethnic surrogates and mental slaves to every conceivable imperialist ‘role-model’ and ‘natural-born-leader’....... of course....
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (54)
By © Muhammad Haque
2154 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 21 September 2004
The Crossrail planned attack on the community in the Brick Lane E1 area is too flagrantly reminiscent of the apartheid policy in Apartheid South Africa... Crossrail planners’ links with some of the ‘local’ ‘experts’ and ‘spokespersons’ in ‘the Spitalfields’ area reek too much of a secret sleazy deal having been struck between ‘some’ of the ‘objectors’ and the perpetrators of the Crossrail planned attack on the community...
To understand how that apartheid attack plan as typified by the Crossrail plan is being operated, it is necessary to get the factual understanding of how the local Tower Hamlets Council has been abused and misused against the rights and entitlements of the local population in the East End. Including the people of the Brick Lane, E1 area.
Even as the then ‘controlling’ Liberal Democrats (whatever actual words were used for their then formally registered Party political name) were emptying their ‘ leadership councillors’ desks at the commercially owned and rented ‘ Tower Hamlets Town hall’ Mulberry Place following the defeat at the 1994 Council election, they knew one thing was still intact.
The ideology that had driven them to deny the people of the East End of an accessible ‘Town Hall’.
Two openly witnessed features of the previous ‘Town Hall’ situated off the Cambridge Heath Road in Bethnal Green were intensely disliked by the antidemocratic and pro-fascistic elements who made the key decisions for and in the then controlling Tower Hamlets Lib Dems stood out as being contributory factors behind their mugging of the people of the East End borough.
The physical location of the Bethnal Green town Hall in a part of the Borough where ordinary people, including elderly and out of work ones, could travel without much obstruction.
The frequency with which local people were taking demos and marches to that Town hall in protest against any number of anti-social decisions being made by the then Lib Dems in power [May 1986 - May 1994]
Some of those key demonstrations had direct implications for the Bangladeshis in London and elsewhere in the UK.
Such as the demonstrations that took place in 1987 , against the then
Tower hamlets council’s racist policy on housing and homelessness.
The anger in the local population against that policy was so widespread that it was possible for a significant part of a whole day for protesters to occupy the then Council chamber in a show of opposition.
Which occupation was peaceful. It was entirely democratic. And it got the point across.
But the Lib Dems were not willing to support the local community. They REACTED.
By taking a series of steps that were intended by Eric Flounders, one of the most reactionary and anti-social ‘Lib Dem’ councillors holding key powers in that group, and by his colleagues, to deny the local people the democratic say over what the local Tower hamlets Council did in the anti of local democracy.
One of the clearest steps was to deport the whole population away from Tower hamlets Town Hall.
Which is in effect what has happened.
And the deportation of the local community from its own Town hall has been maintained by the Blaired Councillors who took office following the May 1994 local council election.
It is ten full years and four months since the Tower Hamlets Council has been in the control of a group of councillors that is not officially Lib Dems.
Yet the policy of denying the local population the full and due access to the peoples’ local Town hall has continued.
So what is ‘different’ ?
There is no ideological difference between the two ‘parties’, the Lib Dems and the Blaired party.
What HAS BEEN INTRODUCED as a different face to the way the
anti-social, anti-people policies are implemented by and through the formal legal body of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets council is in significant parts made ‘community-based’.
By recruiting anti-social grouplet to be based at what in effect are now ‘neighbourhoods'’ obstruction centres.
These centres are in all intents and purposes owned by the entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
If they are not strictly seen as being ‘owned’ as such then their control is exercised by the actual operation of the powers available to the LB TH Council.
The LBTH Council in effect makes the formal legal decisions as to who is ‘approved’ as ‘fit’ to use or have access to these centres.
One of the ways that the LBTH Council does this is by loyally following the policy of apartheid as had been tried and tested in South Africa.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (53)
By © Muhammad Haque
2210 Hrs GMT London
Monday 20 September 2004
Who gave Crossrail attacks planners the go-ahead to target Brick Lane area for the planned attacks and violations?
The answer lies in the vulnerability caused by deprivation in the main population in the Brick Lane area...
Who caused that vulnerability ?
How was that vulnerability ‘achieved’? Who operated and funded that vulnerability-creation ‘project’ ?
How Tower Hamlets Council is openly funding the further corruption of the so-called public amenities controlled via and at the ‘community-based centres’ in SOME of the most populous parts of the East End borough of Tower Hamlets
The Brick Lane area is one of the most populous parts of the Tower Hamlets Borough.
This is so despite the relative size of the whole Borough population in comparison with some of the adjoining inner London Boroughs including Newham to the East, hackney to the North, the Boroughs of Camden and Islington to the North West and the Boroughs of Southwark and Greenwich to the South and across the other, the southern, side of the river Thames.
One of the main reasons for CBRUK’s decision in January 2004 to mount the current information and political campaign in defence of the community in the Brick Lane, London E1 area is the fact that the name Brick Lane is more than just the East London Street of the same name.
Brick Lane is a community like no other in London. Like no other in Britain. Like no other anywhere else.
At one end of this contemporary cultural and social reality is the fact that Brick Lane accommodates and houses some of the most representative small enterprises that make up the human constitution of what a hopefully multi-faceted, multidimensional pro-civilisation community can be. At the other end is the evidence, alive daily and at all hours, of the pits of desperation, deprivation into which some of the participants in the making of that reality are pushed .
KHOODEELAAR ! the epic poem in defence of the Brick Lane E1 area
“Pushed by the forces of greed
Pushed by the forces of envy
Pushed by the forces of jealousy
Pushed by the forces of pettimindedness
Pushed by the forces engaged as agents of the corrupt state in Britain
Pushed by the forces of evil that are unleashed among the most weak
Pushed by the forces of depravity abusing the generosity of the ‘poor’
Pushed by the formal couriers of Party-linked corruption and abuse
Pushed by the informal suppliers of the Party-linked, the odd recluse !
Pushed by the Council-funded crooks peddling the line ‘the Council is super’
Pushed by the combined collected mindless morons undergoing a stupor
as they are ‘groomed’ out of their own identity of faith
as they are ‘groomed’ out of themselves by an open stealth
as they are targeted by the capricious bringers of ‘charm’
disguised as ‘liberated’ ‘friends’ wantonly bent to do harm......
"
KHOODEELAAR ! (52)
By © Muhammad Haque
2154 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 19 September 2004
Extracts from the introduction to KHOODEELAAR ! the epic poem in defence of the Brick Lane London E1 area against the Crossrail plan and against other, related attacks being mounted and carried out by the City of London Corporation and their agencies and agents operating in various guises in the East End of London
Extracts: 2B
“The Crossrail plan to attack the community in the Brick Lane, E1 area is the product of prejudice, bigotry, ignorance, racism and sheer mental and practical corruption on the part of the makers of the decision..”
Extracts 2 C:
“What attitude in the minds of the attackers makes them think that they can carry on attacking, abusing, robbing, mugging and depriving the people of the East End..?”
Extracts: 4e
“Who are these agents and what are these agencies operating in the Brick Lane, London E1 area that are being used by the Corporation of London and their ideological stable-mates to maintain the attacks on the East End and the people in and of the East End in September 2004?
The agents operating in the Brick Lane area are also linked with the agencies formally based in the same area. These agencies are however operating under strict orders linked with the cash grants that they are given.
The cash grants are not given to them secret. Although parts of the cash grants may be provided secretly. But a great deal of the cash grants are given by open reference.
Such as the one boastfully made public by Christine Gilbert the occupier of the expressly-cushioned post of chief executive of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
The boast in Christine Gilbert’s statement lay in the fact that she claimed that Tower Hamlets Council was funding, in July 2003, at least 1800 community groups !
She made the statement in the context of the then ‘topical’ issue of a set of ‘community based groups’ funded by Tower Hamlets council and by other agencies of the UK central Government. One of the main sites or locations of the operations of that grouplet, known as MATT, was at the ‘Montefiore Centre’. The ‘Montefiore Centre’ is no longer referred to as that in the ‘official’ propaganda statements issued either by Tower Hamlets Council or by any other state-linked outfit or their agents. The ‘Montefiore Centre’ is falsely referred to as the ‘Bethnal Green Technology Centre’. That false name was assigned to the Centre a decade or so earlier, when the Tower Hamlets Council was still being ‘controlled’ by the Liberal Democrats.
When the then ‘Labour’ party - completely Blaired since 1995 - took over ‘formal control’ of the Tower Hamlets Borough Council in May 1994, it was conceivable (as it was utterly desirable from the standpoint of the level; of needs in the community) that they the 'Labour' councillors on Tower Hamlets Council change the use and the access of the Montefiore Centre to one that was consistent with the needs of the local community.
They did nothing of the sort.
The result was that in the period between may 1994 to the summer of 2003, the
over-sold, over-designated ‘Bethnal Green Technology Centre’ became a
‘community-located’ arena for the perpetuation of the denial and deprivation against the local community...
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (51)
By © Muhammad Haque 2044 Hrs GMT London
Saturday 18 September 2004
The best way to defeat crass Crossrail plans against the people and communities in East London
Time to dispose of the anti-people GLA - ‘Grotesque London-misleading Alibi’ !
Time to have gutsy campaigners in UK parliament who will stand up to Blair and cronies in regional parasite waste-houses and pass Bills defending the disenfranchised communities like those in the Brick Lane area
The ‘London Money’ which is often cited as being the property of the people of London must not be referred to only in bogus ‘debates’ at the expense of the people of cities in Scotland and in other parts of the UK. The ‘other parts’ include the zones and the people of Manchester who have been deprived of vital UK central Govt support by the Blair regime dishonouring its previous commitments given to Manchester and to similar other regions and the people in those regions.. That sort of corrupting game, which is played by the Blair Bureaucracy to violate peoples of the various regions and inner city areas must be made unlawful by a speedily; enacted Bill protecting the peoples’ rights. But is there an MP in all of the ‘elected MPs’ currently siring in the UK House of Commons who has the guts, the intellect or the understanding of the UK 'constitutional process' to do any such really genuinely parliamentary democratic thing and act ? Fat chance of this happening in the foreseeable future. in the UK. This is true of the remainder of time that Blair has as ‘the Prime Mover’ and this will be true of whoever gets to occupy No. Downing Street after Blair’s time their ends officially.
So how can the people in communities like those in the Brick Lane, London E1 area protect their vital interests and rights, as against the planned and actual daily attacks on them made by the existing ‘system’ of parliamentary ‘government’ centrally and by the parasite ‘system’ called ‘local government’ that is increasingly abused against the people as a whole in the given locality ?
What is the best avenue and the best way to protect the bread and butter rights and entitlements of people whose voice is denied at local ‘democratic forums’ like the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and suppressed in the Ghastly London-less Alibi (GLA) that has been set up to accommodate the hugely insatiable ego of a very confused, emotionally unstable and insecure and opportunistic careerist now so wrongly but uncritically identified with ‘London and Londoners’ ?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (50)
By © Muhammad Haque
London 1614 Hrs GMT Friday 17 September 2004
“Who is wearing the suit in the East End on Friday 17 September 2004 ?”
An ode dedicated to the success of the rip off merchants who rob the ‘poor’ in the East End of London under the various corrupting, sleazing, criminal schemes and scams funded brazenly under the manifestly criminal and robbing programme of ‘regeneration’....
How the crooks rip off the inner city ‘poor’ ! in Tony Blair’s ‘opportunity’ Britain !
‘Do ‘they’ say they even ‘knew’ it has been a lockout here all year ?
“They rip off the inner city ‘poor’
on whom they slam shut the door
on whom they daily shut the door
on whom they firmly shut the door
on whom they blatantly shut the door
on whom they openly shut the door
on whom they wantonly shut the door
as the rip off merchants hold party
making sure they are hale and hearty
as they indulge in feast after feast
they ‘know’ they rule in the East
End of London although they hate its
people whom they push daily to pits
of ignominy, ridicule and obstruction
the rip off merchants plan construction
of their ripping off future careers
no East Enders can place barriers
to the way the rip off merchants do ‘things’
they groom the brainless running rings
around the ‘gormless majority ’ in E1
the rip off merchants know the one
sure secret East Enders don’t know
themselves! Be it Mile End or Bow
be it Brick Lane or Cannon St Road
be it Stepney or the VALLANCE Road
be it Poplar, Limehouse or Duckett Street
the rip off merchants are all over very discreet
......”
(To be continued)
Extracts from
KHOODEELAAR !
The epic poem by MUHAMMAD HAQUE written and published
daily as part of the struggle in defence of the Brick
Lane area and the rest of the East End of London
KHOODEELAAR ! (49)
By © Muhammad Haque
2250 Hrs GMT London
Thursday 16 September 2004
New fare rise for ‘public transport’ in London raises the question - so who has been lying about Crossrail bringing about ‘regeneration’ in London, then ? How can that be when existing bus and train can’t be operated without raising fares ?
The latest announcement of the rise in tube and bus fares in London to be implementation by the London Mayor, is another confirmation of the truth that what the ‘London economy’ needs is NOT more railway lines but more efficient and accountable use of existing public transport infrastructure in London.
What is accountable ?
Like the buses being only driven by drivers who are sensitive to passengers and who actually respect the passengers.
With the recent introduction of the robotised buses (following ken Livingstone's anti-social annihilation of the people-friendly and socially accessible ROUTEMASTER buses) , ordinary bus-travelling London passengers have been encountering a new phenomenon that was never even noticed before in London. Being ignored by bus drivers who don’t seem to recognise either a visible signal for stopping the bus or even sometimes a compulsory bus stop sign.
Thousands of passengers suffer this Livingstone-Mayor-era ignominy every day in London . This is so if the passengers are mostly frail, vulnerable and otherwise de-recognised (if they are of Africa or Asian appearance) .
And this de-recognition seems to be part of the main outlook being taken by the ‘Mayoral regime’ by the Blaired Party ‘card-holder’ Ken Livingstone who no longer conceals his contempt for the inner cities people. Like the people who as individuals and families are engaged in daily struggle against corruption by the public bodies and their agencies and against the funded discrimination being practised by the ‘community centres’ which enjoy the approval and backing of the Blaired regime as it ‘runs’ the ‘centres’ in the Brick Lane and the Whitechapel areas of Tower Hamlets.
As has been shown by Livingstone’ show of defiance towards anyone who has had ‘the temerity to question him ‘ about the oppressive and anti-social Crossline shaft tunnel and other linked and lasting health hazards being planned to be caused to the people in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
One pertinent question that Livingstone-praising ‘ethnic-entrepreneurs’ currently operating in and around the Brick Lane area will have to address is this: whose idea was it to arrange for an ‘ethnic leaders propaganda dinner date with Ken Livingstone’ just before Livingstone faced the 10 June 2004 election to the office of London Mayor again ? And who gave the ‘hosts’ any authority that the community in the Brick Lane area wanted Livingstone to be given that platform and allowed that stunt as a ‘friend of the Brick Lane London E1 area and the community’ ?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (48)
By © Muhammad Haque
2158 Hrs GMT London
Wednesday 15 September 2004
The crassness of intentions and objectives behind those who have been peddling the plan for a Crossrail line allegedly to link west London to east London, becomes exposed almost n a daily basis.
When I first described their intentions as crass I was mainly thinking of the abject disregard by them for the people in the Brick Lane and the rest of the E1 area who would suffer severe dislocations, disruptions if the planned Crossrail shaft tunnel through the Brick Lane area went ahead.
With an increasingly wider look that I have been taking at the history, the antecedents and the ‘progress’ (or lack of it) of the ‘whole’ London Crossrail (there appear to be other ‘'Crossrail'’ stunts being staged in other relatively large cities in the UK outside of London) project, I am finding incontrovertible evidence to justify the project being consigned to oblivion now, before it issued by the profit-seeking, money-grabbing
gangs of robbers of well-organised professional public resource and public money in the UK. I am thinking of construction companies, building firms and companies and s n.
My call for the scrapping of the whole Crossrail project is based on the analysis which has been vindicated by a series of recent and current UK ‘projects.’. The latest support to my analysis is contained in the evidence of the belated recognition of the practice in Britain of systematic corruption of public life by the various companies and their allies. As published today (Wednesday 15 September 2004) in Edinburgh, the Fraser inquiry into the overrun in the costs of the building of the ‘Scottish Parliament’ in Holyrood in Edinburgh.
In the report, Fraser accuses almost every single category of peddler that in the pre-Holyrood building period , was claiming all manner of wonderful things in support of the project for that building.
When the construction of the Holyrood Scottish parliament work was given the go-ahead, the cost was quoted as being a tenth f what it went on to become !
How can that be right ?
How can that be ‘accountable’ ?
How can that be democratic?
Especially so when the most serious internal social crisis threatening the lives and welfare of so many people in Britain is worth £40 Billion... It is the looming pension crisis. And the ramifications over the rest of the UK society can only be fearfully anticipated ...
There is therefore no justification for the demand by the Crossrail lobby that the UK central Government make up the multi£Billion shortfall so that the disastrous Crossrail project can get the go-ahead !
The Crossrail lobby, --- whose ‘local agents’ in and ON the Tower Hamlets Council have spent several thousand hours (of publicly-paid for time in and ON Tower Hamlets Council) between them in taking part in the confection of lines of lies so that they would peddle the Crossrail-linked lies to mislead the people of the East End of London -- never let on, until now, that even some of their own ‘major funding partners’ would balk at the size of the sums that those partners themselves would be ‘expected’ to ‘chip’ in for the crassly conceived parts of the project to be made ‘viable’.
One such ‘dependable’ ‘reliable’ ‘solid’ ‘partner’ the Canary Wharf Group (CWG) , has again confirmed what I have already discussed in this series of commentary that it, the CWG would not agree to the funding to be paid for by collecting the share of the profits that they expect would accrue from the construction of the Crassrail project....
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR ! (47)
By © Muhammad Haque
2110 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 14 September 2004
The CBRUK Campaign against Crossrail planned attacks on the Brick Lane, London E1 area
‘Question time is a waste of time’
In the recklessly endangered era of political slime
infesting the inner cities with grubbiness and crime
the brigade of Blaired entrepreneurs run amuck
defying decency, denying rights, spreading shock
across the communities who daily lose out on respect
never knowing what comes next whether to expect
justice whether to abandon all hope about the future !
Life in the deprived inner cities now is total torture !
As if that were not unspeakable unbearable unutterable
enough, there is the secondary gang so insufferable
in their own posed faith in things British constitutional
they barefacedly invite the denied to the occasional
‘do’ the ‘event’ that they promise will deliver answer
to the pressing question of the day ‘only if you bother’
to ‘join us’ and turn up at the ‘appointed hall of fame’
where they further promise will be seen the big name
‘leader’ of our ‘metropolis this truly big greater London’
‘which big name leader will in fact answer any question
it is a truly public accessible open day and event
we are moved by the aura of ethicality ! The scent
of political transparency is all day wafting in the air
Come and join us and be in your fitting best attire’!
If these promoters of the big lie for famous politico
had honesty in them they would admit that the ego
of the corrupt the corrupting and the corrupted one
is bigger than that of all other known London ones
who are currently ‘official’ members of the GLA
would blindly back the big corrupter in order to delay
any ordinary grouping of Londoners seeking answers
to any genuine questions. The effort will end in tears!
KHOODEELAAR ! (46)
By © Muhammad Haque
2142 Hrs GMT London
Monday 13 September 2004
Being published only here and for the first time the daily political poetry about life in the UK in September 2004
Extracts from the epic poem
“
When bad people get hold of peoples’ wealth
they tend to lose all sense and take to stealth
as they rush around grabbing what they can !
When Tony Blair feigned to save us from ‘Ken’
Blair virtually used a slogan which Blair began
to mouth shortly after the go-ahead had been
given for there to be an ‘elected’ London Mayor
Blair brazenly bared his face saying ‘disaster’
at every stage managed opportunity to block
the ‘official nomination of Ken for Mayor’ ! Lock
stock and barrel of the by then Blaired Party
was placed under red alert to back Blair’s cry
that ‘Ken’ as mayor would in effect make us cry
with grief, disappointment, frustration and waste!
Little did Blair tell us of the ominous awful haste
which the people of London would be hit by
when Blair did a bare-faced turn and sit by
as he let the same ‘Ken’ as mayor get ‘re-voted’
for ‘Ken’ to smash up the weak who had revolted
against the Tories all those years ago in 1997
and now at this hard hour there is no one even
to notice that the alliance of evil the entente of sin
that Blair and ‘Ken’ have forged is more mean
than anything the weak, the vulnerable in London
had any reason to fear especially as based on
the utterances that Blair made as he faked
promises to rid the land of sleaze; Blair talked
incessantly of topics and items the people knew
were in need of being tackled. Blair also knew
as he faked and as he bluffed and as he smirked
that he had already recckied the spot and parked
the vehicle in which he would stage his own exit
as soon as he, Blair, had staged the makeshift
display of being accessible and sleaze-free
Never in all that time was there visible any debris
of so much ill-ambitions, so much ill-will to people
as a whole and to London’s people whose sole
political desire was to be left alone to get on
with what life otherwise had in store! No one
ever suspected Blair would not only let ‘Ken’ in
but he would let ‘Ken’ himself set in train
a scheme here and scam there to drain
the already deprived people of inner London
of what they had and push them to abandon
their hard earned homes, hard-built shops
and feel under pressure to forget the crops
of what for them was the yield of their ‘land’ !
Nobody ever thought they would see this band
of anti-social thuggery being got together
by Blair and “Ken” seeking to put asunder
so much hard work so many hopes of the denied
persons, families, children ! The pair in sin defied
all ethics morality and sense of fairness
as they embarked on lying about how to harness
the oppressor greedy profit-seeking ‘ruler’ boss
City of London Corporation and its lobby to toss
away centuries of oppressive habits and give up
what they most of all craved: a place to carve up
and exploit and rob from the legitimate community!
How gross of the duo to feign any affinity
with the inner city areas including Brick Lane
in and around which there does still remain
a most vibrant alive human community
that would perish without a life-keeping amenity
that is the essence of a true human community...”
These extracts from ‘KHOODEELAAR ! The epic poem by MUHAMMAD HAQUE were written in London between 2040 and 2142 Hrs GMT
on Monday 13 September 2004
KHOODEELAAR ! (45)
By © Muhammad Haque
2014 Hrs GMT London Sunday 12 September 2004
The CBRUK campaign against the planned Crossrail hole attacks on the Brick Lane and E1 area
How crass can the so-called Transport For London be !
Even TESCO is crying (!) ‘unfair’ against the Crossrail funding lunacy !
Amazing !
They don’t say a word abut the lunacy of uprooting people from their homes, their little shops and their community in the Brick Lane area !
The Tories’ ideological lobby the Social Market Foundation has confirmed that Transport for London asked the property companies, including the multinationals “TESCO, Canary Wharf, FPD Savills and British Land” to raise funds by imposing a tax on “on the profits made on nearby property when railways are built - one method put forward by Transport for London to pay for projects like Crossrail. ”
The Social Market Foundation (SMF) has now produced a discussion of the issue in a pamphlet they promoted on 9 September 2004. Says the SMF that “TESCO, Canary Wharf, FPD Savills and British Land” “argue that it is impossible to judge whether property price rises are due to a new railway line or the normal property cycle. Taxing them, therefore, is arbitrary and unfair.”
How odd that some of the UK’s most powerful money-grabbing outfits fits themselves are complaining about unfairness about the proposal on raising funds for the Crossrail disaster yet none of the ‘local’ ‘expected’ ‘public representatives’ on Tower Hamlets Council has said a word in defence of the families and the people that stand to lose what small security of home, of family housing, of small shops and the community they now have in the affected parts of the Brick lane which will be destroyed if the Crossrail hole plan is allowed to go ahead !
Doesn’t it prove, one more time, that Brick Lane area has been ‘selected’ for the planned destruction because those who mace the decision to crush the community’s environment, what 'peace' and 'quiet' there is, what environmental standard there still is, thought that the people in the Brick Lane area are not ‘important enough’ and that the allegedly unimportant people can be treated in the oppressive way so long as the looters of the expected profit from the crassly conceived Crossrail project could get away with bagging the public funding from the UK Government for the whole unwise adventure !
It is now increasingly clear that the expectant ‘looters of the public cash and contracts and deals off the proposed Crossrail capitalistic bonanza for the big-companies’ are getting caught up in the twists of their own antisocial greed and desires !
How can the people who could put the now-exposed and rejected proposal to TESCO et al, be trusted to care at all about the Brick Lane area and the welfare of the people in the Brick Lane area ?
After all, Transport for London is an out and out opportunistic outfit that cares only for the careers of those who confected that outfit!
And these careerists would never even notice that peoples lives were undermined by their planned ramming of the crass railway line through the Brick Lane area...
Against all the facts so far analysed of the crassness of the Crossrail lobby, the sheer banality of their staging an increasingly desperate ‘insultation’ charade around the Brick Lane area has become too monumental a blot on the social landscape in the East End for it to be allowed to remain without detailed comments.
I start those comments which are to appear here on Tuesday 14 September 2004
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR (44) PLUS
KHOODEELAAR ! (43)
By © Muhammad Haque
2030 Hrs GMT London Friday 10 September 2004
Crass talking Crossrail project lobby is rebuffed again by both the multinational corporations and by UK Transport Secretary Alistair Darling. Crossrail plot to make a treble gain at the expense of the East End people they push and keep in poverty ! The core contradiction of capitalistic ‘economics’ rears its utterly ugly head again.
In the week which the mentally servile and ethically bankrupt political journalists on the ‘mainstream’ British media organisations spent in sound-ly and visual-ly licking the various parts of the propaganda bodies of a variety of Tony Blair’s peddlers of poisonous gossip, confirmation came again that it is a very crass thing for any one to claim to ‘liberate’ the victims of their exploitation while at the same time seeking quite openly to mug them of all their pennies !
How can these so-called experts and so-called technically competent and knowledgeable persons who are kept in their various posts to promote the lies that the planned attack on the community via Crossrail will in fact be ‘a good thing’ for the same community expect anyone with any modicum of ordinary understanding take them seriously ?
Let alone believe what they say ?
Far less have any respect for their careerist lynx and lies ?
It is clear that even TESCO, which appears to know more about the trick of making vast profit by luring masses and masses of people in low income to shop in their stores and to buy stiff from TESCO’s other outfits , finds the Crossrail ‘case’ over-stated and over-sold and unconvincing.
Hence TESCO’s agreement with some other multinational profit-seeking outfits who have to Blair and Livingstone that the latter’s latest ploy to fill the multi£Billion funding gap for Crossrail is a non-starter !
Shows just how corrupt those crass- talking fiddlers of public funds have been when they have promised the East Enders the earth and boldly claimed that
the poverty, the deprivation, the social exclusion, the discrimination, the homelessness, the educational underachievement, the barriers, the obstructions that daily affect the lives of families and persons in and around areas like the Brick Lane area will evaporate and ‘nearest thing to heaven on earth’ will be ushered in the East End for all the deprived and the disenfranchised and denied. How ? Just let the fiddlers dig in the East End and run this giant Crossrail project through here !
No case has been made in the mysterious meetings which the Tower hamlets Councillors ‘in the controlling’ Blaired Labour Group have been having for the best part of the past two years with a variety of Crossrail-peddling of characters who have been busy lobbying for the Crossrail project.
I have yet to receive or SEE a single answer to some of the crucial economic and constitutional questions which I addressed to those councillors and also published in the CBRUK campaign bulletin KHOODEELAAR in May 2004.
In a addition to that, the Committee for Bangladeshis’ Rights in the UK (CBRUK) had also pressed Tower hamlets Council to tell the truth about what their role had been in allowing the anti-social plan by Crassrail to be rammed through the East End.
KHOODEELAAR published several versions of a CBRUK statement, including the following one:-
CBRUK demands end to Tower Hamlets Council colluding in attacks on the local community by Crossrail
London Friday 9 April 2004:
The Committee for Bangladeshis’ Rights in the UK (CBRUK) has told Christine Gilbert the Chief Executive of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council that that Council must end all clandestine links with the Crossrail and that in particular the Council mist tell the full facts to the local community of the Council's links with the Crossrail so far.
The demand to Christine Gilbert follows discovery of evidence by CBRUK that contrary to some of the casually made statements in the local area by a number of persons claiming to represent Tower Hamlets Council, the Council has been involved in a series of secret discussions with Crossrail.
_________
In March 2004 CBRUK write to Gordon Brown the Chancellor of the Exchequer in March 2004 and pointed out to him some central absurdities inherent in the Crossrail project and plan.
“Gordon Brown the Chancellor of the Exchequer must reject Crossrail's plan to dig the damaging hole in the Brick Lane area in the East End of London - CBRUK backs local demand. We write to put to you our own demand and the demand of the local people in the Brick Lane area that you reject Crossrail's plan to dig the lethal and antisocial hole in the Brick Lane area. .. Our view is that there is no economic let alone social justification for allowing Crossrail to inflict the harm on this most deprived part of inner London.
Crossrail's planned digging of the hole in the Brick Lane area will severely disrupt lives, destroy livelihoods and deprive the already multiply ply deprived local community in the East End of London even further. We ask Gordon Brown the Chancellor of the Exchequer to say NO to the Crossrail plan for digging the hole in the Brick Lane area.
We point out the fact that the contempt shown towards the people of the Brick Lane in the Crossrail plan is to be contrasted with the consideration Crossrail have shown to people or even empty lands in parts of London that Crossrail know to be either used by or owned by "prosperous' people.
s making the people in the Brick Lane area more deprived and more destabilised the way forward for the inner cities under Gordon Brown the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s ‘Vision’ ? Families in low income, struggling to make ends meet with the very limited sources of income, are going to be made destitute under the planned Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane area. Small businesses, most of which are only viable because of the space they have been able to use in the area, face being annihilated and dug out of existence - literally. Is that the way to 'encourage ' enterprise by people with limited income but with confident sense of enterprise, Gordon? When you have accepted the 'expert's report on the need for expansion in housing provisions, as part of the economic future of the country, how can that programme sit easily with your possibly allowing the making of families and persons homeless and dislocated in the EAST END of London ?
SAY NO TO Crossrail’s plan to dig a big hole in the Brick Lane area. If they 'must' dig a big hole then let them dig it where the vulnerable and the deprived don't get affected...”
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR ! (42)
By © Muhammad Haque
2140 Hrs GMT London Thursday September 2004
Blair hijacks ‘local’ Councils, holds them in Ken Livingstone’s Sit-ye Hall for a day until they agree to do whatever Blair and Livingstone crave !
What does Blair want from the ‘local’ ‘planning authority’ ?
Blair wants from Tower Hamlets Council total complicity !
Blair gets from Tower Hamlets Council utter loyalty !
Blair gets from Tower Hamlets Council no claim to dignity!
What did Blair want from those big City multinationals?
Whatever Blair wanted was denied him by professionals !
The professionals who own and use and run TESCO
They control the banks and don’t do to Blair’s say -so !
So why did Tower Hamlets Council fall so readily in line?
that is how Blaired Councils behave, they never decline
the authority of the authoritarian now holding Party to ransom
Four ‘local’ Councils bowed to the odd pair Tony and Livingstone
As they bowed to the odd pair the ‘local’ Councils acted as colonies
of ‘old’ which have now been revived in the inner cities ! Felonies
against the people and democracy are blatantly on today’s agenda
which Blair is pushing ahead as the ‘local Councils’ surrender
to Blair’s every whim and every caprice and very craze every lust
making sure local people know never to place in Councils ANY trust !...”
Extracts from
KHOODEELAAR !
The epic poem in defence of the Brick Lane area and the rest of the East End against the Blaired attacks via Crossrail and assorted other degeneration projects and lies against the local people being peddled and pushed through and sold by Ken Livingstone ...
These extracts were written at 2140 Hrs GMT within minutes of the public announcement from Sit-ye Hall that the four local Councils had bowed to the diktat of the Blairite regime now being imposed on the London peoples by Ken Livingstone
Origination and production by CBRUK in associated with Sylhetworldtexts
KHOODEELAAR ! (41)
BY © Muhammad Haque
2252 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 8 September 2004
Blair and Livingstone Crass idea on Crossrail REJECTED by TESCO and some other big profiteers from the planned Crossrail project lootery at the expense of the inner city people of London !!!!
The City of London Corporation's pet ‘think-tank’ has let out the fact that TESCO, canary Wharf Group and a number of similarly big multinational big plotters on looting the people by pushing the Crossrail rail through East End have said NO to one of Tony Blair’s and Ken Livingstone's ‘half-baked’; fund-raising (to £Billions) ideas. A hefty tax on property.
I examine this latest end to another of Ken Livingstone's idiots Blaired ‘visions’ (that pun is my instant creation !) in my commentary here on Friday 10 September 2004.
KHOODEELAAR ! (40)
By © Muhammad Haque
2148 Hrs GMT London
Wednesday 8 September 2004
The planned Crossrail attack on the homes, lives, livelihoods, shops, businesses and the overall present health and future well-being of the people and the community in the Brick Lane area is an attack that is only possible to be carried out if the local Tower Hamlets Borough Council goes along with the planned attack.
All signs so far point to the local Tower Hamlets Borough Council being more than willing in going along with the planned Crossrail attack.
Not only that, the Tower Hamlets Borough Council has to date (8 September 2004) paid a large number of its sitting councillors for ‘attending to council business’ which ‘business’ has included the matter of the Crossrail ‘route’.
To date, neither the Council as a whole nor its present chief employee, Christine Gilbert, has made any information available to the community about what it is that the Council has been ‘discussion’ with the Crossrail lobby.
This is not unrelated to what is about to be confirmed in the near future following the definitely NOVEL (=new) sort of electoral outcome of the by-election scheduled to take place in a few hours on Thursday 9 September 2004 for the ‘Isle of Dogs’ Council ward of Millwall in the Tower Hamlets Borough Council.
What is likely to be confirmed by ‘official’ bureaucratic elements and conduct’ following and around the 9 September 2004 Millwall by-election is the fact - known to closely attentive observers over the past at least two decades - that the present Tower Hamlets Borough Council has been reduced to even lesser political substance by the Blaired elements who have been put in control of the Tower Hamlets Council than have been the cases with a large number of other INNER CITY local borough Councils across the UK.
Electoral laws do not permit any discussion of some core aspects of the evidence so close to ‘polling day’. I intend to deal with those on Friday or Saturday of this week (10 and 11 September 2004).
In the meantime, the hustings that HAVE taken place in the past 3 weeks in the actual Millwall Council ward, indicate one thing and this is that the members of the particular population who have been pushed into and kept in poverty there are UNLIKELY to feel confident about Tower Hamlets Borough Council still being controlled by any Blaired or similarly ideologically mechanically oppressive and treacherous grouping of councillors after the next scheduled local Council election (set to take place in May 2006).
The impoverished people also suffer from poor level of recognition by employees of the Tower Hamlets Council.
And those employees include a large number of ‘officer’ ‘category’ post-holders !
That word ‘officer’ is so corrupting and protective of corrupt persons and activities that it must be replaced with a more accurate and less offensive term.
The East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘officer’ employees are currently being paid at public expense - and at the expense of the more deprived part of the Borough's population that also contains he larger parts of the Seelotee community in Tower Hamlets - to actually break up the structure of services and facilities that belonged to the people and to the Council in the past.
These ‘officer’-employees are in fact being used as the agents who make up gangs of ‘white-collar’ handy-persons serving the purposes and working to the de facto orders and agendas of organised, capitalist thieves and anti-social robbers against the local communities in the East End.
These ‘Council’ ‘officers’ are engaged in handing over those resources that are most needed by the most needy and the most disadvantaged persons and families in Tower Hamlets.
It is that category which contains the largest number of Bangladeshis.
Just as it does in the Brick lane area where the Crossrail planned attack is being facilitated and lobbied for by the controlling Blare Group of Labour Councillors on tower Hamlets Council.
The single largest chunk of the property of the Council that is of the people of Tower Hamlets had been the Council’s HOUSING Stock.
That stock is being robbed from the people.
And the robbery is taking place with the Tower Hamlets Council acting as the main aider and abetter and the facilitator.
Before the act. During the act and after the act.
So what is planned by Crossrail against the Brick Lane area and community is neither ‘unique’ nor surprising, given that the entirety of the current plasticised
political agenda being mechanically ratified by the Tower Hamlets Borough Council.
The key instrument the Tower Hamlets Council is using is what sued to be called local control over ‘development’ planning.
At robotic formal meetings and other bureaucratised procedural events held in the largely un-public ‘public setting’ of the Mulberry Place in the really remote and inaccessible (for the utter majority of the people from ALL parts of what is still the Borough of Tower Hamlets) location which could only have been designed and sited with the object of creating a physical barrier between that location and any ordinary member of the ordinary population in the inner city Borough.
When it comes to the theoretical and the hypothetical question of all ‘electors being equal under the law’ in so far as their entitlement is concerned to make a choice at polling day between candidates seeking their vote, the poorer the economic and the consequent social condition of an elector, the less likely are they to be really significantly electorally active.
This is true of the Millwall ward as it is of the Brick Lane area.
And therein lies a secret about a weapon of theft that the Blaired gangs have been using against the very people.
The Blaired gangs have been peddling the antidemocratic, untrue and the plainly poisonous lie that bringing Crossrail to be run and tunnelled over the Brick Lane area and the relevant remainder of the East End of London would create ‘regeneration’.
What do they mean by that word ‘regeneration’ ?
It is a word that has no meaning.
Except a meaning of and in DEGENERATION.
That is why I had devised the analytical substitute DEGENERATION all those years ago.
The conceptual contradictions in the word ‘regeneration’ were forced into focus at least in my observation by the misdeeds that were being brazenly got upto and foisted on the inner cities across the UK by the unlamented Margaret Hilda Roberts (Thatcher)
When Margaret Hilda made that creepy stride up those shaking stairs in what used to be the ‘Conservative Central Office’ (now more aptly referable to as the COMPLETELY COLLAPSING Organisation) closely followed by her Dracula-Guard (Norman Tebbit) putting on his grotesquely smug face of hatred, she must have known that she was going to make a most injuriously hurtful statement to mock and ridicule the most suffocated of the ms of her violations already heaped on thousands of poor people and deprived families across the inner cities.
She said that she was going to sort out those ‘inner cites’ !
And God did she try !
She soon unleashed the poll tax on the people.....
Just as Margaret Hilda ‘sorted out’ those ‘inner cities’ so has her ideological successor Tony Blair. And the horrors that Blair has unleashed against communities like the one in the Brick Lane area are not at all confined to just the threatened Crossrail tunnel and environmental nightmare posed by the Crossrail plan.
As all the LATEST and published indices of the UK Government’s own statistical units and surveys confirm, the Brick Lane are has a community that is, has been and is likely in the foreseeable future to remain one of the most economically, socially deprived parts of the UK population
This is a serious and worrying situation for the whole of the deprived peoples. And it applies to the Bangladeshis just as much as it does to the non-Bangladeshi recipients of the economic and social deprivation in the Brick Lane area and in the rest of the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
How then is it that no less a reactionary and oppressive instrument of British discrimination, disparity and bias and racism than the Confederation of British Industries (CBI) had its big propaganda event staged on Tuesday 7 September 2004 by abusing the Bangladeshi identity of the present Mulberry School in the E1 area ?
What was the CBI ‘celebrating’ in the E1 area and since when had the CBI become real ‘pals’ and ‘friends and 'business partners' and 'Industry partners' ’ of so many ‘families’ of so universally recognised and quoted poverty stricken children and girls ?
How accurate a pre-view of what Crossrail is plotting against the Brick Lane area was the CBI’s prancing on the back of the Mulberry School on Tuesday 7 September 2004 ?
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR ! (39)
By © Muhammad Haque
1848 Hrs GMT London
Tuesday 7 September 2004
Time to stop the degenerating lies against the people of the East End of London . Even the conservative ‘Tribune’ backs those who question the hype about Crossrail and about the Olympic bid ‘2012’ !
When even the disturbingly un-radical UK political title Tribune (which is wrongly described in Britain as a left wing publication in British politics) starts to express reservations about the over-blown over-hyped London Olympic bid 2012 and the routinely propaganda-linked Crossrail project then it would wise indeed for the peddlers of the lies about regeneration in the East End to stop uttering any more lies.
Tribune has joined - belated, in my view - the small band of relatively better informed commentators of the ‘London political scene’ who are accurately warning the Blair administration against the irresponsible and false promotion of the twin wasters of public resources, the Olympic Bid 2012 and the Crossrail (Cross London railway) project.
I shall go into some details about those NEW warnings on this site to be published on Thursday 9 September 2004.
It is worth saying in advance of my particular longer review (due to appear here on 9 September 2004) that whatever the one-time Olympic medal winner Sebastian Coe has been scripted to utter about either the Olympic Bid or about the alleged ‘benefits to East London’ that would flow from a ‘successful London Bid to host the 2012 Olympic in this city’ can only have been put into his propaganda mouth by those who have not the knowledge of what the East End is like economically.
Or socially and environmentally .
Or what it has been like for decades.
Or why the East End of London UK has been the way it has been socially, economically and environmentally for so long despite periodic utterances of idiotic patronising lies by sets and successions of careerists over decades - or have no resource for the ordinary people who are engaged in daily struggle in the East End against the products, symbols and consequences of the agenda of lies and lying that control the accesses and the freedoms of the vast majority of the people of London’s East End.
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR (38) PLUS
KHOODEELAAR ! (37)
Campaign against the Crossrail plan of attacks on the Brick Lane, E1 area in London’s East End continues.
By © Muhammad Haque
2120 Hrs GMT
London Monday 06 September 2004
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
(To be continued)
These extracts from
KHOODEELAAR The epic poem in defence of the
people and the community of
the East End of London
By © Muhammad Haque
Written on Monday 6 September 2004
KHOODEELAAR ! (36)
Community Say No to Crossrail planned attack on the Brick Lane, E1 area
By © Muhammad Haque
2220 Hrs GMT London Sunday 5 September 2004
Keeta Koi Kouncillor-ay
Keeta Koi empee-ay
Keeta Koi Korosrell-ay
Keeta Koi theekadaar-ay?
Keeta Koi dhookadaar-ay?
Keeta Koi salla dayra-ay?
Keeta Koi shartho-tookao-rai?
Keeta Koi dumookh-alai?
Keeta Koi teenmookh-alai?
KHOODEELAAR !(35)
Community Say No to Crossrail planned attack on the Brick Lane, E1 area
By © Muhammad Haque
2240 Hrs GMT London Thursday 2 September 2004
CBRUK mass signature campaign against Crossrail plan starts
Among those who have already signed the CBRUK petition against the Crossrail planned attack are active members of the East London Youth Organisation, small business owners in the Hanbury Street, members of the housing m education and anti-discrimination campaigns of the past two decades in the East London borough of Tower Hamlets.
The CBRUK mass signature campaign supporting a formal petition to be submitted to the UK Parliament was launched in the Hanbury Street in the evening of Wednesday 1 September 2004.
The texts below are being currently supported in the signature campaign. Other materials are set o be distributed in the immediate area which is affected by the planned Crossrail attacks.
“
PETITION TO UK PARLIAMENT Organised by © CBRUK London September 2004
?
© Muhammad Haque / CBRUK London 1 September 2004
We the undersigned residents, tenants in the Hanbury Street, Princelet Street and other members of the community and residents of other streets in the Brick Lane area, London E1 and members of the linked community who use and rely on the amenities and facilities and services in and around the Brick lane area and members of the various voluntary, community, social, cultural and religious organisations in the Brick lane and adjoining area are opposed to the planned tunnelling by Crossrail through this area and that we are totally concerned about the destructive effects the planned tunnelling and related work will cause to the safety of children, the health of children, vulnerable adults, multiply-deprived families and women and the devastating effect on the homes, the families and on the existing businesses, shops and the environment and we support this petition and we support the demands represented in this petition and in the accompanying CBRUK campaign and representation to the UK Parliament asking that Parliament that they take into full and truthful and manifest account all the implications and all the ramifications that the plans will have against social inclusion, social cohesion, social stability, and we draw the UK parliament’s attention to the conflict the proposed Crossrail work will create and represent with UK’s treaty and legislative commitments to fairness, justice and quality for all the people as provided for and enshrined in the European Convention for Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and in particular for all the peoples in deprived and disenfranchised communities like the one that exists in the Brick Lane area and we ask the UK Parliament to NOT agree any Crossrail attacks or operations that violate, affect or undermine or devastate the community in the Brick Lane and in the rest of the E1 area in London
Name home/business address Signature Date
________________________________________________________________
1
”
The CBRUK Campaign in defence of the Brick Lane area against the Crossrail planned attack is being taken to the streets in the rest of the E1 area starting this weekend (Saturday 4 September 2004 onwards)
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR !(34)
Why does JOHN Biggs utter lies for deprivation?
By © Muhammad Haque
1140 Hrs GMT London Thursday 2 September 2004
‘East London’ ‘GLA’ man JOHN Biggs must stop talking lies that make deprivation sound like an adorable pet ! or is Biggs talking crassly of deprivation as if Biggs NEEDS there to be a deprived condition so he can make periodic mileage out of the suffering of the people kept in and pushed into deprivation?
CBRUK defence of Brick Lane issues a final word of advice to glib-talking ‘ JOHN Biggs’, GLA ‘member’ for the insulted constituency of East London - Brick Lane Why JOHN Biggs must learn to stop talking crass lies about deprivation in the East End
The Greater London Assembly is another wasteful, undemocratic, anti-social imposition on the people of London who neither asked for it nor have derived any measurable social benefit from its existence. The losses are massive. The GLA is in a building that was not necessary.
The GLA edifice was built at huge cost to the people of London and for the petty careerist strategic reasons that had more to do with the career plans of Tony Blair et al than to do with any real issues of overcoming the long-standing denial, hardship, deprivation that hundreds of thousands of London families, persons suffer and endure every day.
Nowhere more so than in the East End of London.
This part of London where Brick Lane is, is formally ‘represented’ on the GLA by this very unrepresenting and UNREPRESENTATIVE ‘member’ called JOHN Biggs.
In fact, the record of John Biggs so far speaks volumes to justify the observation that John Biggs was never politically capable of representing the East End of London on any publicly paid-for and publicly-maintained forum.
Neither when he was being paid as a councillor on Tower Hamlets Council nor in his current paid post as GLA member for Tower Hamlets area.
Biggs has NO RECORD OF EVER IN THE ENTIRETY OF HIS CAREER AS PUBLICLY PAID LOCAL COUNCIL (and GLA) ‘politician’ (!!!!) made a single intervention on behalf of the people on any issue that affects the people as opposed to issues that have been of ‘relevance to and of interest to’ the plans and options and objectives of identifiable and implied bureaucrats and collections of vested interests concerned.
He has sought to disguise those occasions when he has ‘played his part’ in voting or speaking on a topic as being ‘beneficial to the local community’ whereas the truth of his ‘interest’, his loyalty and his affiliation has been, without exception, linked with his career, his career plan and his need to remain in publicly paid career no matter how wrong he has been and how unfit his political role has been in the context of the vast and widening gap of economic, social, gap and deprivation in the East End.
In fact, Biggs has been party to the propaganda campaigns in support of creating new types and methods of deprivation. His language gives the game away as to who Biggs has been serving.
Biggs has not been serving the ‘electors’ of any part of inner city Tower Hamlets. He has been supporting the interest of BIG Business.
What an irony there !
Biggs has used the tell-tale word ‘challenge’ in relation to what the Big Business think of the people in the eats who are going to be made even more deprived than is the case already.
Biggs as a paid member on the GLA is now playing a key role in the Big Business plan to bring more deprivation to the Brick Lane area by lobbying for Crossrail.
In one of the plastic and crassly-composed publicly shorts for the Crossrail plan in violation of the people and the community in the Brick lane area, Biggs lends his name to the following (which I saw at 1030 Hrs GMT today Thursday 2 September 2004)
“Crossrail’s interchange with the East London Line will give easy transport access from our most deprived areas to the most dynamic business districts.”
1. What DOES Biggs mean by ‘our most deprived areas’ ?
2. Who has Biggs got with him involved in the maintenance and in the marking as their political property of these ‘our most deprived ‘ areas ?
3. Why does Biggs not stay totally quiet instead of uttering such poisonous outrage against the affected people in the East End that make whatever pretence he may think he is making about representing the needs, rights and entitlements of the people in the electoral constituency which he daily abuses, fails, misrepresents and mis-describes by being in office as a GLA member about ?
4. Will Biggs have the moral courage to actually identify or name or describe adequately, truthfully and honestly who these implied others WITH HIM are (that make up the ‘our most deprived areas’ reference and ) who consider, as he has exhibited he considers it to be a positive thing to have deprivation in the East End of London ?
5. Are these JOHN Biggs-our deprived areas in existence because of the role played by JOHN Biggs in keeping these areas deprived ?
6. What does Biggs know of what ‘deprived areas’ do to the people who have to live in the deprivation?
7. Does Biggs care to find out ?
8. If so, what has he done to find out what deprivation does to people who are ‘encouraged’ by the likes of him to ‘be happy to be in deprived conditions/’?
9. When was the last time that Biggs thought about society and other than about the brazenly irresponsible career that he has been feathering for the past 20 years or so in ‘local politics’?
10.Why does Biggs think that it is okay to deny people in East London what home they have, what security they have, what future they have ?
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR !(33)
KHOODEELAAR [34]
By Muhammad Haque
2240 Hrs GMT London
Tuesday 31 August 2004
The Committee for Bangladeshis’ Rights in the UK (CBRUK) this week agreed the contents of the petition that is going to be submitted to the UK Parliament in advance of the hybrid parliamentary Bill which Transport Secretary Alistair darling stated in July would be presented to Parliament
The hybrid Bill must not be allowed to g through the UK Parliament without that formal legislative body being made fully and adequately ware of the destruction the Crossrail plan would cause to one of the most deprived communities in all of the UK.
The CBRUK petition is phrased in the context of all relevant events that have taken place in the months since I attended a semi-public meeting held at the ‘Montefiore Centre’ in the corner of Hanbury and Deal Streets in January 2004 when I first put the argument in public for the politicisation of the campaign against the Crossrail plan. I again reinforced the arguments for political opposition to the Crossrail plan when I spoke very briefly at the same building where another semi-public meeting took pace on 26 May 2004.
Texts of the CBRUK Petition to UK parliament against the Crossrail plan attacking the lives, livelihoods an safety, health f the community in the Brick Lane area in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets
We the undersigned residents, tenants in the Hanbury Street, Princelet Street and other members of the community and residents an residents of other streets in the Brick lane area, London E1, are opposed to the planned tunnelling by Crossrail through this area and that we are totally concerned about the destructive effects the planned tunnelling and related work will cause to the safety of children, the health of children, vulnerable adults,, multiply deprived families and women and the devastating effect on the existing businesses, shops and homes and the environment and we demand of the UK Parliament they take into full and truthful and manifest account all the implication and all the ramifications that the plans will have against social inclusion, social cohesion, social stability, and against all known declarations by the UK parliament of commitments to fairness, justice and quality for all the people and in keeping with the European Conventions for Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and in particular for all the peoples in deprived and disenfranchised communities like the one that exists in the Brick Lane area ...
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR !(32)
By © Muhammad Haque
2100 Hrs GMT London Sunday 29 August 2004
Eetayi zay amraar shaaraa Beerik Lane eelakka naash koreelaar okta bondd kortam koree ebla aamraa peedeeshon laagai aar...hokhlay meeleea dostokhot dayukka apfanaara
STOP THE Planned Crossrail attack on the Brick lane, E1 area CBRUK starting mass signature campaign this week
Eetayi zay amraar shaaraa Beerik Lane eelakka naash koreelaar okta bondd kortam koree ebla aamraa peedeeshon laagai-aar...
CBRUK is launching a campaign of collection mass signatures to a petition against the planned Crossrail attack on the Brick Lane E1 area. Copies of the petition will be available during the week starting on Tuesday 31 August 2004.
(The texts of the petition and other facts to be posted on this site on 1 September 2004
KHOODEELAAR (31)
By © Muhammad Haque
2230 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 28 August 2004
THE crassness of the Crassrail plan is again exposed by the dishonest plug given it by some on the UK ‘left’ whose only reason for ‘supporting’ the Crass-rail idea is these alleged UK ‘leftists’ alleged recollection of the alleged socialist role played by the former Greater London Council’s coup leader ken Livingstone.
Livingstone is now a ferociously defiant member of Tony Blair’s brigade. So confident is Livingstone in his calculation (and Livingstone is nothing if he is not calculating) about being able to continue to con the potential electors bothering to turn up at any foreseeable poll for the office of Mayor of London that he is blasé about his backing of the planned attack via Crossrail on the people of the East End of London.
Livingstone has not apologised for his remark a year or so ago that he backs Crassrail because that was the way to combine the City of London and Canary Wharf.
In that blasé but revealing statement uttered by Livingstone, the so-called Red ken came across as a very sad case of a very confused man who neither was red nor was a socialist but was a crafty careerists who only knew a few slogans that he would mouth whenever the occasion suited such utterance.
That he has committed a lethal violation of the rights of the entire population of low income East End London and has clued with succession of City of London and Capitalist scams and schemes to uproot the poor people and to rob them of their land and homes, is most clearly seen in the blatant bulldozer of lies that he is now driving with the help of the BBC and of all ‘newspapers’. the ‘once communist’ (!!!!) ‘daily’ Morning Star
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR (30)
Meesa maatra councillor-ray aamra koono pfermisson deesee naa !
By Muhammad Haque
2344 Hrs GMT
London Friday 27 August 2004
The lies for the Crossrail lobby being perpetrated by at least one Tower Hamlets councillor must be accounted for and to the people of Tower Hamlets
Who in Tower Hamlets Council will own up to the confection of the lie about Crossrail plan ?
Who gave any Tower Hamlets Councillor the authority to use their position as Councillor as Tower Hamlets councillor to MAKE any representation in support of the Crossrail lobby ?
Who in that Council was authorised by what constitutional body representing the preferences of the people in the Borough to make what pro-active DEMAND FOR THE ALLOCATION OF UK CENTRAL GOVERNMENT FUNDS FOR THE Crossrail project?
Who gave ANY Current Tower Hamlets Councillor ANY even HINT that the people whose lives, livelihoods and stability, security community health would be disrupted destroyed and destabilised and people who would be made destitute if he panned Crossrail route went through the Brick Lane area would approval of ANY Tower Hamlets councillor pretending to represent those people and the community when the councillor concerned made the false representation on record and took part in a totally corrupt bureaucratic display suggesting that the Crossrail project was at all anywhere on the agenda of the utter, the vast, the overwhelming majority of the people in the ordinary population and among the electorate in the LB Tower Hamlets ?
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR [29] By © Muhammad Haque 2250 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 24 August 2004
Further confirmation of the justness of the CBRUK campaign in defence of the Brick Lane area against the Crossrail plan of attack on the Brick Lane area community
Crass claim of ‘regeneration’ by ‘Crossrail’ in the East End of London dealt another serious blow - by the facts of the Greek LOSSES to the tunes of £billions and the denunciation by ordinary Greek folk of the extravagant waste in the pursuit of empty glory.
Do ordinary East Enders want to pay for a bunch of self-seekers having a good time in Brussels at the expense of poverty stricken families in the East End ?
The ‘surprise’ demonstration by an admittedly small number of individuals outside the so-called London City hall on Tuesday 24 August 2004 denouncing the propaganda line for a London bid for the 2012 Olympic Games confirms once against that any one with any sense of economic common sense abut the macro economy is bound to balk at the hype attaching to that over-rated 2012 Olympic Games bid for London .
The fact that Tuesday’s ‘demo’ was treated more as a stunt by the Blair-promoting BBC does not meant at all that the opposition that is now beginning to be openly shown against the grotesque bid has more sense than is admitted by the self-seeking. ignorant and immature 2012 London bid brigade being kept in ‘jobs’ at public expense.
The cost of hosting the Olympic Games are excessive. Just like the Greeks are finding out to their cost, literally. And as a minor report shown on BBC TV outfit (contrary to the Blaired diktat now effectively ruling over the BBC news and editorial agenda generally ) on Tuesday 24 August 2004, confirmed, most ordinary Greek are not only unimpressed by the Greek Olympic lobby’s outlandish claims of achievement, they are positively hostile to any , even the most minor, suggestion that the Greek hosting of the 2004 Games has brought any economic or other tangible or lasting or measurable gains for the Greek people.
the lesson is most apt and it must be applied to the London brigade.
London’s communities such as the East End community, who are being lied to and lied about by the 2012 bid brigade, must stand up and speak up now. before it is to late.
That is the right way to undermine the corrupt argument being crassly promoted for the ramming of a Crossrail line that includes the planned destruction of substantial parts of the Brick lane and the rest of the London E1 area.
(To be continued)
Why I am writing epic poem KHOODEELAAR (28) in defence of the Brick Lane area and against the Crossrail plan
by © Muhammad Haque
2040 Hrs GMT London Sunday 22 August 2004
I wrote this part of my epic poem KHOODEELAAR about the degeneration of London
on 31 January 2004.
This was literally within minutes after attending the first ‘community’ meeting in the Brick Lane area held against the proposed Crossrail violations of the area.
I wrote this part by combining the thoughts and feelings of the whole community as felt by the narrator and interrogator whom I poetically imagined was either a very neglected Bangladeshi local person in the Brick Lane area in London’s East End Borough of Tower Hamlets.
I imagined him to be heading a sizeable family of demanding members whose basic needs were already left unmet, whose physical image in the neighbourhood was already undermined by a plethora bread and butter problems, who was nowhere near treated with the dignity that he deserved, whose freedom of movement in his own neighbourhood was restricted by the problems caused directly by the local Tower Hamlets council, whose dreams and hopes were daily shattered by the lack of recognition by the agencies set up and kept in continuous funding by the local authority as well as by the UK central Government.........The narrator was also a non-Bangladeshi, multi-ethnic member of the Brick Lane community of people with other backgrounds, of culture, language and thoughts. And hopes.
At the meeting on 31 January 2004, it was clear from the various factual presentations regarding the particular Crossrail plan (against the Brick lane area community) and the destructive effects of the plan on the Brick Lane area, that the key decisions for the attacks had been made by persons who had no respect for the rights of the people in the Brick Lane area. My view as put to that first meeting against the plans attacking the Brick Lane area community was that the only way we could stop the implementation of the plans and the only way we could fend off the Crossrail violations was to make the defence of the community a political issue.
Political in a way that would compel the decision-makers to stop the crassness
that was the Crossrail plan over the Brick Lane area.
Political in a way that would take into account what even the official records of the proceedings of the UK House of Commons (the so-called lower House of the UK legislature) ‘recognised’ was one of the most deprived areas in all of the UK.
Part of my lines written on 31 January 2004 read as follows:
Cross Rail !
You make me so cross
Crossrail
You are set to ruin
this small part
of this big earth
and for what?
Why do you have to come here
and threaten me with the violence
of digging holes in my small little
neighbourhood ?
Why do you have to do the unusual here
while you can do all the big business
without once uprooting another community
anywhere in the whole region of the South of England?
why is it that you think
Brick Lane is
an easy target for you to
dig hole/s in
disrupt
deprive and
destroy? ...”
Extracts from Muhammad Haque’s Lines in Defence of the Brick Lane, London E1 area against the planned Crossrail attacks and violations.
(Parts 2 to 40 are due to be published on the worldwide web, including on this site, in the course of the next few months)
© Muhammad Haque /CBRUK/Sylhetworldtexts London 2004
Khoodeelaar ! [ 25 ] By © Muhammad Haque
2140 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 18 August 2004
THE CBRUK CAMPAIGN IN DEFENCE OF THE BRICK LANE AREA AGAINST THE PLANNED CROSSRAIL HOLE AND OTHER ATTACKS ON THE COMMUNITY IN THE BRICK LANE, WHITECHAPEL, VALLANCE ROAD, STEPNEY AREA OF THE EAST LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS
Tower Hamlets Council has in effect become a conveyor belt for the transfer of the occupation army of the capitalists of the City of London on to what vacant land there is still available in the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
This movement is taking place every working day of the week. And sometimes during the weekends.
The controlling decision-making bureaucrats in the Council are experiencing undisguised glee (Wednesday 18 August 2004) at the fact that their work for the globalisers now taking over the Isle of Dogs is made even easier by the removal of the objections to the next high tower that is being built on the isle.
This is in the same week that also saw the announcement of the offensive ‘need’ by the construction conglomerates for the availability of ‘teenagers’ in strategic inner city areas like the East End Borough of Tower Hamlets to be exploited in the construction industry.
That announcement is supposed to be encouraging what they mis-describes as regeneration.
The idea is that ‘teenagers’ in the East End of London should be rushing to work in the construction trade.
This is a presumption that is multiply presumptuous and racist.
The school-leavers they offensively describe as ‘teenagers’ are mostly leaving schools without the necessary skills of education. They are not being educated in the East end schools to the level that they deserve to be. Or to the level they need to be. If they are to deserve proper jobs with proper returns.
And there is the real gap. And that is created by the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council.
The details must be examined so that the fact and the extents of the abuse by Tower Hamlets council of their ‘powers’ and the failures by the council to represent the community in the Borough can be actually seen.
I have already shown that Tower Hamlets Councillors had been having clandestine (secret) meetings, starting at least in the summer of 2002 with self-seeking careerists getting paid public money in the name of the ‘Crossrail’ project.
Neither the councillors themselves nor Christine Gilbert the ‘chief executive’’ employed in the LBTH Council, said a single word to the local community about who the councillors were meeting and what evidence the meetings examined, if any, that showed to any reasonable level any sign that the people in the Brick lane area and in the rest of the populated parts of the Borough would gain from any further expansion of the City of London Corporation and its agencies into the land and the neighbourhoods and the environment of Tower hamlets.
My questions put a year ago to Tower Hamlets Council included these:-
I. What evidence can you cite - which can be independently checked and verified - to support any claim that Tower Hamlets Council is currently meeting the needs of the whole community in the borough with particular reference to culture, religion, language to the standard expected by all those whose relevant experience in the given field and sphere covered in this question tells them what the level of their needs are and what the level of the respective item of delivery in each should be?
2. What is the actual current total sum in the current financial year that is earmarked and directed to the meeting of the above?
3. What level of audit does Tower Hamlets council conduct - if it at all conducts any audit of the description and implication represented here - on a weekly basis to ensure that the claims the Council has made about meeting the needs (see the last 20 applications for external funding and equivalent support submitted to UK central Government and the European Social Fund agencies) are in fact treated as serious ones by the Council in its key and central decisions?
4. What is the average number of ordinary working days, starting from I (on a scale of I to 30, each unit signifying a day as is ordinarily understood), that it takes the Tower Hamlets Council to deal with the full extent of complaints alleging incompetence, negligence prejudice and violations of one or more aspects of the legal duties that the staff are under? Is it mostly within 30 or beyond 30? If it is under 30, how many such cases have you had knowledge of in the past 20 months and what would you say about the level of satisfaction (on a scale of I to 100) of the ordinary electors or ordinary members in the Tower Hamlets population who initiated or brought a complaint? If it is beyond 30 days, why is that and how many such cases have you had knowledge of in the same period? What does that say about what your answer is to question 1. above?
5. Whose decision was it and with what implication for the image of the present Council, that the present chief executive should have read the statement that she did read to what had been advertised as the inauguration of the new Council on 21 May 2003? Why was that meeting given to so many detailed descriptions of who went on what external outfit? Why was no equivalent discussion or description of A Council posts a held? To most observers, including myself, that showed a deliberate misuse of the time and opportunity which the Council had at its disposal. Why should that kind of conduct be expected by anyone on the present Council to be excused by the electorate and the community?
6. What is the main qualification for the 'adviser' to the chief executive in the context of the evidence of dissatisfaction on the ground that people feel towards the Tower Hamlets council? What does the Council's allowing the creation of that post say about the level of representation of the preferences of the Borough's peoples by Councillors who are elected by the legally approved process? How is the Chief executive held to account to the Borough?
When was the last time that you carried out such an audit of the chief officers?"
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR (24) CBRUK defence of Brick Lane area
against Crossrail attacks
By © Muhammad Haque
2250 Hrs GMT London Monday 16 August 2004
The announcement from Athens this week that the ordinary people of London would have to pay at least another £10 million during the next year so that Ken Livingstone can create some spurious jobs to be held by a new bureaucracy to lobby for the London bid to host the 2012 Olympic games in London, shows how undemocratic the office and the powers of the London Mayor are.
There is no accountability to the so-called voters (because the vast majority of those eligible to vote, including myself, stayed off the polling stations on 10 June 2004 because there was not one candidate that actually measured up to the basic standards) , who are treated with total contempt by the so-called Greater
London Assembly (GLA) that is in fact made up of a collection of the most inane ‘characters’ who have shown neither coverage nor understanding in standing up for ordinary people in London.
And nowhere is that situation starker than in the Brick lane area.
CROSSRAIL-AY BIRIK LANE-OR KANDAAR PRINCLET STREET AAR HANBURY STREET -OR MAAZ-AY KHOOB NEEN GAAT KHOODEELAAR.
(TO BE CONTINUED)
Sylhetworld Daily News Commentary
By © MUHAMMAD HAQUE
Monday 02 August 2004 London 0150 Hrs GMT
CBRUK Live Into the 16h year of political action for Bangladeshis'’ human rights in the UK CBRUK’s campaigning year starts with new phase of demands for an end to the Crossrail hole planned for the Brick lane area.
London 0150 Hrs GMT Sunday 1 August 2004
Today sees the art of the 16th year of the campaigning life of the Committee for Bangladeshis’ Rights in the UK.
That the Bangladeshi community in the UK is in increasing need of campaigning for its collective human rights is clear from the fact that our Central executive Council has this saturday (31 July 2004) decided to embark on the next phase of the current campaign in defence of the Brick lane area.
On Monday 2 August 2004, CBRUK is issuing detailed statement on the economic and social implications against the community of the planned Cross-rail tunnel and hole in the Brick Lane area of London.
It was on 9 July 1989 in the Flower and Dean Walk off Brick Lane that the family of Mr Esmoth Ali and Mr Watir Ali was brutally attacked. It resulted in the deaths of both Mr Alis.
The name ‘Brick Lane’ has been synonymously with the Bangladeshi community’s presence in the London and the UK population for the past at least 50 years.
And the events of July 1989 following the murderous attacks on the Mr Alis have been brought back into active focus now by the planned attack by Crossrail on the community.
In the CBRUK campaign in defence of the Bangladeshi community and of the community of white and other cultural and nationality and non-Bangladeshi ordinary people in the Brick lane area, the leading and the defining advocacy and case has been made by CBRUK in the past five months. I shall be publishing the documentary evidence and live texts of the particular current campaign so far in this series in the next few weeks and months.
Here are some extracts from the documents that I have written in the pats 5 months against the Crossrail plan for an underground hole and a tunnel in the Brick lane area:-
CBRUK LIVE into 16th year
The Campaign against the planned Crossrail hole and tunnel in the Brick Lane are is being conducted in Sylhetti and in English. The Sylhetti word KHOODEELAAR has caught the imagination of the community in a spectacular way. There has been such a demand from non-Sylhetti speaking supporters of the campaign against the Crossrail plan speakers for an explanation or translation or interpretation of the word that I recently pub;published the following
What does KHOODEELAAR mean ?
How the Sylhetti word in the CBRUK campaign title came to be chosen. Its significance and meaning.
I devised this one-word title for the CBRUK CAMPAIGN IN DEFENCE OF THE BRICK LANE AREA as the most communicative Sylhetti language cry against the Crossrail plan for a hole lot of attacks ! Ever since I became convinced that the Brick Lane area was being targeted for a new series of assaults typified by the planned Crossrail hole, I looked in the archives of Sylhetti language and history and Khoodeelaar volunteered itself as the most suitable conveyor of my community’s opposition to the attacks.
So in February 2004 I decided to include it as the banner in this latest CBRUK campaign in defence of a vital part of the Bangladeshi community in the UK.
The word ‘Khudilaar’ is impossible to translate into a single English word in current use or any English word that in my knowledge has ever been in use. KHOODEELAAR bursts with a message of multiple defiance
against the invader of the home. It says that someone [ or a group or an agent has intruded into our home area and ] is doing an illegitimate, undoubtedly harmful digging in the backyard ! Or that they are doing something awful right in front of us.
The digger , the tunneller, is unwanted, uninvited and unfriendly. That the digger is doing the digging or the tunnelling or both, without our consent and despite our objections ! Too close to home for comfort! That the digger doesn’t care about us, the people, the community .... ! The nearest contemporary expression (July 2004) that KHOODEELAAR can be related to in the (British) English language is to say that a ‘dirty digger’ (........) is doing their dirty digging and vandalising in our backyard and unless we hurry and do something about it, he (or ‘they’) will do irreparable damage to our homes, and to our lives...”
© Muhammad Haque © sylhetworldtexts2004 Brick Lane area London E1 UK Saturday 24 July 2004 (to be continued)
Khoodeelaar! Campaign Archives [January 2004 to 12 October 2005]
KHOODEELAAR ! (58) PLUS
KHOODEELAAR ! (57)
CBRUK campaign against the CROSSRAIL Plan for attacking the community in the Brick Lane, London E1 area
By © Muhammad Haque
0320 Hrs GMT
London Friday 24 September 2004
The Plausible liars in the
‘ethnicised’ colony in and around the
Brick Lane area
London E1
How to spot the colonialist liars
and the real muggers, deniers
sucking the lifeblood out
of the community in the
Brick Lane E1 area
in furtherance of the
agenda of the City of London
and all that the City
wants and craves
.....
By their ‘soliciting’
for the City !
By their ‘solicitors’
from the City !
By their be-suiting
of surrogates
in the ‘styles’ of the City
By their ‘buffeting’
celebrations of the latest loots
‘grants and project bids’
in the comforts
of the City
By their grooming
of the ‘ethnic’ dummies
in the shadow of the City
By their grooming
of the ‘ethnic’ crummies
for the purposes
of the City
By their washing the
lot of the brains
of the surrogates ‘ethnics’
whom they ‘accommodate’
defying all ethics!
By their grooming of the
ethnic vulnerable
ill-schooled empty-heads
By their contemptible brothelling
in rushing the victims
to obscene beds
By their distortion of the names of the
local ordinary folk
By their wanton mocking of the
peoples’ cause as another joke
while the muggers, the liars themselves comply
with every City demand against the community
at whose expense the muggers reply
to the satisfaction of the City
in volumes of lying scams
to expose which will require an eternity !
The liars deniers muggers who rob
the local community
rob the people not just of wealth
resource and facility
but they rob the local community
of life tomorrow in the near future
depriving the people of basic certainty
The liars muggers thieves who
scheme and scam every day
have found that their professional
‘suit-wearing’ tie-flaunting
ethnic surrogate minders
will mind after them every day
The ‘suit-wearing’ ‘tie-flaunting’
ethnic surrogates will be by their side
whenever the City-linked liars
City-linked muggers City-linked thieves
run out of what to say
in the latest round of
State-controlled
bids-scramble
let loose for the season and
taking place in the City Side !
By their violence of intent
to rob the local people
By their violence of plots
to fool the local people
By their violence of contempt
against the rights
of the local people
By their violence of prejudice
hatred against the
defenders of the local people
By the violence of their
daily excuses barring the
local people
By the plausiblities of their lies
dressed up daily as anguished sighs
in their pretence
to be ‘with’ the local people
while all the while
undermining every
element of every part
of the protection of the local people
.....”
KHOODEELAAR ! (56)
CBRUK campaign against the CROSSRAIL Plan for attacking the community in the Brick Lane, London E1 area
By © Muhammad Haque
2144 Hrs GMT
London Thursday 23 September 2004
“The be-suited, tie-topped symbols of surrogation to the colonialist oppressive setting and agenda which was on display at the ’meeting’ on Tuesday 27 July 2004, reminded also of the ‘hope’ that every professional, careerist racist violator would cherish and nurture in their chest.
That of seeming to be ‘concerned. That of seeming to care. When in fact taking part in preventing the community from fending off the attacks, planned and imminent.
The ‘stage’ set up to facilitate the presentation delivery of a colonialist symbol of ‘acceptable face of expertise was a stage that would serve the purpose of preventing the ‘trouble-makes’, the ‘native agitators’ who might, just might, spring to action and articulate opposition to the scheme.
That would not be permissible, not in a dozen years , not when the funded surrogates and ethnic token users, ‘manger’s, little ‘bosses’ had set their ‘sights’ on allowing a platform to the ‘duly elected representatives and parliamentary personalities’ !
Thus it was that the whole charade was achieved by keeping the majority of the local community out of the ‘meeting’ place. What turned up as ‘local residents and tenants’ were left in the same state of knowledge about the Crossrail planned threat against the local community when they left the ‘Brady Centre’ as when they had got in there.
The only satisfied faces were the faces of the ‘controllers’ behind the event. Who were they ?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (55)
By © Muhammad Haque
2120 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 22 Sept. 2004
CROSSRAIL Plan for attacking the community in the Brick Lane, London E1 area was INVITED to be brought to the area ! This was done by the attackers using the mental slavery on the parts of the particular sets of operatives who are given cash ‘grants’ and other ‘facilities by the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council...
How Tower Hamlets Council is openly FUNDING ‘community-based’ operatives who are engaged in routinely creating deprivation of the very community where each group of these operatives is based...
These operatives are to be found at stages of the ‘personnel’ involved in the mini-colonialism of the Brick lane London E1 area.
These operatives operate mostly in brad day light.
These operatives, many of them, even wear ‘suits’ !
These ‘suits’ and attached attire are paid for with cash that these operatives are handed IN THE NAME and AT THE EXPENSE of the local community in and around the Brick Lane, London E1 area.
Who are ‘the local community’ ?
All the people who are not paid participants in the obstruction, the denial and the deprivation of the local community in and around the Brick Lane London E1 area.
The anti-social operatives are paid by the state through the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council on tasks that are ‘apparently legitimised’ by the anti-social assignments being put on formal ‘official’ records by using formal, ‘legally-formatted’ documents and ‘contracts’ and validation instruments.
No-one in the local Brick Lane, London E1 area community who is not a paid member of one of the several anti-social criminalising, deprivation-adding, degeneration-creating anti-social projects has any access to the documents.
The ordinary community members have no ‘right’ either to demand to see what the terms of the various contracts, agreements in and on the ‘projects’ in the local community area are on paper.
It follows that the community has no manifest enforced right to demand to see whether the ‘projects’ are in fact delivering what they ‘might be said to be about’ on the actual papers and documents.
The lack of rights may no be quite the formal constitutional position if it is stated or interpreted by any paid professional apologist of the corrupt state.
Like an ‘expert’ who ‘addressed ! ‘ the gathering of alleged tenants and alleged residents held at the Brady Centre (in Hanbury Street, off Brick Lane, London E1) on Tuesday 27 July 2004 when the alleged gathering was allegedly got together to allegedly discuss the response of the alleged tenants and alleged residents to the planned Crossrail attack......
The ‘expert’ was a man who could not hope for a more edifying, gratifying set-up and stage whence to assert the latent ambition and hopes of any flesh and blood imperialist and colonialist !
The ‘expert’ was installed on stage to ‘address’ the gathering that had been so designed and anticipated and manipulated as to be mainly if not wholly of ‘an ethnic background’, such that at least a significant part of that gathering would be ‘additionally handicapped’ if they wee not ‘aided’ and ‘helped’ out of their own
linguistic, intellectual, cultural orientation, mooring and background !
And how to ‘aid’ and ‘help’ the alleged ‘ethnic’ tenants and residents ?
Why with the aid of a collection of morally empty, intellectually non-existent , politically vacant ethnic surrogates and mental slaves to every conceivable imperialist ‘role-model’ and ‘natural-born-leader’....... of course....
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (54)
By © Muhammad Haque
2154 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 21 September 2004
The Crossrail planned attack on the community in the Brick Lane E1 area is too flagrantly reminiscent of the apartheid policy in Apartheid South Africa... Crossrail planners’ links with some of the ‘local’ ‘experts’ and ‘spokespersons’ in ‘the Spitalfields’ area reek too much of a secret sleazy deal having been struck between ‘some’ of the ‘objectors’ and the perpetrators of the Crossrail planned attack on the community...
To understand how that apartheid attack plan as typified by the Crossrail plan is being operated, it is necessary to get the factual understanding of how the local Tower Hamlets Council has been abused and misused against the rights and entitlements of the local population in the East End. Including the people of the Brick Lane, E1 area.
Even as the then ‘controlling’ Liberal Democrats (whatever actual words were used for their then formally registered Party political name) were emptying their ‘ leadership councillors’ desks at the commercially owned and rented ‘ Tower Hamlets Town hall’ Mulberry Place following the defeat at the 1994 Council election, they knew one thing was still intact.
The ideology that had driven them to deny the people of the East End of an accessible ‘Town Hall’.
Two openly witnessed features of the previous ‘Town Hall’ situated off the Cambridge Heath Road in Bethnal Green were intensely disliked by the antidemocratic and pro-fascistic elements who made the key decisions for and in the then controlling Tower Hamlets Lib Dems stood out as being contributory factors behind their mugging of the people of the East End borough.
The physical location of the Bethnal Green town Hall in a part of the Borough where ordinary people, including elderly and out of work ones, could travel without much obstruction.
The frequency with which local people were taking demos and marches to that Town hall in protest against any number of anti-social decisions being made by the then Lib Dems in power [May 1986 - May 1994]
Some of those key demonstrations had direct implications for the Bangladeshis in London and elsewhere in the UK.
Such as the demonstrations that took place in 1987 , against the then
Tower hamlets council’s racist policy on housing and homelessness.
The anger in the local population against that policy was so widespread that it was possible for a significant part of a whole day for protesters to occupy the then Council chamber in a show of opposition.
Which occupation was peaceful. It was entirely democratic. And it got the point across.
But the Lib Dems were not willing to support the local community. They REACTED.
By taking a series of steps that were intended by Eric Flounders, one of the most reactionary and anti-social ‘Lib Dem’ councillors holding key powers in that group, and by his colleagues, to deny the local people the democratic say over what the local Tower hamlets Council did in the anti of local democracy.
One of the clearest steps was to deport the whole population away from Tower hamlets Town Hall.
Which is in effect what has happened.
And the deportation of the local community from its own Town hall has been maintained by the Blaired Councillors who took office following the May 1994 local council election.
It is ten full years and four months since the Tower Hamlets Council has been in the control of a group of councillors that is not officially Lib Dems.
Yet the policy of denying the local population the full and due access to the peoples’ local Town hall has continued.
So what is ‘different’ ?
There is no ideological difference between the two ‘parties’, the Lib Dems and the Blaired party.
What HAS BEEN INTRODUCED as a different face to the way the
anti-social, anti-people policies are implemented by and through the formal legal body of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets council is in significant parts made ‘community-based’.
By recruiting anti-social grouplet to be based at what in effect are now ‘neighbourhoods'’ obstruction centres.
These centres are in all intents and purposes owned by the entity of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
If they are not strictly seen as being ‘owned’ as such then their control is exercised by the actual operation of the powers available to the LB TH Council.
The LBTH Council in effect makes the formal legal decisions as to who is ‘approved’ as ‘fit’ to use or have access to these centres.
One of the ways that the LBTH Council does this is by loyally following the policy of apartheid as had been tried and tested in South Africa.
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (53)
By © Muhammad Haque
2210 Hrs GMT London
Monday 20 September 2004
Who gave Crossrail attacks planners the go-ahead to target Brick Lane area for the planned attacks and violations?
The answer lies in the vulnerability caused by deprivation in the main population in the Brick Lane area...
Who caused that vulnerability ?
How was that vulnerability ‘achieved’? Who operated and funded that vulnerability-creation ‘project’ ?
How Tower Hamlets Council is openly funding the further corruption of the so-called public amenities controlled via and at the ‘community-based centres’ in SOME of the most populous parts of the East End borough of Tower Hamlets
The Brick Lane area is one of the most populous parts of the Tower Hamlets Borough.
This is so despite the relative size of the whole Borough population in comparison with some of the adjoining inner London Boroughs including Newham to the East, hackney to the North, the Boroughs of Camden and Islington to the North West and the Boroughs of Southwark and Greenwich to the South and across the other, the southern, side of the river Thames.
One of the main reasons for CBRUK’s decision in January 2004 to mount the current information and political campaign in defence of the community in the Brick Lane, London E1 area is the fact that the name Brick Lane is more than just the East London Street of the same name.
Brick Lane is a community like no other in London. Like no other in Britain. Like no other anywhere else.
At one end of this contemporary cultural and social reality is the fact that Brick Lane accommodates and houses some of the most representative small enterprises that make up the human constitution of what a hopefully multi-faceted, multidimensional pro-civilisation community can be. At the other end is the evidence, alive daily and at all hours, of the pits of desperation, deprivation into which some of the participants in the making of that reality are pushed .
KHOODEELAAR ! the epic poem in defence of the Brick Lane E1 area
“Pushed by the forces of greed
Pushed by the forces of envy
Pushed by the forces of jealousy
Pushed by the forces of pettimindedness
Pushed by the forces engaged as agents of the corrupt state in Britain
Pushed by the forces of evil that are unleashed among the most weak
Pushed by the forces of depravity abusing the generosity of the ‘poor’
Pushed by the formal couriers of Party-linked corruption and abuse
Pushed by the informal suppliers of the Party-linked, the odd recluse !
Pushed by the Council-funded crooks peddling the line ‘the Council is super’
Pushed by the combined collected mindless morons undergoing a stupor
as they are ‘groomed’ out of their own identity of faith
as they are ‘groomed’ out of themselves by an open stealth
as they are targeted by the capricious bringers of ‘charm’
disguised as ‘liberated’ ‘friends’ wantonly bent to do harm......
"
KHOODEELAAR ! (52)
By © Muhammad Haque
2154 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 19 September 2004
Extracts from the introduction to KHOODEELAAR ! the epic poem in defence of the Brick Lane London E1 area against the Crossrail plan and against other, related attacks being mounted and carried out by the City of London Corporation and their agencies and agents operating in various guises in the East End of London
Extracts: 2B
“The Crossrail plan to attack the community in the Brick Lane, E1 area is the product of prejudice, bigotry, ignorance, racism and sheer mental and practical corruption on the part of the makers of the decision..”
Extracts 2 C:
“What attitude in the minds of the attackers makes them think that they can carry on attacking, abusing, robbing, mugging and depriving the people of the East End..?”
Extracts: 4e
“Who are these agents and what are these agencies operating in the Brick Lane, London E1 area that are being used by the Corporation of London and their ideological stable-mates to maintain the attacks on the East End and the people in and of the East End in September 2004?
The agents operating in the Brick Lane area are also linked with the agencies formally based in the same area. These agencies are however operating under strict orders linked with the cash grants that they are given.
The cash grants are not given to them secret. Although parts of the cash grants may be provided secretly. But a great deal of the cash grants are given by open reference.
Such as the one boastfully made public by Christine Gilbert the occupier of the expressly-cushioned post of chief executive of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
The boast in Christine Gilbert’s statement lay in the fact that she claimed that Tower Hamlets Council was funding, in July 2003, at least 1800 community groups !
She made the statement in the context of the then ‘topical’ issue of a set of ‘community based groups’ funded by Tower Hamlets council and by other agencies of the UK central Government. One of the main sites or locations of the operations of that grouplet, known as MATT, was at the ‘Montefiore Centre’. The ‘Montefiore Centre’ is no longer referred to as that in the ‘official’ propaganda statements issued either by Tower Hamlets Council or by any other state-linked outfit or their agents. The ‘Montefiore Centre’ is falsely referred to as the ‘Bethnal Green Technology Centre’. That false name was assigned to the Centre a decade or so earlier, when the Tower Hamlets Council was still being ‘controlled’ by the Liberal Democrats.
When the then ‘Labour’ party - completely Blaired since 1995 - took over ‘formal control’ of the Tower Hamlets Borough Council in May 1994, it was conceivable (as it was utterly desirable from the standpoint of the level; of needs in the community) that they the 'Labour' councillors on Tower Hamlets Council change the use and the access of the Montefiore Centre to one that was consistent with the needs of the local community.
They did nothing of the sort.
The result was that in the period between may 1994 to the summer of 2003, the
over-sold, over-designated ‘Bethnal Green Technology Centre’ became a
‘community-located’ arena for the perpetuation of the denial and deprivation against the local community...
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (51)
By © Muhammad Haque 2044 Hrs GMT London
Saturday 18 September 2004
The best way to defeat crass Crossrail plans against the people and communities in East London
Time to dispose of the anti-people GLA - ‘Grotesque London-misleading Alibi’ !
Time to have gutsy campaigners in UK parliament who will stand up to Blair and cronies in regional parasite waste-houses and pass Bills defending the disenfranchised communities like those in the Brick Lane area
The ‘London Money’ which is often cited as being the property of the people of London must not be referred to only in bogus ‘debates’ at the expense of the people of cities in Scotland and in other parts of the UK. The ‘other parts’ include the zones and the people of Manchester who have been deprived of vital UK central Govt support by the Blair regime dishonouring its previous commitments given to Manchester and to similar other regions and the people in those regions.. That sort of corrupting game, which is played by the Blair Bureaucracy to violate peoples of the various regions and inner city areas must be made unlawful by a speedily; enacted Bill protecting the peoples’ rights. But is there an MP in all of the ‘elected MPs’ currently siring in the UK House of Commons who has the guts, the intellect or the understanding of the UK 'constitutional process' to do any such really genuinely parliamentary democratic thing and act ? Fat chance of this happening in the foreseeable future. in the UK. This is true of the remainder of time that Blair has as ‘the Prime Mover’ and this will be true of whoever gets to occupy No. Downing Street after Blair’s time their ends officially.
So how can the people in communities like those in the Brick Lane, London E1 area protect their vital interests and rights, as against the planned and actual daily attacks on them made by the existing ‘system’ of parliamentary ‘government’ centrally and by the parasite ‘system’ called ‘local government’ that is increasingly abused against the people as a whole in the given locality ?
What is the best avenue and the best way to protect the bread and butter rights and entitlements of people whose voice is denied at local ‘democratic forums’ like the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and suppressed in the Ghastly London-less Alibi (GLA) that has been set up to accommodate the hugely insatiable ego of a very confused, emotionally unstable and insecure and opportunistic careerist now so wrongly but uncritically identified with ‘London and Londoners’ ?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (50)
By © Muhammad Haque
London 1614 Hrs GMT Friday 17 September 2004
“Who is wearing the suit in the East End on Friday 17 September 2004 ?”
An ode dedicated to the success of the rip off merchants who rob the ‘poor’ in the East End of London under the various corrupting, sleazing, criminal schemes and scams funded brazenly under the manifestly criminal and robbing programme of ‘regeneration’....
How the crooks rip off the inner city ‘poor’ ! in Tony Blair’s ‘opportunity’ Britain !
‘Do ‘they’ say they even ‘knew’ it has been a lockout here all year ?
“They rip off the inner city ‘poor’
on whom they slam shut the door
on whom they daily shut the door
on whom they firmly shut the door
on whom they blatantly shut the door
on whom they openly shut the door
on whom they wantonly shut the door
as the rip off merchants hold party
making sure they are hale and hearty
as they indulge in feast after feast
they ‘know’ they rule in the East
End of London although they hate its
people whom they push daily to pits
of ignominy, ridicule and obstruction
the rip off merchants plan construction
of their ripping off future careers
no East Enders can place barriers
to the way the rip off merchants do ‘things’
they groom the brainless running rings
around the ‘gormless majority ’ in E1
the rip off merchants know the one
sure secret East Enders don’t know
themselves! Be it Mile End or Bow
be it Brick Lane or Cannon St Road
be it Stepney or the VALLANCE Road
be it Poplar, Limehouse or Duckett Street
the rip off merchants are all over very discreet
......”
(To be continued)
Extracts from
KHOODEELAAR !
The epic poem by MUHAMMAD HAQUE written and published
daily as part of the struggle in defence of the Brick
Lane area and the rest of the East End of London
KHOODEELAAR ! (49)
By © Muhammad Haque
2250 Hrs GMT London
Thursday 16 September 2004
New fare rise for ‘public transport’ in London raises the question - so who has been lying about Crossrail bringing about ‘regeneration’ in London, then ? How can that be when existing bus and train can’t be operated without raising fares ?
The latest announcement of the rise in tube and bus fares in London to be implementation by the London Mayor, is another confirmation of the truth that what the ‘London economy’ needs is NOT more railway lines but more efficient and accountable use of existing public transport infrastructure in London.
What is accountable ?
Like the buses being only driven by drivers who are sensitive to passengers and who actually respect the passengers.
With the recent introduction of the robotised buses (following ken Livingstone's anti-social annihilation of the people-friendly and socially accessible ROUTEMASTER buses) , ordinary bus-travelling London passengers have been encountering a new phenomenon that was never even noticed before in London. Being ignored by bus drivers who don’t seem to recognise either a visible signal for stopping the bus or even sometimes a compulsory bus stop sign.
Thousands of passengers suffer this Livingstone-Mayor-era ignominy every day in London . This is so if the passengers are mostly frail, vulnerable and otherwise de-recognised (if they are of Africa or Asian appearance) .
And this de-recognition seems to be part of the main outlook being taken by the ‘Mayoral regime’ by the Blaired Party ‘card-holder’ Ken Livingstone who no longer conceals his contempt for the inner cities people. Like the people who as individuals and families are engaged in daily struggle against corruption by the public bodies and their agencies and against the funded discrimination being practised by the ‘community centres’ which enjoy the approval and backing of the Blaired regime as it ‘runs’ the ‘centres’ in the Brick Lane and the Whitechapel areas of Tower Hamlets.
As has been shown by Livingstone’ show of defiance towards anyone who has had ‘the temerity to question him ‘ about the oppressive and anti-social Crossline shaft tunnel and other linked and lasting health hazards being planned to be caused to the people in the Brick Lane London E1 area.
One pertinent question that Livingstone-praising ‘ethnic-entrepreneurs’ currently operating in and around the Brick Lane area will have to address is this: whose idea was it to arrange for an ‘ethnic leaders propaganda dinner date with Ken Livingstone’ just before Livingstone faced the 10 June 2004 election to the office of London Mayor again ? And who gave the ‘hosts’ any authority that the community in the Brick Lane area wanted Livingstone to be given that platform and allowed that stunt as a ‘friend of the Brick Lane London E1 area and the community’ ?
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR ! (48)
By © Muhammad Haque
2158 Hrs GMT London
Wednesday 15 September 2004
The crassness of intentions and objectives behind those who have been peddling the plan for a Crossrail line allegedly to link west London to east London, becomes exposed almost n a daily basis.
When I first described their intentions as crass I was mainly thinking of the abject disregard by them for the people in the Brick Lane and the rest of the E1 area who would suffer severe dislocations, disruptions if the planned Crossrail shaft tunnel through the Brick Lane area went ahead.
With an increasingly wider look that I have been taking at the history, the antecedents and the ‘progress’ (or lack of it) of the ‘whole’ London Crossrail (there appear to be other ‘'Crossrail'’ stunts being staged in other relatively large cities in the UK outside of London) project, I am finding incontrovertible evidence to justify the project being consigned to oblivion now, before it issued by the profit-seeking, money-grabbing
gangs of robbers of well-organised professional public resource and public money in the UK. I am thinking of construction companies, building firms and companies and s n.
My call for the scrapping of the whole Crossrail project is based on the analysis which has been vindicated by a series of recent and current UK ‘projects.’. The latest support to my analysis is contained in the evidence of the belated recognition of the practice in Britain of systematic corruption of public life by the various companies and their allies. As published today (Wednesday 15 September 2004) in Edinburgh, the Fraser inquiry into the overrun in the costs of the building of the ‘Scottish Parliament’ in Holyrood in Edinburgh.
In the report, Fraser accuses almost every single category of peddler that in the pre-Holyrood building period , was claiming all manner of wonderful things in support of the project for that building.
When the construction of the Holyrood Scottish parliament work was given the go-ahead, the cost was quoted as being a tenth f what it went on to become !
How can that be right ?
How can that be ‘accountable’ ?
How can that be democratic?
Especially so when the most serious internal social crisis threatening the lives and welfare of so many people in Britain is worth £40 Billion... It is the looming pension crisis. And the ramifications over the rest of the UK society can only be fearfully anticipated ...
There is therefore no justification for the demand by the Crossrail lobby that the UK central Government make up the multi£Billion shortfall so that the disastrous Crossrail project can get the go-ahead !
The Crossrail lobby, --- whose ‘local agents’ in and ON the Tower Hamlets Council have spent several thousand hours (of publicly-paid for time in and ON Tower Hamlets Council) between them in taking part in the confection of lines of lies so that they would peddle the Crossrail-linked lies to mislead the people of the East End of London -- never let on, until now, that even some of their own ‘major funding partners’ would balk at the size of the sums that those partners themselves would be ‘expected’ to ‘chip’ in for the crassly conceived parts of the project to be made ‘viable’.
One such ‘dependable’ ‘reliable’ ‘solid’ ‘partner’ the Canary Wharf Group (CWG) , has again confirmed what I have already discussed in this series of commentary that it, the CWG would not agree to the funding to be paid for by collecting the share of the profits that they expect would accrue from the construction of the Crassrail project....
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR ! (47)
By © Muhammad Haque
2110 Hrs GMT
Tuesday 14 September 2004
The CBRUK Campaign against Crossrail planned attacks on the Brick Lane, London E1 area
‘Question time is a waste of time’
In the recklessly endangered era of political slime
infesting the inner cities with grubbiness and crime
the brigade of Blaired entrepreneurs run amuck
defying decency, denying rights, spreading shock
across the communities who daily lose out on respect
never knowing what comes next whether to expect
justice whether to abandon all hope about the future !
Life in the deprived inner cities now is total torture !
As if that were not unspeakable unbearable unutterable
enough, there is the secondary gang so insufferable
in their own posed faith in things British constitutional
they barefacedly invite the denied to the occasional
‘do’ the ‘event’ that they promise will deliver answer
to the pressing question of the day ‘only if you bother’
to ‘join us’ and turn up at the ‘appointed hall of fame’
where they further promise will be seen the big name
‘leader’ of our ‘metropolis this truly big greater London’
‘which big name leader will in fact answer any question
it is a truly public accessible open day and event
we are moved by the aura of ethicality ! The scent
of political transparency is all day wafting in the air
Come and join us and be in your fitting best attire’!
If these promoters of the big lie for famous politico
had honesty in them they would admit that the ego
of the corrupt the corrupting and the corrupted one
is bigger than that of all other known London ones
who are currently ‘official’ members of the GLA
would blindly back the big corrupter in order to delay
any ordinary grouping of Londoners seeking answers
to any genuine questions. The effort will end in tears!
KHOODEELAAR ! (46)
By © Muhammad Haque
2142 Hrs GMT London
Monday 13 September 2004
Being published only here and for the first time the daily political poetry about life in the UK in September 2004
Extracts from the epic poem
“
When bad people get hold of peoples’ wealth
they tend to lose all sense and take to stealth
as they rush around grabbing what they can !
When Tony Blair feigned to save us from ‘Ken’
Blair virtually used a slogan which Blair began
to mouth shortly after the go-ahead had been
given for there to be an ‘elected’ London Mayor
Blair brazenly bared his face saying ‘disaster’
at every stage managed opportunity to block
the ‘official nomination of Ken for Mayor’ ! Lock
stock and barrel of the by then Blaired Party
was placed under red alert to back Blair’s cry
that ‘Ken’ as mayor would in effect make us cry
with grief, disappointment, frustration and waste!
Little did Blair tell us of the ominous awful haste
which the people of London would be hit by
when Blair did a bare-faced turn and sit by
as he let the same ‘Ken’ as mayor get ‘re-voted’
for ‘Ken’ to smash up the weak who had revolted
against the Tories all those years ago in 1997
and now at this hard hour there is no one even
to notice that the alliance of evil the entente of sin
that Blair and ‘Ken’ have forged is more mean
than anything the weak, the vulnerable in London
had any reason to fear especially as based on
the utterances that Blair made as he faked
promises to rid the land of sleaze; Blair talked
incessantly of topics and items the people knew
were in need of being tackled. Blair also knew
as he faked and as he bluffed and as he smirked
that he had already recckied the spot and parked
the vehicle in which he would stage his own exit
as soon as he, Blair, had staged the makeshift
display of being accessible and sleaze-free
Never in all that time was there visible any debris
of so much ill-ambitions, so much ill-will to people
as a whole and to London’s people whose sole
political desire was to be left alone to get on
with what life otherwise had in store! No one
ever suspected Blair would not only let ‘Ken’ in
but he would let ‘Ken’ himself set in train
a scheme here and scam there to drain
the already deprived people of inner London
of what they had and push them to abandon
their hard earned homes, hard-built shops
and feel under pressure to forget the crops
of what for them was the yield of their ‘land’ !
Nobody ever thought they would see this band
of anti-social thuggery being got together
by Blair and “Ken” seeking to put asunder
so much hard work so many hopes of the denied
persons, families, children ! The pair in sin defied
all ethics morality and sense of fairness
as they embarked on lying about how to harness
the oppressor greedy profit-seeking ‘ruler’ boss
City of London Corporation and its lobby to toss
away centuries of oppressive habits and give up
what they most of all craved: a place to carve up
and exploit and rob from the legitimate community!
How gross of the duo to feign any affinity
with the inner city areas including Brick Lane
in and around which there does still remain
a most vibrant alive human community
that would perish without a life-keeping amenity
that is the essence of a true human community...”
These extracts from ‘KHOODEELAAR ! The epic poem by MUHAMMAD HAQUE were written in London between 2040 and 2142 Hrs GMT
on Monday 13 September 2004
KHOODEELAAR ! (45)
By © Muhammad Haque
2014 Hrs GMT London Sunday 12 September 2004
The CBRUK campaign against the planned Crossrail hole attacks on the Brick Lane and E1 area
How crass can the so-called Transport For London be !
Even TESCO is crying (!) ‘unfair’ against the Crossrail funding lunacy !
Amazing !
They don’t say a word abut the lunacy of uprooting people from their homes, their little shops and their community in the Brick Lane area !
The Tories’ ideological lobby the Social Market Foundation has confirmed that Transport for London asked the property companies, including the multinationals “TESCO, Canary Wharf, FPD Savills and British Land” to raise funds by imposing a tax on “on the profits made on nearby property when railways are built - one method put forward by Transport for London to pay for projects like Crossrail. ”
The Social Market Foundation (SMF) has now produced a discussion of the issue in a pamphlet they promoted on 9 September 2004. Says the SMF that “TESCO, Canary Wharf, FPD Savills and British Land” “argue that it is impossible to judge whether property price rises are due to a new railway line or the normal property cycle. Taxing them, therefore, is arbitrary and unfair.”
How odd that some of the UK’s most powerful money-grabbing outfits fits themselves are complaining about unfairness about the proposal on raising funds for the Crossrail disaster yet none of the ‘local’ ‘expected’ ‘public representatives’ on Tower Hamlets Council has said a word in defence of the families and the people that stand to lose what small security of home, of family housing, of small shops and the community they now have in the affected parts of the Brick lane which will be destroyed if the Crossrail hole plan is allowed to go ahead !
Doesn’t it prove, one more time, that Brick Lane area has been ‘selected’ for the planned destruction because those who mace the decision to crush the community’s environment, what 'peace' and 'quiet' there is, what environmental standard there still is, thought that the people in the Brick Lane area are not ‘important enough’ and that the allegedly unimportant people can be treated in the oppressive way so long as the looters of the expected profit from the crassly conceived Crossrail project could get away with bagging the public funding from the UK Government for the whole unwise adventure !
It is now increasingly clear that the expectant ‘looters of the public cash and contracts and deals off the proposed Crossrail capitalistic bonanza for the big-companies’ are getting caught up in the twists of their own antisocial greed and desires !
How can the people who could put the now-exposed and rejected proposal to TESCO et al, be trusted to care at all about the Brick Lane area and the welfare of the people in the Brick Lane area ?
After all, Transport for London is an out and out opportunistic outfit that cares only for the careers of those who confected that outfit!
And these careerists would never even notice that peoples lives were undermined by their planned ramming of the crass railway line through the Brick Lane area...
Against all the facts so far analysed of the crassness of the Crossrail lobby, the sheer banality of their staging an increasingly desperate ‘insultation’ charade around the Brick Lane area has become too monumental a blot on the social landscape in the East End for it to be allowed to remain without detailed comments.
I start those comments which are to appear here on Tuesday 14 September 2004
[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR (44) PLUS
KHOODEELAAR ! (43)
By © Muhammad Haque
2030 Hrs GMT London Friday 10 September 2004
Crass talking Crossrail project lobby is rebuffed again by both the multinational corporations and by UK Transport Secretary Alistair Darling. Crossrail plot to make a treble gain at the expense of the East End people they push and keep in poverty ! The core contradiction of capitalistic ‘economics’ rears its utterly ugly head again.
In the week which the mentally servile and ethically bankrupt political journalists on the ‘mainstream’ British media organisations spent in sound-ly and visual-ly licking the various parts of the propaganda bodies of a variety of Tony Blair’s peddlers of poisonous gossip, confirmation came again that it is a very crass thing for any one to claim to ‘liberate’ the victims of their exploitation while at the same time seeking quite openly to mug them of all their pennies !
How can these so-called experts and so-called technically competent and knowledgeable persons who are kept in their various posts to promote the lies that the planned attack on the community via Crossrail will in fact be ‘a good thing’ for the same community expect anyone with any modicum of ordinary understanding take them seriously ?
Let alone believe what they say ?
Far less have any respect for their careerist lynx and lies ?
It is clear that even TESCO, which appears to know more about the trick of making vast profit by luring masses and masses of people in low income to shop in their stores and to buy stiff from TESCO’s other outfits , finds the Crossrail ‘case’ over-stated and over-sold and unconvincing.
Hence TESCO’s agreement with some other multinational profit-seeking outfits who have to Blair and Livingstone that the latter’s latest ploy to fill the multi£Billion funding gap for Crossrail is a non-starter !
Shows just how corrupt those crass- talking fiddlers of public funds have been when they have promised the East Enders the earth and boldly claimed that
the poverty, the deprivation, the social exclusion, the discrimination, the homelessness, the educational underachievement, the barriers, the obstructions that daily affect the lives of families and persons in and around areas like the Brick Lane area will evaporate and ‘nearest thing to heaven on earth’ will be ushered in the East End for all the deprived and the disenfranchised and denied. How ? Just let the fiddlers dig in the East End and run this giant Crossrail project through here !
No case has been made in the mysterious meetings which the Tower hamlets Councillors ‘in the controlling’ Blaired Labour Group have been having for the best part of the past two years with a variety of Crossrail-peddling of characters who have been busy lobbying for the Crossrail project.
I have yet to receive or SEE a single answer to some of the crucial economic and constitutional questions which I addressed to those councillors and also published in the CBRUK campaign bulletin KHOODEELAAR in May 2004.
In a addition to that, the Committee for Bangladeshis’ Rights in the UK (CBRUK) had also pressed Tower hamlets Council to tell the truth about what their role had been in allowing the anti-social plan by Crassrail to be rammed through the East End.
KHOODEELAAR published several versions of a CBRUK statement, including the following one:-
CBRUK demands end to Tower Hamlets Council colluding in attacks on the local community by Crossrail
London Friday 9 April 2004:
The Committee for Bangladeshis’ Rights in the UK (CBRUK) has told Christine Gilbert the Chief Executive of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council that that Council must end all clandestine links with the Crossrail and that in particular the Council mist tell the full facts to the local community of the Council's links with the Crossrail so far.
The demand to Christine Gilbert follows discovery of evidence by CBRUK that contrary to some of the casually made statements in the local area by a number of persons claiming to represent Tower Hamlets Council, the Council has been involved in a series of secret discussions with Crossrail.
_________
In March 2004 CBRUK write to Gordon Brown the Chancellor of the Exchequer in March 2004 and pointed out to him some central absurdities inherent in the Crossrail project and plan.
“Gordon Brown the Chancellor of the Exchequer must reject Crossrail's plan to dig the damaging hole in the Brick Lane area in the East End of London - CBRUK backs local demand. We write to put to you our own demand and the demand of the local people in the Brick Lane area that you reject Crossrail's plan to dig the lethal and antisocial hole in the Brick Lane area. .. Our view is that there is no economic let alone social justification for allowing Crossrail to inflict the harm on this most deprived part of inner London.
Crossrail's planned digging of the hole in the Brick Lane area will severely disrupt lives, destroy livelihoods and deprive the already multiply ply deprived local community in the East End of London even further. We ask Gordon Brown the Chancellor of the Exchequer to say NO to the Crossrail plan for digging the hole in the Brick Lane area.
We point out the fact that the contempt shown towards the people of the Brick Lane in the Crossrail plan is to be contrasted with the consideration Crossrail have shown to people or even empty lands in parts of London that Crossrail know to be either used by or owned by "prosperous' people.
s making the people in the Brick Lane area more deprived and more destabilised the way forward for the inner cities under Gordon Brown the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s ‘Vision’ ? Families in low income, struggling to make ends meet with the very limited sources of income, are going to be made destitute under the planned Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane area. Small businesses, most of which are only viable because of the space they have been able to use in the area, face being annihilated and dug out of existence - literally. Is that the way to 'encourage ' enterprise by people with limited income but with confident sense of enterprise, Gordon? When you have accepted the 'expert's report on the need for expansion in housing provisions, as part of the economic future of the country, how can that programme sit easily with your possibly allowing the making of families and persons homeless and dislocated in the EAST END of London ?
SAY NO TO Crossrail’s plan to dig a big hole in the Brick Lane area. If they 'must' dig a big hole then let them dig it where the vulnerable and the deprived don't get affected...”
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR ! (42)
By © Muhammad Haque
2140 Hrs GMT London Thursday September 2004
Blair hijacks ‘local’ Councils, holds them in Ken Livingstone’s Sit-ye Hall for a day until they agree to do whatever Blair and Livingstone crave !
What does Blair want from the ‘local’ ‘planning authority’ ?
Blair wants from Tower Hamlets Council total complicity !
Blair gets from Tower Hamlets Council utter loyalty !
Blair gets from Tower Hamlets Council no claim to dignity!
What did Blair want from those big City multinationals?
Whatever Blair wanted was denied him by professionals !
The professionals who own and use and run TESCO
They control the banks and don’t do to Blair’s say -so !
So why did Tower Hamlets Council fall so readily in line?
that is how Blaired Councils behave, they never decline
the authority of the authoritarian now holding Party to ransom
Four ‘local’ Councils bowed to the odd pair Tony and Livingstone
As they bowed to the odd pair the ‘local’ Councils acted as colonies
of ‘old’ which have now been revived in the inner cities ! Felonies
against the people and democracy are blatantly on today’s agenda
which Blair is pushing ahead as the ‘local Councils’ surrender
to Blair’s every whim and every caprice and very craze every lust
making sure local people know never to place in Councils ANY trust !...”
Extracts from
KHOODEELAAR !
The epic poem in defence of the Brick Lane area and the rest of the East End against the Blaired attacks via Crossrail and assorted other degeneration projects and lies against the local people being peddled and pushed through and sold by Ken Livingstone ...
These extracts were written at 2140 Hrs GMT within minutes of the public announcement from Sit-ye Hall that the four local Councils had bowed to the diktat of the Blairite regime now being imposed on the London peoples by Ken Livingstone
Origination and production by CBRUK in associated with Sylhetworldtexts
KHOODEELAAR ! (41)
BY © Muhammad Haque
2252 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 8 September 2004
Blair and Livingstone Crass idea on Crossrail REJECTED by TESCO and some other big profiteers from the planned Crossrail project lootery at the expense of the inner city people of London !!!!
The City of London Corporation's pet ‘think-tank’ has let out the fact that TESCO, canary Wharf Group and a number of similarly big multinational big plotters on looting the people by pushing the Crossrail rail through East End have said NO to one of Tony Blair’s and Ken Livingstone's ‘half-baked’; fund-raising (to £Billions) ideas. A hefty tax on property.
I examine this latest end to another of Ken Livingstone's idiots Blaired ‘visions’ (that pun is my instant creation !) in my commentary here on Friday 10 September 2004.
KHOODEELAAR ! (40)
By © Muhammad Haque
2148 Hrs GMT London
Wednesday 8 September 2004
The planned Crossrail attack on the homes, lives, livelihoods, shops, businesses and the overall present health and future well-being of the people and the community in the Brick Lane area is an attack that is only possible to be carried out if the local Tower Hamlets Borough Council goes along with the planned attack.
All signs so far point to the local Tower Hamlets Borough Council being more than willing in going along with the planned Crossrail attack.
Not only that, the Tower Hamlets Borough Council has to date (8 September 2004) paid a large number of its sitting councillors for ‘attending to council business’ which ‘business’ has included the matter of the Crossrail ‘route’.
To date, neither the Council as a whole nor its present chief employee, Christine Gilbert, has made any information available to the community about what it is that the Council has been ‘discussion’ with the Crossrail lobby.
This is not unrelated to what is about to be confirmed in the near future following the definitely NOVEL (=new) sort of electoral outcome of the by-election scheduled to take place in a few hours on Thursday 9 September 2004 for the ‘Isle of Dogs’ Council ward of Millwall in the Tower Hamlets Borough Council.
What is likely to be confirmed by ‘official’ bureaucratic elements and conduct’ following and around the 9 September 2004 Millwall by-election is the fact - known to closely attentive observers over the past at least two decades - that the present Tower Hamlets Borough Council has been reduced to even lesser political substance by the Blaired elements who have been put in control of the Tower Hamlets Council than have been the cases with a large number of other INNER CITY local borough Councils across the UK.
Electoral laws do not permit any discussion of some core aspects of the evidence so close to ‘polling day’. I intend to deal with those on Friday or Saturday of this week (10 and 11 September 2004).
In the meantime, the hustings that HAVE taken place in the past 3 weeks in the actual Millwall Council ward, indicate one thing and this is that the members of the particular population who have been pushed into and kept in poverty there are UNLIKELY to feel confident about Tower Hamlets Borough Council still being controlled by any Blaired or similarly ideologically mechanically oppressive and treacherous grouping of councillors after the next scheduled local Council election (set to take place in May 2006).
The impoverished people also suffer from poor level of recognition by employees of the Tower Hamlets Council.
And those employees include a large number of ‘officer’ ‘category’ post-holders !
That word ‘officer’ is so corrupting and protective of corrupt persons and activities that it must be replaced with a more accurate and less offensive term.
The East London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council’s ‘officer’ employees are currently being paid at public expense - and at the expense of the more deprived part of the Borough's population that also contains he larger parts of the Seelotee community in Tower Hamlets - to actually break up the structure of services and facilities that belonged to the people and to the Council in the past.
These ‘officer’-employees are in fact being used as the agents who make up gangs of ‘white-collar’ handy-persons serving the purposes and working to the de facto orders and agendas of organised, capitalist thieves and anti-social robbers against the local communities in the East End.
These ‘Council’ ‘officers’ are engaged in handing over those resources that are most needed by the most needy and the most disadvantaged persons and families in Tower Hamlets.
It is that category which contains the largest number of Bangladeshis.
Just as it does in the Brick lane area where the Crossrail planned attack is being facilitated and lobbied for by the controlling Blare Group of Labour Councillors on tower Hamlets Council.
The single largest chunk of the property of the Council that is of the people of Tower Hamlets had been the Council’s HOUSING Stock.
That stock is being robbed from the people.
And the robbery is taking place with the Tower Hamlets Council acting as the main aider and abetter and the facilitator.
Before the act. During the act and after the act.
So what is planned by Crossrail against the Brick Lane area and community is neither ‘unique’ nor surprising, given that the entirety of the current plasticised
political agenda being mechanically ratified by the Tower Hamlets Borough Council.
The key instrument the Tower Hamlets Council is using is what sued to be called local control over ‘development’ planning.
At robotic formal meetings and other bureaucratised procedural events held in the largely un-public ‘public setting’ of the Mulberry Place in the really remote and inaccessible (for the utter majority of the people from ALL parts of what is still the Borough of Tower Hamlets) location which could only have been designed and sited with the object of creating a physical barrier between that location and any ordinary member of the ordinary population in the inner city Borough.
When it comes to the theoretical and the hypothetical question of all ‘electors being equal under the law’ in so far as their entitlement is concerned to make a choice at polling day between candidates seeking their vote, the poorer the economic and the consequent social condition of an elector, the less likely are they to be really significantly electorally active.
This is true of the Millwall ward as it is of the Brick Lane area.
And therein lies a secret about a weapon of theft that the Blaired gangs have been using against the very people.
The Blaired gangs have been peddling the antidemocratic, untrue and the plainly poisonous lie that bringing Crossrail to be run and tunnelled over the Brick Lane area and the relevant remainder of the East End of London would create ‘regeneration’.
What do they mean by that word ‘regeneration’ ?
It is a word that has no meaning.
Except a meaning of and in DEGENERATION.
That is why I had devised the analytical substitute DEGENERATION all those years ago.
The conceptual contradictions in the word ‘regeneration’ were forced into focus at least in my observation by the misdeeds that were being brazenly got upto and foisted on the inner cities across the UK by the unlamented Margaret Hilda Roberts (Thatcher)
When Margaret Hilda made that creepy stride up those shaking stairs in what used to be the ‘Conservative Central Office’ (now more aptly referable to as the COMPLETELY COLLAPSING Organisation) closely followed by her Dracula-Guard (Norman Tebbit) putting on his grotesquely smug face of hatred, she must have known that she was going to make a most injuriously hurtful statement to mock and ridicule the most suffocated of the ms of her violations already heaped on thousands of poor people and deprived families across the inner cities.
She said that she was going to sort out those ‘inner cites’ !
And God did she try !
She soon unleashed the poll tax on the people.....
Just as Margaret Hilda ‘sorted out’ those ‘inner cities’ so has her ideological successor Tony Blair. And the horrors that Blair has unleashed against communities like the one in the Brick Lane area are not at all confined to just the threatened Crossrail tunnel and environmental nightmare posed by the Crossrail plan.
As all the LATEST and published indices of the UK Government’s own statistical units and surveys confirm, the Brick Lane are has a community that is, has been and is likely in the foreseeable future to remain one of the most economically, socially deprived parts of the UK population
This is a serious and worrying situation for the whole of the deprived peoples. And it applies to the Bangladeshis just as much as it does to the non-Bangladeshi recipients of the economic and social deprivation in the Brick Lane area and in the rest of the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
How then is it that no less a reactionary and oppressive instrument of British discrimination, disparity and bias and racism than the Confederation of British Industries (CBI) had its big propaganda event staged on Tuesday 7 September 2004 by abusing the Bangladeshi identity of the present Mulberry School in the E1 area ?
What was the CBI ‘celebrating’ in the E1 area and since when had the CBI become real ‘pals’ and ‘friends and 'business partners' and 'Industry partners' ’ of so many ‘families’ of so universally recognised and quoted poverty stricken children and girls ?
How accurate a pre-view of what Crossrail is plotting against the Brick Lane area was the CBI’s prancing on the back of the Mulberry School on Tuesday 7 September 2004 ?
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR ! (39)
By © Muhammad Haque
1848 Hrs GMT London
Tuesday 7 September 2004
Time to stop the degenerating lies against the people of the East End of London . Even the conservative ‘Tribune’ backs those who question the hype about Crossrail and about the Olympic bid ‘2012’ !
When even the disturbingly un-radical UK political title Tribune (which is wrongly described in Britain as a left wing publication in British politics) starts to express reservations about the over-blown over-hyped London Olympic bid 2012 and the routinely propaganda-linked Crossrail project then it would wise indeed for the peddlers of the lies about regeneration in the East End to stop uttering any more lies.
Tribune has joined - belated, in my view - the small band of relatively better informed commentators of the ‘London political scene’ who are accurately warning the Blair administration against the irresponsible and false promotion of the twin wasters of public resources, the Olympic Bid 2012 and the Crossrail (Cross London railway) project.
I shall go into some details about those NEW warnings on this site to be published on Thursday 9 September 2004.
It is worth saying in advance of my particular longer review (due to appear here on 9 September 2004) that whatever the one-time Olympic medal winner Sebastian Coe has been scripted to utter about either the Olympic Bid or about the alleged ‘benefits to East London’ that would flow from a ‘successful London Bid to host the 2012 Olympic in this city’ can only have been put into his propaganda mouth by those who have not the knowledge of what the East End is like economically.
Or socially and environmentally .
Or what it has been like for decades.
Or why the East End of London UK has been the way it has been socially, economically and environmentally for so long despite periodic utterances of idiotic patronising lies by sets and successions of careerists over decades - or have no resource for the ordinary people who are engaged in daily struggle in the East End against the products, symbols and consequences of the agenda of lies and lying that control the accesses and the freedoms of the vast majority of the people of London’s East End.
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR (38) PLUS
KHOODEELAAR ! (37)
Campaign against the Crossrail plan of attacks on the Brick Lane, E1 area in London’s East End continues.
By © Muhammad Haque
2120 Hrs GMT
London Monday 06 September 2004
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
Ee-kaigoo zeiggai koi seelotee maat taar mookho aai-na?
ee-ggei oukhaan koibonee hei zoodee zaagah-pfai-naa?
(To be continued)
These extracts from
KHOODEELAAR The epic poem in defence of the
people and the community of
the East End of London
By © Muhammad Haque
Written on Monday 6 September 2004
KHOODEELAAR ! (36)
Community Say No to Crossrail planned attack on the Brick Lane, E1 area
By © Muhammad Haque
2220 Hrs GMT London Sunday 5 September 2004
Keeta Koi Kouncillor-ay
Keeta Koi empee-ay
Keeta Koi Korosrell-ay
Keeta Koi theekadaar-ay?
Keeta Koi dhookadaar-ay?
Keeta Koi salla dayra-ay?
Keeta Koi shartho-tookao-rai?
Keeta Koi dumookh-alai?
Keeta Koi teenmookh-alai?
KHOODEELAAR !(35)
Community Say No to Crossrail planned attack on the Brick Lane, E1 area
By © Muhammad Haque
2240 Hrs GMT London Thursday 2 September 2004
CBRUK mass signature campaign against Crossrail plan starts
Among those who have already signed the CBRUK petition against the Crossrail planned attack are active members of the East London Youth Organisation, small business owners in the Hanbury Street, members of the housing m education and anti-discrimination campaigns of the past two decades in the East London borough of Tower Hamlets.
The CBRUK mass signature campaign supporting a formal petition to be submitted to the UK Parliament was launched in the Hanbury Street in the evening of Wednesday 1 September 2004.
The texts below are being currently supported in the signature campaign. Other materials are set o be distributed in the immediate area which is affected by the planned Crossrail attacks.
“
PETITION TO UK PARLIAMENT Organised by © CBRUK London September 2004
?
© Muhammad Haque / CBRUK London 1 September 2004
We the undersigned residents, tenants in the Hanbury Street, Princelet Street and other members of the community and residents of other streets in the Brick Lane area, London E1 and members of the linked community who use and rely on the amenities and facilities and services in and around the Brick lane area and members of the various voluntary, community, social, cultural and religious organisations in the Brick lane and adjoining area are opposed to the planned tunnelling by Crossrail through this area and that we are totally concerned about the destructive effects the planned tunnelling and related work will cause to the safety of children, the health of children, vulnerable adults, multiply-deprived families and women and the devastating effect on the homes, the families and on the existing businesses, shops and the environment and we support this petition and we support the demands represented in this petition and in the accompanying CBRUK campaign and representation to the UK Parliament asking that Parliament that they take into full and truthful and manifest account all the implications and all the ramifications that the plans will have against social inclusion, social cohesion, social stability, and we draw the UK parliament’s attention to the conflict the proposed Crossrail work will create and represent with UK’s treaty and legislative commitments to fairness, justice and quality for all the people as provided for and enshrined in the European Convention for Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and in particular for all the peoples in deprived and disenfranchised communities like the one that exists in the Brick Lane area and we ask the UK Parliament to NOT agree any Crossrail attacks or operations that violate, affect or undermine or devastate the community in the Brick Lane and in the rest of the E1 area in London
Name home/business address Signature Date
________________________________________________________________
1
”
The CBRUK Campaign in defence of the Brick Lane area against the Crossrail planned attack is being taken to the streets in the rest of the E1 area starting this weekend (Saturday 4 September 2004 onwards)
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR !(34)
Why does JOHN Biggs utter lies for deprivation?
By © Muhammad Haque
1140 Hrs GMT London Thursday 2 September 2004
‘East London’ ‘GLA’ man JOHN Biggs must stop talking lies that make deprivation sound like an adorable pet ! or is Biggs talking crassly of deprivation as if Biggs NEEDS there to be a deprived condition so he can make periodic mileage out of the suffering of the people kept in and pushed into deprivation?
CBRUK defence of Brick Lane issues a final word of advice to glib-talking ‘ JOHN Biggs’, GLA ‘member’ for the insulted constituency of East London - Brick Lane Why JOHN Biggs must learn to stop talking crass lies about deprivation in the East End
The Greater London Assembly is another wasteful, undemocratic, anti-social imposition on the people of London who neither asked for it nor have derived any measurable social benefit from its existence. The losses are massive. The GLA is in a building that was not necessary.
The GLA edifice was built at huge cost to the people of London and for the petty careerist strategic reasons that had more to do with the career plans of Tony Blair et al than to do with any real issues of overcoming the long-standing denial, hardship, deprivation that hundreds of thousands of London families, persons suffer and endure every day.
Nowhere more so than in the East End of London.
This part of London where Brick Lane is, is formally ‘represented’ on the GLA by this very unrepresenting and UNREPRESENTATIVE ‘member’ called JOHN Biggs.
In fact, the record of John Biggs so far speaks volumes to justify the observation that John Biggs was never politically capable of representing the East End of London on any publicly paid-for and publicly-maintained forum.
Neither when he was being paid as a councillor on Tower Hamlets Council nor in his current paid post as GLA member for Tower Hamlets area.
Biggs has NO RECORD OF EVER IN THE ENTIRETY OF HIS CAREER AS PUBLICLY PAID LOCAL COUNCIL (and GLA) ‘politician’ (!!!!) made a single intervention on behalf of the people on any issue that affects the people as opposed to issues that have been of ‘relevance to and of interest to’ the plans and options and objectives of identifiable and implied bureaucrats and collections of vested interests concerned.
He has sought to disguise those occasions when he has ‘played his part’ in voting or speaking on a topic as being ‘beneficial to the local community’ whereas the truth of his ‘interest’, his loyalty and his affiliation has been, without exception, linked with his career, his career plan and his need to remain in publicly paid career no matter how wrong he has been and how unfit his political role has been in the context of the vast and widening gap of economic, social, gap and deprivation in the East End.
In fact, Biggs has been party to the propaganda campaigns in support of creating new types and methods of deprivation. His language gives the game away as to who Biggs has been serving.
Biggs has not been serving the ‘electors’ of any part of inner city Tower Hamlets. He has been supporting the interest of BIG Business.
What an irony there !
Biggs has used the tell-tale word ‘challenge’ in relation to what the Big Business think of the people in the eats who are going to be made even more deprived than is the case already.
Biggs as a paid member on the GLA is now playing a key role in the Big Business plan to bring more deprivation to the Brick Lane area by lobbying for Crossrail.
In one of the plastic and crassly-composed publicly shorts for the Crossrail plan in violation of the people and the community in the Brick lane area, Biggs lends his name to the following (which I saw at 1030 Hrs GMT today Thursday 2 September 2004)
“Crossrail’s interchange with the East London Line will give easy transport access from our most deprived areas to the most dynamic business districts.”
1. What DOES Biggs mean by ‘our most deprived areas’ ?
2. Who has Biggs got with him involved in the maintenance and in the marking as their political property of these ‘our most deprived ‘ areas ?
3. Why does Biggs not stay totally quiet instead of uttering such poisonous outrage against the affected people in the East End that make whatever pretence he may think he is making about representing the needs, rights and entitlements of the people in the electoral constituency which he daily abuses, fails, misrepresents and mis-describes by being in office as a GLA member about ?
4. Will Biggs have the moral courage to actually identify or name or describe adequately, truthfully and honestly who these implied others WITH HIM are (that make up the ‘our most deprived areas’ reference and ) who consider, as he has exhibited he considers it to be a positive thing to have deprivation in the East End of London ?
5. Are these JOHN Biggs-our deprived areas in existence because of the role played by JOHN Biggs in keeping these areas deprived ?
6. What does Biggs know of what ‘deprived areas’ do to the people who have to live in the deprivation?
7. Does Biggs care to find out ?
8. If so, what has he done to find out what deprivation does to people who are ‘encouraged’ by the likes of him to ‘be happy to be in deprived conditions/’?
9. When was the last time that Biggs thought about society and other than about the brazenly irresponsible career that he has been feathering for the past 20 years or so in ‘local politics’?
10.Why does Biggs think that it is okay to deny people in East London what home they have, what security they have, what future they have ?
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR !(33)
KHOODEELAAR [34]
By Muhammad Haque
2240 Hrs GMT London
Tuesday 31 August 2004
The Committee for Bangladeshis’ Rights in the UK (CBRUK) this week agreed the contents of the petition that is going to be submitted to the UK Parliament in advance of the hybrid parliamentary Bill which Transport Secretary Alistair darling stated in July would be presented to Parliament
The hybrid Bill must not be allowed to g through the UK Parliament without that formal legislative body being made fully and adequately ware of the destruction the Crossrail plan would cause to one of the most deprived communities in all of the UK.
The CBRUK petition is phrased in the context of all relevant events that have taken place in the months since I attended a semi-public meeting held at the ‘Montefiore Centre’ in the corner of Hanbury and Deal Streets in January 2004 when I first put the argument in public for the politicisation of the campaign against the Crossrail plan. I again reinforced the arguments for political opposition to the Crossrail plan when I spoke very briefly at the same building where another semi-public meeting took pace on 26 May 2004.
Texts of the CBRUK Petition to UK parliament against the Crossrail plan attacking the lives, livelihoods an safety, health f the community in the Brick Lane area in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets
We the undersigned residents, tenants in the Hanbury Street, Princelet Street and other members of the community and residents an residents of other streets in the Brick lane area, London E1, are opposed to the planned tunnelling by Crossrail through this area and that we are totally concerned about the destructive effects the planned tunnelling and related work will cause to the safety of children, the health of children, vulnerable adults,, multiply deprived families and women and the devastating effect on the existing businesses, shops and homes and the environment and we demand of the UK Parliament they take into full and truthful and manifest account all the implication and all the ramifications that the plans will have against social inclusion, social cohesion, social stability, and against all known declarations by the UK parliament of commitments to fairness, justice and quality for all the people and in keeping with the European Conventions for Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and in particular for all the peoples in deprived and disenfranchised communities like the one that exists in the Brick Lane area ...
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR !(32)
By © Muhammad Haque
2100 Hrs GMT London Sunday 29 August 2004
Eetayi zay amraar shaaraa Beerik Lane eelakka naash koreelaar okta bondd kortam koree ebla aamraa peedeeshon laagai aar...hokhlay meeleea dostokhot dayukka apfanaara
STOP THE Planned Crossrail attack on the Brick lane, E1 area CBRUK starting mass signature campaign this week
Eetayi zay amraar shaaraa Beerik Lane eelakka naash koreelaar okta bondd kortam koree ebla aamraa peedeeshon laagai-aar...
CBRUK is launching a campaign of collection mass signatures to a petition against the planned Crossrail attack on the Brick Lane E1 area. Copies of the petition will be available during the week starting on Tuesday 31 August 2004.
(The texts of the petition and other facts to be posted on this site on 1 September 2004
KHOODEELAAR (31)
By © Muhammad Haque
2230 Hrs GMT
London Saturday 28 August 2004
THE crassness of the Crassrail plan is again exposed by the dishonest plug given it by some on the UK ‘left’ whose only reason for ‘supporting’ the Crass-rail idea is these alleged UK ‘leftists’ alleged recollection of the alleged socialist role played by the former Greater London Council’s coup leader ken Livingstone.
Livingstone is now a ferociously defiant member of Tony Blair’s brigade. So confident is Livingstone in his calculation (and Livingstone is nothing if he is not calculating) about being able to continue to con the potential electors bothering to turn up at any foreseeable poll for the office of Mayor of London that he is blasé about his backing of the planned attack via Crossrail on the people of the East End of London.
Livingstone has not apologised for his remark a year or so ago that he backs Crassrail because that was the way to combine the City of London and Canary Wharf.
In that blasé but revealing statement uttered by Livingstone, the so-called Red ken came across as a very sad case of a very confused man who neither was red nor was a socialist but was a crafty careerists who only knew a few slogans that he would mouth whenever the occasion suited such utterance.
That he has committed a lethal violation of the rights of the entire population of low income East End London and has clued with succession of City of London and Capitalist scams and schemes to uproot the poor people and to rob them of their land and homes, is most clearly seen in the blatant bulldozer of lies that he is now driving with the help of the BBC and of all ‘newspapers’. the ‘once communist’ (!!!!) ‘daily’ Morning Star
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR (30)
Meesa maatra councillor-ray aamra koono pfermisson deesee naa !
By Muhammad Haque
2344 Hrs GMT
London Friday 27 August 2004
The lies for the Crossrail lobby being perpetrated by at least one Tower Hamlets councillor must be accounted for and to the people of Tower Hamlets
Who in Tower Hamlets Council will own up to the confection of the lie about Crossrail plan ?
Who gave any Tower Hamlets Councillor the authority to use their position as Councillor as Tower Hamlets councillor to MAKE any representation in support of the Crossrail lobby ?
Who in that Council was authorised by what constitutional body representing the preferences of the people in the Borough to make what pro-active DEMAND FOR THE ALLOCATION OF UK CENTRAL GOVERNMENT FUNDS FOR THE Crossrail project?
Who gave ANY Current Tower Hamlets Councillor ANY even HINT that the people whose lives, livelihoods and stability, security community health would be disrupted destroyed and destabilised and people who would be made destitute if he panned Crossrail route went through the Brick Lane area would approval of ANY Tower Hamlets councillor pretending to represent those people and the community when the councillor concerned made the false representation on record and took part in a totally corrupt bureaucratic display suggesting that the Crossrail project was at all anywhere on the agenda of the utter, the vast, the overwhelming majority of the people in the ordinary population and among the electorate in the LB Tower Hamlets ?
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR [29] By © Muhammad Haque 2250 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 24 August 2004
Further confirmation of the justness of the CBRUK campaign in defence of the Brick Lane area against the Crossrail plan of attack on the Brick Lane area community
Crass claim of ‘regeneration’ by ‘Crossrail’ in the East End of London dealt another serious blow - by the facts of the Greek LOSSES to the tunes of £billions and the denunciation by ordinary Greek folk of the extravagant waste in the pursuit of empty glory.
Do ordinary East Enders want to pay for a bunch of self-seekers having a good time in Brussels at the expense of poverty stricken families in the East End ?
The ‘surprise’ demonstration by an admittedly small number of individuals outside the so-called London City hall on Tuesday 24 August 2004 denouncing the propaganda line for a London bid for the 2012 Olympic Games confirms once against that any one with any sense of economic common sense abut the macro economy is bound to balk at the hype attaching to that over-rated 2012 Olympic Games bid for London .
The fact that Tuesday’s ‘demo’ was treated more as a stunt by the Blair-promoting BBC does not meant at all that the opposition that is now beginning to be openly shown against the grotesque bid has more sense than is admitted by the self-seeking. ignorant and immature 2012 London bid brigade being kept in ‘jobs’ at public expense.
The cost of hosting the Olympic Games are excessive. Just like the Greeks are finding out to their cost, literally. And as a minor report shown on BBC TV outfit (contrary to the Blaired diktat now effectively ruling over the BBC news and editorial agenda generally ) on Tuesday 24 August 2004, confirmed, most ordinary Greek are not only unimpressed by the Greek Olympic lobby’s outlandish claims of achievement, they are positively hostile to any , even the most minor, suggestion that the Greek hosting of the 2004 Games has brought any economic or other tangible or lasting or measurable gains for the Greek people.
the lesson is most apt and it must be applied to the London brigade.
London’s communities such as the East End community, who are being lied to and lied about by the 2012 bid brigade, must stand up and speak up now. before it is to late.
That is the right way to undermine the corrupt argument being crassly promoted for the ramming of a Crossrail line that includes the planned destruction of substantial parts of the Brick lane and the rest of the London E1 area.
(To be continued)
Why I am writing epic poem KHOODEELAAR (28) in defence of the Brick Lane area and against the Crossrail plan
by © Muhammad Haque
2040 Hrs GMT London Sunday 22 August 2004
I wrote this part of my epic poem KHOODEELAAR about the degeneration of London
on 31 January 2004.
This was literally within minutes after attending the first ‘community’ meeting in the Brick Lane area held against the proposed Crossrail violations of the area.
I wrote this part by combining the thoughts and feelings of the whole community as felt by the narrator and interrogator whom I poetically imagined was either a very neglected Bangladeshi local person in the Brick Lane area in London’s East End Borough of Tower Hamlets.
I imagined him to be heading a sizeable family of demanding members whose basic needs were already left unmet, whose physical image in the neighbourhood was already undermined by a plethora bread and butter problems, who was nowhere near treated with the dignity that he deserved, whose freedom of movement in his own neighbourhood was restricted by the problems caused directly by the local Tower Hamlets council, whose dreams and hopes were daily shattered by the lack of recognition by the agencies set up and kept in continuous funding by the local authority as well as by the UK central Government.........The narrator was also a non-Bangladeshi, multi-ethnic member of the Brick Lane community of people with other backgrounds, of culture, language and thoughts. And hopes.
At the meeting on 31 January 2004, it was clear from the various factual presentations regarding the particular Crossrail plan (against the Brick lane area community) and the destructive effects of the plan on the Brick Lane area, that the key decisions for the attacks had been made by persons who had no respect for the rights of the people in the Brick Lane area. My view as put to that first meeting against the plans attacking the Brick Lane area community was that the only way we could stop the implementation of the plans and the only way we could fend off the Crossrail violations was to make the defence of the community a political issue.
Political in a way that would compel the decision-makers to stop the crassness
that was the Crossrail plan over the Brick Lane area.
Political in a way that would take into account what even the official records of the proceedings of the UK House of Commons (the so-called lower House of the UK legislature) ‘recognised’ was one of the most deprived areas in all of the UK.
Part of my lines written on 31 January 2004 read as follows:
Cross Rail !
You make me so cross
Crossrail
You are set to ruin
this small part
of this big earth
and for what?
Why do you have to come here
and threaten me with the violence
of digging holes in my small little
neighbourhood ?
Why do you have to do the unusual here
while you can do all the big business
without once uprooting another community
anywhere in the whole region of the South of England?
why is it that you think
Brick Lane is
an easy target for you to
dig hole/s in
disrupt
deprive and
destroy? ...”
Extracts from Muhammad Haque’s Lines in Defence of the Brick Lane, London E1 area against the planned Crossrail attacks and violations.
(Parts 2 to 40 are due to be published on the worldwide web, including on this site, in the course of the next few months)
© Muhammad Haque /CBRUK/Sylhetworldtexts London 2004
Khoodeelaar ! [ 25 ] By © Muhammad Haque
2140 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 18 August 2004
THE CBRUK CAMPAIGN IN DEFENCE OF THE BRICK LANE AREA AGAINST THE PLANNED CROSSRAIL HOLE AND OTHER ATTACKS ON THE COMMUNITY IN THE BRICK LANE, WHITECHAPEL, VALLANCE ROAD, STEPNEY AREA OF THE EAST LONDON BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS
Tower Hamlets Council has in effect become a conveyor belt for the transfer of the occupation army of the capitalists of the City of London on to what vacant land there is still available in the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
This movement is taking place every working day of the week. And sometimes during the weekends.
The controlling decision-making bureaucrats in the Council are experiencing undisguised glee (Wednesday 18 August 2004) at the fact that their work for the globalisers now taking over the Isle of Dogs is made even easier by the removal of the objections to the next high tower that is being built on the isle.
This is in the same week that also saw the announcement of the offensive ‘need’ by the construction conglomerates for the availability of ‘teenagers’ in strategic inner city areas like the East End Borough of Tower Hamlets to be exploited in the construction industry.
That announcement is supposed to be encouraging what they mis-describes as regeneration.
The idea is that ‘teenagers’ in the East End of London should be rushing to work in the construction trade.
This is a presumption that is multiply presumptuous and racist.
The school-leavers they offensively describe as ‘teenagers’ are mostly leaving schools without the necessary skills of education. They are not being educated in the East end schools to the level that they deserve to be. Or to the level they need to be. If they are to deserve proper jobs with proper returns.
And there is the real gap. And that is created by the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council.
The details must be examined so that the fact and the extents of the abuse by Tower Hamlets council of their ‘powers’ and the failures by the council to represent the community in the Borough can be actually seen.
I have already shown that Tower Hamlets Councillors had been having clandestine (secret) meetings, starting at least in the summer of 2002 with self-seeking careerists getting paid public money in the name of the ‘Crossrail’ project.
Neither the councillors themselves nor Christine Gilbert the ‘chief executive’’ employed in the LBTH Council, said a single word to the local community about who the councillors were meeting and what evidence the meetings examined, if any, that showed to any reasonable level any sign that the people in the Brick lane area and in the rest of the populated parts of the Borough would gain from any further expansion of the City of London Corporation and its agencies into the land and the neighbourhoods and the environment of Tower hamlets.
My questions put a year ago to Tower Hamlets Council included these:-
I. What evidence can you cite - which can be independently checked and verified - to support any claim that Tower Hamlets Council is currently meeting the needs of the whole community in the borough with particular reference to culture, religion, language to the standard expected by all those whose relevant experience in the given field and sphere covered in this question tells them what the level of their needs are and what the level of the respective item of delivery in each should be?
2. What is the actual current total sum in the current financial year that is earmarked and directed to the meeting of the above?
3. What level of audit does Tower Hamlets council conduct - if it at all conducts any audit of the description and implication represented here - on a weekly basis to ensure that the claims the Council has made about meeting the needs (see the last 20 applications for external funding and equivalent support submitted to UK central Government and the European Social Fund agencies) are in fact treated as serious ones by the Council in its key and central decisions?
4. What is the average number of ordinary working days, starting from I (on a scale of I to 30, each unit signifying a day as is ordinarily understood), that it takes the Tower Hamlets Council to deal with the full extent of complaints alleging incompetence, negligence prejudice and violations of one or more aspects of the legal duties that the staff are under? Is it mostly within 30 or beyond 30? If it is under 30, how many such cases have you had knowledge of in the past 20 months and what would you say about the level of satisfaction (on a scale of I to 100) of the ordinary electors or ordinary members in the Tower Hamlets population who initiated or brought a complaint? If it is beyond 30 days, why is that and how many such cases have you had knowledge of in the same period? What does that say about what your answer is to question 1. above?
5. Whose decision was it and with what implication for the image of the present Council, that the present chief executive should have read the statement that she did read to what had been advertised as the inauguration of the new Council on 21 May 2003? Why was that meeting given to so many detailed descriptions of who went on what external outfit? Why was no equivalent discussion or description of A Council posts a held? To most observers, including myself, that showed a deliberate misuse of the time and opportunity which the Council had at its disposal. Why should that kind of conduct be expected by anyone on the present Council to be excused by the electorate and the community?
6. What is the main qualification for the 'adviser' to the chief executive in the context of the evidence of dissatisfaction on the ground that people feel towards the Tower Hamlets council? What does the Council's allowing the creation of that post say about the level of representation of the preferences of the Borough's peoples by Councillors who are elected by the legally approved process? How is the Chief executive held to account to the Borough?
When was the last time that you carried out such an audit of the chief officers?"
(To be continued)
KHOODEELAAR (24) CBRUK defence of Brick Lane area
against Crossrail attacks
By © Muhammad Haque
2250 Hrs GMT London Monday 16 August 2004
The announcement from Athens this week that the ordinary people of London would have to pay at least another £10 million during the next year so that Ken Livingstone can create some spurious jobs to be held by a new bureaucracy to lobby for the London bid to host the 2012 Olympic games in London, shows how undemocratic the office and the powers of the London Mayor are.
There is no accountability to the so-called voters (because the vast majority of those eligible to vote, including myself, stayed off the polling stations on 10 June 2004 because there was not one candidate that actually measured up to the basic standards) , who are treated with total contempt by the so-called Greater
London Assembly (GLA) that is in fact made up of a collection of the most inane ‘characters’ who have shown neither coverage nor understanding in standing up for ordinary people in London.
And nowhere is that situation starker than in the Brick lane area.
CROSSRAIL-AY BIRIK LANE-OR KANDAAR PRINCLET STREET AAR HANBURY STREET -OR MAAZ-AY KHOOB NEEN GAAT KHOODEELAAR.
(TO BE CONTINUED)
Sylhetworld Daily News Commentary
By © MUHAMMAD HAQUE
Monday 02 August 2004 London 0150 Hrs GMT
CBRUK Live Into the 16h year of political action for Bangladeshis'’ human rights in the UK CBRUK’s campaigning year starts with new phase of demands for an end to the Crossrail hole planned for the Brick lane area.
London 0150 Hrs GMT Sunday 1 August 2004
Today sees the art of the 16th year of the campaigning life of the Committee for Bangladeshis’ Rights in the UK.
That the Bangladeshi community in the UK is in increasing need of campaigning for its collective human rights is clear from the fact that our Central executive Council has this saturday (31 July 2004) decided to embark on the next phase of the current campaign in defence of the Brick lane area.
On Monday 2 August 2004, CBRUK is issuing detailed statement on the economic and social implications against the community of the planned Cross-rail tunnel and hole in the Brick Lane area of London.
It was on 9 July 1989 in the Flower and Dean Walk off Brick Lane that the family of Mr Esmoth Ali and Mr Watir Ali was brutally attacked. It resulted in the deaths of both Mr Alis.
The name ‘Brick Lane’ has been synonymously with the Bangladeshi community’s presence in the London and the UK population for the past at least 50 years.
And the events of July 1989 following the murderous attacks on the Mr Alis have been brought back into active focus now by the planned attack by Crossrail on the community.
In the CBRUK campaign in defence of the Bangladeshi community and of the community of white and other cultural and nationality and non-Bangladeshi ordinary people in the Brick lane area, the leading and the defining advocacy and case has been made by CBRUK in the past five months. I shall be publishing the documentary evidence and live texts of the particular current campaign so far in this series in the next few weeks and months.
Here are some extracts from the documents that I have written in the pats 5 months against the Crossrail plan for an underground hole and a tunnel in the Brick lane area:-
CBRUK LIVE into 16th year
The Campaign against the planned Crossrail hole and tunnel in the Brick Lane are is being conducted in Sylhetti and in English. The Sylhetti word KHOODEELAAR has caught the imagination of the community in a spectacular way. There has been such a demand from non-Sylhetti speaking supporters of the campaign against the Crossrail plan speakers for an explanation or translation or interpretation of the word that I recently pub;published the following
What does KHOODEELAAR mean ?
How the Sylhetti word in the CBRUK campaign title came to be chosen. Its significance and meaning.
I devised this one-word title for the CBRUK CAMPAIGN IN DEFENCE OF THE BRICK LANE AREA as the most communicative Sylhetti language cry against the Crossrail plan for a hole lot of attacks ! Ever since I became convinced that the Brick Lane area was being targeted for a new series of assaults typified by the planned Crossrail hole, I looked in the archives of Sylhetti language and history and Khoodeelaar volunteered itself as the most suitable conveyor of my community’s opposition to the attacks.
So in February 2004 I decided to include it as the banner in this latest CBRUK campaign in defence of a vital part of the Bangladeshi community in the UK.
The word ‘Khudilaar’ is impossible to translate into a single English word in current use or any English word that in my knowledge has ever been in use. KHOODEELAAR bursts with a message of multiple defiance
against the invader of the home. It says that someone [ or a group or an agent has intruded into our home area and ] is doing an illegitimate, undoubtedly harmful digging in the backyard ! Or that they are doing something awful right in front of us.
The digger , the tunneller, is unwanted, uninvited and unfriendly. That the digger is doing the digging or the tunnelling or both, without our consent and despite our objections ! Too close to home for comfort! That the digger doesn’t care about us, the people, the community .... ! The nearest contemporary expression (July 2004) that KHOODEELAAR can be related to in the (British) English language is to say that a ‘dirty digger’ (........) is doing their dirty digging and vandalising in our backyard and unless we hurry and do something about it, he (or ‘they’) will do irreparable damage to our homes, and to our lives...”
© Muhammad Haque © sylhetworldtexts2004 Brick Lane area London E1 UK Saturday 24 July 2004 (to be continued)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Many across UK are concerned at Bechtel Crossrail
CRASS role by Crossrail that is now exposed as blatantly Bechtel-controlled
KHOODEELAAR! No to BBC spin for time-servers over 'McBride'
KHOODEELAAR! commentary on Brian Paddick's piece on the London Met Police ‘in crisis’
KHOODEELAAR! exclusive analysis of the role of TU bureaucracy backing Big Business
No to City of London, Big Business, agenda against right to democratic SAY against corruption...
UK MPs - just published 'expenses' -
AADHIKARonline noting the evidence of the abuse of power by the Daily Mail's Richard Littlejohn ...
SUNDAY PEOPLE Political Editor tells Darling to scrap Crossrail
KHOODEELAAR! updater site by AADHIKAR Media Foundation
KHOODEELAAR! twitter
KHOODEELAAR! on twitter
END POVERTY of politics NOW, updated message to USA Congress... here, shortly
KHOODEELAAR! action anniversary of demonstration against Tower Hamlets Council on 1 March 2006
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole agenda:Action archive May 2006
- 2358 hrs GMT london saturday 28 february 2009: khoodeelaar! no to crossrail hole agenda. no to no say by local people ;el on the actual decisions that are made in the name of local people, at the of local people …khoodeelaar! no to the crossrail agenda is a no to the same agenda that is now vividly seen in the ‘daily news items’ about the behaviour of big business peddlers… no to the agenda of multi billion pound [and dollar and yen and…] robbery of the public by big business.. khoodeelaar! no to all this has been voiced for years.. years when no mainstream media or side-stream media latching on to the coattails of the mainstream had any idea of the accuracy of our analysis… so we are telling gordon brown to pay heed and scrap crossrail.. brown has got it wrong. not only because he miscalculated the ‘electoral aspects of ken Livingstone’;, who had been misleading brown on crossrail by sub-racist anti-scottish slogans pandering to london city-centric big business touts.. brown also misunderstood economics brown is not going to make any difference by staging the next ‘big event’ via the usa houses [Senate and Reps] … for the reality of economics is people and brown has misunderstood the people factor., as he has misunderstood the factor of greed and corruption that are and have been the real spurs and the incentives of the system he wrongly refers to as capable of regulation… brown has misunderstood all these at all levels.,.. and the fact that in the usa there are a similar number or more of similarly confused holders of office being given ‘mainstream media ‘exposure and access and slots does not mean that these propaganda slots will amount to solving the crisis that has been deliberately created and exacerbated by the very offenders with whom, brown and his fellow-travellers are in bed.. policy wise.. and in term s of their continuing misrepresentation of the world… brown cannot be seriously expecting that his re-drafting of the essentially flawed script as delivered from Bristol, England via the bbc and his substitution of the word progressive’ for ‘British’ would;d do the necessary and make people think he has changed is delusional.. he has got to change his attitude and to do that brown will need much more than a change of script wrier.. he also must not underestimate the people in ordinary communities and myst not assume that Tony bliar’s abuse of peoples’ trust – and ‘confidence’ [that word confidence and its associated trust, will come back to haunt brown even more than he appears to know] ...
- http://khoodeelaardotcomfrontpage.blogspot.com/
Why is 'Private Eye' refusing to publish evidence it has of how Bechtel lobby acts in UK
BBC ruins a good story! Someone should check Maxine's scripts BEFORE and AFTER
- 1425 [1400] Hrs GMT London Friday 6 february 2008: KHOODEELAAR! auditing the BBC! BBC ruins a good story! Someone should check Maxine's scripts BEFORE and AFTER... BBC News Channel presenter Maxine More-One has done it again. She has promoted UK Tory “SHADOW Chief Secretary to the Treasury” to the post without 'the shadow'. Perhaps Maxine is anxious for the incumbent to leave the post....It was a story about Sarkozy accusing Brown of ruining things.... Now the BBC itself has ruined the impact of the item... Maxine was presenting Tory Philip Hammond and as she did that she said he was the Chief Secretary to the Treasury. When the 'interview' ended, she did it again. At 1343 Hrs GMT Friday 6 February 2009. Neither her co-presenter Matthew Amroliwala nor their City man for the afternoon Simon Jacques who both came in after Maxine's chat with Hammond, made any remark on the wrong presentation.. A bureaucratic point. But the demands of evidence warrant that even that is accurately put on the BBC.. Significantly, NOR did Hammond himself bother to state anything remotely corrective of that error on the BBC! [To be continued]
- 1425 [1400] Hrs GMT London Friday 6 february 2008: KHOODEELAAR! auditing the BBC! BBC ruins a good story! Someone should check Maxine's scripts BEFORE and AFTER... BBC News Channel presenter Maxine More-One has done it again. She has promoted UK Tory “SHADOW Chief Secretary to the Treasury” to the post without 'the shadow'. Perhaps Maxine is anxious for the incumbent to leave the post....It was a story about Sarkozy accusing Brown of ruining things.... Now the BBC itself has ruined the impact of the item... Maxine was presenting Tory Philip Hammond and as she did that she said he was the Chief Secretary to the Treasury. When the 'interview' ended, she did it again. At 1343 Hrs GMT Friday 6 February 2009. Neither her co-presenter Matthew Amroliwala nor their City man for the afternoon Simon Jacques who both came in after Maxine's chat with Hammond, made any remark on the wrong presentation.. A bureaucratic point. But the demands of evidence warrant that even that is accurately put on the BBC.. Significantly, NOR did Hammond himself bother to state anything remotely corrective of that error on the BBC! [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! 2 years and 17 days ago! That Jo Valentine, 'baroness' was abusing...
KHOODEELAAR! action against Crossrail holes-inviter Tower Hamlets Council 1 March 2006
Even more details of Sleazy, illegal, unconstitutional goings-on in UK 'Upper' House of Parliament
MORE EVIDENCE ON BRAZEN SHAMELESS GREEDY SLEAZY BARONS!
AADHIKARonline action commentary link
Crossrail scam Bill-supporter Alan Johnson is at centre of Scrooge-like behaviour...
How incredible! A Prime Minister plotting against a rival! 'Never'!
It is not Christine Gilbert.. but another Christine... a timely news item
- KHOODEELAAR! has chronicled the role of Christine Gilbert in the Tower Hamlets Council's controlling clique’s official position on Crossrail..... On the evidence we have published, a properly representative and accountable Council in Tower Halest would have done what this [linked here] out-of-London borough council has done over her failures of that Council’s former 'chief executive' who is also called Christine.............[To be continued]
- KHOODEELAAR! has chronicled the role of Christine Gilbert in the Tower Hamlets Council's controlling clique’s official position on Crossrail..... On the evidence we have published, a properly representative and accountable Council in Tower Halest would have done what this [linked here] out-of-London borough council has done over her failures of that Council’s former 'chief executive' who is also called Christine.............[To be continued]
TUC Brendan stages fairness wish!
Tower Hamlets Crossrail-hole-scam-peddler council EXPOSED again
Muhammad Haque daily commentary: Action archive December 2005
Twitter KHOODEELAAR!
CRASS plugs, again, for CRASSRail in CRASSLY edited London 'Standard'
Bank of England failed to spot UK economic crisis! Admits official!
THIS column now carries LATEST UPDATES of KHOODEELAAR! on twitter
KHOODEELAAR! is on twitter now
Peter Hendy cuts TfL jobs then cites CROSSRAIL 'delivery' [!] as 'answer'!
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail UPDATES on Twitter
Crossrail halted! It is true. But only about Glasgow 'Crossrail'. London longs to hear the news!
Now, who is caught out lying then! And how long will the slide last?
Creating the moral framework years before Barack Obama was even heard of
Now they are openly plotting to Bribe the Irish to lie! Politicians beyond condemnation
- This news item says it all about what the careerist politicos will do to stay in power or at least in post.....THEY ARE OPENLY LYING to get the Irish to vote YES!
- This news item says it all about what the careerist politicos will do to stay in power or at least in post.....THEY ARE OPENLY LYING to get the Irish to vote YES!
BBC research! What utter rubbish! as Barry Sheerman would not say but mean to say!
The BBC can't run a CRASS political coverage of shielding bankrupt economic policy ...
Brown IS at the centre of crisis caused by CRASSness of his boasting....
Even CRASSrail-touting Bloomberg has to report the expsoure of CRASS Keynesian callousness
The word is CRASS. Khoodeelaar has used it since 2004! Now they are catching up
FranK Fraud Field, David Fraud and Veronica Wadley- having a smashing day ...
CRASS role by fronters for Big Business Crossrail agenda - their 'priorities'
KHOODEELAAR! action against the abysmally ignorant, poverty-creating 'reforms'
What Simon Jenkins says about Crossrail scam, on the Guardian web site
Simon Jenkins, a 'most influential peddler for Crossrail', now realises CROSSRAIL is a scam!
Even OFCOM 'wakes up'! To be 'seen to be rapping a breach done ‘for Boris Johnson'
- 0150 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 9 December 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! A breach of broadcasting guidelines, however banal and unrigorous THOSE may be, was untenable.. It comes to pass that EVEN OFCOM, the very unrigorous and a very unaccountable outfit in itself, has decided to stage a ‘wake up’ stunt and ‘fine’ perpetrating station ‘talk-sport’ a meagre sum.… The link is with an endorsement for candidate Boris Johnson on 20 march 2008....It seems that even an endorsement for Boris can bring about a condemnation...[To be continued]
- 0150 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 9 December 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! A breach of broadcasting guidelines, however banal and unrigorous THOSE may be, was untenable.. It comes to pass that EVEN OFCOM, the very unrigorous and a very unaccountable outfit in itself, has decided to stage a ‘wake up’ stunt and ‘fine’ perpetrating station ‘talk-sport’ a meagre sum.… The link is with an endorsement for candidate Boris Johnson on 20 march 2008....It seems that even an endorsement for Boris can bring about a condemnation...[To be continued]
Is the KHOODEELAAR! No to “Big Business Crossrail holes attack” CAMPAIGN area a 'banned' zone now?
0048 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 9 December 2008 KHOODEELAAR!
If so, who 'banned' the zone? Under what law? Under what democratic authority? When did they bring about that ban? And why is it not in the public domain?
[To be continued]
If so, who 'banned' the zone? Under what law? Under what democratic authority? When did they bring about that ban? And why is it not in the public domain?
[To be continued]
David Ross! Another Ross being gross! That is crass! Very crass. Boris adviser Ross has been gross!
Happy Eid al Azha to all
Happy Eid al Azha to all
Monday 8 December 2008
Monday 8 December 2008
Boris the Big Business Crossrail scam-peddler shares ignorant daily with a plain stupid journo
Boris Johnson is getting deeply into the mire, as we have been predicting he will do...
The FT is making false statement for Big Business Crossrail, as has Boris Johnson
Times online REACTIVATES the Michael Snyder mode, to shield Big Business tool
"'Full speed ahead' for Crossrail despite business levy protests "
Crossrail-peddlers at DfT ALSO accused of lying, by campaigners against Heathrow runaway
Now they confess! England, universities are taking FEWER students from 'deprived' backgrounds....
BLUNDERING BORIS is strangely painted as sound Johnson when he peddles Crossrail
- 1618 Hrs KHOODEELAAR! SAYS that the DAILY MAIL is as corrupt and as ignorant on this whole Damian Green affair as it is corrupt and ignorant on Crossrail..... The contradictions of the Daily mail are mere symptoms of the corrupt role the paper has played in making Britain an increasingly antidemocratic society... [To be continued]
- 1618 Hrs KHOODEELAAR! SAYS that the DAILY MAIL is as corrupt and as ignorant on this whole Damian Green affair as it is corrupt and ignorant on Crossrail..... The contradictions of the Daily mail are mere symptoms of the corrupt role the paper has played in making Britain an increasingly antidemocratic society... [To be continued]
- KHOODEELAAR! evidential updater and links on Boris Johnson... What some of the comments were saying earlier this year .. about Boris Johnson
A bill will be brought forward to authorise the construction of Crossrail.
CRASS rail! More CRASS ROLE for 'local Councils' to raise tax to fund Crossrail!
Daily Telegraph Sketch writer has a more informative and informed piece on Martin
Crossrail "Darling' and Bragger Johnson still set to face legal challenges on Crossrail
KHOODEELAAR! had warned Blair over 2 years ago and advised him to 'DROP Christine Gilbert'
Poverty of politics - a look at Bangladesh 2006
WANTED A TRUTHFUL PARLIAMENT IN THE UK!
Is House of Commons Speaker being denounced for his ONLY failure?
Car company shedding 000s of workers... Will CROSSRAIL make them employed?
KHOODEELAAR! has analysed UK Lib Dems as Lib Dumbs! on the evidence. Now even CLEGG admits it
Brown 'stimulus' is stale, stalled...Best policy is to scrap waste, scrap Crossrail
Crossrail is an unconstitutional scam, open to serious challenge...
Et Tu Terry! Terry Leahy put on a fabricated front of fabulous growth a while ago!
BOTH the Tories and the DAILY MAIL have been aiding and abetting the attacks on liberty
- 0150 Hrs GMT London Sunday 30 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TELLING the ‘Opposition' Conservatives and the DAILY Mail: Get your morality right, first! YOU have brought about the Police State! Now free society from it!
- 0150 Hrs GMT London Sunday 30 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TELLING the ‘Opposition' Conservatives and the DAILY Mail: Get your morality right, first! YOU have brought about the Police State! Now free society from it!
CRASSness of Crossrail will be exposed by the facts at the core of the peddlers...
How many 'local council and Blaired Party' time-servers are on transport quangos?
Gordon Brown's fallacies in funding Big Business at the expense of the UK society [348]
Crossrail scam-funder Blairing regime can waste Billions of public money [341]
Heathrow expansion is condemned by even Blaired Party MPs!
Rising jobless figures cover the UK...yet Brown-fronted Blaired spin denies it
Constant factor in the crassness of Crossrail-plugging Brown policy: a hole, even a McElvoy can
Millions new jobless being added to the lists across the 'superior' ! economies
CRASSNESS at the centre of funding wasteful Crossrail scam
Crossrail scam-committed Brown admits to having done on VAT what Ca-Morons accused him of ...
Scrap the City of Greed, Corruption and fraud..scrap the CITY'S scam Crossrail...
Even Michael Brown, a time server, begins to see a fraudulent statement in a stooged parliament
Now, will the 'sober' Johnson himself stop peddling Crossrail 'like a drunk'?
Boris touts for Big Business CRASSrail and contradicts himself, again!
Big Business Big Brother! Blair was evidently NOT trusted by the GW Bush regime!
Broughton, in Edinburgh, is cited as exposing Brown's serious ignorance
650000 jobs set to be 'lost' in London region alone, by 2010!
Homelessness up 35% in Wales as it spreads in England too...
Homelessness is on the rise, as Brown carries on boasting of borrowing
- 0825 GMT London Saturday 22 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the regime in the UK that is acting as the de facto agency for Big Business greed, is behaving callously and in doing so, is causing additional POVERTY and destitution across society... affecting the people who have less and pushing them into situations where they will have even less or nothing at all...[To be continued]
- 0825 GMT London Saturday 22 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the regime in the UK that is acting as the de facto agency for Big Business greed, is behaving callously and in doing so, is causing additional POVERTY and destitution across society... affecting the people who have less and pushing them into situations where they will have even less or nothing at all...[To be continued]
Crass 'economics' in the crass world of Crossrail debts-causing, poverty-creating...
Even the Times cannot hide the crassness of Brown's CRASS role for Crossrail
Scrap Crossrail, save £Billions, spare the public the AVOIDABLE debt
Does Brown understand that 'local' democracy deficit HAS BEEN destroying the body politic?
As if on cue from KHOODEELAAR!, OFSTED's 'ex' token Woodhead resurfaces
Haringey Council's lawyer too let Child P down, at crucial time before the murder
Why Brown should SUPPORT ethical values, as opposed to CRASS vah-loos of greed and sleaze...
Brown-fronted regime in the UK is IRRESPONSIBLE on environment: pesticide
Anti-Pesticide case ruling tells Brown what he is doing wrong
International attention on the tragedy of infant murdered due to neglect by the Council...
The careerists must stop lying. Post-holders must account to the public
OFSTED's 'other' 'mentionable' inspector, C Woodhead, is 'back in the news'!
UK Jobless numbers to rise to 3.3 Million in 2010, says one Economist..
Kent blogger damns Boris Johnson as BONKERS over the 'Oakervee' airport!
Boris Johnson disowned by his "party' over the Oakervee water airport!
- 2318 GMT Thursday 13 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! Asks: If EVEN the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD can disown Boris Johnson as well as the Tories already doing it for days, how is it that the SAME lot [the Tory party and the nostandards STANDARD] APPROVE of the same Boris ‘Bonkers’ Johnson on Crossrail? [To be continued]
- 2318 GMT Thursday 13 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! Asks: If EVEN the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD can disown Boris Johnson as well as the Tories already doing it for days, how is it that the SAME lot [the Tory party and the nostandards STANDARD] APPROVE of the same Boris ‘Bonkers’ Johnson on Crossrail? [To be continued]
CRASSrail is peddled by a conning cabal of cultists .... via the Ken-touting Guardian
CRASS plug for Big Business LAW firms' 'roles' for Crossrail scam
TESSA JOWELL's latest confession to 2012 Bid con PROVES that Crossrail has been a con too!
HOW Haringey became one of England's most discredited Councils
Even S Hoggart, of the Guardian, damns Brown over Child P!
London Assembly 'critics' of Boris Johnson 'echo' KHOODEELAAR!
Getting Boris Johnson to THINK before he sinks in the mire of wasteful Big Business spin
Crossrail-peddling Boris Johnson adds to his follies by promoting Livingstone beneficiary
Cluelessness lies at the centre of every plugger for CRASS Crossrail
Scrap Crossrail, avoid debt, make money available for genuine use..
Start being PRUDENT Gordon. Stop spinning. Scrap Crossrail..And save £Billions...
- 1955 Hrs GMT Sunday 9 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Gordon Brown was ‘deciding’ on economics on considerations other than the core economics and economic criteria.... And that shows... Even the Ca-Moron Tories can point out Brown’s flaws.. And, as they are doing right now, via the BBC...’tax cuts’ too may cause problems Like INCREASING DEBTS And overwhelm the economy under debt.....Brown has got to get away from spin... And look at the real components of the economy... What is happening to people and what is happening to the allocation of the available resources to meet the needs... And who is making the main gains and who is losing out.... balance that ... and you will begin to find the answer..... Which reminds of the NEED for Brown to get really prudent..... And there is no better scope for him to practise prudence than by scrapping Crossrail..... and all the other wasteful, debt-causing, poverty-creating CROSSRAIL.....[To be continued]
- 1955 Hrs GMT Sunday 9 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Gordon Brown was ‘deciding’ on economics on considerations other than the core economics and economic criteria.... And that shows... Even the Ca-Moron Tories can point out Brown’s flaws.. And, as they are doing right now, via the BBC...’tax cuts’ too may cause problems Like INCREASING DEBTS And overwhelm the economy under debt.....Brown has got to get away from spin... And look at the real components of the economy... What is happening to people and what is happening to the allocation of the available resources to meet the needs... And who is making the main gains and who is losing out.... balance that ... and you will begin to find the answer..... Which reminds of the NEED for Brown to get really prudent..... And there is no better scope for him to practise prudence than by scrapping Crossrail..... and all the other wasteful, debt-causing, poverty-creating CROSSRAIL.....[To be continued]
If the ‘Barnett Formula’ is still active, then IT TOO would show Crossrail as CRASS! ....
KHOODEELAAR! No to BAA £230 to CRASSRAIL is vindicated, Again!
Boris Johnson shows his ignorance of transport priorities and safety
Even OBAMA echoes the language of KHOODEELAAR!
"concerns over BAA's investment into Crossrail "
Boris Johnson: figures prove his crass propensities against transport priorities in London
- Muhammad Haque, London says.[on the web site of EALING Times, London published at ] ..2 : 21pm Fri 7 Nov 08 “Your report, even assuming that it is based on spin and propaganda from Boris Johnson and the still ill-advised agents of Big Business Crossrail - is full of contradictions. This again shows that Crossrail is not the answer to transport needs of and in London. If they have to take away almost £3 billion from OTHER transport programmes then it goes without saying that Crossrail is ADDING to the transport problems of London. Look at Crossrail rationally. Once you do that, the fundamental flaws of this deeply crass ploy will become obvious. Scrap Crossrail. Save £16 Billion at 2008 prices.”
- Boris Johnson: figures prove his crass propensities against transport priorities in London
AADHIKARonline publishing with KHOODEELAAR! 24.7 No to Crossrail
Even more crassness on appropriate funding for transport in London by Brown regime
Johnson scraps a toxic costs barrier to NHS care at point of need...!
Even Alan Johnson has 'acted' on the NHS scandal. let Brown follow suit...
Bloomberg, NY, USA, 'echoes' [may be sheer coincidence] KHOODEELAAR! warning to Brown
Bank loses £10 Billion.... “Piece of cake!"! as far as Crossrail scam-funding Brown is concerned.
BROWN Must avoid the Crossrail hole, abyss of debt
CRASS role playing London Guardian now confesses! KHOODEELAAR! is telling the truth on CRASSrail
PORTILLO is ignorant of what is going on, is wobbly and self-serving
- 1728 GMT Sunday 2 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to wasteful bureaucracy wasting £Billions of public money every year...Portillo has not even noticed that Brown has been aware of the widespread incompetence and unreliability within the Govt...... That is a bigger issue than anything Portillo pretentiously refers to... {To be continued]
- 1728 GMT Sunday 2 November 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to wasteful bureaucracy wasting £Billions of public money every year...Portillo has not even noticed that Brown has been aware of the widespread incompetence and unreliability within the Govt...... That is a bigger issue than anything Portillo pretentiously refers to... {To be continued]
If Brown KNEW of Iceland disaster 6 months ago, he has KNOWN of Crossrail crassness & wastefulness
CRASSly conceived Crossrail scam-funder Brown's 'global' 'solution' set to come unstuck!
Crossrail hole Darling set on a course to mega debts -resulting in poll disasters...
Crossrail hole scam-funder Brown set to make even Tory look 'responsible'
Crass talk for Crossrail hole by Boris Johnson updated
Brown heading for CRASS role that he will fail to live down!
CRASS role by Crossrail peddler City Snyder 2006: Action archive against Crossrail
CRASS abuse of state power, to enrich Big Business Crossrail contractors...
Diabolical, Crossrail scam-funder Darling shows two fingers to ordinary banks staff facing the sack
Guardian,reviving Ken Livingstone lie insults the holocaust victims’ plight
- Degeneration and the London GUARDIAN have always gone hand in hand. Degeneration in and of the ‘inner cities’. Corruption, sleaze and dehumanisation are three of the headline words that can be used to refer to the millions of lives ruined by the degenerative culture flaunted by successions of crooks holding positions of ‘power’ in local councils, regional assemblies and UK central Govt departments and ministries.The Guardian has been at the forefront of backing the crooks. under many diverse guises The buzz word now is of course the equally corrupting, contaminating diversity...It is the one that has replaced the dozens that were ‘in fashion’ as far as the contaminating lies of the Guardian were concerned. What they used to hide under racism they now flaunt in the display box of diversity.And every conceivable contemporary pretext and psychological emotion is invoked to justify the degeneration programme that is being carried out.. The ‘economic’ phrase that the corrupters and the degenerators are now using, in the context of the current phase of the capitalistic outrage, is ‘investment’. And, of course, ‘Keynes’.First on Keynes: The morons do not know that Keynes [J M Keynes, the public schooled boy from cambridge at the UK Ministry....] NEVER was the economist they are painting him to have been. Keynes had NOT the clue as to HOW capitalists rob and loot and bankrupt the public..... If Keynes had the clue that he needed to have then he did not share it with the readers of his overrated works. The point is that Keynes was as patronising and as corrupting as the bands of the adherents of his supposed genius have been these past few weeks... Incredibly, these idiots have been ALSO pretending to be themselves socialists as they have been =doing the work for Alistair darling and acting as his spin-soldiers [here is another KHOODEELAAR! word, just created!]..........Darling is painted now as an almost genuine socialist. So much so that they have been ‘reporting’ the ‘amazing fact’ that Darling has in his office at the UK finance ministry [the ‘Treasury’! even when it is fronting a bankrupting policy!!!] , a portrait of the ‘great man’ himself.... J M Keynes.....J M Keynes thought of the public, the people in general as robots that could be propelled and manipulated by capitalists ploys... And his stimulating [qv] programme - to whatever extent he in fact argued for it or ‘authored’ the idea, which is nonsense, more on this in later parts of this- ddi not recognise the role of justice, fairness and ethics. HE may have opined on this in peripheral terms. But fairness, consideration for others were NOT the moving factors in his scheme... What he was about was a con. And a gigantic, wasteful confidence trick with which to fool the people......And keep CAPITALISM in control....I think it is appropriate therefore to refer to Keynes as Cons. Ads in Keynes Kons for capitalism Keynesianism as Konsyanism for capitalism.....Keynes cons for capitalism!....NO wonder than that the Guardian, the more successful propaganda organ for corrupt capitalistic, exploitative, unjust, unequal, degenerating society programming, is peddling sub-Keynesian mortgaging of the ordinary peoples lives o=so that the crooks in control can put a few million quid in their own ‘local’ ‘deprived area pockets’.No wonder also that the Guardian has unleashed a man who brings in references to the holocaust and the fleeing of his grand father from Nazi Germany, to do a propaganda job for the crooks in control of the corrupt local councils.....He pats them on the back and benignly excuses their corruption by saying they have been ‘muddling through’!It is a wrong use of the plight of the victims of Nazi germany. And it is inappropriate...People who genuinely want to teach others the lessons from the times of the Nazis in power and their atrocities, violations and violence, must not rush to praise the racists of today... They must show they understand racism and they must oppose racism...Degenerating the inner cities has been one of the most ‘successful’ racist projects in the context of the ‘East End’...But then the Guardian man will not live in that East End....And he will not recognise it either even if he physically lived in any part of the East End that was today...He is jaundiced. He is ignorant. And he is very very biased against the communities that make up the population in the East End...No wonder that the Guardian ‘writer’ has not heard any protests against Crossrail. hole scam...[To be continued]
- By©Muhammad Haque: 0450 GMT London Sunday 26 October 2008 Degeneration and the London GUARDIAN have always gone hand in hand. Degeneration in and of the ‘inner cities’. Corruption, sleaze and dehumanisation are three of the headline words that can be used to refer to the millions of lives ruined by the degenerative culture flaunted by successions of crooks holding positions of ‘power’ in local councils, regional assemblies and UK central Govt departments and ministries.The Guardian has been at the forefront of backing the crooks. under many diverse guises The buzz word now is of course the equally corrupting, contaminating diversity...It is the one that has replaced the dozens that were ‘in fashion’ as far as the contaminating lies of the Guardian were concerned. What they used to hide under racism they now flaunt in the display box of diversity.And every conceivable contemporary pretext and psychological emotion is invoked to justify the degeneration programme that is being carried out.. The ‘economic’ phrase that the corrupters and the degenerators are now using, in the context of the current phase of the capitalistic outrage, is ‘investment’. And, of course, ‘Keynes’.First on Keynes: The morons do not know that Keynes [J M Keynes, the public schooled boy from cambridge at the UK Ministry....] NEVER was the economist they are painting him to have been. Keynes had NOT the clue as to HOW capitalists rob and loot and bankrupt the public..... If Keynes had the clue that he needed to have then he did not share it with the readers of his overrated works. The point is that Keynes was as patronising and as corrupting as the bands of the adherents of his supposed genius have been these past few weeks... Incredibly, these idiots have been ALSO pretending to be themselves socialists as they have been =doing the work for Alistair darling and acting as his spin-soldiers [here is another KHOODEELAAR! word, just created!]..........Darling is painted now as an almost genuine socialist. So much so that they have been ‘reporting’ the ‘amazing fact’ that Darling has in his office at the UK finance ministry [the ‘Treasury’! even when it is fronting a bankrupting policy!!!] , a portrait of the ‘great man’ himself.... J M Keynes.....J M Keynes thought of the public, the people in general as robots that could be propelled and manipulated by capitalists ploys... And his stimulating [qv] programme - to whatever extent he in fact argued for it or ‘authored’ the idea, which is nonsense, more on this in later parts of this- ddi not recognise the role of justice, fairness and ethics. HE may have opined on this in peripheral terms. But fairness, consideration for others were NOT the moving factors in his scheme... What he was about was a con. And a gigantic, wasteful confidence trick with which to fool the people......And keep CAPITALISM in control....I think it is appropriate therefore to refer to Keynes as Cons. Ads in Keynes Kons for capitalism Keynesianism as Konsyanism for capitalism.....Keynes cons for capitalism!....NO wonder than that the Guardian, the more successful propaganda organ for corrupt capitalistic, exploitative, unjust, unequal, degenerating society programming, is peddling sub-Keynesian mortgaging of the ordinary peoples lives o=so that the crooks in control can put a few million quid in their own ‘local’ ‘deprived area pockets’.No wonder also that the Guardian has unleashed a man who brings in references to the holocaust and the fleeing of his grand father from Nazi Germany, to do a propaganda job for the crooks in control of the corrupt local councils.....He pats them on the back and benignly excuses their corruption by saying they have been ‘muddling through’!It is a wrong use of the plight of the victims of Nazi germany. And it is inappropriate...People who genuinely want to teach others the lessons from the times of the Nazis in power and their atrocities, violations and violence, must not rush to praise the racists of today... They must show they understand racism and they must oppose racism...Degenerating the inner cities has been one of the most ‘successful’ racist projects in the context of the ‘East End’...But then the Guardian man will not live in that East End....And he will not recognise it either even if he physically lived in any part of the East End that was today...He is jaundiced. He is ignorant. And he is very very biased against the communities that make up the population in the East End...No wonder that the Guardian ‘writer’ has not heard any protests against Crossrail. hole scam...[To be continued]
Crossrail scam-backing GURADIAN Polly Toynbee must HERSELF show evidence...
London Crossrail should be CANCELLED! Wishes a N-East England MP!
Goldman Sucks! As it becomes Goldman Sacks!
NOT WORK Rail! How unfit Network rail has been yet it is heavily involved in CROSSRAIL
Who, in Crossrail hole scam-funding Govt, CAN the public believe?
Big Business-serving councils in England - 7 fingered!
Collusion between Crossrail and Hammerson, despite ‘denial’ and ‘disappointment’
Only a ‘rich’ and a Rothschild, could threaten Osborne like the Telegraph says he did!
Crossrail hole scam-backer, City of London tout Boris Johnson BENT the facts on 'bendy buses'!
They are echoing KHOODEELAAR! No to crass role by Alistair Dire-ling!
Alistair Darling should scrap Crossrail. It is a City of London ploy
Muhammad Haque, London Times online, rejecting Crossrail scam
- KHOODEELAAR! Organiser Muhammad Haque diagnosed and dissected the flawed London Crossrail scam, in a piece published as comment on the Times online on 23 september 2007. . . . . It was valid then. It is even more valid now Thursday 16 October 2008: 'Tunnel Vision' . And underneath in a subheading it says, "Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital" Then you quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up! They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that Crossrail will cause. What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and big business . Muhammad Haque . Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill 0125 Hrs GMT London Sun. Muhammad Haque, London, UK
- KHOODEELAAR! Organiser Muhammad Haque diagnosed and dissected the flawed London Crossrail scam, in a piece published as comment on the Times online on 23 september 2007. . . . . It was valid then. It is even more valid now Thursday 16 October 2008: 'Tunnel Vision' . And underneath in a subheading it says, "Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital" Then you quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up! They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that Crossrail will cause. What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and big business . Muhammad Haque . Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill 0125 Hrs GMT London Sun. Muhammad Haque, London, UK
- KHOODEELAAR! Organiser Muhammad Haque diagnosed and dissected the flawed London Crossrail scam, in a piece published as comment on the Times online on 27 september 2007. . . . . It was valid then. It is even more valid now Thursday 16 October 2008: 'Tunnel Vision' . And underneath in a subheading it says, "Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital" Then you quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up! They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that Crossrail will cause. What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and big business . Muhammad Haque . Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill 0125 Hrs GMT London Sun. Muhammad Haque, London, UK
More EVIDENCE that EXISTING LOndon transport infrastructure needs FUNDING, NOT 'Crossrail'
Boris Johnson's touting for Big Business Crossrail is FURTHER exposed....
- 1034 GMT 1134 Hrs UK Time London saturday 11 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! updating on the evidence of the ignorant utterance by Boris Johnson for Big Business and corrupting ploy that is known also as the London Crossrail hole scam..... The LINKED item is from the web site of pro-Big business lobby. Even THEY admit that the transport needs and priorities, policies and funding in London are in a mess.... Logic would therefore warrant that Boris Johnson should address the mess and sort it out. But No, Boris is continuing to abuse the office he holds in the name of London by acting as another tout for Big business....Boris Johnson was able to plug Crossrail at the end of his plug slot on the BBC Radio 4 this week. And that was all that the peddlers needed They have repeated that utterance as if it is beyond any question the PROVEN FACT... They have continued to treat the London CROSSRAIL scam for Big Business as a cult. As an article of faith for their fanatic zealous brainwashed..........We shall be examining that plug for Crossrail on TODAY programme and show that contrary to the myths that have been cultivated by John Humphrey himself about his being the allegedly fierce and fearless interrogator of politicians, that Humphrys too is an opportunist and a deeply ignorant careerist who LACKS knowledge about MOST subjects that are listed on the TODAY programme .......That Humphrys, like Jeremy Paxman, is an abuser of the fact that MOST ‘ordinary people’ have been ‘successfully’ lulled into a state of ignorance about the ways and the methods fo the brainwashing, zombifying media..... That on that alleged interview with Boris Johnson, HUMPHRYS exhibited HIS lamentable ignorance about London as he did about transport...... No wonder that the plug by Boris Johnson as allowed to be dropped as the last segment in the broadcast bit of the slot given to Johnson..... No wonder too that ‘Crossrail’ was NOT examined on the programme...... Which shows, again, that those liars who have been publishing the utterance of that Boris Johnson plug for CRASSrail have been basing their peddling on a multiple cat of lying via and by the BBC acting again as a stooge outfit for Big Business.... Just as KHOODEELAAR! had predicted the BBC would be doing when we analysed and examined the fact that the BBC Political Abuser Nick Robinson had been suddenly upping his plugs for the City of London .....[To be continued]
- http://www.dofonline.co.uk/governance/tfl-boosts-income-by-increasing-fines-100810.html
Crossrail hole plot peddling DAILY MAIL group is as corrupt as the City of London..
TfL WASTED or practically lost £Millions while Boris RAISED fares...
- 0940 GMT London Thursday 9 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to BORIS JOHNSON peddling the very agenda that the Big Business LOOTING conglomerates set to rob the public of £Billions....[To be continued]
- 0940 GMT London Thursday 9 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to BORIS JOHNSON peddling the very agenda that the Big Business LOOTING conglomerates set to rob the public of £Billions....[To be continued]
World class CRASSNESS of the Crossrail hole-peddling City of London EXPOSED!
KHOODEELAAR! update: constitutional law notice on Boris Johnson
KHOODEELAAR! 'anticipates' a headline like this ,' End of line for city’s Crossrail''
CRASS role for Canary Wharf in hyping Crossrail hole plot peddler
CRASS talk by crassrail cult-peddling touts in Scotland too!
- 1628 GMT London Monday 6 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence on the crassness of the Crassrail scam pedlars everywhere.....“ Crossrail could be abandoned due to the spiralling costs....” ..... We have in the past nearly 5 years of investigation into the behaviour of the place men and place women touting for CRASSrail in London showed just how idiotic the Crassrail scam peddling tout installed in the formal institution of ‘democracy’ is.... Like the idiotic 'MP' from a UK parliamentary constituency in the east of London [as different from the ‘East End of London] Mike Gapes - he should be renamed GAPs, as in gaps in the mental 'faculties' ... the gaps between his mental faculties and the concepts of common sense and so on-... The ONLY evidence the big business construction conglomerates ever have found and ever can find of any ‘link’ between the peddled scam called CRASSrail and the ‘area they target for abuse in the projected looting of public funds under the cover of the scam....is in the ranks of the zombies in ‘elected’ posts and positions linked with those.... It is the same in London as it is now in Scotland.... Over in Scotland and not far from Aberdeen, the touts have reared their CRASS talking heads and they are faking the ‘case for CROSSRAIL’ just as furiously there as their counterpart zombies did in relation to London. They take leave of all common sense... EVEN when they realise that there is no justification for the wasteful scam being funded with public money.....[To be continued]
- 1628 GMT London Monday 6 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence on the crassness of the Crassrail scam pedlars everywhere.....“ Crossrail could be abandoned due to the spiralling costs....” ..... We have in the past nearly 5 years of investigation into the behaviour of the place men and place women touting for CRASSrail in London showed just how idiotic the Crassrail scam peddling tout installed in the formal institution of ‘democracy’ is.... Like the idiotic 'MP' from a UK parliamentary constituency in the east of London [as different from the ‘East End of London] Mike Gapes - he should be renamed GAPs, as in gaps in the mental 'faculties' ... the gaps between his mental faculties and the concepts of common sense and so on-... The ONLY evidence the big business construction conglomerates ever have found and ever can find of any ‘link’ between the peddled scam called CRASSrail and the ‘area they target for abuse in the projected looting of public funds under the cover of the scam....is in the ranks of the zombies in ‘elected’ posts and positions linked with those.... It is the same in London as it is now in Scotland.... Over in Scotland and not far from Aberdeen, the touts have reared their CRASS talking heads and they are faking the ‘case for CROSSRAIL’ just as furiously there as their counterpart zombies did in relation to London. They take leave of all common sense... EVEN when they realise that there is no justification for the wasteful scam being funded with public money.....[To be continued]
- 1628 GMT London Monday 6 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence on the crassness of the Crassrail scam pedlars everywhere.....“ Crossrail could be abandoned due to the spiralling costs....” ..... We have in the past nearly 5 years of investigation into the behaviour of the place men and place women touting for CRASSrail in London showed just how idiotic the Crassrail scam peddling tout installed in the formal institution of ‘democracy’ is.... Like the idiotic 'MP' from a UK parliamentary constituency in the east of London [as different from the ‘East End of London] Mike Gapes - he should be renamed GAPs, as in gaps in the mental 'faculties' ... the gaps between his mental faculties and the concepts of common sense and so on-... The ONLY evidence the big business construction conglomerates ever have found and ever can find of any ‘link’ between the peddled scam called CRASSrail and the ‘area they target for abuse in the projected looting of public funds under the cover of the scam....is in the ranks of the zombies in ‘elected’ posts and positions linked with those.... It is the same in London as it is now in Scotland.... Over in Scotland and not far from Aberdeen, the touts have reared their CRASS talking heads and they are faking the ‘case for CROSSRAIL’ just as furiously there as their counterpart zombies did in relation to London. They take leave of all common sense... EVEN when they realise that there is no justification for the wasteful scam being funded with public money.....[To be continued]
Crossrail hole scam peddling Big company is found guilty..!
- 1610 GMT 1710 Hrs UK London Monday 6 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘corrupt Big Business-peddled Crossrail hole scam...’ CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! One of the Big construction outfits, in fact reportedly the biggest construction company in the UK, involved in the peddling of Crossrail, has been exposed as being engaged in obtaining property by deception... by ‘unlawful conduct’......d they are saying obtaining property by unlawful conduct... They are not using the phrase obtaining property by deception. But that is exactly what the phrase used should be.. ..[To be continued]
- 1530 GMT 1630 Hrs UK London Monday 6 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to ‘corrupt Big Business-peddled Crossrail hole scam...’ CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! One of the Big construction outfits, in fact reportedly the biggest construction company in the UK, involved in the peddling of Crossrail, has been exposed as being engaged in obtaining property by deception... by ‘unlawful conduct’........[To be continued]
Left out of action! an insightful report on the bankrupt 'British left'
- 0105 GMT London Monday 6 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of the bankruptcy of the ‘British Left’ or the ‘left in Britain’ which has [even in conceptual terms] neither ideas nor action about the real world....It is at its most ease [or confusion] when engaged in fantasy.....As this [linked] commentary taken from a web site of the internationalist outlook shows, the ‘British Left [a very fundamental contradiction indeed] is in an even more dire state than the capitalists of their alleged target......No wonder that the ‘Morning Scar’ NEVER criticised Ken lyingstill Livingstone, the tout of capitalist City of London ... Livingstone’s banality is exposed also in his desperate mutterings for Crossrail as contained in a sub-psychiatric report in the Conrad Blacked London Telegraph...[To be continued]
- 0105 GMT London Monday 6 October 2008: KHOODEELAAR! updating the evidence of the bankruptcy of the ‘British Left’ or the ‘left in Britain’ which has [even in conceptual terms] neither ideas nor action about the real world....It is at its most ease [or confusion] when engaged in fantasy.....As this [linked] commentary taken from a web site of the internationalist outlook shows, the ‘British Left [a very fundamental contradiction indeed] is in an even more dire state than the capitalists of their alleged target......No wonder that the ‘Morning Scar’ NEVER criticised Ken lyingstill Livingstone, the tout of capitalist City of London ... Livingstone’s banality is exposed also in his desperate mutterings for Crossrail as contained in a sub-psychiatric report in the Conrad Blacked London Telegraph...[To be continued]
Crassrail hole plot-peddling by 'resigned' Ruth Kelly....
1 year ago this month: Muhammad Haque challenge to Crossrail hole plot peddler Tom Harris
First detailed KHOODEELAAR! comment on- and advice for GEOFF HOON.....!
London ECONOMIST magazine remains as confused as ever on how to make sense of economics of greed
Towers of greed erected in Tower hamlets are sinking
Daily Express 'sister' title the ever-zombifying DAILY STAR,1 October 2008
UK Press fakes reality! And they idiotically blame a few, they call the spivs!
Brown must drop CROSSRAIl and prioritise needs of EXISTING transport urgencies in London
CRASS cultish treatment of CRASSrail by Brown-fronted regime beholden to Big Business
Was it the moment Boris remembered KHOODEELAAR! advice to STOP talking crassrail?
KHOODEELAAR! tells Boris Johnson: STOP bringing your office to further discredit by CRASSrail
- 1415 Hrs GMT London Sunday 28 september 2008: KHOODEELAAR! Organiser MUHAMMAD HAQUE on the London Times newspaper web site [timesonline] reminding Boris Johnson of his [Muhammad Haque] publicly stated advice to Boris Johnson given in 2007: Show you have a morality and ethics HIGHER than Ken Livingstone had....HERE is a short version of the advice, as published in the past 90 minutes on the Timesonline, “ If Boris Johnson wants to gain any credibility for himself then he must take the advice I publicly gave him last year as he was preparing to become a candidate for the post he [has] now already messed up in a big way. Show he has a morality and an ethics that is higher than that of Ken Livingstone. Muhammad Haque, London, UK
- 1405 Hrs GMT London Sunday 28 september 2008: KHOODEELAAR! Organiser MUHAMMAD HAQUE on the London Times newspaper web site [timesonline] reminding Boris Johnson of his [Muhammad Haque] publicly stated advice to Boris Johnson given in 2007: Show you have a morality and ethics HIGHER than Ken Livingstone had.... [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! tells the UK Conservatives: STOP backing WASTEFUL CROSSRAIL
CRASS conduct by CRASSrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council clique [131]
- This page was last edited at 1310 GMT 1410 Hrs UKTime London saturday 27 September 2008/ 27 Ramadan 1429 AH: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole Big Business scam.....” CAMPAIGN has said all along that the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council is a clique. That clique is the one that makes the decisions. Not all the eligible councillors at any given time. There are several layers of concealment that the corrupt clique uses to give the public impression that Tower Hamlets is a duly democratically active, duly delivering service providers to the community in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by a clique that is out and out corrupt. Out and out antidemocratic. And it is outrageously brazen about itself. Why? Because it [the corrupt clique that controls the actual decision-making activities on Tower Hamlets London Borough Council, AS DIFFERENT from the formal displays of decision-making that are staged via the formal holding of certain residual committees...] knows that there is no opposition on the opposition benches. No opposition in effect. There is of course the appearance of opposition for formal references. But there is no opposition of substance from the formally listed opposition bench councillors. Those are also decreasing in number! Quite apart from the doubly anti-democratic slide of formally-listed opposition 'benches' [in a tiny council there are so many tiny grouplets even on the ever tiny opposition] councillors clambering aboard the group that is IN EFFECT controlled by the corrupt clique, there is also no opposition from the so-called ‘local press’. In fact an independent, informative, relevant and ethical ‘local press’ does not exist in Tower Hamlets. Nor is there any actual journalism from any allegedly ethnicity-linked parts of the population that makes up Tower Hamlets Borough..... This, above, summarised evidence is the main explanation for the brazen backing that the ‘local Tower Hamlets Council’ has been giving to Big Business agenda operated in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. This little difference between the Borough and the Council is of monumental and far-reaching significance.....[To be continued]
- This page was last edited at 1310 GMT 1410 Hrs UKTime London saturday 27 September 2008/ 27 Ramadan 1429 AH: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole Big Business scam.....” CAMPAIGN has said all along that the ‘local’ Tower Hamlets Council is a clique. That clique is the one that makes the decisions. Not all the eligible councillors at any given time. There are several layers of concealment that the corrupt clique uses to give the public impression that Tower Hamlets is a duly democratically active, duly delivering service providers to the community in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Tower Hamlets Council is controlled by a clique that is out and out corrupt. Out and out antidemocratic. And it is outrageously brazen about itself. Why? Because it [the corrupt clique that controls the actual decision-making activities on Tower Hamlets London Borough Council, AS DIFFERENT from the formal displays of decision-making that are staged via the formal holding of certain residual committees...] knows that there is no opposition on the opposition benches. No opposition in effect. There is of course the appearance of opposition for formal references. But there is no opposition of substance from the formally listed opposition bench councillors. Those are also decreasing in number! Quite apart from the doubly anti-democratic slide of formally-listed opposition 'benches' [in a tiny council there are so many tiny grouplets even on the ever tiny opposition] councillors clambering aboard the group that is IN EFFECT controlled by the corrupt clique, there is also no opposition from the so-called ‘local press’. In fact an independent, informative, relevant and ethical ‘local press’ does not exist in Tower Hamlets. Nor is there any actual journalism from any allegedly ethnicity-linked parts of the population that makes up Tower Hamlets Borough..... This, above, summarised evidence is the main explanation for the brazen backing that the ‘local Tower Hamlets Council’ has been giving to Big Business agenda operated in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. This little difference between the Borough and the Council is of monumental and far-reaching significance.....[To be continued]
CRASSLY pro-Big Business 'Transport' briefing on Guardian 'drops' Crossrail from Ruth Kelly 'list'
Big Business propaganda tout Anne McElvoy goes over the top in hyping CRASSrail, pegging it unduly
- 1630 Hrs GMT 1730 Hrs UK Time London Wednesday 24 September 2008:KHOODEELAAR! the economic, ethical, environmental, legal and constitutional law CAMPAIGN against the Big Business agenda Crossrail hole scam UPDATING the evidence of the pro-Big Business role played by Ruth Kelly since her appointment in 2007 to the DfT [UK Department for Transport] by Gordon Brown....In this series of updates, we shall be listing some of the key questions that we have put to Ruth Kelly during the 14 months and 27 days [give or take a day] that she has been in that post. We shall show that in common WITH the behaviour in office of her predecessors in that same post [Alistair Darling and then Douglas Alexander, who has been publicly linked with a man who played, reportedly, the crucial role for BECHTEL in getting Gordon Brown to make the IMPRUDENT and ill-advised ‘commitment’ of £Billions of UK public cash to the CRASSrail scam] AIL scam for which she has mouthed the lies for Big Business and the City of London.... We shall also focus on the lying plug as carried by the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD and its ‘executive editor’ Anne BIG BUSINESS plant McEvoy... McEvoy’s promotion of Ruth Kelly’s ‘conference’ ‘speech’ to one about ‘Crossrail’ shows the brazenness of the lying media that is hooked on plugging the agenda of Big Business. No matter how wasteful that is to the UK public, how irrelevant that scam is to the actual needs of the people of London.....[To be continued]
- 1630 Hrs GMT 1730 Hrs UK Time London Wednesday 24 September 2008:KHOODEELAAR! the economic, ethical, environmental, legal and constitutional law CAMPAIGN against the Big Business agenda Crossrail hole scam UPDATING the evidence of the pro-Big Business role played by Ruth Kelly since her appointment in 2007 to the DfT [UK Department for Transport] by Gordon Brown....In this series of updates, we shall be listing some of the key questions that we have put to Ruth Kelly during the 14 months and 27 days [give or take a day] that she has been in that post. We shall show that in common WITH the behaviour in office of her predecessors in that same post [Alistair Darling and then Douglas Alexander, who has been publicly linked with a man who played, reportedly, the crucial role for BECHTEL in getting Gordon Brown to make the IMPRUDENT and ill-advised ‘commitment’ of £Billions of UK public cash to the CRASSrail scam] AIL scam for which she has mouthed the lies for Big Business and the City of London.... We shall also focus on the lying plug as carried by the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD and its ‘executive editor’ Anne BIG BUSINESS plant McEvoy... McEvoy’s promotion of Ruth Kelly’s ‘conference’ ‘speech’ to one about ‘Crossrail’ shows the brazenness of the lying media that is hooked on plugging the agenda of Big Business. No matter how wasteful that is to the UK public, how irrelevant that scam is to the actual needs of the people of London.....[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! Ruth Kelly DID mouth scripted plugs for CRASSRAIL
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! that ALL peddlers of London CRASSrail were callous or dodgy...
- 0858 GMT London Wednesday 24 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That ALL pluggers of CROSSRAIL are CALLOUS or dishonest or ignorant or all of those things.... JUST look at the first paragraph published in the last 30 minutes on the web site of Theresa May's maidenhead based 'news' outlet the Maidenhead Advertiser: It says Crossrail is a 'multimillion pound project..... How incredibly ignorant are they ! [To be continued]
- 0858 GMT London Wednesday 24 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That ALL pluggers of CROSSRAIL are CALLOUS or dishonest or ignorant or all of those things.... JUST look at the first paragraph published in the last 30 minutes on the web site of Theresa May's maidenhead based 'news' outlet the Maidenhead Advertiser: It says Crossrail is a 'multimillion pound project..... How incredibly ignorant are they ! [To be continued] "An exhibition revealing details of the multi-million pound Crossrail trainline will roll into town on Friday. "
Exposing further ugly truth about capitalist City of London NORM of corruption...
KHOODEELAAR! No to “London CROSSRAIL Big Business scam....” EVIDENTIAL update
KHOODEELAAR! updating on the crass role being played by Andrew Gilligan for CRASSrail scammers
- 1120 GMT 1220 Hrs London Thursday 18 September 2008/18 Ramadan 1429 AH: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That CRASSrail was being plugged as a religious cult or as a cult by Big Business... Even the over-hyped investigative 'journalist' Andrew Gilligan has been engaged today by the DailY Mail group to peddle CRASSrail.... They will never tell the truth. They will never know the value of telling the truth.....[To be continued] PLUG for CRASSrail by ANDREW Gilligan, posted on the CRASSrail hole scam Big Business agenda plugging London EVENING nostandards STANDARD web site a couple of minuets after midday London time Thursday 18 September 2008
- 1120 GMT 1220 Hrs London Thursday 18 September 2008/18 Ramadan 1429 AH:
KHOODEELAAR! has been documenting the evidence of Brown's profound ignorance of economics...
- 0050 GMT 0150 Hrs UK Time London Thursday 18 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to crassly conceived, corrupting Big Business Agenda Crossrail hole plot..." CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That Gordon Brown was fronting a Blaired regime that was in effect an outfit of Big Business interests… That Big Business was callous… That Big Business did not care whether the needs of ordinary people on transport or on anything else were being actually recognised, correctly addressed and adequately and actually delivered… ALL that Big business ‘cared’ for was profit… and the excuse the pretext to be able to loot as much of the ordinary peoples’ resources, money and rights as the Govt of the day would allow the Big business to rob, steal and misappropriate…. That Crossrail was given the ‘commitment’ of public funding by Gordon Brown acting as a stooge of Big Business, rather than acting as a responsible democrat who was actually aware of the truth of the t situation in the K ands in London… hat Gordon Brown has become almost a laughing stock [see,. strictly for references. the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD report on Wednesday 17 September 2008 saying that Brown was humiliated in cabinet...] because of his brazen siding with Big business in contrast with his over-hyped alleged dithering when it comes to ordinary peoples needs….. That Gordon Brown cannot be treated as having even understood what he was saying when he said those words in tune with the then Ken Livingstone entourage as he posed in canary Wharf made the utterances of profound and unforgettable ignorance in peddling the leis scripted by Big Business and dressed as ‘Crossrail’….. That Douglas Oakervee, the hugely discredited operative who cost the public a large amount of money while he, Oakervee had been in Hong Kong, was not fit to be appointed to Crossrail, but that he was appointed and then praised to the skies by Ken Livingstone,….. That Livingstone has been lying …. Was lying and will continue to lie so long as anyone gives him a platform to like on…. That Oakervee was involved in misleading the UK parliament about what Crossrail Company was getting up to….. that Alistair Darling as Transport Secretary misled parliament and lied to the public when he made that allocation of £100 Million to CLRL under an lyingly passed piece of corrupting legislation called the Railways Act 2005……[To be continued]
- 0050 GMT 0150 Hrs UK Time London Thursday 18 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to crassly conceived, corrupting Big Business Agenda Crossrail hole plot..." CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That Gordon Brown was fronting a Blaired regime that was in effect an outfit of Big Business interests… That Big Business was callous… That Big Business did not care whether the needs of ordinary people on transport or on anything else were being actually recognised, correctly addressed and adequately and actually delivered… ALL that Big business ‘cared’ for was profit… and the excuse the pretext to be able to loot as much of the ordinary peoples’ resources, money and rights as the Govt of the day would allow the Big business to rob, steal and misappropriate…. That Crossrail was given the ‘commitment’ of public funding by Gordon Brown acting as a stooge of Big Business, rather than acting as a responsible democrat who was actually aware of the truth of the t situation in the K ands in London… hat Gordon Brown has become almost a laughing stock [see,. strictly for references. the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD report on Wednesday 17 September 2008 saying that Brown was humiliated in cabinet...] because of his brazen siding with Big business in contrast with his over-hyped alleged dithering when it comes to ordinary peoples needs….. That Gordon Brown cannot be treated as having even understood what he was saying when he said those words in tune with the then Ken Livingstone entourage as he posed in canary Wharf made the utterances of profound and unforgettable ignorance in peddling the leis scripted by Big Business and dressed as ‘Crossrail’….. That Douglas Oakervee, the hugely discredited operative who cost the public a large amount of money while he, Oakervee had been in Hong Kong, was not fit to be appointed to Crossrail, but that he was appointed and then praised to the skies by Ken Livingstone,….. That Livingstone has been lying …. Was lying and will continue to lie so long as anyone gives him a platform to like on…. That Oakervee was involved in misleading the UK parliament about what Crossrail Company was getting up to….. that Alistair Darling as Transport Secretary misled parliament and lied to the public when he made that allocation of £100 Million to CLRL under an lyingly passed piece of corrupting legislation called the Railways Act 2005……[To be continued]
CROSSRAIL Ruth Kelly: semi-satirical web site says she is 'somewhat revolting
Cartoonist captures Brown's role in enriching Big Business, making the poor poorer
CRASS, irrational, insane peddling of CRASSrail on BBC 'Politics Show' London
CRASSrail costs out of hand, says 'land value tax' web site: View their site via link below
Tory wannabe MP for 'Tower Hamlets' Tim Archer MUST NOT tell lies...
- 0020 GMT London Tuesday 9 September 2008 KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' Big Business agenda CAMPAIGN exposes the Tory Councillor Tim Archer [102] Tim Archer may find it ok to talk to the Alan Rusbridger Guardian, which is so Polly Toynbeed in its ignorance and tokenism and backwardness and corruption that it will not be able to tell a lying timeserving utterance .... Especially one that is made about the ‘deprived’ East End borough of Tower Hamlets.... The RECORD of Tim Archer on Tower Hamlets Council is one that he cannot be boasting about. It is one of typical opportunism and small minded ness. And of racism. But we are here going to focus on Archer's brazen boast that his party is sticking up for local people against the controlling clique. The words controlling clique belong with KHOODEELAAR! Tim Archer has NOT spoken out against capitalism. He has not spoken out against property speculation. He has not spoken on POVERTY at all. Not to OPPose the creation of poverty in the East End. Tim Archer has been a typical, opportunistic Tory taking advantage of little incidents and episodes to put the controlling clique at a momentary disadvantage. The strategy is the same . they back the Blairing Council. And they have done in the past 4 years since they got in.[To be continued]
- 0020 GMT London Tuesday 9 September 2008 KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail hole plot' Big Business agenda CAMPAIGN exposes the Tory Councillor Tim Archer [102] Tim Archer may find it ok to talk to the Alan Rusbridger Guardian, which is so Polly Toynbeed in its ignorance and tokenism and backwardness and corruption that it will not be able to tell a lying timeserving utterance .... Especially one that is made about the ‘deprived’ East End borough of Tower Hamlets.... The RECORD of Tim Archer on Tower Hamlets Council is one that he cannot be boasting about. It is one of typical opportunism and small minded ness. And of racism. But we are here going to focus on Archer's brazen boast that his party is sticking up for local people against the controlling clique. The words controlling clique belong with KHOODEELAAR! Tim Archer has NOT spoken out against capitalism. He has not spoken out against property speculation. He has not spoken on POVERTY at all. Not to OPPose the creation of poverty in the East End. Tim Archer has been a typical, opportunistic Tory taking advantage of little incidents and episodes to put the controlling clique at a momentary disadvantage. The strategy is the same . they back the Blairing Council. And they have done in the past 4 years since they got in.[To be continued]
Andrew Gilligan LOSES 'worth' by attaching 'worth' to the Big Business Crossrail scam
- 1950 GMT London Monday 8 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is republishing the following comment piece by-lined to Andrew Gilligan and carried in the print editions of today's London EVENING nostandards STANDARD. Why we are doing so? As part of the evidence that the EVENING nostandards STANDARD is still treating CRASSrail as a cult item and phenomenon,, always to be left out of any critical assessment or evaluation. We note that the Gilligan piece is apparently an objective attack on ken Livingstone's recorded mess at the TfL. Yet the piece makes an exception of CRASSrail. Describing CRASSRAIL as a 'project of real worth'. This is contradictory., and dishonest. Whether this phrase was inserted by Veronica Wadley or whether itv was Gilligan who wrote it himself is not known as yet. But the fact is that the piece is contradictory because of that plug in it for CRASSrail. Assuming that Gilligan wrote it himself, it is clear on that evidence that Gilligan is just as dishonest as anyone else that has been peddling Crassrail... On that evidence, Gilligan's claimed objectivity in the rest of the item falls. [To be continued]
- 1950 GMT London Monday 8 September 2008: KHOODEELAAR! is republishing the following comment piece by-lined to Andrew Gilligan and carried in the print editions of today's London EVENING nostandards STANDARD. Why we are doing so? As part of the evidence that the EVENING nostandards STANDARD is still treating CRASSrail as a cult item and phenomenon,, always to be left out of any critical assessment or evaluation. We note that the Gilligan piece is apparently an objective attack on ken Livingstone's recorded mess at the TfL. Yet the piece makes an exception of CRASSrail. Describing CRASSRAIL as a 'project of real worth'. This is contradictory., and dishonest. Whether this phrase was inserted by Veronica Wadley or whether itv was Gilligan who wrote it himself is not known as yet. But the fact is that the piece is contradictory because of that plug in it for CRASSrail. Assuming that Gilligan wrote it himself, it is clear on that evidence that Gilligan is just as dishonest as anyone else that has been peddling Crassrail... On that evidence, Gilligan's claimed objectivity in the rest of the item falls. [To be continued]
CROSSRAIL hole plot: WAS RUTH KELLY unconvinced, all along, even as she 'boasted' of CROSSRAIL?
CROSSRAIL is CRASS
CROSSRAIl hole Big Business agenda-courier Ruth Kelly set for 'demotion'
Aberdeen resident echoes KHOODEELAAR! view of 'local council' as crass and lacking commonsense...
- Read the letter headed 'Building a future for Aberdeen'
- By©Muhammad Haque 1920 Hrs GMT London Saturday 6 September 2008: CRASS role by ‘our inept Council’ is the clear verdict of a local resident writing in their local paper after it became clear that the local Council had showed lack of common sense on transport.... And vision....The particular local resident took the ‘local council ‘to task over their role on their local Crossrail project......How ‘local council’ after local council is being exposed as being CRASS and lacking common sense whenever the ‘Crossrail’, any ‘Crossrail’ scheme is involved... There must be something about the word “Crossrail’ that gets the local council’s to act crass!
Even the TUC, a right-wing diffuser of the exploited 'workers' in the UK, damns Big Biz Brown...
KHOODEELAAR! No to 'Crossrail Big Business lying scam' CAMPAIGN is vindicated, again
How USELESS and misleading the London FT has been
Khoodeelaar! campaign slogan is vindicated by web site from Paddington, London
Even the CRASSrail hole peddling Guardian 'publishes the news'
First court case is started against a London Crossrail plot COUNCIL
KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business agenda Crossrail backer CBI Lambert
How could the same regime be trusted as they spun for Big Business CRASSRAIL hole scam ?
Say 'CRASSrail' ! and BOTH Brown and Darling will LOOK cheerful!
CRASSrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council is in fantasy land...
CRASSrail hole plot-peddler GUARDIAN's Dan Milmo sneaks in a reference to EDDINGTON
KHOODEELAAR! continuing to question CROSSRAIL hole plot-backers Brown and Darling...
BBC TV exhibits Clueless Darling's pernicious Guardian
Crassrail hole plot-peddling ARCHANT-owned papers losing 'readers'
CRASS 'logic' by CRASSrail hole plot peddling conglomerates....
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrailholeplot Council
KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASS role for 'London Crossrail scam' by 'Newham Recorder'....
NOT THE Mr Bean! CRASSrail hole plot-peddler Boris cannot have heard of Charles Bean....
Murdoch-ed London Times may be hinting at London 2012 embarassment...
Iraq war-backing OBSERVER Editor Roger Alton edits the INDEPENDENT now, backing Big Business agenda
The London FT print version 'Bank Holiday' Monday 25 August 2008
The sub-pornographic, pimpling 'daily' newspaper! 'STAR'
Crossrail hole plot-backing GUARDIAN London Bank Holiday Monday 25 August 2008
Daily Express London Bank Holiday Monday 25 August 2008
CRASSRAIL hole FT confesses - East London will NOT benefit!
CRASS role being played by the Guardianed London OBSERVER for CRASSRAIL
Bloomberg, NY, USA: repeating the 'purpose' of CRASSrail: to link Heathrow to Canary Wharf!
Even the Conrad Black-ed London Telegraph confesses to UK Govt CONTRACTOR unreliability
- 1818 GMT KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business CRASSrail hole scam...1810 GMT 1910 Hrs UK Time London Friday 22 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Big Business scam Crossrail hole plot....” CAMPAIGN has argued with evidence every single day since 31 January 2004 [the date of the actual beginning of this campaign] that Big Business was essentially bad for ordinary people, that Big Business was also country to the essential values of democracy, tolerance and a just society, that Big Business did not care, cannot care and will never care for the needs of ordinary people... that the UK public stood to lose out via CRASSrail and that the central moving forces behind CRASSrail were the interests we have identified as the ‘City of London elements and interests’........That our analysis has been correct has been vindicated [unwillingly but actually] by the hundreds of items of confessions, admissions published by the Big Business-supporting outlets of propaganda and mainstream media in the UK in the years since 31 January 2008. As the they c to vindicate the KHOODEELAAR! dissection and analysis and conclusion and finding of the undesirability of Big Business.... We have researched and researched into the operation of Big Business as the dominating influence behind the agenda that is formally set by the formally established, maintained ‘democratic institutions’ including the UK House of Commons... We have shown in exhausting detail how the UK House of Commons has been a stooged House of Commons.. that it is neither holding the executive of the day to account nor is it capable of doing so... because of a plethora of factors lying at the heat of the UK ‘state’..... That the reason why the brazenly crassly contrived and crassly conceived CRASSrail hole scam [called the ‘London Crossrail’ ‘project] has been given passage through the UK House of Commons generally and via the ‘House of Commons Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in particular [and we HERe do NOT even refer to the offensively over-hyped House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee] is not evidence of democratic scrutiny at work but that ON THE CONTRARY it is evidence of the total absence of democracy in the House of Commons on all issues and on all matters that matter...... That today’s [Friday 22 August 2008] the ‘mainstream’ ‘media’ which BACKS the Big Business CRASSrail hole scam, is expressing all degrees and levels of anxiety an concern over the latest disclosure or finding of the LOSS OF VITAL PERSONAL DATA by the Police Department [that is the KHOODEELAAR! phrase from now on [1810 GMT Friday 22 August 2008] for the UK Interior Ministry, the ‘Home Office’] is PROOF of just how CLUELESS these media ‘editors and experts’ are about the state of mess and abuse of pub;ic resources and public powers that Big Business has created and keeps via the UK state.... We say again that therefore the unconstitutionally promoted Crossrail scam must be made subject to the constitutionality that it has been allowed to evade and avoid...PENDING the democraic scruitun, Gordon Brown must scrap the CRASSrail now...[To be continued]..
- 1818 GMT KHOODEELAAR! No to Big Business CRASSrail hole scam...1810 GMT 1910 Hrs UK Time London Friday 22 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Big Business scam Crossrail hole plot....” CAMPAIGN has argued with evidence every single day since 31 January 2004 [the date of the actual beginning of this campaign] that Big Business was essentially bad for ordinary people, that Big Business was also country to the essential values of democracy, tolerance and a just society, that Big Business did not care, cannot care and will never care for the needs of ordinary people... that the UK public stood to lose out via CRASSrail and that the central moving forces behind CRASSrail were the interests we have identified as the ‘City of London elements and interests’........That our analysis has been correct has been vindicated [unwillingly but actually] by the hundreds of items of confessions, admissions published by the Big Business-supporting outlets of propaganda and mainstream media in the UK in the years since 31 January 2008. As the they c to vindicate the KHOODEELAAR! dissection and analysis and conclusion and finding of the undesirability of Big Business.... We have researched and researched into the operation of Big Business as the dominating influence behind the agenda that is formally set by the formally established, maintained ‘democratic institutions’ including the UK House of Commons... We have shown in exhausting detail how the UK House of Commons has been a stooged House of Commons.. that it is neither holding the executive of the day to account nor is it capable of doing so... because of a plethora of factors lying at the heat of the UK ‘state’..... That the reason why the brazenly crassly contrived and crassly conceived CRASSrail hole scam [called the ‘London Crossrail’ ‘project] has been given passage through the UK House of Commons generally and via the ‘House of Commons Crossrail Bill Select Committee’ in particular [and we HERe do NOT even refer to the offensively over-hyped House of Lords Crossrail Bill Select Committee] is not evidence of democratic scrutiny at work but that ON THE CONTRARY it is evidence of the total absence of democracy in the House of Commons on all issues and on all matters that matter...... That today’s [Friday 22 August 2008] the ‘mainstream’ ‘media’ which BACKS the Big Business CRASSrail hole scam, is expressing all degrees and levels of anxiety an concern over the latest disclosure or finding of the LOSS OF VITAL PERSONAL DATA by the Police Department [that is the KHOODEELAAR! phrase from now on [1810 GMT Friday 22 August 2008] for the UK Interior Ministry, the ‘Home Office’] is PROOF of just how CLUELESS these media ‘editors and experts’ are about the state of mess and abuse of pub;ic resources and public powers that Big Business has created and keeps via the UK state.... We say again that therefore the unconstitutionally promoted Crossrail scam must be made subject to the constitutionality that it has been allowed to evade and avoid...PENDING the democraic scruitun, Gordon Brown must scrap the CRASSrail now...[To be continued]..
CROssrail hole plot-promoter DFT is a CLIENT of the data loss PA CONSULTING!!!!
UK Home Office caught again as not fit for purpose on really important test -
Unemployment set to rise in UK....... At a rate unrivalled by any 'rival economy' !
CRASSrail hole plot-peddling CBI man Lambert crassly peddles lethal nuclear waste....
KHOODEELAAR! 24-7 blog against Big Business CROSSRAIL hole agenda
KHOODEELAAR! web site
KHOODEELAAR! No to" CRASSrail" CAMPAIGN is echoed in YORKSHIRE, too..
CRASSrail isn't working! It was never about a working economy! But the sinking economy can't be sal
Harriet Harman is at the centre of abuse of MP powers to hide MPs greed! Even by changing law
Robert Fisk's INDEPENDENT is brazenly promoting pro Iraq occupation USA War company Bechtel!!
Even the CRASSrail-hole backer EVENING STANDARD, London, confesses to crassness of Crossrail £££
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole-inviter Tower Hamlets Council...
Comment by MUHAMMAD HAQUE: Timesonline 5 July 2008
Crossrail hole plot-enforcer Bob Kiley and his CRASSly-granted 'home'
Kiley could INTIMIDATE people into 'agreeing to back Crossrail hole of lies'
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole
1858 GMT Thurs 14 Aug 2008
1852 GMT Thursday 14 August 2008
1854 GMT Thursday 14 August 2008
1850 GMT Thursday 14 August 2008
1728 GMT Thursday 14 August 2008: Another Blairing minister, DWP James Purnell in effect exposed...
- KHOODEELAAR! No to "CRASSness of LYING GOVT MINISTERS! and assorted carpetbaggers bringing CROSSRAIL hole plot benefits to the deprived East End of London..." CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! DO NOT trust the word of a Govt Minister, especially one who voted for CRASSrail hole plot.... [to be continued]
- KHOODEELAAR! No to "CRASSness of LYING GOVT MINISTERS! and assorted carpetbaggers bringing CROSSRAIL hole plot benefits to the deprived East End of London..." CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! DO NOT trust the word of a Govt Minister, especially one who voted for CRASSrail hole plot.... [to be continued]
1615 GMT London Thursday 14 August 2008: London Crassrail hole scam is too costly, says E STANDARD
- By©Muhammad Haque 1615 GMT London Thursday 14 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! told you so! That the 'world class city' hype that the couriers and peddlers of Big Business CRASSrail hole plot got used to uttering and mouthing in the weeks and months when Ken Livingstone was involved in getting Gordon Brown to act imprudently in making the ill-advised utterances of committing £Billions of public money to CRASSrail...” would come back to haunt the perpetrators, has now been coming back to haunt Gordon Brown quite comprehensibly..... Today’s confession by the fabricating London Evening ‘nostandards’ Standard is the latest in a series of over 100 separate confessions that have been made by a wide variety of sources and parties all with relevance to the CROSSRAIL hole project and its acceptability and legitimacy. . We are still of the view that more evidence will emerge to even more totally discredit every single one of the decision-makers that has bragged of CRASSrail as the symbol; of the ‘WORLD CLASS STATUS OF THE CITY OF LONDON’’. KHOODEELAAR! advice to Gordon Brown - SCRAP CRASSrail and spare yourself some measures of extra headache and discredit... [To be continued]
- By©Muhammad Haque 1615 GMT London Thursday 14 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! told you so! That the 'world class city' hype that the couriers and peddlers of Big Business CRASSrail hole plot got used to uttering and mouthing in the weeks and months when Ken Livingstone was involved in getting Gordon Brown to act imprudently in making the ill-advised utterances of committing £Billions of public money to CRASSrail...” would come back to haunt the perpetrators, has now been coming back to haunt Gordon Brown quite comprehensibly..... Today’s confession by the fabricating London Evening ‘nostandards’ Standard is the latest in a series of over 100 separate confessions that have been made by a wide variety of sources and parties all with relevance to the CROSSRAIL hole project and its acceptability and legitimacy. . We are still of the view that more evidence will emerge to even more totally discredit every single one of the decision-makers that has bragged of CRASSrail as the symbol; of the ‘WORLD CLASS STATUS OF THE CITY OF LONDON’’. KHOODEELAAR! advice to Gordon Brown - SCRAP CRASSrail and spare yourself some measures of extra headache and discredit... [To be continued]
1550 GMT THusrday 14 August 2008:CRASS breach of 'company code against cab use' by CRASSrail TfL
0832 GMT London Thursday 14 August 2008: OTT Hyped CRASSrail costs too high.....
- 0832 GMT London 14 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! That the crassly conceived, OVER THE TOP-hyped Crossrail scam was not economically viable..... [To be continued]
- 0832 GMT London 14 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! That the crassly conceived, OVER THE TOP-hyped Crossrail scam was not economically viable..... [To be continued]
1508 GMT Weds 13 Aug 2008: Where is this sign? When was it put up there, by who and as part of wha
0650 GMT London 13 August 2008: CRASS talk by Transport for London exposed by facts
1750 GMT London 11 August 2008: Poverty-minister PURNELL has hsi eyes on the East End poor
- KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot, poverty-crating agenda:By©Muhammad Haque 1758 GMT London Monday 11 August 2008: Blairing poverty-imposition minister in the Brown-fronted regime has been busy today.... 'talking' to people in northern England about how they can live with the effective removal of the welfare shield.....PURNELL’s entourage is set soon to descend on the East End of London with the aid of the Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on the Corrupt Tower Hamlets Council....PURNELL is engaged in a deeply poisonous plot to make people in the East End of London even poorer...PURNELL has set up dubious links with ethnicity-linked touts who are feeding him information... how to carry out the crack down on the already below-poverty-line families in Tower hamlets...[To be continued]
- KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot, poverty-crating agenda:By©Muhammad Haque 1758 GMT London Monday 11 August 2008: Blairing poverty-imposition minister in the Brown-fronted regime has been busy today.... 'talking' to people in northern England about how they can live with the effective removal of the welfare shield.....PURNELL’s entourage is set soon to descend on the East End of London with the aid of the Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on the Corrupt Tower Hamlets Council....PURNELL is engaged in a deeply poisonous plot to make people in the East End of London even poorer...PURNELL has set up dubious links with ethnicity-linked touts who are feeding him information... how to carry out the crack down on the already below-poverty-line families in Tower hamlets...[To be continued]
1320 GMT London Monday 11 August 2008: Lloyds.com says CROSSRAIL Bill is still not 'Act'!!!
0945 GMT 11 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! putting on record BBC's plugging CROSSRAIL and CBI crassness
0850 GMT Monday 11 August 2008: BBC caught stealing again... BBC has been peddling CROSSRAIL too
- 0850 GMT London Monday 11 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! again says that the BBC cannot be allowed any longer to pretend that it is staffed by honest people or that its agenda is run by honesty.... The Corporation is the single biggest media and propaganda organisation in the UK with the maximum capacity to lie to and mislead the largest number of UK people... and people of larger numbers abroad...The BBC has got to be made ethical, moral, honest.....[To be continued]
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7551083.stm
1720 GMT Sunday 10 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! action archive
CRASSrail causes 'cultural' uprooting of central London ASTORIA.....which Danni Minogue visited
1120 GMT London Sunday 10 August 2008: Imprudent, uneconomic, wasteful CROSSRAIL hole plot backer
1120 GMT Sunday 10 August 2008: CRASSly-conceived Crossrail hole-plot backer Darling in crass trap
2150 GMT Saturday 9 August 2008: Is Darling on the way out? KHOODEELAAR! is watching him!
East Ender condemns Crossrail hole-inviter Councillors, the stooges and the ethnicity ' papers'
1850 GMT London Saturday 9 August 2008
Crossrail hole plot-peddler Alistair Darling is no darling to trruthfulness....
Tower Hamlets 'leading' 'councillor' boasted only last month of 'poorest borough'.
- This page was last edited at 1030 GMT London Saturday 9 August 2008
- 1010 GMT London saturday 9 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! No to “CRASSly conceived, unaccountable, unaudited Crossrail hole pack...' CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! That accountability is the first thing when it comes to the needs of the public being allowed to be ‘led’ for private Business and profit...... HERE the DAILY MIRROR has published a report today showing that an unaudited 'health' private company is operating in Tower Hamlets.. The outfit is also reported in the Mirror investigation report to be linked with some very dangerous, worrying practices by unaccountable and unaudited 'personnel'..... Just like the personnel that are engaged in plugging the unaudited Crossrail hole plot... ...[To be continued]
1454 GMT London Friday 8 August 2008: Crossrail has no sense, says BASINGSTOKE Councillor...
CRASSness, irrelevance, obsolesce of CROSSRAIL exposed by EDDINGTON report itself...
Muhammad Haque [2006] comments on CRASS role of and by stooged MPs...ACTION ARCHIVE
CRASS confession by CRASSrail hople plot-peddling LYING FT! Just look at the sentence of FT lying f
CRASS delay in CRASSrail 'design' ! Another reason why it should be scrapped....
KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law action against "CROSSRAIL hole' -EVIDENCE, update [8]
CRASS conduct by Crossrail hole plot-backing 'Archant' idiots going over the top in their idiocy
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole/s
First EVER picture of KHOODEELAAR! campaigners meeting Crossrail hole-company CLRL staff. [1]
Khoodeelaar! No to "Crossrail hole plot" campaigner ASKAR MIAH condemns stooging for Crossrail....
James Purnell's DWP-empoyed promotion careerist SUE GARRARD has no sense ...
Poverty-creation stunt-indulger and wannabe heir to Maggie Thatcher James Purnell's DWP is bankrupt
Times, London, City Diary resumes promoting Crossrail - since the Snyder Knighthood!
- 1400 GMT London Wednesday 6 August 2008: As KHOODEELAAR! pointed out at the time, that the REAL REASON why the London Times news organisation had carried a totally incredible plug and promotion for Michael Snyder and the real reason why it had TOTALLY stopped any comments on that plug appearing on the Timesonline web site, was one and only one reason: that the Murdoch-ed Times was being sued to peddle for the snide Synder in his little enterprise to get himself a knighthood. Which knighthood the Snide Snyder eventually did get as contained in the ‘monarchical’ ‘birthday honours’ [!!!!!!!!!!!!] list that appeared in a matter of weeks....And so KHOODEELAAR! was vindicated ONCE AGAIN......The conduct on the part of the Times on that occasion is included as evidence of the CRASSrail hole promoting lies by the relevant agencies ...... [To be continued]
- 1400 GMT London Wednesday 6 August 2008: As KHOODEELAAR! pointed out at the time, that the REAL REASON why the London Times news organisation had carried a totally incredible plug and promotion for Michael Snyder and the real reason why it had TOTALLY stopped any comments on that plug appearing on the Timesonline web site, was one and only one reason: that the Murdoch-ed Times was being sued to peddle for the snide Synder in his little enterprise to get himself a knighthood. Which knighthood the Snide Snyder eventually did get as contained in the ‘monarchical’ ‘birthday honours’ [!!!!!!!!!!!!] list that appeared in a matter of weeks....And so KHOODEELAAR! was vindicated ONCE AGAIN......The conduct on the part of the Times on that occasion is included as evidence of the CRASSrail hole promoting lies by the relevant agencies ...... [To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! analysis of crassness of CROSSRAIL is in effect shared by ordinary businesses....
- 0925 GMT London Wednesday 6 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! comment as published on the RAILNEWS.co.uk web site on Crassness of Crossrail hole agenda puts the rising concern about Crossrail into inner city East london and constitutional law perspective by showing up the utter unconstitutionality of the CRASSrail hole agenda peddlers in Parliament... The full text of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE comment on the Railnews.co.uk web site:You state " SERIOUS questions have been raised over how exactly funding will be raised for the £16 billion London Crossrail project, following the granting of Royal Assent for construction work to start." INDEED! For 56 months, the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional, legal, economic, environmental, social and ethical campaign against the crassly conceived, crassly peddled, irresponsibly promoted Crossrail hole agenda has argued that the package was wrong. That the economics and the ordinary London public did not demand the spending of £Billions of public money into a diversionary ‘project’ like Crossrail. That the EXISTING transport and associated infrastructure in London linked with higher capacity and relevance deserved to be paid attention to.... That uttering slogans like 'world class city' did not deliver the service for the people who need that. There has been no scrutiny of the purpose, the content or the implication of the Crossrail Bill during the almost cultish passage of it through the two Houses. HUNDREDS of objectors were OBSTRUCTED from presenting evidence before either House to show how seriously flawed the Bill was.... No economic study was conducted to answer the dozens of profound questions that are attached to the proposed scam... The hyped up lie that the scam would 'bring benefits and regeneration' to areas like the 'deprived East End of London' is instantly contradicted by and exposed in the real purpose as stated by the promoters and the lobbies which is to connect three places Canary Wharf the City of London and Heathrow.... Is that a justifiable ground to spend [mis-apply] £Billions of public money on the scam for? In any case, ALL the references to positive impact of the CRASSrail are projections... NOT one item of evidence has been referred to in the [just under] 4 years of the Crossrail Bill being promoted through Parliament that has shown any evidence of any public demand from any part of London for the scheme.. THERE HAS BEEN evidence of the insidious Big Business lobby calling for it.....Time to look for a proper project for London';s transport needs and for the scarce money of the public to be used... Scrap Crossrail even now... Not too late at all.. Not especially for the hundreds of small traders in the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area who have signed the Khoodeelaar! constitutional law challenge papers against Crossrail hole agenda.... We are mounting the long promised legal action against the Crossrail hole agenda and we have on our list a most diverse and extensive list of witnesses who will support the challenge to Crossrail through the court system in the UK and then in the European courts system if necessary. Organiser, KHOODEELAAR! No to "Crossrail hole plot.." CAMPAIGN Muhammad Haque, London, UK [To be continued]
- 0925 GMT London Wednesday 6 August 2008: KHOODEELAAR! comment as published on the RAILNEWS.co.uk web site on Crassness of Crossrail hole agenda puts the rising concern about Crossrail into inner city East london and constitutional law perspective by showing up the utter unconstitutionality of the CRASSrail hole agenda peddlers in Parliament... The full text of the MUHAMMAD HAQUE comment on the Railnews.co.uk web site:You state " SERIOUS questions have been raised over how exactly funding will be raised for the £16 billion London Crossrail project, following the granting of Royal Assent for construction work to start." INDEED! For 56 months, the KHOODEELAAR! constitutional, legal, economic, environmental, social and ethical campaign against the crassly conceived, crassly peddled, irresponsibly promoted Crossrail hole agenda has argued that the package was wrong. That the economics and the ordinary London public did not demand the spending of £Billions of public money into a diversionary ‘project’ like Crossrail. That the EXISTING transport and associated infrastructure in London linked with higher capacity and relevance deserved to be paid attention to.... That uttering slogans like 'world class city' did not deliver the service for the people who need that. There has been no scrutiny of the purpose, the content or the implication of the Crossrail Bill during the almost cultish passage of it through the two Houses. HUNDREDS of objectors were OBSTRUCTED from presenting evidence before either House to show how seriously flawed the Bill was.... No economic study was conducted to answer the dozens of profound questions that are attached to the proposed scam... The hyped up lie that the scam would 'bring benefits and regeneration' to areas like the 'deprived East End of London' is instantly contradicted by and exposed in the real purpose as stated by the promoters and the lobbies which is to connect three places Canary Wharf the City of London and Heathrow.... Is that a justifiable ground to spend [mis-apply] £Billions of public money on the scam for? In any case, ALL the references to positive impact of the CRASSrail are projections... NOT one item of evidence has been referred to in the [just under] 4 years of the Crossrail Bill being promoted through Parliament that has shown any evidence of any public demand from any part of London for the scheme.. THERE HAS BEEN evidence of the insidious Big Business lobby calling for it.....Time to look for a proper project for London';s transport needs and for the scarce money of the public to be used... Scrap Crossrail even now... Not too late at all.. Not especially for the hundreds of small traders in the Brick Lane, Whitechapel, Bethnal Green ‘south’ and Stepney London E1 area who have signed the Khoodeelaar! constitutional law challenge papers against Crossrail hole agenda.... We are mounting the long promised legal action against the Crossrail hole agenda and we have on our list a most diverse and extensive list of witnesses who will support the challenge to Crossrail through the court system in the UK and then in the European courts system if necessary. Organiser, KHOODEELAAR! No to "Crossrail hole plot.." CAMPAIGN Muhammad Haque, London, UK [To be continued]
What would CRASS Ken Livingstone-fanatic NOT-Green Jenny say of Ealing Greens?
CRASS role by Crassrail hole plot peddling CLRL! And Tom Harris! And Ruth Kelly...!
Whitechapel Market - target of CROSSRAIL hole attacks! Yet Council uses this target to brag...
UK 'Peers' 'Constitution committee'! It chose blindness and let CRASSRAIL'Bill' through
CRASSrail hole agenda risking Tube lines upkeep,, and delaying 3 million passengers a day...
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council
KHOODEELAAR! 16440 P.1 Monday 4 August 2008
Even the CRASSrail hole agenda peddler, LSE-based tout Tony Travers confesses to its crassness....
Crossrail hole plot-backer John McDonnell is no answer to anything.....
Crossrail hole plot-backer UK Transport Minister RUTH KELLY 'confesses all' to KHOODEELAAR!
Blair's RECORD consists of WARs on the innocent, the poor, the disenfranchised....
Guardian's grandad White again fakes it as he chats to BBC blonde as a 'Dave fan'...
BBC news channel fronter Peter Sissons was accused of irresponsible utterance
AADHIKAR, image of the First Frontpage 19 December 1980
Even more evidence of the stupidty and crassness of the Crossrail hole plot-peddling London FT...
KHOODEELAAR! Manifesto of action in the East End of London against Crossrail hole agenda...
KEN CROSSRAIL HOLE PLOT PEDDLER LIVINGSTONE Makes world class confession! He had conned!
KHOODEELAAR! 16440 print edition [Page 2] Friday 1 Aug 2008
If BA profits are hit by rising fuel bills, will there still be a 'world class' slogan for Heathrow
Bob Marshall-Andrews is a rare MP, who really talks about constitutionality
Tower Hamlets features as worst for waiting for GP service: UK PRESS ASSOCIATION reports
GPs service in Tower Hamlets: Survey finds Tower Hamlets rated worst for waiting time..
Basingstoke, too, is let down by Crossrail hole plot peddlers in Govt
KHOODEELAAR! Told you so! The CRASSrail hole plot-pluggers are CRASS, as is the CRASSrail scam...
- 1235 GMT London Tuesday 29 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! legal acton programme will include as evidence of crass, unconstitutional gloating attitude and behaviour by the backers of the Big Business Crossrail hole plot the type of piece that is contained in THIS latest plug.... KHOODEELAAR! will argue that in every utterance the pluggers of the Crossrail hole scam have shown their crassness, irrationality and lack of relevance to the needs of the people of London....In this bragging about the ‘House of Lords’ not even ‘requiring’ to hold a vote on the CRASSrail hole Bill, they confirm the many layers of stupidity and callousness that they represent and exhibit....... KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenges will expose such conduct and with the inclusion of such evidence will show that Crossrail Bill was a crassly conceived, crassly promoted cam through and through... and that it was never about addressing the transport needs of the people of London.......The transport needs of the ordinary people of London have been abused and reduced to a side section in the lunatic Big Business propaganda aimed solely at getting the Big Business coporate hands on £Billions of public money......[To be continued]
- 1235 GMT London Tuesday 29 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! legal acton programme will include as evidence of crass, unconstitutional gloating attitude and behaviour by the backers of the Big Business Crossrail hole plot the type of piece that is contained in THIS latest plug.... KHOODEELAAR! will argue that in every utterance the pluggers of the Crossrail hole scam have shown their crassness, irrationality and lack of relevance to the needs of the people of London....In this bragging about the ‘House of Lords’ not even ‘requiring’ to hold a vote on the CRASSrail hole Bill, they confirm the many layers of stupidity and callousness that they represent and exhibit....... KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenges will expose such conduct and with the inclusion of such evidence will show that Crossrail Bill was a crassly conceived, crassly promoted cam through and through... and that it was never about addressing the transport needs of the people of London.......The transport needs of the ordinary people of London have been abused and reduced to a side section in the lunatic Big Business propaganda aimed solely at getting the Big Business coporate hands on £Billions of public money......[To be continued]
- 1235 GMT London Tuesday 29 July 2008: KHOODEELAAR! legal acton programme will include as evidence of crass, unconstitutional gloating attitude and behaviour by the backers of the Big Business Crossrail hole plot the type of piece that is contained in THIS latest plug.... KHOODEELAAR! will argue that in every utterance the pluggers of the Crossrail hole scam have shown their crassness, irrationality and lack of relevance to the needs of the people of London....In this bragging about the ‘House of Lords’ not even ‘requiring’ to hod a vote on the CRASSrail hole Bill, they confirm the many layers of stupidity and callousness that they represent and exhibit....... KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law challenges will expose such conduct and with the inclusion of such evidence will show that Crossrail Bill was a crassly conceived, crassly promoted cam through and through... and that it was never about addressing the transport needs of the people of London.......The transport needs of the ordinary people of London have been abused and reduced to a side section in the lunatic Big Business propaganda aimed solely at getting the Big Business coporate hands on £Billions of public money......[To be continued]
KHOODEELAAR! legal action focus on three of the CRASSrail Big Business agenda couriers...
Does an 'East London Councillor' demonstrate honesty? Consistently?
More empty, crass plugs for Crossrail by corrupted 'London Councils' PR agents'
Muhammad Haque challenges CRASSrail-spinning MP John AUSTIN
Tory Charlotte is given space by conniving Guardian to confound pernicious Guardian's own lying...
- 1325 [and at 1540] Hrs GMT Monday 28 July 2008:: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole agenda of ADDING to the poverty in the East End of London.....” says to the LYING Guardian that the ‘REAL REASON WHY ~he Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired Party’ is being ‘punished’ [if that is the word] is to be found in the pages of the LYING Guardian which even this past seven days has published a lie ‘praising’ the poverty-creating behaviour of the Tower Hamlets Council....The Guardian has contributed and is continuing to contribute daily - to giving the Blaring agenda-couriers and performers the ‘appearance of acceptability’ when in fact t they have been demolishing the very fabric of what makes society What keeps society With any modicum of social safety and sustainability...... By backing the lies of Big Business and by peddling the lying City of London CROSSRAIL hole plot agenda, the Guardian has confirmed that it [The Guardian] does not care for the truth much less for justice and rights for the people who are institutionally pushed into poverty,d deprivation, destitution and denial of rights...and denial of. dignity and social and human defence.........[To be continued]
- 1325 Hrs GMT Monday 28 July 2008:: KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole agenda of ADDING to the poverty in the East End of London.....” says to the LYING Guardian that the ‘REAL REASON WHY ~he Gordon Brown-fronted Blaired Party’ is being ‘punished’ [if that is the word] is to be found in the pages of the LYING Guardian which even this past seven days has published a lie ‘praising’ the poverty-creating behaviour of the Tower Hamlets Council....The Guardian has contributed and is continuing to contribute daily - to giving the Blaring agenda-couriers and performers the ‘appearance of acceptability’ when in fact t they have been demolishing the very fabric of what makes society What keeps society With any modicum of social safety and sustainability...... By backing the lies of Big Business and by peddling the lying City of London CROSSRAIL hole plot agenda, the Guardian has confirmed that it [The Guardian] does not care for the truth much less for justice and rights for the people who are institutionally pushed into poverty,d deprivation, destitution and denial of rights...and denial of. dignity and social and human defence.........[To be continued]
How the Crossrail hole plot-funding UK DfT flouts the brazenly stated 'aims' of the DfT itself
Harriet Harman could not even speak straight about the crisis
No to Crossrail hole, Big Business agenda-backer Harriet Harman...
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole-backer Harriet Harman
The idiocy and contempt for facts as shown for CRASSrail hole by the LONDON IGNORANT web
Crossrail is for BIG BUSINESS to be allowed to loot the public and rob the East End of London....
Crossrail is to take over land in the East End of London and further dislocate the community ....
Action against Crossrail hole plot-inviter Tower Hamlets Council, 1 March 2006
Ruth Kelly neglecting rail transport in Yorkshire region...while boasting of Big Business CRASSrai
Big Business London Crossrail hole plot-backer Ruth Kelly AGAIN lets down regions' transport ....
KHOODEELAAR! image dated 25 July 2008
On TONY BLAIR's BENEFIT FRAUD....
The FT: " a conspiracy between BA and Virgin Atlantic ..."
Muhammad Haque says Barack Obama must make poverty his main political theme. Times web site London
A first utterance by a source other than KHOODEELAAR! 'to put Crossrail on hold'
Muhammad Haque exposes Crossrail Bill UNCONSTITUTIONALITY.... in PROPERTY WEEK
- transport... Least of all about the people in whose name the Big infrastructure projects cam was contrived and made into an ‘Act’... That was a discredited act before it became a ‘Royal Assent’-‘stamped’ Act.. Time now to scrap it..... [To be continued]
- transport... Least of all about the people in whose name the Big infrastructure projects cam was contrived and made into an ‘Act’... That was a discredited act before it became a ‘Royal Assent’-‘stamped’ Act.. Time now to scrap it..... [To be continued]
BASINGSTOKE Councillor, too, says CROSSRAIL is not sensible...!
- "Crossrail has little benefit for Basingstoke" KHOODEELAAR! 1738 GMT London 25 July 2008: Commenting on the BASINGSTOKE GAZETTE web site item ['Crossrail has little benefit for Basingstoke'] [Friday 25 July 2008] Muhammad Haque to BASINGSTOKE GAZETTE, "You report Councillor Horace Mitchell as stating "I don't see a lot of common sense in it," Indeed! That is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail has dubbed the scheme CRASS rail. In the past three days following the formal assent being attached to the Hybrid Crossrail Bill, certain views which only KHOODEELAAR! had stated in the period February 22 2005 to July 21 2008 about Crassrail have also been in effect acknowledged, for the first time' by some of the most fanatic members of the pro-Crossrail propaganda machines. Evidently, they too now realise that Crossrail does not make sense! We argued that the Bill was being passed through the Commons and the Lords -including via the 'Crossrail Bill Select committee' set up in each House- without scrutiny. There was a stooge committee in each House and the 360 odd objectors were not allowed to question the main premise of the Bill. We have shown that the Bill was unconstitutional and are now about to file the long overdue constitutional law challenges in the UK domestic courts. We are doing this so that a sensible solution to transport needs of the areas can be found and funded with the precious, scarce public money. As Channel 4 news pointe d out in October 2007 when reporting Brown’s then election-linked series of publicity statements, the ‘commitment’ of £Billions of public funds to Crossrail was AGAINST the advice of Rod Eddington. Eddington, the former aviation trade executive, had been specially commissioned to do a report on the future of UK’s transport infrastructure....! Brown there behaved imprudently. It is not too late even now to stop the further waste of £Billions..... Places like Basingstoke deserve a full and fair say on the transport provisions being planned with public money and in the name of the public in the region...Yours sincerely, Muhammad Haque, Organiser, KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot....” CAMPAIGN 1725 GMT London Friday 25 July 2008
- "Crossrail has little benefit for Basingstoke" KHOODEELAAR! 1738 GMT London 25 July 2008: Commenting on the BASINGSTOKE GAZETTE web site item ['Crossrail has little benefit for Basingstoke'] [Friday 25 July 2008] Muhammad Haque to BASINGSTOKE GAZETTE, "You report Councillor Horace Mitchell as stating "I don't see a lot of common sense in it," Indeed! That is why the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against Crossrail has dubbed the scheme CRASS rail. In the past three days following the formal assent being attached to the Hybrid Crossrail Bill, certain views which only KHOODEELAAR! had stated in the period February 22 2005 to July 21 2008 about Crassrail have also been in effect acknowledged, for the first time' by some of the most fanatic members of the pro-Crossrail propaganda machines. Evidently, they too now realise that Crossrail does not make sense! We argued that the Bill was being passed through the Commons and the Lords -including via the 'Crossrail Bill Select committee' set up in each House- without scrutiny. There was a stooge committee in each House and the 360 odd objectors were not allowed to question the main premise of the Bill. We have shown that the Bill was unconstitutional and are now about to file the long overdue constitutional law challenges in the UK domestic courts. We are doing this so that a sensible solution to transport needs of the areas can be found and funded with the precious, scarce public money. As Channel 4 news pointe d out in October 2007 when reporting Brown’s then election-linked series of publicity statements, the ‘commitment’ of £Billions of public funds to Crossrail was AGAINST the advice of Rod Eddington. Eddington, the former aviation trade executive, had been specially commissioned to do a report on the future of UK’s transport infrastructure....! Brown there behaved imprudently. It is not too late even now to stop the further waste of £Billions..... Places like Basingstoke deserve a full and fair say on the transport provisions being planned with public money and in the name of the public in the region...Yours sincerely, Muhammad Haque, Organiser, KHOODEELAAR! No to “Crossrail hole plot....” CAMPAIGN 1725 GMT London Friday 25 July 2008
- http://ttp://www.basingstokegazette.co.uk/news/newsheadlines/display.var.2409550.0.0.php
KHOODEELAAR! leaflet 16420 Friday 25 July 2008
Crossrail hole plot, Big Business agenda-backer London GUARDIAN confesses to lying for Crossrail..
- 0810 Hrs GMT LOndon Friday 25 July 2008 : KHOODEELAAR! recording the latest confession by Crossrail hole plot-peddling Big Business agenda-promoting courier of Ken Livingstone's propaganda........How can the CRASSrail hole plot-peddling, lying Guardian now admit that the Tube trains even exist in London?
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/jul/23/transport.london
KHOODEELAAR! legal action programme updated as at 14 March 2006
Boris Johnson-friendly Daily Telegrpah news organisation ADMITS that KHOODEELAAR! has been right...
After Glasgow East...the East End of London calling against FUNDED corruption in the community
- 0310 Hrs GMT London Friday 25 July 2008: This is Friday. According to all the 'mainstream' , 'popular' 'media' the Friday in the East End of London is the one day in the week when unidentified but wholly stereotyped extremist events take place ..... By all received and prevalent usages of the term ‘extremist’, it is to be found not far from the relative ‘radical’, which in turn is not very far from ‘campaign’.... The latter two are about justice. It is very rare, ‘extremely’ so, that either [‘radical’ or ‘extremist’] is associated with negative aim. That is to say, radical and extremist are often about seeking positive aims. Like fairness. Equality. Justice.... Which are among some of the key aims behind the Khoodeelaar! campaign. Yet there is no evidence that hordes of radicals from the ordinary population are up in arms campaign against Big Business... It is one thing that the effects of Big Business police and the local Council’s treachery against the local people will hurt the people. But it is another thing to say that therefore the people are doing much to oppose the attacks. Which means that the people are passive..... Sleeping... Which is where the Khoodeelaar! campaign has found them over the past 56 months.... Which is why the references to ‘the East End’ as uttered in Glasgow, Scotland, early this morning by John Mason of the Scottish National Party [=’SNP’] need to be qualified by voicing the concerns about Lon don’s East End.... If Brown has messed up in Glasgow East so Brown has messed up in London East... Khoodeelaar! has been telling Brown so since February 2004...... If an electoral disaster were to be repeated against Brown-fronted Blaired outfit at the next election in London ‘s East then alone will they listen... But what then? What after they have ‘listened’? They will FUND some of the ‘locally’ based agents, touts, timeservers and assorted operatives, under various guises in ‘the community’. Who will keep an eye on those outfits? Who will make sure that THEY do not rob the people in whose name they are funded? [To be continued]
- 0310 Hrs GMT London Friday 25 July 2008: This is Friday. According to all the 'mainstream' , 'popular' 'media' the Friday in the East End of London is the one day in the week when unidentified but wholly stereotyped extremist events take place ..... By all received and prevalent usages of the term ‘extremist’, it is to be found not far from the relative ‘radical’, which in turn is not very far from ‘campaign’.... The latter two are about justice. It is very rare, ‘extremely’ so, that either [‘radical’ or ‘extremist’] is associated with negative aim. That is to say, radical and extremist are often about seeking positive aims. Like fairness. Equality. Justice.... Which are among some of the key aims behind the Khoodeelaar! campaign. Yet there is no evidence that hordes of radicals from the ordinary population are up in arms campaign against Big Business... It is one thing that the effects of Big Business police and the local Council’s treachery against the local people will hurt the people. But it is another thing to say that therefore the people are doing much to oppose the attacks. Which means that the people are passive..... Sleeping... Which is where the Khoodeelaar! campaign has found them over the past 56 months.... Which is why the references to ‘the East End’ as uttered in Glasgow, Scotland, early this morning by John Mason of the Scottish National Party [=’SNP’] need to be qualified by voicing the concerns about Lon don’s East End.... If Brown has messed up in Glasgow East so Brown has messed up in London East... Khoodeelaar! has been telling Brown so since February 2004...... If an electoral disaster were to be repeated against Brown-fronted Blaired outfit at the next election in London ‘s East then alone will they listen... But what then? What after they have ‘listened’? They will FUND some of the ‘locally’ based agents, touts, timeservers and assorted operatives, under various guises in ‘the community’. Who will keep an eye on those outfits? Who will make sure that THEY do not rob the people in whose name they are funded? [To be continued]
To the property speculators and profit-seeking land-grabbers, CROSSRAIL is FOR exploiting people
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council clique... DEMONSTRATION
Ruth Kelly, Boris Johnson and Peter Hendy pose ina Crossrail-peddling photo-opp... They look tense!
The East London IDIOTISER contradicts its own 'printed' accounts, regularly
Crossrail hole plot agenda backer RUTH KELLY 'confesses' all to KHOODEELAAR!
Muhammad Haque, Timesonline, London, comments on the crassness of the Crossrail scam
- MUHAMMAD HAQUE Times, London, web site: "Tunnel Vision' ......"Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital" .Then you [the Times newspaper] quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up! They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that crossrail will cause. What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and big business Muhammad Haque
- "Tunnel Vision' ......"Crossrail will slash journey times and bump up property prices on both sides of the capital" .Then you [the Times newspaper] quote a whole range of property companies stating in gleeful terms how the prices of properties in currently deprived [!] areas will shoot up! They specifically also mention the Whitechapel area in the East End of London. Poverty and deprivation there are between the UK's highest. There is no irony in the Crossrail hypers' glee that the deprived and the low-income people will SUFFER as a direct result of the ADDITIONAL income disparity and the ADDITIONAL social exclusion and inequality that crossrail will cause. What a way to waste £Billions of public money boosting the coffers of those who cause inequality in society. The East End people WILL be made poorer still by the imposition of the Crossrail Trojan horse for speculators and big business Muhammad Haque
Is pushing the poverty-creating Crossrail hole Big Business agenda worth Brown's adding to poverty?
Notice how David Begg states his doubts about the value of Crossrail
Muhammad Haque asks UK's top civil servant today to scrap Crossrail hole scam...
Alf Dubs! Even he was flabbergasted by Bassam's protection of Network Rail Dubs suggested that the
CRASS talk by Crossrail hole plot tout Ken Livingstone
- This YOUTUBE compilation by a third party, not at all with any links or connection with KHOODEELAAR! , depicts that Ken Livingstone made several false or untruthful statements about Crossrail....Livingstone made those statements as part of his touting for the Big Business agenda Crossrail hole scam.. It is lies and untruths as uttered by all the main promoters fo CRASSrail that make it untenable and unacceptable..... Khoodeelaar! is set to start the filing of the applications as soon as procedures allow.
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOzvkRSaNGk
KHOODEELAAR! the banner saying NO to Crossrail hole Bill
Times newspaper, London, web site getting confused about its Crossrail hole agenda plugs
KHOODEELAAR! logo of the CAMPAIGN against Crossrail hole Bill...
Snooper from the Mulberry Place? Or a honest news reporter who was again spiked by prejudice?
London INDEPENDENT on Sunday 20 July 2008
The [Glasgow] HERALD Saturday 19 July 2008
A typically twisting profiteering scam plugged by the DAILY EXPRESS Saturday 19 July 2008
KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail questions Darling's 'feeling' of taxpayers' pain,..Times, 19 July 2008
ALISTAIR DARLING has a package of wastefulness and debt he himself created: Get rid of Crossrail
Harriet Harman backs Crossrail hole plot against the East End of London
KHOODEELAAR! demonstration 11 September 2007
CRASS perks in CRASSrail job, bragged about by CRASSRAIL contractor
AADHIKAR the original masthead at 19 December 1980
"Most deprived borough in the country.." is being lumbered with more poverty-creating scams...
- MUHAMMAD HAQUE as published [Tuesday 15 July 2008] on the Times London, web site, commenting on the admission by the Crossrail hole plot-agenda-inviter Tower Hamlets Council 'ex' leader Denise Jones THAT “Tower is the most deprived borough in the country’....." By calling it something that contains the word 'rich' while doing everything that kept up the impoverishment of the borough, they have shown once again the poverty of their politics. No wonder Tower Hamlets is the 'most deprived borough in the country'. They admit it. With no sign of shame. Or sense!
- MUHAMMAD HAQUE as published [Tuesday 15 July 2008] on the Times London, web site, commenting on the admission by the Crossrail hole plot-agenda-inviter Tower Hamlets Council 'ex' leader Denise Jones THAT “Tower is the most deprived borough in the country’
KHOODEELAAR! electoral challenges in Tower Hamlets, East London, seats -TO STOP the CROSSRAIL hole
London E1 area KHOODEELAAR! supporter in Brick Lane and Hanbury Street
The truth about the Crossrail hole plot-inviting clique on Tower Hamlets Council....
- KHOODEELAAR! No to CRASS role being played for Crossrail hole plot agenda by the ‘local paper’ the East London Advertiser, trading in the area corresponding to the ‘East London’ borough of Tower Hamlets : WHO is hiding the truth of the corrupt clique's role? Step forward Malcolm Starbrook, who else! The frequency with which 'Malcolm' 'stars' in the 'trade press', moaning and boasting, is a spectacle to behold.... About time that we took a look at the role Malcolm has been playing in hiding the truth about the community from the IDIOTISER 'millions of readers' [Oops! don't mean to hide that fact It is under 20000 [or significantly lower than that limit] , the circulation of the East London IDIOTISER that 'Malcolm' 'edits'.... [To be continued]
- http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=7&storycode=41652&c=1
Network Rail? No, Cheatwork Rail, so KHOODEELAAR! renames Network Rail from now on...
Will Tony Blair ever stop lying? But the UNRELIABLE Daily Tel web site does not help!
- DAILY TELEGRAPH web site is controlled dishonestly, prejudicially and ignorantly....[To be continued]
- KHOODEELAAR! No to "Big Business agenda Crossrail hole plot.." CAMPAIGN asks at 0005 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 July 2008: This in view of the latest item of evidence that Blair never knew - could never have known what telling the truth was... In this item the Conrad Black-ed daily Telegraph is forced to show up Blair's infantile lying......[To be continued]
- KHOODEELAAR! No to "Big Business agenda Crossrail hole plot.." CAMPAIGN asks at 0005 Hrs GMT London Sunday 13 July 2008: This in view of the latest item of evidence that Blair never knew - could never have known what telling the truth was... In this item the Conrad Black-ed daily Telegraph is forced to show up Blair's infantile lying......[To be continued]
YOUTUBE Video showing Ken Livingstone openly abusing London Assembly for daring to question him...
- KHOODEELAAR! Commentary Part 2 on this week's display of ego by Ken Livingstone via UK House of Commons select Committee...... in the context of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Stooging of the Crossrail Bill Select Committee [ To be continued]
- KHOODEELAAR! Commentary Part 2 on this week's display of ego by Ken Livingstone via UK House of Commons select Committee...... in the context of the KHOODEELAAR! campaign against the Stooging of the Crossrail Bill Select Committee [ To be continued]
The REUTERS news agency shows daily how biased it is against liberty and freedom.
'East London Says No to Crossrail-caused Poverty...'
No to Crossrail hole is a universally understood demand in the area
Former boss of UK's MI5 Intelligence organisation speaking today against 42 day detention
Boris Johnson publicly shows up [Steve] Norris,[the latest plugger for Crossrail]
Charlie Falconer in the UK 'House of Peers' today, Tuesday 8 July 2008
ITV London Tuesday 8 July 2008 again showed how stupid and anti-democratic that programme is
Boris Johnson scraps Ken Livingstone's 'gas-guzzlers' charges...
BBC item on businesses expecting looming recession, makes no mention of Crossrail London scam...
With the likes of Dennis Skinner braying 'against the Tories' at any excuse.....
Heavily scripted performance by Crossrail hole plot-agenda fronter Ruth Kelly...
The BBC has got to tell the truth first and then pretend to defer to the public and 'listen'...
Another video showing Crossrail hole plot-backer Ken Livingstone contradicting himself on fares ...
Is London safe for tourists? Answer: Ken Livingstone lied when he went OTT in boasting about it
- KHOODEELAAR! says at 1600 GMT Sunday 6 July 2008: Ditch Ken Livingstone's CRASS lie for Crossrail hole plot. Livingstone went OTT in making the false utterance, London is a 'world class city'.... What about the world-scaring [OK, to Polly T and assorted liars at the Guardian for their fabricating ‘candidate’ Ken Livingstone, ‘world-deterring’!] violence that Livingstone presided over for 8 years?
- KHOODEELAAR! says: Ditch Ken Livingstone's CRASS lie for Crossrail hole plot. Livingstone went OTT in making the false utterance, London is a 'world class city'.... What about the world-scaring [OK, to Polly T and assorted liars at the Guardian for their fabricating ‘candidate’ Ken Livingstone, ‘world-deterring’!] violence that Livingstone presided over for 8 years?
RUTH KELLY! 'WHO SHE?'
Muhammad Haque, demonstrating how Crossrail hole plot would make East Enders POORER..
Crossrail hole plot-INVITING, poverty-creating Tower Hamlets clique silent
No to Crossrail hole - a resident in the Brick Lane E1 area with KHOODEELAAR! No to Crossrail...
Crossrail hole plotter USA Bechtel 'is advising Crossrail' and is also a BIG Player in the NUCLEARI
EU ratification challenger Stuart Wheeler on BBC2 NEWSNIGHT
Caroline Flint! She wants you skint!... Lines of Hunger in Gordon Brown's Britain....
AADHIKAR Rights, the first front page Monday 19 December 1980
Conrad Black, Boris Johnson, Barbara Amiel-ed 'Daily Telegrpah' London Saturday 31 May 2008
"Dirty Desmond''-owned Daily EXPRESS, London, Saturday 31 May 2008
The Scotsman, Edinburgh Friday 30 May 2008
Murdoch SUN, London Friday 30 May 2008
The Independent, London, Friday 30 May 2008
Daily Mirror, London Friday 30 May 2008
Financial Times, London
Guardian, London, Friday 30 May 2008
Blog Archive
- ► 2010 (361)
- ▼ 2009 (736)