2250 Hrs GMT
London
Wednesday
31 March 2010.
Editor © Muhammad Haque.
Khoodeelaar! Told brown so! That his preaching about 'fair immigration.' staged at a secret location in 'East LONDON' today [Wednesday 31 march 2010] insulted. It insulted the truth. It insulted the people who really knew about migration, immigration and history. Uk Gordon brown, on the other hand, delivered a pack of lies about immigration. He concealed the truth about European mass migration to Asia, Africa and the rest of the world. Michael scholar has not told him off for those untruths that g brown uttered and promoted. Michael scholar has ticked brown off for a relatively minor matter.
However, we reproduce the report from the LONDON EVENING STANDARD carrying a comment from Michael scholar about g brown's inaccurate assertion.
We shall later on discuss brown's ignorant preaching in the context of the high unemployment, schools and councils' failures in East LONDON and their implications on people of all ethnicities, nationalities and religions and faith backgrounds in the so-called Olympic boroughs in East LONDON.
Unlike the khoodeelaar! Campaign against big business agenda crossrail scam, Gordon brown does not understand the inner city East end of LONDON.
And he also does not care. What he understands is the value of votes and what he cares about is to grab the votes by any means. With his Norman wisdom-reminder smile, which is unsettling at the best of times, Gordon brown’s appearance in ‘East LONDON’ has been another fakery. It would be unremarkable if it weren’t so dangerously misleading.
Millions of people across the UK would have suffered the brainwashing footage broadcast by the BBC from ‘East LONDON’. Neither the facts of brown’s backing for corrupt local council clique nor the adverse impacts of the behaviour of corrupt big business operatives at the expense of the people of ‘East LONDON’ was shown on the Gordon brown 'migration' broadcasts.
Looked at in the context of the 2010 general election charade, the Gordon brown migration stunt was hugely offensive. He left out the fact that the popular prejudices about ‘immigrants’ are not based on facts but on hype. And that government causes the worst sort of hype against ‘immigrants’. And by the mainstream parties. And the Bliared party now fronted by Gordon brown has been as bad as the UK con party fronted by d Cameron. Both have lied. And they have lied to capitulate to the very forces of prejudice about which g brown was muttering his ‘warning’ today.
Brown will not convince. For he has been one of the most ignorant, pro-racist utterer on the subject. As we have pointed out on a hundred occasions in the past three years, brown in fact boasts of empire and imperialism. T
his is not compatible with any idea of fairness’ whatsoever. Why? For a start, Brown did not disown, let alone apologise for, a single one of his many racist boats and comments of the past years. Nor did he even refer to any semi-truthful hypothesis showing any level of correlation between income and 'immigration'.
There was no truth whatever in Brown’s spiel. It was empty, empty and empty. Just like Brown’s empty promises about ‘jobs and benefits’ as part of his peddling role for Big Business agenda Crossrail scam, so was his ‘immigration’ preaching today [Wednesday 31 March 2010] an insult, an embarrassment and a disservice.
[To be continued]
From the web site of the London ‘EVENING STANDARD’, accessed at 2140 Hrs GMT 31 March 2010
“PM criticised over immigration data
31.03.10
Girl dies as snow hits parts of UK
Jobs axed at rail maintenance firm
Talks progress averts gas strike
Robbers jailed after juryless trial
Cameron plans 'neighbourhood army'
Woman charged with station murder
Chechen rebel claims Moscow attacks
Met dismisses shamed senior officer
Number of prisoners at record high
Gordon Brown has been rebuked by a watchdog for his use of immigration statistics as he issued a plea for a "responsible" debate on the issue during the coming election campaign.
UK Statistics Authority chair Sir Michael Scholar said the Prime Minister sought to draw links between data that was "not comparable" in a podcast which sparked protests from opposition parties last week.
The ruling cast a shadow over Mr Brown's attempt to position Labour as the party of fairness and responsibility on immigration, in a speech in which he warned against election "scaremongering" about numbers of foreigners coming to the UK.
In a letter to the PM, Sir Michael pointed to two errors in the Downing Street internet broadcast.
Mr Brown had claimed net inward migration - the number of arrivals minus those leaving - fell from 237,000 in 2007 to 163,000 in 2008 and 147,000 last year, but Sir Michael said the correct figure for 2007 was 233,000. More seriously, he said the 147,000 figure used by Mr Brown was wrong because it is taken from a different data set which has not yet been adjusted. Mr Brown corrected his error in the speech, without drawing attention to the original inaccuracy.
In his letter to the PM, Sir Michael said he hoped all parties would be "careful in their use of statistics" during the election.
Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said Mr Brown was turning into "a serial offender in misleading the British people".
"He gave false information to the Chilcot Inquiry, his advertising campaign about policing was banned, and now he has given an inaccurate picture of his record on immigration," said Mr Grayling. "Britain should expect better from its Prime Minister. No wonder we need change."
In his speech in east London, the Prime Minister promised that a re-elected Labour administration would deliver "fair and controlled" migration through its points-based system, while denouncing Conservative plans for an annual cap on incomers as "arbitrary and unworkable" and bad for business. He said the Government had "no intention" of allowing unskilled workers from outside the EU into Britain and would close the door for chefs and care workers by 2014.
But he insisted that no mainstream parties want to stop immigration altogether and called for an "open and responsible debate" on how best to control it.
Ads by Google
UK Visas
UK Immigration Visas. Expert Advice Call Now On: 0207 100 1919!
www.CapitalVisas.com/UK-Visas
Gordon Brown
What do Labour stand for? Info on Labour policies/MPs online
www.lbc.co.uk
London Almost Free
Get daily deals on the best stuff to do, eat & buy in London!
www.Groupon.com/London
Immigration Experts
Expert UK Immigration Solicitors. Support When You Need It Most.
pauljohncompanysolicitorse15.co.uk
Reader views (10) Add your view
Labour have been destroying this country for the last 13 years and if they stay in power we may as well all leave and find a country that pays to house us and gives us free Health care. For the size of this pathetic little island compared to the rest of the world we have a big mouth and even bigger ideas!!! Our contribution to helping green house gases is a mere drop in the ocean!!
- Janet, London
Immigration falling?
Does that include the 400,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS loitering with intent in London, whom the Home Office CANNOT TRACE?
- Reuben Camara, Plot 1, Morecambe Compound, EUSSR
Brown knows damn well that he cannot deliver a 'controlled and fair' immigration system. He no longer has the power to manage this country's make up.That power now lies with Brussels.
All Brown can do is sit back and tacitly allow his local Councils to micro manage every second of the lives of law abiding residents.
The latest lunacies are, the rapist allowed to stay in the country because he 'might get married' and the OAP tagged for selling a goldfish.
We will have much much more of this strangling of the human spirit if Liebour are re-elected.
- Nora Kane, london
The Labour spin machine has cranked up a few gears in the last few days, and this is another subject where this man is terribly out of touch. Immigration has clearly been out of control for many years, and this view has nothing to do people’s “worst instincts of nationalism and xenophobia”. It’s to do with living in and experiencing an overcrowded country where services and infrastructure are overstretched. A country where young people/students can no longer get jobs. Immigrants head here, because they know we have little immigration control and our benefits system is ready and waiting to be abused. We know it and the immigrants know it.
- Xtremely Worried, Britain (No Longer great)
Thanks Gordon, but it's not like you haven't had 13 years is it?
I think there should be a cap on immigration linked to the unemployment rate.
- Alfresco, Reading, Berkshire
There is a very simple answer to the immigration problem: one person allowed in when one person leaves. All asylum seekers to be closer monitored and returned ti their country of origin when conditions permit. All foreign students to be required to pay a deposit of £10,000 when entering Britain refundable upon exit. All foreign students to be required to produce medical certification upon entry.
- Simon, London
An admission then that the previous decade`s scenario was neither controlled nor fair!
That should be enough in itself to swing the opinion polls against, should it not?
Instead of Gordon talking about British jobs for British Workers, perhaps a more appropriate slogan would be "British redundancies for British workers"?
A decade of NOT training people for the jobs we NEED, but allowing the overstuffing of institutions with degrees in "Diversity", Sport technology, Media Studies, instead of training home grown armies of Engineers, Electricians, Plumbers, Bricklayers Builders.
A decade of allowing people NOT to take up jobs that were offered by because generous benefits and uncontrolled migrant workers gave them all the excuses not to .
A decade of paying the feckless to breed multiple broods of feckless children to furnish their clientell state.
The milking of those who DO work for their (and other peoples) living via stealth taxes.
The NuLab definition of "FAIR" should be examined very closely indeed.
- Darius, London
It's a bit late now Mr Broon, years on incompetence and blatant lying to the electorate, coupled with an obvious attempt at social engineering through immigration can't be covered up by you or Mr Johnson grandstanding to the media. What was said when the EU borders were opened? we will only recieve 13ooo and actually 600000 turned up to help themselves to my taxes ans health care.
- Frank, London
So what have New Labour been doing for the past 13 years then ?
- John Bloomfield, Twickenham
So why has Gordon Brown not controlled immigration hitherto? Why does it take an election to take control of immigration?
- Jorlakay, mukdahan thailand
follow me on Twitter
Comments (22)
Add your comment