0200 GMT
London
Sunday
03 January 2010
Editor© Muhammad Haque
“
Thursday, April 13, 2006
Third edition 13 April 2006
http://www.khoodeelaar.com
This [the 3rd] Edition [of the day] Updated at 1730 Hrs GMT / 1830 Hrs Uktime on Thursday 13 April 2006
Khoodeelaar is a Seelotee language word devised by Muhammad Haque for the Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign established in January 2004 to defend the Brick Lane London E1 area against the Crossrail hole assault. The details of that assault plan are as contained in the legislative plan the ‘Crassrail Bill’, now in the UK House of Commons
KHOODEELAAR!
The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole-tunnel ‘project, scheme, plan’ Bill [that is ‘the Crossrail Bill’ in the UK House of Commons – in April 2006]
Legal Disclaimer published at the end of this web page
This Khoodeelaardotcom and the khoodeelaar.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER can be viewed at the bottom of this edition
Khoodeelaar! Online 2006
Published by CBRUK from London UK
Editor: Muhammad Haque
Legal affairs:
Lawcompliance
lawcompliance@hotmail.co.uk
Constitutional matters:
lawmedia lawmedia@hotmail.com
Khoodeelaar Media
khoodeelaartv@yahoo.co.uk
For archived copies of the original Khoodeelaar! Analysis of the Crossrail hole Bill, Khoodeelaar! Investigative reports on the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council Crossrail-hole-Clique and related Khoodeelaar analytical materials including those published on Khoodeelaardotcom send your request by email to
khoodeelaardotcom@yahoo.co.uk
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Manifesto 2006 Commentary
By©Muhammad Haque
1730 GMT London Thursday 13 April 2006
Throughout the past four years during which the Crassrail hole attack plan has been pushed against the community in the East End of London, the so-called local paper the East London Idiotiser has published [if at all – and it has done so in a most erratic, insistent, factually ignorant and misleading and inconsistent way] most idiotically.
It has shown ignorance and added confusion. It has persistently shielded the crooks in the controlling clique on the Tower Hamlets Council who have concealed the facts of their collusion with the promoters of the Crossrail hole attack on the community and have lied to and against the community for the Crossrail hole assault promoters.
In the latest weekly print edition [their ‘internet’ appearance is only a few months old – on that we have a report coming here soon] published today Thursday 13 April 2006, the crassly-edited East London Idiotiser stuffs the so-called news pages with mainly inane, ignorant, idiotic items, including alleged news and features spaces in the Idiotiser being given to the promotion of dud candidates for the scheduled 4 May 2006 election.
Contrary to some of the recent ‘reports’ published by the same East London Idiotiser on some only of the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the Crossrail hole plan, there is no evidence or sign in any of the pages of so-called election ‘news’ in the print edition [or indeed on the web site ‘versions] dated Thursday 13 April 2006 of that movement!
Yet it has been the khoodeelaar movement against the crooks controlling the Crossrail-hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council that has been the politically pro-democratising, pro-accountability phenomenon in the area! For the first time in a very long time indeed!
The defence of the community against the CrossRail hole assault is a defence movement, which will be enhanced and strengthened around and beyond the current Council-election ‘season’.
How dare the ‘writers’ of the editorial stuff appearing the latest print edition [and web-site truncations] in the East London Idiotiser fabricate so openly and shamelessly for the benefit of the Crossrail-hole-bent crooks ‘led’ by Michael Keith?
The guises of the dud candidates have been extensively changed by the East London Idiotiser to paint them as some sort of credible electoral challengers to the corrupt stinking sleazy bunch controlling the council now...How can the dummies of the controlling clique be any ‘alternative’ to the crooks themselves?
KHOODEELAARonline is due to publish a detailed report soon exposing the East London IDIOTISER’s role in keeping the East End community as ill-informed as possible and in shielding the corrupt doings of the clique now in ‘control’ of the Crossrail-hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council.
Why is the East London Idiotiser publishing as another East End Lies now?
Why is it peddling Michael Keith’s dummy candidates as otherwise?
Under cover of ‘election campaign news’, the East London Idiotiser exposes its own ugly cash-linked propensity on publishing! The crass Crossrail hole ‘reporting’ is now confirmed as being linked with the East London IDIOTISER’s own cash-grabbing leanings – a special KHOODEELAARonline report will be published here shortly
[To be continued]
From the previous [the 2nd] edition Thursday 13 April 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Manifesto 2006 Commentary
By©Muhammad Haque
0330 Hrs GMT London Thursday 13 April 2006-04-13
If so many people say the current clique of Tower Hamlets, in the East End of London, borough councillors are corrupt, how come there is such a frenetic ‘canvassing’ for votes going on?
Should the corrupt kind of councillors be re-elected?
Should their types be elected [if those types are seeking election for the first time]?
The rank corruption of Tower Hamlets councillors – and of the clique that controls that council - was reportedly exposed on a ‘satellite TV programme’ broadcast from London in the evening of Wednesday 12 April 2006.
In that programme, sitting councillors from ‘Spitalfields Brick Lane’, the Tower Hamlets Council ward that includes the Brick Lane area, were severely condemned by certain participants, sources who spoke to KHOODEELAARonline have said.
“These are the ones who brought the CrossRail hole problem to us” they said.
‘People have said NO MORE VOTES FOR THE LIARS’, said Mr Miah of the Shahjalal Estate off the Vallance Road in the Weavers Ward, adjacent to the Brick Lane area.
“People phoned in and said that councillors were lying and they must be changed”.
It is also reported that another ‘ethnicity-linked’ satellite TV channel is due to stage a similar programme later on in which the same type of electioneering is expected to be indulged in.
The Khoodeelaar organisation has confirmed again that the channels are the subject of legal proceedings. They have breached the codes of conduct and have fabricated stories to give slants in favour of particular self-peddlers, groupings or interests.
Both ethnicity-linked satellite channels have broadcast programmes over the Crossrail hole matter but have deliberately failed to include the facts or to give viewers the key let alone the full factual information on the alleged issue of the Crossrail hole referred to.
Instead, parades of self-seeking, image-addicted individuals have been given access to the broadcast time and the facts distorted or diluted or utterly suppressed.
[To be continued]
From the previous edition: 0140 Hrs GMT Thursday 13 April 2006
Did another ‘ethnicity linked’ satellite ‘TV channel’ based in London UK, do another ‘debate’ on the Crossrail hole assault on the Brick Lane London E1 area and did they do so by lying to their viewers?
By©Muhammad Haque
Organiser, the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CrossRail hole attacks on the Brick Lane London E1 area
0140 Hrs GMT Thursday 13 April 2006
This question arises from claims in the Brick Lane London E1 area reported to Khoodeelaar! campaign in the evening of Wednesday 12 April 2006 that another satellite ‘TV channel’, which is allowed the licence to broadcast from London UK because of its allied affinity with an alleged ethnicity-linked section of the audience, has given platforms to some bogus opponents of the Crossrail hole plan.
The pretext for the platform as used by the ‘broadcaster’ was the local council election campaign period that is underway now.
The facts did not come out and the programme editor was as ignorant of both the key facts as they were of the demands, the strategy of the Khoodeelaar! movement as well.
Like the other satellite TV channel ‘ethnicity linked to broadcast on the satellite channels, there was no information sent by the broadcaster to the Khoodeelaar campaign either before or during the reported broadcast.
Khoodeelaar! is now filing formal legal process claims against the licence-holder and publisher of the satellite channel concerned under the law against the broadcasting of repaired falsified ‘reports’ about the CrossRail assault and the abuse by the broadcaster of the existence of our campaign to provide platforms to some of the perpetrators of the CrossRail hole assault on the community.
The other ‘ethnicity-linked satellite TV’ channel is the subject of separate legal proceedings. We shall publish further details about that other cannel after legally checking the relevant details.
For now, this report is about the ‘second ethnicity linked’ satellite TV channel which allegedly had a number of ‘prospective councillors’ seeking election to Tower Hamlets Council at the 4 May 2006 elections.
According to one member of the RESPECT coalition who was interviewed by Khoodeelaaronline at 2330 Hrs GMT on Wednesday 12 April 2006,
[To be continued]
From the pervious edition:
Postal vote ‘fraud’ allegation
Tower Hamlets Council election candidates have been accused of vote fraud in the Brick Lane London E1 area
More here shortly
Khoodeelaar! legal action against the Chief Executive of the London borough of Tower Hamlets council and the controlling clique ion the Council is going ahead and the final deadline for the last set of procedural formalities to be complied with by the defendants has been set as Friday 14 April 2006.
Further details on the claims against the Council and against its chief executive will be published on this web site over the weekend.
This filed at 2310 Hrs GMT on wednesady1 2 April 2006 / 0010 hrs UK time on thsudday1 3 April 2006
From the previous edition:
From the previous edition:
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 – Part P
By © Muhammad Haque
1500 Hrs GMT/1600 Hrs UK
Wednesday 12 April 2006
The Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CrossRail hole assault on the Brick Lane London E1 area includes all issues to do with the Tower Hamlets [the local] Council’s legal and constitutional obligations.
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 activities have already included the fact that we have drawn attention to the purpose of this Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 and the mode of applying it’s expressed and legally implied purposes to ‘candidates’ for council elections from every single known faction or grouping [or of no apparent grouping].
We have set out the terms of reference in the previous parts and in this part, part P. we address the matter of the Pledge.
What is a pledge?
A pledge is any statement that can be citied back to the maker of the pledge.
A pledge is any statement that the candidate will make during the run up to 4 May 2006 [as presently scheduled to be the polling day] elections and do so with reference to their own suitability for election and their sane and sound and sober intention to do something about any matter issue or subject if and when elected to the Council.
We shall NOT seek pledge in relation to anything in particular from any candidate.
We have been offered unsolicited undertakings and expressions from the candidates.
We shall NOT rely on those.
Instead, we shall rely on those that the candidates have either personally or directly made or those that have been made in their name or on their behalf and with their actual or express or implied consent about any issue that is covered by the law and by the constitution as being within the remits of the duties and the relevance of the holder of any relevant elected office on the or in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
The power of the people lies not in the peoples’ presumed freedom to make any number of articulations about any number of issues. The power lies in the logical and constitutional relevance of the demands that can be made.
Once a candidate is in post after the elections scheduled for 4 May 2006, we shall be seeking the ‘elected’ councillors’ responses on the outstanding questions that we have been putting to the EXISTING councillors since February 2004.
We shall ensure that no councillor on Tower Hamlets Council is able to indulge in the game of pretence: [which goes something like this ] one minute they exist the next minute they don’t. This is not real. And those that have not been in receipt of our reminders recently - the existing councillors [ from Tower Hamlets Council ] concerned who have been appearing on ‘TV’ slots albeit shown mainly on satellite and as dedicated ‘ethnicity-linked’ outlets– should note that this Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 is as much the product of their political zombiness as it is that of the active corruption by their colleagues or ‘bosses’ in the controlling clique on the current Council.
The corruption, the collusion, the diversion, the delay and the dissembling, the lying that the controlling clique has been indulging in to promote the CrossRail hole assault on our community
We shall be sending all the due reminders in due course and we shall do so with the vigour and clarity that the campaign to stop the CrossRail hole requires and warrants.
Every single one of the recent ‘TV stars’ [who have made smiling, grinning appearances on the ethnicity-linked slots] making ANY assertion about their own actual or in principle opposition to the CrossRail hole assault will be asked a series of legal questions demanding the production of legally verified and verifiable evidence in support of their claims.
We know of not one councillor – until 17 January 2006 – on Tower Hamlets Council who either said or went public in stating anything that remotely resembled even one word of support to our campaign against the Crossrail hole let alone doing anything discernible/detectible [logically and legally] with us in our 27 months of opposition to the CrossRail hole assault.
That a number of those previously silent ‘councillors’ became at once available for ‘TV stardom’ and also able to ‘remember’ things that had not existed – the things including their phantom political roles in opposing the CrossRail hole assaults plan on dates prior to 17 January 2006 – is a fact far too serious for us to ignore.
We shall seek court orders against any of those otherwise ‘innocent about CrossRail hole’ councillors to persuade them to confess that they too have been lying.
[To be continued]
From the previous [the 2nd] edition, Wednesday 12 April 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane London E1 area
campaign events and information list at 1330 Hrs GMT Wednesday 12 April 2006
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 – Part P is due to be published here first, shortly
Also due to be published today is the first part of our examination of the ‘Manifesto’ as published by or in the name of the Conservatives in Tower Hamlets: Are they serious in their ….. ?
Why George Galloway’s condemnation [on Monday 10 April 2006 at a news conference’ held in the Brick Lane Lo9ndon E1 area] of Tower Hamlets Council as a corrupt Council must be treated as an election pledge by his RESPECT coalition that when – and if – it gets any control or any say in the control of the Council after the scheduled 4 May 2006 election, the RESPECT coalition must do everything and be seen to do everything, to root out corruption from the Council. – to be published here shortly
From the pervious [the 1st] edition Wednesday 12 April 2006
Why the Khoodeelaar! Legal action against Crossrail-hole Minister Alistair Darling is the only way to get him to tell the truth on what he put in that ‘written statement’ dated 30 March 2006
Constitutional law commentary
By© Muhammad Haque
1115 Hrs GMT London Wednesday 12 April 2006
The legal action programme is extensive and involves a significant number of persons and parties as defendants. Those include London mayor Ken Livingstone and more than one person currently ‘sitting’ as a councillor or as a key employee in the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
By the very organisation [and use - and otherwise] of the legal system [s] in the UK, any legal action about the legality and about the constitutionality of action by the Secretary of State is complex. It is even more complex when brought by people in the community.
The legal action is being started because of the failure on Alistair Darling’s part to tell the truth about what he has been up to in terms of his links with the touts that now control the London borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
By touts I mean those elements who have abused their positions on the Council and who have behaved like hired agents or agents for the Crassrail hole Big Business Assault on the Brick Lane |London E1 area.
The crucial factor is the behaviour [collectively] of the specific defendants concerned in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets council, namely Michael Keith and Christine Gilbert. What were they doing in promoting the crass Crossrail hole assault programme on our community in the relevant time?
This is crucial because Alistair Darling has exposed himself to the charge that he is still colluding with the fabricators, the liars that have told lies to the community in the name of the Tower Hamlets Council in the matter of the Crossrail hole assault.
The evidence of Alistair Darling’s collusion – or at best ‘carelessness’ – is in the written statement that he issued in the UK House of Commons on 30 March 2006.
In that statement he twice referred to the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council expressly as being involved in representing the community’s concern.
Which is reasonable to a point.
But he failed to tell what the actual burden, the depth and the strength of the community’s concern has been and remains.
And he did that because he wanted to aid the liars on Tower Hamlets Council even at that’s stage.
The lies include the abuse and the crassly ill-advised manipulation of the day-to-day words and phrases.
Whereas Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole movement has maintained all along - and is reiterating that position hereby and herewith - that we oppose CrossRail hole FULL STOP< the liars have sought to defuse the impact of that opposition, to confuse and undermine the singularity of that phrase.
We are not asking them to MINIMISE the impact of the hole. We are asking them to STOP any hole programme.
I have told Alistair Darling- in letters that I have written to him and in other communications sent to his officers who are in contact with me on the matter of the CrossRail Bill - more than once that as a self-professed ‘lawyer’, he must be very careful about any illegal or untruthful statement he makes or has made.
I have been particularly concerned about his statement made in February 2005 when he introduced the Crossrail Bill in the UK House of Commons.
In making that statement, Alistair Darling said that he was ‘satisfied’ that the contents of that Bill complied with the requirements of the European Human Rights Conventions.
That simply was not true.
But did Alistair Darling tell a lie?
He may not have done.
Or he may have done so since I drew his attention to the possibility that he might be seen as having lied in February 2005.
I have explained to him that he may be held liable for telling a lie or for lying to ‘Parliament’ unless he withdraws that CrossRail Bill and redrafts it.
As the Bill is, it is still in contravention of the Human Rights Conventions. Just as it was when Alistair Darling introduced it.
[To be continued]
From the previous [the 6th] edition published on Tuesday 11 April 2006-04-12
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail-hole lies by ‘local paper’ bribed by Tower Hamlets Council –
Tower Hamlets ‘local paper’ ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ given final court action notice over its publication of series of lies for the CrossRail-hole-plugging clique on Tower Hamlets council [full report here on Wednesday12 April 2006]
From the previous edition: Brick Lane London E1 area NO to Crossrail hole UK Tuesday 11 April 2006
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Reports
[continued]
By© Muhammad Haque
1550 Hrs London Tuesday 11 April 2006
The exclusive report on the very first full length interview given to a TV station by Khoodeelaar! on 17 January 2006, will be featured on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site in the very near future.
That interview set out the full set of legal grounds and evidence against the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council and in particular detailing the relevant legal claims the claimants have against Council chief executive Christine Gilbert.
This filed 1550 Hrs London Time
Tuesday 11 April 2006
The Pre-action protocols against CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling MP have been updated today Tuesday 11 April 2006.
We shall publish in the next 48 hours the full texts of the related updates as served on London mayor Ken Livingstone and the seven defendants Michael Keith, Christine Gilbert and five others on the present controlling clique in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council.
From the previous edition:
Demand for confirmation of the abandonment of the Crossrail-hole plan – latest Khoodeelaar queries to CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling
Those texts will be published here at 1600 Hrs GMT today.
In the meantime Khoodeelaaronline is publishing here the texts of a draft letter sent to us by one of the campaigning members of the khoodeelaar movement, the Woodseer and Hanbury Residents Association.
Khoodeelaaronline quote Woodseer and Hanbury Residents association [WHRA] [e-mail whrauk@yahoo.co.uk] draft letter on the outstanding questions about the Crassrail hole following the Ken Livingstone stunt ‘news’ release of 24 March 2006 and the ‘written statement’ to Parliament as published by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling [30 March 20-06].
“Following a letter from John Biggs stating that information on the new
Crossrail proposals and petitioners in Spitalfields will not be heard
until after the local elections. We wish to issue a formal complaint
about the decision to issue a press release about new Crossrail
proposals in Spitalfields prior to the local elections without
providing details or information about the proposals to petitioners
against the Crossrail Bill.
We understand from sources that there will be a third tunnel and there
will still need to be an obtrusive shaft in the heart of the Hanbury
Street area, for which, no details have been provided in the email.
We would therefore request the reason why further information has not
been made available to petitioners given this response from members of
the Crossrail team. Contrary to the claims as some previous assertions
by Crossrail, we are advised by experts that the densely populated
community and the buildings around the shaft will suffer substantial
impacts from the works. You will appreciate the proposals will result
in demolition, the digging of a shaft, dust, noise and any likely
subsidence, which will ensue and the community is aware that it will
suffer a significant adverse impact.
The community cannot accept arbitrary statements that a ventilation and
access shaft, which we understand needs to be large, will not cause
much harm. Our concerns are based on the fact that historic buildings
suffered harm during works on the Jubilee Line despite similar
assurances. You will appreciate that the community would like to
evaluate the new Crossrail proposals.
The community has expressed concerns that this new press release, which
has been released prior to local elections, adds further uncertainty,
as it is not accompanied with any details about how the new Crossrail
proposals will affect the community. You will appreciate that the
community has been left distraught by the proposals brought by promoter
Cross London Rail Links Ltd that were negotiated by Tower Hamlets
Council and originally agreed by Tower Hamlets Council, the Mayor and
the Department for Transport. You will appreciate the community has
been seeking amendments since 2003.
We remain concerned that your office did not give any notice to
petitioners and more seriously, campaigners have been denied access to
any details about the new proposals. The community is worried about the
absence of details or expert evidence on the exact changes and how the
new proposals will affect people in Spitalfields. To this end, we hope
you will note all information relating to new proposals in the
Spitalfields area is being requested under the Freedom of Information
(FOI) Act 2000.
We would be very grateful if you could send the information we have
requested above to us by email or registered post to the above address.
WHRA will use your response to aid our decision on how to proceed
further.
”
Khoodeelaaronline unquote Woodseer and Hanbury Residents association [WHRA] [e-mail whrauk@yahoo.co.uk] draft letter on the outstanding questions about the Crassrail hole following the Ken Livingstone stunt ‘news’ release of 24 March 2006 and the ‘written statement’ to Parliament as published by CrossRail hole Minister Alistair Darling [30 March 20-06].
From the previous edition:
By© Muhammad Haque
0750 GMT / 0850 UK time
Brick Lane London E1 Area
Tuesday 11 April 2006
Why is it important to know what George Galloway says about the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council?
For the Khoodeelaar! campaign against the CrossRail hole attack on the East End of London, we are particularly concerned at the level of corruption in the bureaucracy and in the controlling clique on the present Tower Hamlets that we have uncovered over the past years since we were forced to start the Khoodeelaar movement to stop the Crossrail hole.
Logically and practically, we will identify with or support any public post holder who shows that they recognise the fact that corruption is a threat to the very democracy that we are fighting to establish.
We have uncovered evidence that the Tower Hamlets Council’s legal , electoral and constitutional remits, entity and resources have been systematically or generally abused by the controlling clique on the Council at the present time
For a start, Tower Hamlets Council is THE most corrupt local council that Galloway has come across in over thirty years of involvement as an active participant in British politics at several levels.
Speaking to reporters in the Brick Lane London E1 Area on Monday [10 April 2006]
George Galloway said that Tower Hamlets Council was the target of his RESPECT coalition at the scheduled elections on 4 May 2006.
Galloway identified two issues on which the RESPECT coalition was focussing its election campaign in Tower Hamlets: the Crossrail threat to the East End and the transfer of Housing stock away from Council control.
In summarising the latest reported U-turn by the Transport Secretary on the Crossrail hole plot against the Brick Lane London E1 area, George Galloway said that although he noted the news of the U-turn, he remained skeptical about the political motives behind the announcement of the U-turn. He believed that the U-turn was directly linked with the campaign against Crossrail that Khoodeelaar had led with the support of his RESPECT organisation and others opposed to the Crossrail hole attack.
[The U-turn was staged as a news announcement carried in a London Mayor Ken Livingstone n release – and flashed on the web site of the Council-friendly, local ‘East London Idiotiser’ on Friday 24 March 2006]
Galloway said that the current corrupt administration on Tower Hamlets Council was set to be removed by electors at 4 May 2006.
He also commented on the reported staging recently of the Blair Party’s ‘local council’s elections campaign launch’ from an address in Wapping, in the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
Galloway interpreted the choice of that part of Tower Hamlets and the choice of Tower Hamlets at all as evidence that the Blair regime was seriously worried about losing control of the Council come the 4 May 2006 polls.
The Bethnal Green and Bow MP then listed a number of topical items showing the depth and the stinking range of corruption, sleaze that predominate the Blair administration in Britain today.
He confidently predicted that the RESPECT coalition would be given the mandate by voters in the East End of London at the local council polls.
Which he linked with his own election to the UK Parliament on 5 May 2005 when he replaced the Blairist Oona King as the MP for Bethnal Green and Bow.
He said that he has a search system whereby he received regular updates on what is being said about him. He singled out the reports he was receiving from the Google search system that was showing a pattern in the reports being linked with Oona King still claiming that she lost to him because of alleged prejudice by the voters in the Bethnal Green and Bow Constituency against Oona King’s being Jewish.
George Galloway reiterated his rejection of the reported ‘explanation’ by Oona King of the reason/s for her defeat.
He said that the same voters had elected her in 1997 and again in 2001.
She had not become Jewish only before the 5 May 2005 election. She was Jewish all along. She was the same origins and backgrounds at the 1997 election and at the 2001 election. In any case, he said, MOST people did not even know she was Jewish.
But they voted for her regardless of her religious or ethnic affinity or origins. They voted against Oona King on 5 May 2005 in the Bethnal green and Bow Constituency because of her policy.
It may be recalled that George Galloway only in the past week, exposed the latest attempt by the Blairing propaganda network at entrapping him in a way that would show him as an anti-Semitic, that is one who is prejudiced against the Semitic or as the contemporary association is, the Jewish people. The relevance of George Galloway’s encounter with Mazher Mahmood, the Fake Sheikh, will be examined by KHOODEELAARonline shortly.
[To be continued]
LEGAL DISCLAIMER 0830 Hrs GMT / 0930 Hrs UK time Wednesday 5 April 2006
The contents published on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site are written, authored and created by the Editor and they belong to the Editor unless otherwise stated in relation to individual items published here. The name Khoodeelaar is the intellectual property of the Editor and Author. All materials are published here purely and solely for educational purposes. That is, NO part of the items published or cited as original trailers here on this Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be used for commercial, immoral, illegal or party political or sectarian or propaganda purposes or for any purposes that are anathema to the universally accepted and recognised codes of ethics and morality. Intellectual property rights action shall be taken to protect the integrity of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against the Crossrail hole attacks plan scheme project Bill [UK House of Commons at the date of this disclaimer] and their contractors, touts and agencies. NO part of the contents of the Khoodeelaardotcom web site must be included in any promotion of the interests against whose continuation and existence the Khoodeelaardotcom web site is created authored written and published. That means that none of these materials must be used to show Crossrail programme in any positive light as to do so would contradict the aims and objects of the contents of this web site. And that would amount to illegal and immoral distortion of the contents of this Khoodeelaardotcom web site