Twitter, to End POVERTY
1910 Hrs GMT
London Sunday 24 May 2009
KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That Alistair Darling was callous about the law. That he had lied. That he was unfit for purpose..
KHOODEELAAR! said all these YEARS before there existed any remote possibility of the London DAILY TELEGRAPH group doing what they have now done in the past 15 days: publish SOME OF THE MOUNTAIN of existing evidence that supports the KHOODEELAAR! diagnosis of the past 5 years and 5 months, that the UK Houses of Parliament were overrun with thieves, liars, cheats and crooks...
We have been saying for over 5 years now about Alistair Darling that as an alleged trained lawyer, he had an additional duty to tell the truth. And we said that he failed to tell the truth and he has continued to fail to apologise for lying to Parliament in February 2005 as he formally presented the Crossrail Bill to the UK House of Commons...We have also published with regular updates evidence of Alistair Darling’s other acts of fabrication lying and deceiving the public... Like the formal statement dated 30 March 2006 in which he confirmed in a most convoluted way the decision that he had caved in to our campaign demand and that he was scrapping the Crossrail DIRT hole in Hanbury Street/ Princelet Street
We have shown that Alistair Darling got a transport minister located in the Houses of PEE-rs to sneak out a statement saying that £100 Million had been granted to CLRL. That was in December 2005. For more than 3 years now, we have been asking Darling [and the successor post holders at the UK DEpartment ‘for’ Transport=DfT in that time, eg Douglas Alexander, Ruth Kelly and Geoff Hoon] to explain what justification he had for doing that. We have over 100 separate items of evidence to show that Darling abused his position and that there is no constitutional justification for the £100- million to have been paid to still;l unexplained ‘causes’.
Today’s confessions about Darling's behaviour ‘as an MP’ as made on the BBC ‘Politics Show’ [London Sunday 24 May 2009] require that we go through the outstanding questions that Darling mist show about the wasteful Crossrail.
[To be continued[]
"
BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE ATTACKS exposes abuse of 'MPs'
© CBRUK / KHOODEELAAR 2005 | 21.12.2005 22:36 | Analysis | Ecology | Social Struggles | London | World
BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE ATTACKS Campaign focus on the Facts Of Another Crass Payment by Tony Blair To the big business interests, Crossrail Promoters, of £100 Million Of Public Cash! Blaire’s Transport front man Alistair Darling Shows Two Fingers To ‘Parliamentary accountability’ and to the MPs Select Committee on the Crossrail hole Bill’!
BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE ATTACKS Campaign focus on the Facts Of Another Crass Payment by Tony Blair To the big business interests, Crossrail Promoters, of £100 Million Of Public Cash! Blaire’s Transport front man Alistair Darling Shows Two Fingers To ‘Parliamentary accountability’ and to the MPs Select Committee on the Crossrail hole Bill’!
© CBRUK/KHOODEELAAR 2005
THE BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL HOLE BILL 2005 has learnt that despite being asked to show evidence in justification for allocating one hundred £million to the crossrail promoters, secretary of state for transport Alistair darling mp has failed to do so.
The only ‘evidence’ is contained in the ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’ statement made by Alistair darling’s co-minister
Described in the ‘house of lords hansard’ as ‘lord davies of Oldham’. The Davies is quoted in the Hansard as made the utterances (see further down) confirming the payment.
Our associated voluntary organisation for audit of public cash allocations and powers peoples audit on 15 December 2005 asked the department for transport to provide a breakdown on the alleged use by crossrail promoters of this latest £100 million of public cash.
The constitutional law points at this stage include this - what is the point of setting up a select committee of mps to ‘scrutinise’ the contents and the full implications on all the affected communities and peoples of the crossrail bill (the scrutiny is said to be scheduled to start in January 2006) when the government is making such a huge sum of public money available to the promoters?
It is not implied flouting of the House of Commons.
It is not suspected flouting of the House of Commons. It is open defiance of any existence of any legitimate say on the party of the whole of House of Commons. For every select committee is constitutionally in being with the authority of the whole House of Commons and thus of the UK parliament.
The fact that an Mps’ ‘SELECT COMMITTEE’ has been set up to examine the Crossrail hole BILL and the fact that that Bill is not yet in the statute book means that the government is acting unconstitutionally and illegally in paying any public cash at this stage to the very parties and interests whose plans and whose alleged reasoning are yet to be examined and given any verdict bon by the Mps’ SELECT COMMITTEE.
Unless of course Blair is saying to all the innocent believers in ‘the sovereignty of the Brutish Parliament that he doesn't give a damn about any mps select committee.
Just as Alistair Darling is saying two fingers to the same small group of mps that has been listed as members of the committee that will scrutinise the crossrail bill staring in January!!!!
The Khoodeelaar! (BRICK LANE LONDON E1 AREA NO TO CROSSRAIL HOLE ATTACKS) Campaign stated as far back as 19 July 2005 that the mps ‘debate’ held as part of the formality to give the procedural second reading to the crossrail hole bill was no more than mere formality.
That the so-called debate was a sham.
That the UK HOUSE OF COMMONS was not being treated by the vast majority of MPs themselves as the democratic forum, to speak freely on behalf of the electors and for the people far less to tell the truth .
We are not thrilled today [Wednesday 21 December 2005] to report that the latest display of a £100 Million abuse by Tony Blair’ group of their access to and the ‘political’ control of the executive in the British parliamentary system will do nothing at all to assist any future spin by anyone – whether nominally academic or brazenly careerist – who would seek to substantiate any claim to the effect that ‘our democratic parliamentary system works and it is respected by our elected holders of the most powerful offices in the land’!
[We shall continue this analysis]
FOR NOW, HERE IS WHAT ALISTAIR DARLING’S CO-MINISTER HAD TO SAY IN THE ‘HOUSE OF LORDS’:-
“
My right honourable friend the secretary of state for transport (Alistair darling) has made the following ministerial statement. I am today making an additional £100 million available for the further development of crossrail. This money will be used by cross London rail links (CLRL the company held jointly by the department and TfL to assist them with promotion of the crossrail bill to provide proper support to the project as we take the crossrail hybrid bill through parliament over this period. It will also allow CLRL, working with the
Department and TFL, to do necessary research and planning before the crossrail scheme can enter its next phase of development. The case for crossrail is clear and the government have long said that they are committed to the scheme. This is a further sign of that commitment. This is a complex long-term project but important features are being determined at this stage. Money spent properly now will see its reward later in a better planned, better designed and therefore better value for money final scheme. But that does not mean that resource is unlimited. The grants I am announcing today will allow CLRL to make a start on a detailed programme of work for the development of crossrail. My department will continue to monitor expenditure on the project to ensure best value as the bill continues through parliament. These grants will be paid to clrl by my department under section 6 of the railways act 2005. ”
© CBRUK / KHOODEELAAR 2005
"
follow me on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment