1312 GMT
London
Saturday
02 January 2010
Editor © Muhammad Haque
KHOODEELAAR! Showing how the Guardian lies about the East End of London. That phrase ‘Guardian reader’ is NOT a complementary one. Not in the context of the Guardian’s record of lying about the East End of London.
However, it is not obvious that the Guardian is lying UNLESS each of its perpetrations is looked at carefully.
So when the Big Business City of London decided to annexe the site of the former Spitalfields Market in the late 1980s, the Guardian faked a few pieces bout the alleged ‘concerns’ about it.
But instead of reporting the facts of the actual community and telling the truth about the City of London annexation and about the people and the community who were going to be undermined, attacked and dislocated, the Guardian decided to pick up two agents of the same interests but as the agents were included in the ethnicity-linked packaging of the pernicious-agenda-edited Guardian, the end result of the ‘Guardian journalism’ was that it did not make any difference to the annexation agenda.
As ALWAYS, the Guardian DELIBERATELY suppressed the truth about what the actual people defending the community were saying.
That emptiness, that blanking of the people and the superimposition in their place of ethnicity linked stooges approved of by the likes of the Big Business tout Ken Livingstone, has been the real TREND of the Guardian’s ‘journalism’.
It is this RECORD that makes the Guardian insidious, pernicious.
Nearly 20 years later, the Guardian has been doing the same thing about the same area. It is again peddling the City of London agenda of annexing the East End of London.
In the course of its distortion of the campaign against CrossRail, the Guardian decided to send Hugh Muir to Brick Lane.
Now, Muir, who was brainwashed via the Daily Telegraph before being given slots on the Guardian and the likes and thereby in effect recruited to the ethnic surrogate petty-careerists brigade by Ken Livingstone and mates, is NOT , CANNOT be allowed to pretend to know what the East End of London is politically historically and culturally like.
Yet the fact that he was capable of being involved as a packaged item in the Guardian's racist ethnicity-linking, the Alan Rusbridger gang sent him to ‘cover’ the ‘community.
And Muir, as has been his record, MISSED the main plot.
He did not know what Crossrail was all about.
He did not see the agenda. He did not know the London transport system.
He did not know the UK economy.
He did not know anything of substance in context.
He did not even see the community.
Just as his ‘leader’ and ‘inspiration’ Ken Livingstone would have liked it!
[To be continued]
follow me on Twitter
London
Saturday
02 January 2010
Editor © Muhammad Haque
KHOODEELAAR! Showing how the Guardian lies about the East End of London. That phrase ‘Guardian reader’ is NOT a complementary one. Not in the context of the Guardian’s record of lying about the East End of London.
However, it is not obvious that the Guardian is lying UNLESS each of its perpetrations is looked at carefully.
So when the Big Business City of London decided to annexe the site of the former Spitalfields Market in the late 1980s, the Guardian faked a few pieces bout the alleged ‘concerns’ about it.
But instead of reporting the facts of the actual community and telling the truth about the City of London annexation and about the people and the community who were going to be undermined, attacked and dislocated, the Guardian decided to pick up two agents of the same interests but as the agents were included in the ethnicity-linked packaging of the pernicious-agenda-edited Guardian, the end result of the ‘Guardian journalism’ was that it did not make any difference to the annexation agenda.
As ALWAYS, the Guardian DELIBERATELY suppressed the truth about what the actual people defending the community were saying.
That emptiness, that blanking of the people and the superimposition in their place of ethnicity linked stooges approved of by the likes of the Big Business tout Ken Livingstone, has been the real TREND of the Guardian’s ‘journalism’.
It is this RECORD that makes the Guardian insidious, pernicious.
Nearly 20 years later, the Guardian has been doing the same thing about the same area. It is again peddling the City of London agenda of annexing the East End of London.
In the course of its distortion of the campaign against CrossRail, the Guardian decided to send Hugh Muir to Brick Lane.
Now, Muir, who was brainwashed via the Daily Telegraph before being given slots on the Guardian and the likes and thereby in effect recruited to the ethnic surrogate petty-careerists brigade by Ken Livingstone and mates, is NOT , CANNOT be allowed to pretend to know what the East End of London is politically historically and culturally like.
Yet the fact that he was capable of being involved as a packaged item in the Guardian's racist ethnicity-linking, the Alan Rusbridger gang sent him to ‘cover’ the ‘community.
And Muir, as has been his record, MISSED the main plot.
He did not know what Crossrail was all about.
He did not see the agenda. He did not know the London transport system.
He did not know the UK economy.
He did not know anything of substance in context.
He did not even see the community.
Just as his ‘leader’ and ‘inspiration’ Ken Livingstone would have liked it!
[To be continued]
Twitter, to End POVERTY
follow me on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment