0610 Hrs GMT
London
Thursday
04 March 2010
Editor © Muhammad Haque
KHOODEELAAR! continuing the evidential diagnosis on the role played by Michael Foot in and for the UK Palace of Ghostsminster: would Michael Foot have made any difference to the actual conduct and the actual prejudices as exhibited by the stooged MPs packaged as the servile ‘Crossrail Bill select committee’ ? Would Foot have made any difference to the standard of transparency [IF AT ALL] as found in the House of Commons? What did he actually do to alter the state of the Palace of Ghostsminster? We shall be looking at his role in this in the exclusive series of analyses here and on the linked AADHIKARonline and Khoodeelaar! Sites and blogs in the next day or so. –2
ALL the published, accessible and known ‘tributes’ paid to Michael Foot in the past 20 Hours or so since the ‘news’ of his demise was publicised, have referred to Foot’s personally amiable nature, his place as a great parliamentarian and so on.
But these ‘tributes’ have not at all referred to the role [or ‘what role’] he played in keeping the Palace of Ghostsminster a palace of ghosts.
The man who made the news with the mace – Michael Heseltine- was wheeled in [and or wheeled out] to display his own idiocy. He referred to Foot’s wearing of that coat and what an embarrassment that was.
The BBC and the ITV and their print and radio counterparts have shown, so far [as at 0610 GMT Thursday 04 March 2010] that they are engaged ion then unending zombification of their viewers, listeners and ‘readers’!
[To be continued]
Twitter, to End POVERTY
follow me on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment