1330 [1305] GMT
London
Monday
18 January 2010
Two ‘revelations’ occurred during the token staged session of the ‘London Assembly’ ‘Transport Committee’. One was an assertion made by one of the CrossRail scam bureaucrats making the appearance to the effect that the Lib Dems’ Vince Cable had reaffirmed his Party’s total unqualified dedication to serve the Big Business agenda Crossrail scam.
That ‘reassuring' insertion was perpetrated without any audible prompting from the 'chair' of the do Caroline Pidgeon herself or indeed from anyone else.
However, the reference to Vince Cable being dedicated to serve the Big business agenda Crossrail scam was highly significant in the context of his widely publicised utterance at the start of the Lib Dem party annual seaside jamboree 2009 when Cable had declared that Crossrail was not a priority for his Party.
Readers and viewers of the KHOODEELAAR! Campaign diagnosis of Vince Cable would have noticed that on 15 October 2009 we did catch Cable and found him undeniably unplugged on the very issue and topic of CrossRail.
We have since that date extensively reported on the state of confusion and fundamental, no, UNTENABLE ignorance on the part of Cable and his Party about Crossrail in the context of their additionally contradictory ‘economic policies’.
We have reported and in our reporting shown that Cable did not even know where he was geographically or environmentally or in terms of the basic facts on the relevant legislation and policy concerned when he appeared at a Tower Hamlets Lib Dems party staged ‘public meeting’ at the misleadingly named ‘Oxford’ House in the Derbyshire Street off the Bethnal Green Road London E2 on 15 October 2009.
So the Crossrail time-servers’ volunteering the ‘info’ that none other than Vince Cable himself had reassured them of his dedication showed, again, that contrary to the image that Cable has ill-advisedly gotten used to projecting about himself [as a 'sage' on matters economic, financial, as OTT-hyped by the Mail on Sunday that retains Cable's 'services' in return for a significant contribution to his 'unselfish' career], he remains as confused and off the rails as his colleagues on most topics and policy matters.
And that confusion very easily embraces the likes of local [Southwark] and regional [‘London Assembly’] time-servers of the political careerist description of Caroline Pidgeon herself.
[To be continued]
.