London
Tuesday
14 Sepetmber 2010
Editor © Muhammad Haque
Crossrail hole plot-inviting Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy fronter Christine Gilbert [up to 2006 when she was 'rescued' by the Bliar regime and placed at OFSTED] has made a habit of issuing evidentially contradictory poses.
Not long after being installed at OFSTED, Christine Gilbert [also featuring in the contextual news due to her being married to Tony McNulty] appeared in the ‘news’ by making the first of a number of about turns.
She has done another now.
All these impact on the standard and quality or lack of them in the schools and similar institutions in Tower Hamlets over which she asserted the bureaucratic rule for years.
The consequences of the lies and the prejudice and the obstructions that Tower Hamlets clique has been putting in the way of the campaigners in the community have been dire for the affected pupils, youngsters and their families.
The failures and the failings of Tower Hamlets as the ‘Local Education Authority’ are indistinguishable from those that the same clique has shown in its role as the INVITER of the Crossrail hole attacks scam on the East End.
We shall examine in some detail in the next 48 hours Christine Gilbert’s about turn, as reported this morning by the London Daily Telegraph.
In the meantime, we reproduce below the texts of the brief comment rebutting Gilbert’s OFSTED hypes that AADHIKARonline has just published on the Daily Telegraph website in the past 25 minutes.
Perhaps Christine Gilbert should now publish some of the original evidence collecetd by CERTH, the Campaign for Educational Rights in Tower Hamlets in the 1990s. CERTH told one of Christine Gilbert’s predecessors at OFSTED, Chris Woodhead that he should stop the abuse of Poverty to justify poor work by those employed to teach in inner city schools. Ms Gilbert should also tell the public before she leaves her post at OFSTED why a few hundred pupils doing apparently well at GCSE or A level exams justifies the local Councils, like Tower Hamlets gloating beyond belief at THEIR [the Councils’ – as Local education Authorities’] ‘achievements’. We can here add the fact that historically in inner London covering in particular the years of the now defunct ILEA [Inner London Education Authority], Poverty was IMPOSED as a de facto item in the CURRICULUM of the relevant ‘LEA’ bureaucracy in each location to promote the CASE for central Government funding and similar ‘support’ while maintaining a fierce opposition to those who attempted to argue that that was wrong. Look at the archives of the ILEA [unless they have been strategically and mysteriously deleted] and you will find the evidence. OFSTED’s own bureaucracy has been doing strategic deleting as well. They have obstructed the evidence of CERTH’s original materials that had been made available to Chris Woodhead for his education. The battle is still on and if Christine Gilbert has found respect for the truth she should take swift steps for the return of the vital educational materials to their authors. And then she can begin to tell the UK public why she had behaved as a backer of the stooging of those 1800 community organisations in Tower Hamlets with whom she claimed [in July 2003] the Council had been working in positive cooperation. The evidence of high percentage of young people and adults in Tower Hamlets being unable to find jobs or tangible routes to higher education is the real damning reality. Not the belated stunts being staged and issued to salvage the ‘reputation’ of the current OFSTED bureaucracy. If Michael Gove gains any credibility for HIS stunts, that will not be solely due to HIS ideological bent. The bureaucracy in inner city and similar Councils doubling as the Local Education Authority will have contributed a scandalously large amount of negligence failure and institutionalised ignorance to make the likes of Gove look appealing to some in the communities concerned.