KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially diagnosing the latest exhibition of economic and historic ignorance by UK G Brown as he embarks, Norman Wisdom-like, on a road show based on another fakery, made even worse by its reminder of Tony Bliar's own incantation ['Education. Education, Education’!]. UK G Brown is a secret admirer of a very 'British Jihad' only that it is translated TO READ Crusade... How much does the Imperialist Brown realize that Crusade is as bad economically it is morally, historically? And ELECTORALLY!? That truthfulness is much preferable to any of the pathetic lines that his ‘advisers’ appear to be conjuring up every single week. NO matter who ‘wins’ or gets to share the ‘regime’ that is set up following any formal ‘election’ in the UK in the next two months or so, ALL the economic, social, environmental and even ecumenical problems that are present today will be there. No real change will take place as the regime will not be fronted by any really changed personnel. And the reason for that lack of change will be traceable to 13 years of imprudence by G Brown and the same number of years of lies by Blair and his ilk. And the collusion and collaboration by the two ‘mainstream Parties’ during the sane years. Just as those have been doing in peddling Big Business agenda scam Crossrail in the East End of London and across London. Crass. Crass. Crass.

KHOODEELAAR! Evidentially diagnosing the latest exhibition of economic and historic ignorance by UK G Brown as he embarks, Norman Wisdom-like, on a road show based on another fakery, made even worse by its reminder of Tony Bliar's own incantation ['Education. Education, Education’!]. UK G Brown is a secret admirer of a very 'British Jihad' only that it is translated TO READ Crusade... How much does the Imperialist Brown realize that Crusade is as bad economically as it is morally, historically? And ELECTORALLY!? That truthfulness is much preferable to any of the pathetic lines that his ‘advisers’ appear to be conjuring up every single week. NO matter who ‘wins’ or gets to share the ‘regime’  that  is set up following any formal ‘election’ in the UK in the next two months or so, ALL the economic, social, environmental and even ecumenical problems that are present today will be there. No real change will take place as the regime will not be fronted by any really changed personnel. And the reason for that lack of change will be traceable to 13 years of imprudence by G Brown and the same number of years of lies by Blair and his ilk. And the collusion and collaboration by the two ‘mainstream Parties’ during the sane years. Just as those have been doing in peddling Big Business agenda scam Crossrail in the East End of London and across London. Crass. Crass. Crass.

1920 GMT

London

Saturday

27 February 2010

Editor © Muhammad Haque

The FT [see below] is reporting that Gordon Brown is now imitating Tony Blair in effect. Our contextual evidential diagnosis is that in doing so, UK G Brown is substituting one ‘topic’ for another and making the intonation ‘ Jobs, Jobs, Jobs’ [thus aping Tony Blair's ‘Education, Education, Education’].

If Bliar's 'achievements' on 'education' or 'Education' during ten years of his abuses of office is any guide, then G Brown is embarking on another dishonest, wasteful, misleading adventure.

Does UK G Brown know of a place called Redcar? Has he heard of the people robbed of their jobs and of their community by his 'Party in office'? And incidentally, whose Party is it?

What about the Big Business involved in looting the Corus workers of their jobs and of their hopes?

Who colluded with the Big Business involved and who in effect facilitated their looting of the 'British' 'workers' resources and rights?

UK G Brown is not clued up. He is clueless. He said even last week that 'private enterprise' was the way forward!

It is not the way forward anywhere. Not in the sense that private enterprise Big Business means it, has meant it to be.

From Gavdos in Greece in the south to Bluejibs in Unst in the Shetland in the north, ‘private enterprise’ is proving to be NOT the way.

Turmoil, anger, despair are enveloping individuals, families and entire communities across ‘western’ Europe.

Yet the self-advertising ‘student of history’ keeps uttering plainly ignorant ‘pearls of idiocy’.

And nothing could be more damning than today’s propaganda piece carried in the London DAILY MAIL [Saturday 27 February 2010] by-lined to Andrew Pierce, who has travelled from Rupert Murdoch’s dens in Wapping in the ‘deprived’ inner city East End of London to join the immigrants on board the Daily Mail to carry out ferocious assaults on the image of ‘British vah-loos’ that G Brown so ignorantly foments.

Pierce is basing the assault on the part propaganda unleashed by ‘the other side’. But there is a lot in the material that ought to be taken seriously.

Nothing more important in the Pierce piece than the matter of the "cost of mass immigration" to the ‘British economy’.

Any genuine, unbiased and truthful student of history would have realised that immigration in the decades following the second European war has been linked with poverty in the ‘originating’ countries. It follows that the alterative to that volume of immigration could only be found in the resources available in the originating countries. Resources of democracy that were allowed to remain unused.

Instead of using and supporting genuine democratic movements and environments, the ‘British vah-loos’ have incited and encouraged destabilisation in vast regions of the world which then become GROSS exporters of people seeking economic 'answers' and 'shelters' in the west!

As if that policy were not bad enough, the self-styled student of history [G Brown’s  alleged ph d is a scandalous insult to the calling of scholarship in G Brown’s case, as he parades   his ’academic achievements’ while allegedly addressing the tasks  in office] keeps BOASTING of the British Empire!

Which is what he did during his embarrassingly OTT-hyped ‘trips across parts of Africa’ prior to Tony Bliar’s departure from No. 10 Downing Street.

On more than one occasion during his ‘travels’ in Africa, G Brown sounded almost as Nick Griffin of the UK BNP would do had he been uttering in the same place on the same set of ‘vah-loos’, the entity that is nearly very much [sephologically predicting as based ion this weekend’s showing of popular prejudices]  at the widely cited ‘St Stephen’s Gate’ at the Palace of Ghostsminster.

Thanks to the achievements of G Brown the historian and T Bliar the ‘Middle East Peace-maker’ [God help us!] the ‘British economy’ is in a right mess just as are Brown’s British ‘vah-loos’.

But the bankers are okay. As are Goldman Sachs, one of G Brown’s most favoured gangs of looters of the world’s resources and produces.

[To be continued]

At 1840 GMT today Saturday 27 February 2010 the following Uniform Resource Locator [=URL] on the Internet yielded the article texts we reproduced below it. The same URL may not display the same texts at other times, depending on what the publishers, the Financial Times [=’FT’] group decide to do with their publishing practices. 

The Editor, AADHIKARonline

1845 GMT London Saturday 27 February 2010

"Brown defends Labor’s record on jobs

By Jim Pickard in Swansea

Published: February 27 2010 17:25 | Last updated: February 27 2010 17:25

Gordon Brown placed “jobs, jobs, jobs” at the heart of Labour’s election campaign as he portrayed the Tories as a party of fox-hunting, tax cuts for the rich and the preservation of hereditary peers.

At a speech at Welsh Labour’s spring conference on Saturday, the prime minister sought to undermine David Cameron’s “change” slogan by suggesting that many of the Tory policies had been the same for a century.

EDITOR’S CHOICE

Analysis: Rolling revolution - Feb-25

Editorial Comment: Brown’s great rage - Feb-22

Blunkett takes online route to donations - Feb-22

In depth: The Labour party - Feb-19

Brown hit by claims over fits of rage - Feb-21

Sue Cameron: Damage to Brown? Maybe not - Feb-22

“How can they claim they are the party of change when these policies, the House of Lords, backing fox-hunting, inheritance tax are not exactly new policies, they are the old policies that have defined the Conservative party for more than 100 years.”

Buoyed by a recent narrowing of the opinion polls, Mr Brown made an unashamedly political speech which defended Labour’s record on jobs and insisted that employment would be the government’s “first priority, second priority and third priority” in the coming months and years.

The prime minister maintained that a Tory victory would have terrible consequences for Britain. “We would see in a number of months a generation of achievements starting to be wiped out, our hard-won economic recovery put at risk, the NHS we have rebuilt put in danger,” he claimed.

At the same time, he admitted that a Labour government would at some point have to reduce the deficit. Labour would never shirk from tough choices, he insisted.

In his phraseology, however, cuts under a Labour government would merely be a matter of an “efficiency drive” and some “cuts in other areas”.

In reality economists predict that whichever party forms the next government is likely to have to cut some departments’ spending by up to 20 per cent if certain priorities – such as the NHS – are ring-fenced.

The prime minister’s comments came amid a revival of confidence within the Labour ranks, with delegates at the Swansea event taking pleasure from recent opinion polls showing a narrowing gap behind the Tories just weeks before the general election.

Peter Hain, Welsh secretary, admitted that six months ago members of the public had been more critical of Mr Brown than Mr Cameron.

But Mr Hain told the FT: “People on the doorsteps are saying more things about, making more critical comments about Cameron, rather than comments about the prime minister, six months ago there was a lot of flak around the prime minister, now it seems to be swirling around Cameron.”

Mr Hain continued: “Not long ago people were saying the Tories were going to win, now they are saying there is a chance of Labour winning.”

MPs, councillors and Welsh assembly members alike confirmed that there was little appetite within Labour for a snap election – despite rumours late last week that Mr Brown could go to the polls within days. Instead, most still expect and want the general election to take place on May 6.

Dai Havard, an outspoken Labour backbencher, admitted that there was still a lot of disaffection among voters in Wales, including former supporters of his party. But he said there was now at least a chance of winning a slender majority in the election.

Mr Brown, in his speech, tried to laugh off the “Bullygate” story which has dominated Westminster throughout the week.

“It has been a strange week,” he mused. “The only thing I haven’t been accused of recently is killing Archie Mitchell in Eastenders. For the press here: I promise you, I didn’t even lay a finger on him.”

Vox pops by the FT in several towns in the last 24 hours have found the public unstirred by the much-publicised articles last weekend which suggested that Mr Brown had bullied staff at 10 Downing Street. Most members of the public who spoke to this newspaper dismissed the stories as exaggerated or irrelevant.

Mr Hain said that when he criticised the articles during Thursday’s Question Time programme he had been cheered by the audience.

Alana Davies, the party’s candidate for Vale of Glamorgan – a marginal seat which is high on the Tories’ target list – told the FT that, if anything, the story “shows that Gordon Brown is a strong leader.”

Elsewhere Ed Balls, schools secretary, told a gathering of Labour councillors that cost-cutting at Tory councils was “proof” that a Conservative government would slash public spending without remorse.

Mr Balls, a key ally of the prime minister, told the Labour Local Government Association conference that the British public was becoming “more sceptical” about the supposed “smoke and mirrors” of Mr Cameron’s Tories.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

follow me on Twitter